Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 140 (1994), 2999-3006; DOI  10.1099/13500872-140-11-2999
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marchesi, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marchesi, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, N. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marchesi, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, N. J.

SDS-degrading bacteria attach to riverine sediment in response to the surfactant or its primary biodegradation product dodecan-1-ol

Julian R. Marchesi{dagger}, Sarah A. Owen1, Graham F. White1, W. Alan House2 and Nicholas J. Russell1

1School of Molecular and Medical Biosciences, Biochemistry Unit, University of Wales Cardiff, PO Box 911, Cardiff CF1 3US, UK
2Institute of Freshwater Ecology, River Laboratory, East Stoke, Wareham, Dorset BH20 6BB, UK

Author for correspondence: Julian R. Marchesi. Tel: +44 222 874000. Fax: +44 222 874305. e-mail: marchesi@cardiff.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

A laboratory-scale river microcosm was used to investigate the effect of the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on the attachment of five Pseudomonas strains to natural river-sediment surfaces. Three of the Pseudomonas strains were chosen for their known ability to express alkylsulphatase enzymes capable of hydrolysing SDS, and the other two for their lack of such enzymes. One strain from each category was isolated from the indigenous bacterial population present in the river sediment used; other isolates were from soil or sewage. The alkylsulphatase phenotypes were confirmed by gel zymography of cell extracts. Addition of SDS to mixed suspensions of river sediment with any one of the biodegradation-competent strains stimulated the attachment of bacteria to the sediment particles. In contrast, the attachment of biodegradation-incompetent strains was weak and, moreover, was unaffected by SDS. The SDS-stimulated attachment for competent organisms coincided with rapid biodegradation of the surfactant. The primary intermediate of SDS biodegradation, dodecan-1-ol, accumulated transiently, and the numbers of attached bacteria correlated closely with the amount of dodecan-1-ol present. Direct addition of dodecan-1-ol also stimulated attachment but the effect was more immediate compared with SDS, when there was a lag period of approximately 2 h. To account for these observations, a model is proposed in which SDS stimulates the attachment of biodegradation-competent bacteria through its conversion to dodecan-1-ol, and it is hypothesized that the observed reversibility of the attachment is due to the subsequent removal of dodecan-1-ol by further bacterial metabolism.


Keywords: biodegradation, sodium dodecyl sulphate(SDS), dodecan-1-ol, biofilm, surfactant

{dagger} Present address: School of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Wales Cardiff, PO Box 915, Cardiff CF1 3TL, UK.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 Society for General Microbiology.