Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 142 (1996), 623-629; DOI  10.1099/13500872-142-3-623
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradshaw, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schilling, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradshaw, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schilling, K. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bradshaw, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schilling, K. M.

Effect of Oxygen, Inoculum Composition and Flow Rate on Development of Mixed-Culture Oral Biofilms

David J. Bradshaw1,*M, Philip D. Marsh1, Clive Allison2 and Kurt M. Schilling2,{dagger}

1Research Division, CAMR, Salisbury SP4 OJG, UK
2Unilever Research Port Sunlight Laboratory, Bebington, Wirral L63 3JW, UK

* Author for correspondence: David J. Bradshaw. Tel: +44 1980 612 732. Fax: +44 1980 612 731.

ABSTRACT

The effect of aeration on the development of a defined biofilm consortium of oral bacteria was investigated in a two-stage chemostat system. An inoculum comprising 10 species, including both facultatively anaerobic and obligately anaerobic bacteria, and species associated with oral health and disease, was inoculated into an anaerobic first-stage chemostat vessel. The effluent from this chemostat was linked to an aerated [200 ml CO2/air (5:95, v/v) min-1] second-stage vessel, in which removable hydroxyapatite discs were inserted to allow biofilm formation. Comparisons were made of planktonic and biofilm communities in the aerated second-stage vessel by means of viable counts. Both planktonic and early biofilm communities were dominated by Neisseria subflava comprising > 40% of total c.f.u. in the fluid phase, and > 80% of c.f.u. in 2 h biofilms. Obligate anaerobes persisted in this mixed culture, and succession in biofilms led them to predominate only after 7 d. Despite the continuous addition of air, the dissolved oxygen tension (dO2) within the culture remained low (< 5% of air saturation), and the redox potential (Eh) was –275 mV. In order to assess the significance of the presence of N. subflava in community development, a subsequent experiment omitted this aerobe from the inoculum, to produce a nine-species culture. The planktonic phase was predominated by three streptococcal species, Prevotella nigrescens and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Biofilms again underwent successional changes, with anaerobes increasing in proportion with time. In contrast to the culture including N. subflava dO2 was 50–60% of air saturation, and the Eh was + 50 mV. In the final experiment, the rate of addition of first-stage culture was reduced to 1/10 of that in the previous experiment, in order to determine whether anaerobes were growing, rather than merely persisting in the aerated culture. The data for the planktonic phase indicated that the anaerobes were growing in aerated (dO2 40–50%, Eh + 100 mV) conditions. Once again, anaerobes increased in proportion in older biofilms. The study indicates that mixed cultures can protect obligate anaerobes from the toxic effects of oxygen, both in the biofilm and planktonic modes of growth.


Keywords: biofilm, oxygen, dental plaque microbiology, mixed cultures, chemostat

{dagger} Present address: Unilever Research US Inc., 45 River Road, Edgewater, NJ 07020, USA.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. Kreth, Y. Zhang, and M. C. Herzberg
Streptococcal Antagonism in Oral Biofilms: Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii Interference with Streptococcus mutans
J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2008; 190(13): 4632 - 4640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
A. Al-Ahmad, A. Wunder, T. M. Auschill, M. Follo, G. Braun, E. Hellwig, and N. B. Arweiler
The in vivo dynamics of Streptococcus spp., Actinomyces naeslundii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Veillonella spp. in dental plaque biofilm as analysed by five-colour multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization
J. Med. Microbiol., May 1, 2007; 56(5): 681 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
K. Yi, A. W. Rasmussen, S. K. Gudlavalleti, D. S. Stephens, and I. Stojiljkovic
Biofilm Formation by Neisseria meningitidis
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2004; 72(10): 6132 - 6138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. S. Foster and P. E. Kolenbrander
Development of a Multispecies Oral Bacterial Community in a Saliva-Conditioned Flow Cell
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2004; 70(7): 4340 - 4348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
W. L. Kuhnert and R. G. Quivey Jr.
Genetic and Biochemical Characterization of the F-ATPase Operon from Streptococcus sanguis 10904
J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2003; 185(5): 1525 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
P. D. Marsh
Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes?
Microbiology, February 1, 2003; 149(2): 279 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
R. M. Donlan and J. W. Costerton
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2002; 15(2): 167 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
R. G. Quivey Jr, W. L. Kuhnert, and K. Hahn
Genetics of Acid Adaptation in Oral Streptococci
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 2001; 12(4): 301 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
E. Kononen, A. Kanervo, A. Takala, S. Asikainen, and H. Jousimies-Somer
Establishment of Oral Anaerobes during the First Year of Life
Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 1999; 78(10): 1634 - 1639.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
D. J. Bradshaw, P. D. Marsh, G. K. Watson, and C. Allison
Role of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Coaggregation in Anaerobe Survival in Planktonic and Biofilm Oral Microbial Communities during Aeration
Infect. Immun., October 1, 1998; 66(10): 4729 - 4732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
G. H.W. Bowden and I. R. Hamilton
Survival of Oral Bacteria
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1998; 9(1): 54 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ADRHome page
P. D. Marsh and D. J. Bradshaw
Physiological Approaches to the Control of Oral Biofilms
Advances in Dental Research, April 1, 1997; 11(1): 176 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 Society for General Microbiology.