Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 143 (1997), 3381-3389
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, B.
Right arrow Articles by Seemuller, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, B.
Right arrow Articles by Seemuller, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, B.
Right arrow Articles by Seemuller, E.

microbiology, Vol 143, 3381-3389, Copyright © 1997 by Society for General Microbiology


ARTICLES

Sequence and RFLP analysis of the elongation factor Tu gene used in differentiation and classification of phytoplasmas

B Schneider, KS Gibb and E Seemuller
Faculty of Science, Northern Territory University, Darwin, Australia. bschneid@darwin.ntu.edu.au

Primers designed from sequences of the gene encoding the elongation factor Tu (tuf gene) of several culturable mollicutes amplified most of the tuf gene from phytoplasmas of the aster yellows, stolbur and X- disease groups. About 85% of the tuf gene from two aster yellows strains and a tomato stolbur phytoplasma was sequenced. The nucleotide sequence similarity between these related phytoplasmas was between 87.8 and 97.0%, whereas the homology with other mollicutes was 66.3-72.7%. The similarity of the deduced amino acid sequence was significantly higher, ranging from 96.0 to 99.4% among the phytoplasmas and 78.5% to 83.3% between phytoplasmas and the culturable mollicutes examined. From the nucleotide sequences of the phytoplasma strains, two pairs of primers were designed; one amplified the phytoplasmas of most phylogenetic groups that were established, the other was specific for the aster yellows and stolbur groups. The phytoplasmas of the various groups that were amplified could be distinguished by RFLP analysis using Sau3AI, Alul and HpaII. The aster yellows group could be divided into five Sau3AI RFLP groups. These results showed that the tuf gene has the potential to be used to differentiate and classify phytoplasmas. Southern blot analysis revealed that the tuf gene is present as a single copy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
L. T. T. Tran-Nguyen, M. Kube, B. Schneider, R. Reinhardt, and K. S. Gibb
Comparative Genome Analysis of "Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense" (Subgroup tuf-Australia I; rp-A) and "Ca. Phytoplasma asteris" Strains OY-M and AY-WB
J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2008; 190(11): 3979 - 3991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
The IRPCM Phytoplasma/Spiroplasma Working Team - P
'Candidatus Phytoplasma', a taxon for the wall-less, non-helical prokaryotes that colonize plant phloem and insects
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, July 1, 2004; 54(4): 1243 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
C. Streten and K. S. Gibb
Identification of genes in the tomato big bud phytoplasma and comparison to those in sweet potato little leaf-V4 phytoplasma
Microbiology, July 1, 2003; 149(7): 1797 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
A. C. Padovan, G. Firrao, B. Schneider, and K. S. Gibb
Chromosome mapping of the sweet potato little leaf phytoplasma reveals genome heterogeneity within the phytoplasmas
Microbiology, April 1, 2000; 146(4): 893 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
S. Razin, D. Yogev, and Y. Naot
Molecular Biology and Pathogenicity of Mycoplasmas
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 1998; 62(4): 1094 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 Society for General Microbiology.