HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beard, S. J. Articles by Walsby, A. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Beard, S. J. Articles by Walsby, A. E. Agricola Articles by Beard, S. J. Articles by Walsby, A. E.

Growth competition between Halobacterium salinarium strain PHH1 and mutants affected in gas vesicle synthesis

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK

²Author for correspondence: Anthony E. Walsby. Tel: +44 117 9287490. Fax: +44 117 9257374.

ABSTRACT

To investigate the role of the buoyancy provided by gas vesicles in the facultative anaerobe Halobacterium salinarium PHH1, the growth of a gas-vacuolate (Gv⁺) strain in competition with two gas-vesicle-defective (Gv^def) mutants was examined. The Gv⁺ strain synthesized gas vesicles throughout its growth cycle, and floated up to form a thick surface scum during the exponential growth phase in static culture. Mutant Gv^def1 produced significantly fewer gas vesicles than the Gv⁺ strain in corresponding stages of growth, although in late stationary phase a small proportion of cells floated up to the surface of static cultures. Mutant Gv^def2 had a much lower gas vesicle content in shaken culture and produced negligible amounts of gas vesicles in static culture. The Gv⁺ and the two Gv^def strains grew equally well in shaken cultures, but in static cultures, where steep vertical gradients of oxygen concentration were established, Gv^def1 was outgrown by the Gv⁺ strain. Gv^def2 outcompeted the Gv⁺ strain in shallow static cultures, perhaps because Gv^def2 carried a smaller protein burden, which offset the benefits of buoyancy. This selection for Gv^def2 was lost in deeper static cultures, although it could be restored by aerating static cultures from below. The results support the hypothesis that the role of buoyancy in halobacteria is to maintain cells at the more aerated surface of brine pools.