|
|
||||||||
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK1
Trafford Centre for Medical Research, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RY, UK2
Wellcome Trust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 3
Author for correspondence: Lucas D. Bowler. Tel: +44 1273 678309. Fax: +44 1273 678433. e-mail: bafn7{at}sussex.ac.uk
Representational difference analysis of cDNA (cDNA RDA) provides a powerful technique for the identification of specific differences between two mRNA populations. The method has previously been used to analyse differential gene expression in eukaryotes, but until now has not been successfully applied to prokaryotes. A strain of Neisseria meningitidis with a deletion of the iron-regulated lactoferrin-binding protein A (lbpA) gene, grown under iron- replete conditions, and the isogenic parent strain, grown under iron limitation, were used as a model for developing cDNA RDA for use with bacteria. In this system, the technique should specifically detect the differential expression of the lbpA gene in the parent strain, along with other genes whose expression is switched on (or up- regulated) under iron-deficient conditions. Since cDNA RDA requires high-quality, representative mRNA, a variety of methods for the isolation of RNA were evaluated. A triisopropylnaphthalene sulphonic acid/p-aminosalicylic acid-based technique was found to give the best results. cDNA was prepared from total RNA isolated from the two N. meningitidis strains and subjected to an adapted cDNA RDA procedure. The method resulted in the amplification of five major PCR products, which included fragments of the lbpA gene and the iron-regulated RTX-like toxin gene (frpC), thus validating the technique for use with bacteria.
Keywords: cDNA representational difference analysis, differential gene expression, RNA isolation, iron regulation, Neisseria meningitidis
Abbreviations: cDNA RDA, representational difference analysis of cDNA; PAS, p-aminosalicylic acid; TNS, triisopropylnaphthalene sulphonic acid
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. De Long, K. A. Kinney, and M. J. Kirisits Prokaryotic Suppression Subtractive Hybridization PCR cDNA Subtraction, a Targeted Method To Identify Differentially Expressed Genes Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2008; 74(1): 225 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Taylor, P. N. Ward, C. D. Rapier, J. A. Leigh, and L. D. Bowler Identification of a Differentially Expressed Oligopeptide Binding Protein (OppA2) in Streptococcus uberis by Representational Difference Analysis of cDNA J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2003; 185(17): 5210 - 5219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Becker, W. Hufnagle, G. Peters, and M. Herrmann Detection of Differential Gene Expression in Biofilm-Forming versus Planktonic Populations of Staphylococcus aureus Using Micro-Representational-Difference Analysis Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2001; 67(7): 2958 - 2965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |