HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xavier, J. B. Articles by Stewart, P. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xavier, J. B. Articles by Stewart, P. S. Agricola Articles by Xavier, J. B. Articles by Stewart, P. S.

Biofilm-control strategies based on enzymic disruption of the extracellular polymeric substance matrix – a modelling study

¹ Center for Biofilm Engineering and Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Montana State University-Bozeman, Bozeman, MT 59717-3980, USA
² Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands

Correspondence
Joao B. Xavier
J.Xavier{at}tnw.tudelft.nl

A kinetic model is proposed to assess the feasibility of strategies for the removal of biofilms by using substances that induce detachment by affecting the cohesiveness of the matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). The model uses a two-state description of the EPS (natural EPS and compromised EPS) to provide a unified representation of diverse mechanisms of action of detachment-promoting agents (DPAs), which include enzymes that degrade the EPS and other agents described in the literature. A biofilm-cohesiveness factor describes local increases in detachment rates resultant from losses in cohesive strength. The kinetic model was implemented in an individual-based biofilm-modelling framework, including detachment rates dependent on local cohesiveness. The efficacy of treatments with DPAs was assessed by three-dimensional model simulations. Changes in treatment efficacy were evaluated quantitatively by using a Thiele modulus, which quantifies the relationship between diffusion of the DPA through the biofilm matrix and DPA decay rate, and a Damköhler number relating the rate of EPS reaction with a DPA and the rate of EPS production by the micro-organisms in the biofilm. This study demonstrates the feasibility and limits of implementing biofilm-control strategies based on attacking the EPS.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Sauer, J. Steczko, and S. R. Ash Effect of a solution containing citrate/Methylene Blue/parabens on Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and biofilm, and comparison with various heparin solutions J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2009; 63(5): 937 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. K. Lu and J. J. Collins Dispersing biofilms with engineered enzymatic bacteriophage PNAS, July 3, 2007; 104(27): 11197 - 11202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ahimou, M. J. Semmens, G. Haugstad, and P. J. Novak Effect of Protein, Polysaccharide, and Oxygen Concentration Profiles on Biofilm Cohesiveness Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2007; 73(9): 2905 - 2910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Xavier and K. R. Foster From the Cover: Cooperation and conflict in microbial biofilms PNAS, January 16, 2007; 104(3): 876 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Rabinovitch and P. S. Stewart Removal and Inactivation of Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms by Electrolysis Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 72(9): 6364 - 6366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]