Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 151 (2005), 2671-2683; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.27990-0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, B.
Right arrow Articles by Cebula, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, B.
Right arrow Articles by Cebula, T. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Li, B.
Right arrow Articles by Cebula, T. A.
Microbiology 151 (2005), 2671-2683; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.27990-0
© 2005 Society for General Microbiology

Structure and distribution of the phosphoprotein phosphatase genes, prpA and prpB, among Shigella subgroups

Baoguang Li, Eric W. Brown, Christine D'Agostino, J. Eugene LeClerc and Thomas A. Cebula

Division of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 8301 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, MD 20708, USA

Correspondence
Thomas A. Cebula
tcebula{at}cfsan.fda.gov

Phosphoprotein phosphatases encoded by the prpA and prpB genes function in signal transduction pathways for degradation of misfolded proteins in the extracytoplasmic compartments of Escherichia coli. In order to trace the evolution of prp genes and assess their roles in other enteric pathogens, the structure and distribution of these genes among closely related Shigella subgroups were studied. PCR amplification, probe hybridization studies and DNA sequencing were used to determine the prp genotypes of 58 strains from the four Shigella subgroups, Dysenteriae, Boydii, Sonnei and Flexneri. It was found that the prp alleles among Shigella subgroups were extremely susceptible to gene inactivation and that the mutations involved in prp allele inactivation were varied. They included IS insertions, gene replacement by an IS element, a small deletion within the gene or large deletion engulfing the entire gene region, and base substitutions that generated premature termination codons. As a result, of 58 strains studied, only eight (14 %) possessed intact prpA and prpB genes. Of the Shigella strains examined, 76 % (44/58) showed at least one of the prp alleles inactivated by one or more IS elements, including IS1, IS4, IS600 and IS629. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that IS elements have been independently acquired in multiple lineages of Shigella, suggesting that loss of functional alleles has been advantageous during Shigella strain evolution.


The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the prpA and prpB genes and the IS insertion sequences found inside the prp genes are AY734633–AY734679. Those for the phylogenetic datasets are as follows: mdh sequences, AY434217–AY434274; gapA, AY434159–AY434216; thrB, AY434275–AY434332; argR, AY434333–AY434390; crr, AY434159–AY434216.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 Society for General Microbiology.