|
|
||||||||
1 Centre for Carbohydrate Bioprocessing (CCB), TNO-University of Groningen, PO Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands
2 Department of Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute (GBB), University of Groningen, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NN, Haren, The Netherlands
3 Innovative Ingredients and Products, TNO Quality of Life, Rouaanstraat 27, 9723 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence
Lubbert Dijkhuizen
L.Dijkhuizen{at}rug.nl
Bacterial fructosyltransferase (FTF) enzymes synthesize fructan polymers from sucrose. FTFs catalyse two different reactions, depending on the nature of the acceptor, resulting in: (i) transglycosylation, when the growing fructan chain (polymerization), or mono- and oligosaccharides (oligosaccharide synthesis), are used as the acceptor substrate; (ii) hydrolysis, when water is used as the acceptor. Lactobacillus reuteri 121 levansucrase (Lev) and inulosucrase (Inu) enzymes are closely related at the amino acid sequence level (86 % similarity). Also, the eight amino acid residues known to be involved in catalysis and/or sucrose binding are completely conserved. Nevertheless, these enzymes differ markedly in their reaction and product specificities, i.e. in
(2
6)- versus
(2
1)-glycosidic-bond specificity (resulting in levan and inulin synthesis, respectively), and in the ratio of hydrolysis versus transglycosylation activities [resulting in glucose and fructooligosaccharides (FOSs)/polymer synthesis, respectively]. The authors report a detailed characterization of the transglycosylation reaction products synthesized by the Lb. reuteri 121 Lev and Inu enzymes from sucrose and related oligosaccharide substrates. Lev mainly converted sucrose into a large levan polymer (processive reaction), whereas Inu synthesized mainly a broad range of FOSs of the inulin type (non-processive reaction). Interestingly, the two FTF enzymes were also able to utilize various inulin-type FOSs (1-kestose, 1,1-nystose and 1,1,1-kestopentaose) as substrates, catalysing a disproportionation reaction; to the best of our knowledge, this has not been reported for bacterial FTF enzymes. Based on these data, a model is proposed for the organization of the sugar-binding subsites in the two Lb. reuteri 121 FTF enzymes. This model also explains the catalytic mechanism of the enzymes, and differences in their product specificities.
-D-galactopyranosyl-(1
6)-
-D-glucopyranosyl-(1
2)-
-D-fructofuranoside; GH, glycoside hydrolase; HPAEC, high-performance anion-exchange chromatography; Inu, Lb. reuteri 121 inulosucrase; Lev, Lb. reuteri 121 levansucraseThis article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Lammens, K. Le Roy, L. Schroeven, A. Van Laere, A. Rabijns, and W. Van den Ende Structural insights into glycoside hydrolase family 32 and 68 enzymes: functional implications J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(3): 727 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Ortiz-Soto, M. Rivera, E. Rudino-Pinera, C. Olvera, and A. Lopez-Munguia Selected mutations in Bacillus subtilis levansucrase semi-conserved regions affecting its biochemical properties Protein Eng. Des. Sel., October 1, 2008; 21(10): 589 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Anwar, S. Kralj, M. J. E. C. van der Maarel, and L. Dijkhuizen The Probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533 Produces High-Molecular-Mass Inulin from Sucrose by Using an Inulosucrase Enzyme Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2008; 74(11): 3426 - 3433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Goosen, X.-L. Yuan, J. M. van Munster, A. F. J. Ram, M. J. E. C. van der Maarel, and L. Dijkhuizen Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of a Novel Intracellular Invertase from Aspergillus niger with Transfructosylating Activity Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2007; 6(4): 674 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |