| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Center for Environmental Genomics, Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
Correspondence
Turlough M. Finan
finan{at}mcmaster.ca
The ability to recognize and predict non-
54 promoters in the alphaproteobacteria is not well developed. In this study, 25 experimentally verified Sinorhizobium meliloti promoter sequences were compiled and used to predict the location of other related promoters in the S. meliloti genome. Fourteen candidate predictions were targeted for verification and of these at least 12 proved to be genuine promoters. As a result, the experimental identification of 12 novel promoters linked to genes rpoD, topA, rpmJ, trpS, ropB1, metC, rpsT, secE, trkH and three tRNA genes is reported. In all, 99 predicted and verified promoters are reported, including those linked with 13 tRNA genes, eight ribosomal protein genes and a number of other physiologically important or essential genes. On the basis of sequence conservation and a mutational analysis of promoter activity, the –35 and –10 consensus for these promoters is 5-CTTGAC-N17-CTATAT. This promoter structure, which seems to be widely conserved amongst several other genera in the alphaproteobacteria, shares significant similarity with, but is skewed by a 1 nt step from, the canonical Escherichia coli 70 promoter. Perhaps this difference is responsible for the observation that S. meliloti promoters are often poorly expressed in E. coli. In this regard, expression data from plasmid-borne gfp-reporter fusions to eight of the S. meliloti promoters verified in this work revealed that while these promoters were very active in S. meliloti and Agrobacterium tumefaciens only very low, near-background activity was detected in E. coli.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Bahlawane, B. Baumgarth, J. Serrania, S. Ruberg, and A. Becker Fine-Tuning of Galactoglucan Biosynthesis in Sinorhizobium meliloti by Differential WggR (ExpG)-, PhoB-, and MucR-Dependent Regulation of Two Promoters J. Bacteriol., May 15, 2008; 190(10): 3456 - 3466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Chen, M. Bagdasarian, M. G. Kaufman, A. K. Bates, and E. D. Walker Mutational Analysis of the ompA Promoter from Flavobacterium johnsoniae J. Bacteriol., July 15, 2007; 189(14): 5108 - 5118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. I. Muglia, D. H. Grasso, and O. M. Aguilar Rhizobium tropici response to acidity involves activation of glutathione synthesis Microbiology, April 1, 2007; 153(4): 1286 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Cheng, C. D. Sibley, R. Zaheer, and T. M. Finan A Sinorhizobium meliloti minE mutant has an altered morphology and exhibits defects in legume symbiosis Microbiology, February 1, 2007; 153(2): 375 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. H. Mauchline, J. E. Fowler, A. K. East, A. L. Sartor, R. Zaheer, A. H. F. Hosie, P. S. Poole, and T. M. Finan Mapping the Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 solute-binding protein-dependent transportome PNAS, November 21, 2006; 103(47): 17933 - 17938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Rotter, S. Muhlbacher, D. Salamon, R. Schmitt, and B. Scharf Rem, a New Transcriptional Activator of Motility and Chemotaxis in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2006; 188(19): 6932 - 6942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |
