Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 153 (2007), 3448-3457; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2007/008524-0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holder, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keyhani, N. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holder, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keyhani, N. O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holder, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keyhani, N. O.
Microbiology 153 (2007), 3448-3457; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2007/008524-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology

Surface characteristics of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria (Cordyceps) bassiana

Diane J. Holder, Brett H. Kirkland, Michael W. Lewis and Nemat O. Keyhani

Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Correspondence
Nemat O. Keyhani
keyhani{at}ufl.edu

Marked differences in surface characteristics were observed among three types of single-cell propagules produced by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed the presence of bundles or fascicles in aerial conidia absent from in vitro blastospores and submerged conidia. Contact angle measurements using polar and apolar test liquids placed on cell layers were used to calculate surface tension values and the free energies of interaction of the cell types with surfaces. These analyses indicated that the cell surfaces of aerial conidia were hydrophobic, whereas those of blastospores and submerged conidia were hydrophilic. Zeta potential determinations of the electrostatic charge distribution across the surface of the cells varied from +22 to –30 mV for 16-day aerial conidia at pH values ranging from 3 to 9, while the net surface charge ranged from +10 to –13 mV for submerged conidia, with much less variation observed for blastospores, +4 to –4 mV, over the same pH range. Measurements of hydrophobicity using microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons (MATH) indicated that the surfaces of aerial conidia were hydrophobic, and those of blastospores hydrophilic, whereas submerged conidia displayed cell surface characteristics on the borderline between hydrophobic and hydrophilic. Insect pathology assays using tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens) larvae revealed some variation in virulence among aerial conidia, in vitro blastospores and submerged conidia, using both topical application and haemocoel injection of the fungal cells.


Abbreviations: AFM, atomic force microscopy; HI, hydrophobicity index; HIC, hydrophobic-interaction chromatography; MATH, microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 Society for General Microbiology.