Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 154 (2008), 3624-3638; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2008/023382-0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mellies, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mavor, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mellies, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mavor, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mellies, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mavor, D.
Microbiology 154 (2008), 3624-3638; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2008/023382-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology

Ler interdomain linker is essential for anti-silencing activity in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli

Jay L. Mellies1, Fredrick J. Larabee2, Melissa A. Zarr3, Katy L. Horback4, Emily Lorenzen1 and David Mavor1

1 Biology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, USA
2 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
3 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
4 Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97202, USA

Correspondence
Jay L. Mellies
jay.mellies{at}reed.edu

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) expresses a type III secretion system (T3SS) required for pathogenesis. Regulation of the genes encoding the T3SS is complex; two major regulators control transcription, the silencer H-NS, and the related H-NS-like protein Ler. Our laboratory is interested in understanding the molecular differences that distinguish the anti-silencer Ler from H-NS, and how Ler differentially regulates EPEC virulence genes. Here, we demonstrate that mutated Ler proteins either containing H-NS {alpha}-helices 1 and 2, missing from Ler, or truncated for the 11 aa C-terminal extension compared with the related H-NS protein, did not appreciably alter Ler function. In contrast, mutating the proline at position 92 of Ler, in the conserved C-terminal DNA binding motif, eliminated Ler activity. Inserting 11 H-NS-specific amino acids, 11 alanines or 6 alanines into the Ler linker severely impaired the ability of Ler to increase LEE5 transcription. To extend our analysis, we constructed six chimeric proteins containing the N terminus, linker region or C terminus of Ler in different combinations with the complementary domains of H-NS, and monitored their in vivo activities. Replacing the Ler linker domain with that of H-NS, or replacing the Ler C-terminal, DNA binding domain with that of H-NS eliminated the ability of Ler to increase transcription at the LEE5 promoter. Thus, the linker and C-terminal domains of Ler and H-NS are not functionally equivalent. Conversely, replacing the H-NS linker region with that of Ler caused increased transcription at LEE5 in a strain deleted for hns. In summary, the interdomain linker specific to Ler is necessary for anti-silencing activity in EPEC.


Abbreviations: AE, attaching and effacing; EHEC, enterohaemorrhagic E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; LEE, locus of enterocyte effacement; T3SS, type III secretion system; wt, wild-type







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.