Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 155 (2009), 979-988; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.024539-0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobb, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hobb, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, S. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hobb, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, S. A.
Microbiology 155 (2009), 979-988; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.024539-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology

Evaluation of procedures for outer membrane isolation from Campylobacter jejuni

Rhonda I. Hobb1, Joshua A. Fields1, Christopher M. Burns2 and Stuart A. Thompson1

1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
2 College of Biomedical Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA

Correspondence
Stuart A. Thompson
stthomps{at}mcg.edu

Although infection with Campylobacter jejuni is one of the leading causes of gastroenteritis worldwide, relatively little is known about the factors that are required to elicit a protective immune response. The need for a vaccine against this pathogen is well recognized and a number of vaccine candidates have been tested with varying degrees of success; however, there is still a lack of a suitable vaccine. To gain a better understanding of the outer-membrane protein components of this organism, a ‘gold standard’ method to purify the outer membrane is needed. Therefore, we attempted to develop a robust and reliable method which resulted in a pure outer-membrane fraction. A total of nine methodologies were examined and analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using subcellular markers for the cytoplasm, cytoplasmic membrane and outer membrane. We found that glycine extraction, differential detergent extraction using Triton X-100, serial extraction using 1 M Tris pH 7, spheroplasting by lysozyme and sonication, and carbonate extraction did not produce pure outer-membrane preparations. However, we identified three methods that provided outer-membrane fractions free from subcellular contamination. Isopycnic centrifugation using a 30–60 % sucrose gradient produced seven fractions free from cytoplasmic or cytoplasmic membrane contamination; however, these fractions did not correspond as well as expected with the typical outer-membrane-associated peak (e.g. Escherichia coli or Salmonella). The spheroplast method using lysozyme alone also resulted in pure outer-membrane fraction, as did carbonate washing of this sample. The extraction of outer membranes using N-lauroylsarcosine (Sarkosyl) produced the purest and most reproducible sample. These outer-membrane preparations will be useful for future studies aimed at identifying C. jejuni surface proteins as vaccine components.


Abbreviations: OMP, outer-membrane protein

A supplementary figure showing the analysis of Sarkosyl preparations of outer membranes from additional C. jejuni and C. coli strains is available with the online version of this paper.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.