HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mic.0.026286-0v1 155/5/1623    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Guo, A. Articles by Schifferli, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Guo, A. Articles by Schifferli, D. M. Agricola Articles by Guo, A. Articles by Schifferli, D. M.

FimH alleles direct preferential binding of Salmonella to distinct mammalian cells or to avian cells

Peifu Chen^1,

Aiqing Jia^1,

¹ State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
² University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, 3800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

This study aimed to determine whether allelic variants of the FimH adhesin from Salmonella enterica confer differential bacterial binding to different types of mammalian cells [murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (DCs) and HEp-2 cells] and chicken leukocytes. Although the type 1 fimbriated S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strains AJB3 (SR-11 derivative) and SL1344 both aggregated yeast cells, only the former bound efficiently to DCs and HEp-2 cells. Type 1 fimbriae-mediated binding to DCs having previously been shown to require the FimH adhesin and to be inhibited by mannose, FimH sequences from strains SL1344 and AJB3 were compared and found to differ by only one residue, asparagine 158 in SL1344 being replaced by a tyrosine in AJB3. The importance of residue 158 for FimH-mediated binding was further confirmed in recombinant Escherichia coli expressing S. enterica type 1 fimbriae with a variety of substitutions engineered at this position. Additional studies with the ‘non-adhesive’ FimH of a type 2 fimbriated S. enterica serovar Gallinarum showed that this FimH did not mediate bacterial binding to murine DCs or HEp-2 cells. However, the type 2 FimH significantly improved bacterial adhesion to chicken leukocytes, in comparison to the type 1 FimH of strain AJB3, attributing for the first time a function to the type 2 fimbriae of S. enterica. Consequently, our data show that allelic variation of the S. enterica FimH adhesin directs not only host-cell-specific recognition, but also distinctive binding to mammalian or avian receptors. It is most relevant that this allele-specific binding profile parallels the host specificity of the respective FimH-expressing pathogen.

Correspondence
Dieter M. Schifferli
dmschiff{at}vet.upenn.edu

Present address: School of Animal Science, Yunan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, Yunan, China.

Present address: Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Science, Guangzhou 510640, China.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for strain AJB3 fimH in pAZ30 and for strain AZb57 fimH in pAZ32 are EU445777 and EU445778, respectively.