Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 155 (2009), 1699-1707; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.023119-0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mic.0.023119-0v1
155/5/1699    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snoep, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Teixeira de Mattos, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snoep, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Teixeira de Mattos, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Snoep, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Teixeira de Mattos, M. J.
Microbiology 155 (2009), 1699-1707; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.023119-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology

Control of specific growth rate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

J. L. Snoep1,2, M. Mrwebi1, J. M. Schuurmans3, J. M. Rohwer1 and M. J. Teixeira de Mattos3

1 Triple J Group for Molecular Cell Physiology, Department of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
2 Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK
3 University of Amsterdam, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Department of Molecular and Microbial Physiology, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

In this contribution we resolve the long-standing dispute whether or not the Monod constant (KS), describing the overall affinity of an organism for its growth-limiting substrate, can be related to the affinity of the transporter for that substrate (KM). We show how this can be done via the control of the transporter on the specific growth rate; they are identical if the transport step has full control. The analysis leads to the counter-intuitive result that the affinity of an organism for its substrate is expected to be higher than the affinity of the enzyme that facilitates its transport. Experimentally, we show this indeed to be the case for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for which we determined a KM value for glucose more than two times higher than the KS value in glucose-limited chemostat cultures. Moreover, we calculated that at glucose concentrations of 0.03 and 0.29 mM, the transport step controls the specific growth rate at 78 and 49 %, respectively.

Correspondence
J. L. Snoep
jls{at}sun.ac.za







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.