| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, NL-9751 NN Haren, The Netherlands
2 Laboratory of Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Groningen, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence
Oscar P. Kuipers
O.P.Kuipers{at}rug.nl
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
N9ComK) showed higher transcription activation than wild-type ComK, when expressed in Lactococcus lactis. However, in B. subtilis, transcription activation by N9ComK was twofold lower than that by wild-type ComK, resulting from a five- to sixfold lower protein level of ComKN9. Thus, relatively, N9ComK is more active in transcription activation than wild-type ComK. These results suggest that the presence of this N-terminal extension on ComK is a trade-off between high transcription activation and a thus far unidentified role in regulation of ComK.
Present address: Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, PO Box 1068 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Present address: Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Hamoen et al., 2003b). During exponential growth, competence development is prevented by regulating the level of ComK in the cell via both transcriptional and post-translational control. Transcription of comK is repressed by binding of AbrB, CodY and Rok to the comK promoter (Hamoen et al., 2003a; Hoa et al., 2002; Serror & Sonenshein, 1996). Any ComK that is synthesized at this stage is bound by the adaptor protein MecA, which targets ComK for proteolytic degradation by the ClpCP protease complex (Turgay et al., 1998). At the onset of stationary growth, the cell responds to environmental changes, such as nutrient deprivation and increased cell densities, by relieving transcriptional repression of comK by AbrB and CodY (Hahn et al., 1995; Serror & Sonenshein, 1996) and by synthesis of ComS. This small protein binds to MecA and replaces ComK, resulting in the release of ComK from the proteolytic complex (Turgay et al., 1997). Once ComK is free in the cell, it activates transcription of its cognate gene, by binding to the promoter region, where it can overcome repression by Rok (Hoa et al., 2002; Van Sinderen & Venema, 1994; Van Sinderen et al., 1995). Via this autostimulatory loop, ComK levels increase rapidly and, subsequently, ComK activates transcription of other genes, e.g. the late competence genes, encoding the DNA-binding, -uptake and -integration machinery (Van Sinderen & Venema, 1994).
ComK activates transcription by binding to specific sequences, so-called K-boxes, located upstream of ComK-dependent genes. Each K-box consists of two AT-boxes, separated by a spacing of two, three or four helical turns between the start positions of the repeating AT-box units. Functional ComK consists of a tetramer, composed of two dimers, which each bind to an AT-box. ComK binding is accompanied by DNA bending (Hamoen et al., 1998). The major role of ComK in transcription activation is to stabilize the binding of RNA polymerase, probably by facilitating interactions with upstream DNA, through bending of the promoter area (Susanna et al., 2004).
As becomes clear from the regulatory pathway, ComK is involved in different types of interactions: (i) protein–DNA binding, which is of particular interest because contacts occur through the minor groove of the DNA helix (Hamoen et al., 1998), and (ii) protein–protein interactions, involving either interactions with other proteins, such as MecA, or between ComK proteins, resulting in dimerization and tetramerization. The occurrence of different interactions suggests that the ComK protein contains specific, distinct domains, responsible for one or more of the interactions. ComK is a relatively small protein of only 22·8 kDa. Amino acid sequence comparisons and structural prediction studies did not reveal the presence of any clear domains. However, an alignment with ComK-like proteins from other bacterial species shows a high degree of conservation throughout the entire amino acid sequence, with the exception of the extreme N-terminal part (Fig. 1). The C-terminal region is not conserved throughout all listed bacteria, but shows conservation when subgroups are concerned, e.g. between Listeria species or between Bacillus licheniformis and B. subtilis.
|
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
. Escherichia coli strains were grown in TY medium, supplemented with 100 µg ampicillin ml–1 when required. To purify the maltose-binding protein (MBP)–ComK fusion protein, cells were grown in the presence of 0·2 % glucose and 0·3 mM IPTG (pMal protein-fusion and purification system, New England Biolabs). L. lactis strains were grown at 30 °C in twofold-diluted M17-based medium, supplemented with 0·5 % glucose (GM17) and appropriate antibiotics (chloramphenicol and/or erythromycin, both 4 µg ml–1). Protein expression was induced from the nisin-inducible promoter with 1 : 10 000 dilutions of supernatant of an overnightculture of nisin-producing L. lactis NZ9700 in GM17 (De Ruyter et al., 1996).
|
; Sambrook et al., 1989). Enzymes were obtained from Roche, New England Biolabs or Pharmacia and radiolabelled nucleotides from Amersham. For isolation of plasmids and purification of PCR products, the High Pure Plasmid Isolation kit and the High Pure PCR Product Purification kit, respectively, were used (Roche). Chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis was isolated as described by Venema et al. (1965). E. coli strains were transformed using CaCl2-induced competence (Sambrook et al., 1989) and L. lactis strains using electrotransformation with a gene-pulser (Bio-Rad) as described by Leenhouts & Venema (1993). B. subtilis strains were transformed as described by Anagnostopoulos & Spizizen (1961).
PCR amplifications and plasmid constructions.
PCR reactions were performed as described by Innes & Gelfand (1990), using Pwo or Expand DNA polymerase (Roche) on chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis 168 as a template. Plasmids and primers are listed in Table 1
and Table 2, respectively. For purification purposes, an MBP–ComK fusion was constructed in E. coli. To construct this fusion, the comK gene was amplified with primers ComK-start and ComK-end. The resulting PCR product was digested with XmnI and HindIII and cloned into XmnI/HindIII-digested pMal-c2X, yielding plasmid pMal-ComK.
|
N9ComK, pNZ-ComKC25 and pNZ-ComK C35, respectively.
To produce an N-terminal 9 aa truncation variant of ComK in B. subtilis, a N9comK copy was integrated into the amyE locus of B. subtilis 168 under control of the comK promoter. For this purpose, the comK region was amplified with primers yhxC-H3 and comK-start-BbsI and with comK-dN9-BbsI and comK+500. Both PCR products were digested with BbsI and ligated to form a 2·3 kb product. Using the ligation mixture as a template, the N9comK region was amplified with primers yhxC-H3 and ComK+500. The PCR product was digested with BamHI and HindIII and ligated into BamHI/HindIII-digested pDL, resulting in the integration vector pDL-N9ComK. Transformation of this plasmid into B. subtilis 168 resulted in strain amyE : : N9comK. To test transcription activation by N9ComK, the replicative plasmid pG-wt was introduced, yielding strain B. subtilis pG9. Finally, to have N9ComK as the only ComK protein in the cell, the wtcomK copy was deleted by transformation with chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis BV2004 (Hamoen et al., 2002), resulting in strain pG9K. The control strain for transcription activation by wtComK consisted of B. subtilis 168 transformed with pG-wt, yielding strain pGwt.
To investigate potential differences in interactions of wtComK and N9ComK with the proteolytic system, a mecA deletion was introduced into B. subtilis pG9K and B. subtilis pGwt via transformation with chromosomal DNA of B. subtilis QB4650 (Msadek et al., 1998). This transformation resulted in strains pG9K-M and pGwt-M, which contain N9ComK or wtComK, respectively, as the only ComK protein in the cell. Despite the changes necessary for the experiments, all the B. subtilis strains used in this study are isogenic.
Overexpression and purification of MBP–ComK.
Overexpression of the MBP–ComK fusion protein was induced by adding IPTG (final concentration 0·3 mM) to an exponentially growing E. coli culture (OD600 0·7–0·8). After 2 h of induction, cells were harvested by centrifugation (10 min, 8000 r.p.m., Beckman centrifuge). ComK was purified as described by Hamoen et al. (1998), yielding either native ComK (after cleavage with factor Xa) or the MBP–ComK fusion.
Expression and cell extracts of ComK in L. lactis.
Expression of wtComK and mutants with an N- or C-terminal His-tag was induced from the nisin-inducible promoter by adding supernatant from an overnight culture of L. lactis NZ9700 in 1 : 10 000 dilutions to L. lactis cultures at the end of the exponential growth phase. To obtain ComK for electrophoretic mobility shift assays, cells were harvested after 2 h of induction (10 min, 8000 r.p.m., Beckman centrifuge). Cell extracts were prepared by resuspending the cell pellet from 2 ml of culture in 200 µl resuspension buffer (10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8). Cells were disrupted by fast prep (45 s, speed 6, Bio101 analyser).
Purification of His6-ComK expressed in L. lactis.
Expression of His6-ComK was induced in L. lactis as indicated above. Purification was performed in a batch procedure under denaturing conditions. Cells from a 1 l culture were resuspended in 6 ml buffer A (0·1 M NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8·0, 2 % Triton X-100) with lysozyme (1 µg µl–1). After 20 min at 37 °C, cells were disrupted by French press. A clear cell extract was obtained by ultracentrifugation (25 min, 77 000 g, 4 °C, Beckman ultracentrifuge, SW-41 rotor). To this extract, buffer B (buffer A+8 M urea) was added to a volume of 50 ml. The extract was mixed with 2·5 ml Talon column material (Clontech). After 1 h at room temperature, the column material was centrifuged (10 min, 9000 g, Eppendorf centrifuge), then washed sequentially with buffer B and buffer C (8 M urea, 0·1 M NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6·3). His6-ComK was eluted in 1 ml buffer E (8 M urea, 0·1 M NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 4·5) and dialysed against dialysis buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 0·5 mM DTT, 0·1 M Na2SO4) with gradually decreasing urea concentrations. Upon reaching 1 M urea, the sample was dialysed overnight at 4 °C against dialysis buffer without urea. The purified protein was divided into aliquots and stored at –80 °C.
Transcription activation test system in L. lactis.
Transcription activation by wtComK and ComK variants was first tested in L. lactis. ComK expression was induced at the end of the exponential growth phase from the nisin-inducible promoter on the pNZ plasmids (De Ruyter et al., 1996). Transcription activation was tested using the lacZ reporter under control of the B. subtilis comG promoter on plasmid pG-wt (K. A. Susanna and others, unpublished). Samples were taken at the moment of induction and at 30 min intervals for 2 h. 
-Galactosidase activity was determined as described by Israelsen et al. (1995). Control samples were analysed for protein expression by SDS-PAGE (Laemmli, 1970) and Western blotting (Towbin et al., 1979). His-tagged ComK proteins were detected with a His6-specific first antibody and an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (both from Amersham) and visualized by chemiluminescent detection using the ECL Western blotting analysis system (Amersham).
Transcription activation test system in B. subtilis.
Transcription activation by N9ComK was compared with that by wtComK in B. subtilis using the lacZ gene on plasmid pG-wt as reporter. Samples for -galactosidase assays were taken from the transition point until 4 h into the stationary growth phase, at 1 h intervals. Expression of wtComK and N9ComK was checked by Western blot analysis, using a ComK-specific first antibody (Van Sinderen & Venema, 1994) and an anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (Amersham). To indicate the relative amounts of wtComK and N9ComK in B. subtilis, the intensity of similar-sized areas covering the signal of wtComK or N9ComK was determined using the software package of Quantity One. The intensity of wtComK in B. subtilis strain pGwt was set to 100 % and the intensity of wtComK and N9ComK in the other strains was represented as the percentage of this wtComK level.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs).
These were performed essentially as described previously (Hamoen et al., 1998). A comG-promoter fragment was used as a probe, amplified by PCR with primers comG-AT2-EcoRI and comG-end-XbaI. The product was end-labelled with T4 polynucleotide kinase using [
-32P]ATP. EMSAs were performed with cell extracts and compared with shifts from pure ComK (purified from MBP–ComK fusions). Proteins and probes were premixed on ice in 20 µl binding buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8·0), 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 0·5 mM dithiothreitol, 0·05 mg poly[d(I-C)] ml–1, 0·05 mg BSA ml–1 and 8·7 %, v/v, glycerol). Complexes were allowed to form for 15 min at 37 °C, followed by running 15 µl of each sample on a non-denaturing 6 % polyacrylamide gel. Gels were run in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris/acetate, pH 8·2, and 2 mM EDTA) at 100 V, dried, and autoradiographed using a phosphor-screen (Packard). Read-outs of the screens were made using the Perkin Elmer-Packard Cyclone Storage phosphor system.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
-Galactosidase studies demonstrated that transcription activation at the comG promoter was stimulated by both His-tag ComK variants, indicating that ComK of B. subtilis is active in L. lactis (Fig. 2a). However, transcription activation by His6-ComK was three to four times higher than that by ComK-His6, despite a smaller difference (at most twofold) in protein expression, as was determined by Western blotting with an anti-His antibody (results not shown). This suggests that the position of the His-tag influences the ability of ComK to activate transcription. Furthermore, transcription is about 10-fold lower than normally observed for wtComK without a tag at the same promoter in B. subtilis.
|
). In the present study, ComK was expressed as a His-tag fusion, which might influence DNA binding or oligomerization of the protein. In order to determine the effect of the His-tag, His6-ComK was isolated from L. lactis using a Talon column. However, all the His6-ComK ended up in the unbound fraction, indicating that the His-tag is inaccessible for column binding. To solve this problem, purification was performed under denaturing conditions, using buffers with 8 M urea. Under these conditions, His6-ComK did bind to the column and could be purified. The purified protein could successfully be renatured to active DNA-binding His6-ComK, as was demonstrated by EMSAs (Fig. 2b). The binding characteristics of His6-ComK were comparable to binding of ComK purified from the MBP–ComK system in E. coli, as described by Hamoen et al. (1998). Since His6-ComK could only be purified under denaturing conditions, an alternative system was tested, using cell extracts. Although the observed band is weaker than for purified proteins, DNA binding with typical ComK characteristics could be demonstrated using cell extracts of L. lactis producing either His6-ComK or ComK-His6 (Fig. 2c). This possibility provided a quick tool to test binding of ComK truncation variants directly from cell extracts. Furthermore, this approach prevents wrong interpretations of binding characteristics of mutants, due to potential unsuccessful renaturing of the truncation variants. Therefore, all in vitro binding experiments in this study were performed with cell extracts instead of purified ComK variants.
The C-terminal region of ComK is required for transcription activation
As can be seen in Fig. 1, ComK proteins from different bacterial species show clear sequence conservation throughout the entire protein, with the exception of the N-terminal end. The C-terminal part is not conserved for all ComK proteins, but shows conservation when subgroups are considered, e.g. B. subtilis and B. licheniformis, for which most of the last 35 aa are identical or similar. Since the C-terminal region is partially conserved, a specific role for this part of ComK is expected. To investigate this role, truncations lacking 25 or 35 aa from the C-terminus were constructed and expressed as N-terminal His-tag fusions in L. lactis. -Galactosidase assays were used to determine transcription at the (B. subtilis) comG-promoter, demonstrating that transcription activation by both His6-ComKC25 and His6-ComKC35 is completely abolished (Fig. 3a), despite a normal protein production level as shown by SDS-PAGE and Western blot experiments using an anti-His antibody (Fig. 3c). The loss of transcription activation might be due to a loss of DNA binding or to a defect in the transcription activation mechanism. To discriminate between these possibilities, EMSAs were performed with cell extracts containing His6-ComK, His6-ComKC25 or His6-ComKC35; these demonstrated that both ComK mutants could still bind DNA (Fig. 3b). However, the observed shift by binding of the mutant proteins was smaller than the wtComK shift and, for His6-ComKC35, the band is much weaker.
|
). Using this approach, we demonstrated that small differences in protein size, due to the truncations, only resulted in small differences in shift when the AT-boxes were located on opposite sides of the DNA helix so that only dimer binding could occur (Fig. 4, lower panel). This can by no means explain the large differences in shifts observed when both AT-boxes were located on the same side of the DNA helix (Fig. 4, upper panel). Furthermore, the shifts by His6-ComKC25 and His6-ComKC35 are similar for both probes, indicating that in both situations, these mutants bind as dimers instead of tetramers. The wtComK shift on the other hand increases from the addAB+5 to the addABwt K-box, corresponding to oligomerization from dimers into tetramers. For wtComK binding, tetramerization is accompanied by DNA bending. A loss of tetramerization for the C-terminal truncation variants and thus a decrease of induced bending would explain the loss of transcription activation, since previous studies demonstrated that the main effect of ComK in transcription activation at the comG promoter is to stabilize binding of RNA polymerase, by facilitating interactions with the upstream DNA through bending of the promoter region (Susanna et al., 2004).
|
). This observation raises curiosity about the function of this region. As a first attempt to elucidate its role in different interactions, a truncation of 9 aa from the N-terminus was constructed and expressed in L. lactis (His-tag fusion to C-terminus). The ability of this mutant, N9ComK-His6, to activate transcription was tested as described for the C-terminal truncations. Surprisingly, transcription activation by N9ComK-His6 was increased about two- to threefold compared to wtComK-His6 (Fig. 5a). As for the other mutants, DNA binding was determined using EMSAs, demonstrating that binding by N9ComK-His6 was also increased compared to ComK-His6 (Fig. 5b), while Western blots indicated similar expression levels for both proteins (results not shown).
|
N9ComK is relatively more active than wtComK in B. subtilisN9ComK (without His-tag) was expressed in B. subtilis. The constructed test strain, B. subtilis pG9K, contained the comK region with N9ComK under control of the wtcomK promoter integrated into the amyE locus, plasmid pG-wt to determine transcription activation and a deletion of the wild-type copy of comK. As a control B. subtilis pGwt was constructed, containing wtComK and plasmid pG-wt. -Galactosidase assays with these two strains demonstrated that the level of transcription activation by N9ComK was about twofold lower than for wtComK (Figs 6 and 7). However, Western blot analysis showed that the expression level for N9ComK was about five- to sixfold lower than for wtComK (Fig. 7b), indicating that, also in B. subtilis, N9ComK is relatively more active in transcription activation than wtComK.
|
|
N9ComK is probably not due to altered MecA interactionsN9ComK in B. subtilis is four to five times lower than for wtComK. This wtComK level in strain pGwt is set to 100 % in Fig. 7 and is in this text referred to as the standard wtComK-level. A possible explanation for the lower expresssion of N9ComK could be that the truncation of 9 aa from the N-terminus alters the interaction between ComK and MecA, which targets ComK for proteolysis. To investigate this possibility, a mecA deletion was introduced into B. subtilis pG9K, resulting in strain pG9K-M. As shown in Fig. 7, the levels of N9ComK expression and -galactosidase activity increased upon introduction of mecA, resulting in protein expression comparable to the standard wtComK-level; so effectively, in this pG9K-M strain, four to five times as much N9ComK is produced as when a functional mecA gene is present. Also transcription activation is increased to about four- to fivefold of the pGwt level. N9ComK expression and transcription activation could not be compared with wtComK under the same conditions, since B. subtilis strain pGwt-M turned out to be unstable. However, previous research demonstrated a dramatic overexpression of wtComK in a mecA background to levels several times the wild-type ComK level (Kong & Dubnau, 1994). So although the level of N9ComK is increased upon introduction of a mecA deletion, the level is still lower than what would be expected based on previous research for wtComK, suggesting that altered interactions of N9ComK with MecA are not the main reason for the low protein expression level. |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). However, the transcription activation observed from a comG–lacZ fusion in L. lactis is about 10-fold lower than that from the same promoter in B. subtilis, although nisin-induced ComK expression in L. lactis should be sufficient to stimulate comG transcription to high levels. It might be that the presence of the His-tag on ComK decreases transcription activation. At least the position of this tag influences DNA binding and transcription activation by ComK (Fig. 2). Alternatively, the lower transcription in L. lactis could result from differences between the RNA polymerases of L. lactis and B. subtilis. Nevertheless, the fact that B. subtilis ComK can activate transcription from the comG promoter in L. lactis provides a suitable test-system for ComK-truncation mutants.
The C-terminal region of ComK was shown to be required for transcription activation, which is completely abolished upon removal of 25 aa (Fig. 3). Western blot assays showed that protein production levels were comparable to the level of His6-ComK, indicating that the loss of transcription activation does not result from reduced protein production. Furthermore, we have shown that increasing the ComK level in L. lactis by a higher induction does not lead to a higher transcription level, indicating that the ComK concentration is not limiting for transcription activation and that an increase in ComK levels cannot compensate for the observed transcription activation deficiency of the mutants (unpublished data). The DNA-binding affinity of His6-ComKC25 is not affected, but the extent of the shift is smaller, suggesting binding of a single ComK dimer instead of a tetramer. Previous research showed that oligomerization of ComK dimers into a tetramer can only occur when both AT-boxes are located on the same side of the DNA helix (Hamoen et al., 1998). When the two boxes are positioned on opposite sides of the helix, ComK is forced to bind as a dimer. By inverting the orientation of the AT-boxes, a similar shift for His6-ComKC25 or His6-ComKC35 was demonstrated for both the probe with inverted AT-boxes and the one with normal AT-boxes, indicating dimer binding in both cases, whereas the shift for wtComK differs from dimer to tetramer binding between the two situations. Binding of ComK tetramers is accompanied by DNA bending, which will be affected by the loss of tetramerization in the C-terminal truncation variants. This explains the loss of transcription activation, since previous research showed that the major effect of ComK on transcription activation is on stabilizing RNAP binding, probably via facilitating contacts between RNA polymerase and upstream DNA, enabled by DNA bending (Susanna et al., 2004).
In addition to a function for the C-terminal region of ComK, this study also investigated the role of the N-terminal part of ComK in the competence regulatory pathway. To our surprise, removing 9 aa from the N-terminus of ComK yielded a variant hyperactive in transcription activation in L. lactis (Fig. 5). The DNA-binding affinity of this variant is higher as well. However, using L. lactis as a host might mask effects of the N-terminal truncation in relation to other regulatory inputs, which are present in B. subtilis, but not in L. lactis. Compared with the complex competence regulatory pathway in B. subtilis, the system in L. lactis is incomplete, since it lacks for example MecA. Furthermore, by using an inducible system, potential effects on the autostimulatory loop involved in comK transcription are missed. In order to determine the biological relevance of the N-terminal region of ComK, a N9ComK variant was introduced into the amyE locus of B. subtilis under control of the comK promoter. Although the absolute level of transcription of comG–lacZ was twofold lower, N9ComK was relatively more active in transcription activation in B. subtilis as well, since the protein expression level was five- to sixfold lower than wtComK expression (Figs 6 and 7). A possible explanation for the decreased expression of N9ComK could be an altered interaction with MecA/ClpCP, resulting in a faster breakdown of ComK or a slower release of ComK from the complex as a response to interactions of ComS with MecA at the onset of the stationary growth phase. To investigate the interactions with MecA, a mecA deletion was introduced, resulting in an increase in protein expression to wild-type level accompanied by a four- to fivefold enhancement of transcription activation by N9ComK. However, the proper control experiment could not be performed, since a stable B. subtilis mecA strain could not be obtained, despite several attempts (Fig. 7). Previous research described the construction of such a mutant, although high revertance was reported, which might cause the instability of the strain. However, the reports described a level of wtComK overexpression that was much higher than the level achieved in this study for N9ComK (Kong & Dubnau, 1994), suggesting that, despite the increase of N9ComK expression in a mecA background, an altered interaction between N9ComK and MecA is not the main reason for the low expression level. As an alternative, a clpC deletion was introduced, since ClpC acts on the same proteolytic control system as MecA. clpC strains could be obtained in both a B. subtilis pGwt and a pG9K background, although again pGwt was more affected by the lack of ClpC than pG9K, as became clear from the slower growth rate of B. subtilis pGwt. In the clpC strain pGwt-C, transcription activation by wtComK and its protein expression level increased three- to fourfold compared to B. subtilis pGwt. In contrast, however, transcription activation by N9ComK increased only slightly to 50–75 % of the level of pGwt, which means little or no increase compared to the original N9ComK strain, pG9-K (results not shown). Taken together, these results suggest that the low expression of N9ComK is not due to altered interactions with the MecA/ClpCP proteolytic degradation complex. Other possible explanations for the decreased protein expression of N9ComK could be a reduced transcription activation at the comK promoter or, alternatively, a decreased intrinsic stability of N9ComK. The latter possibility is not the most likely, since the protein could be normally expressed in L. lactis, without displaying instability. Since N9ComK was shown to be more active in transcription activation, it might not seem very likely that the reduced protein production is due to a lowered transcription activation of comK. However, in this study, transcription activation was tested at the comG promoter, which differs significantly from the comK promoter and might be easier to activate. For example, the comG promoter does not need any other activators than ComK, while at the comK promoter DegU is required to stimulate ComK-activated transcription when ComK concentrations are low. Furthermore, in the K-box of the comK promoter the spacing between the start positions of the two AT-boxes spans four helical turns, compared with three turns in the comG promoter. It might be that this longer spacing requires other abilities of the ComK protein. If the N-terminal region of ComK were required for one of these mechanisms, a truncation of this part would result in lower transcription activation at the comK promoter and therefore in a reduced ComK production. More research is required to determine the exact role of the N-terminal region of ComK in the function of the protein. However, the fact that truncation of the N-terminal region of ComK results in higher transcription activation, but lower protein expression, suggests that the presence of this region is a trade-off between optimal transcription activation and a thus far unidentified role in regulation of transcription, activity or stability of ComK.
This study presents a general overview of the location of two domains affecting ComK behaviour. Further research is required to determine the exact role of the N-terminal region of ComK in the activity and/or stability of the protein. Furthermore, despite the elucidation of the C-terminal region as being required for tetramerization, the exact mechanism and the amino acid residues involved remain unknown. However, it is tempting to speculate on possible mechanisms underlying tetramerization. For example, the C-terminal part of ComK contains many charged residues, suggesting that the distribution of negative and positive charges enables electrostatic interactions of this region with the C-terminal part of other ComK proteins or, alternatively, interactions with other charged regions in the protein. The same mechanism could apply for ComK proteins in other species, since all ComK proteins have a relatively high proportion of charged residues in their C-terminal region.
Functional domains for the other indicated ComK interactions, like dimerization, DNA binding and interactions with MecA, have not been identified yet. However, the significantly lower DNA-binding affinity of ComKC35, as compared to wtComK and ComKC25, may indicate that the C-terminal region of ComK also forms part of the DNA-binding domain. This interpretation is supported by the observation that ComK displays limited sequence homology with the DNA-binding domain of human hSRY, which interestingly is a minor groove binder as well (Werner et al., 1995). The region showing the highest homology is slightly touched in ComKC35, while most of the homologous region is located further towards the middle segment of ComK and is not affected by any of the truncations. It has been suggested before that the DNA-binding mechanism of ComK could be similar to that of hSRY (Hamoen et al., 1998), which would be an interesting starting point for further research. In addition, further research is required to elucidate the domains involved in dimerization and interactions with MecA.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidham, J. G., Smith, J. A. & Struhl, K. (1998). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: Wiley.
De Ruyter, P. G., Kuipers, O. P. & de Vos, W. M. (1996). Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl Environ Microbiol 62, 3662–3667.[Abstract]
Dubnau, D. & Lovett, C. M. J. (2002). Transformation and recombination. In Bacillus subtilis and its Closest Relatives. From Genes to Cells, pp. 453–471. Edited by A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch & R. Losick. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
Hahn, J., Roggiani, M. & Dubnau, D. (1995). The major role of Spo0A in genetic competence is to downregulate abrB, an essential competence gene. J Bacteriol 177, 3601–3605.
Hamoen, L. W., van Werkhoven, A. F., Bijlsma, J. J. E., Dubnau, D. & Venema, G. (1998). The competence transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis recognizes short A/T-rich sequences arranged in a unique, flexible pattern along the DNA helix. Genes Dev 12, 1539–1550.
Hamoen, L. W., Smits, W. K., de Jong, A., Holsappel, S. & Kuipers, O. P. (2002). Improving the predictive value of the competence transcription factor (ComK) binding site in Bacillus subtilis using a genomic approach. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 5517–5528.
Hamoen, L. W., Kausche, D., Marahiel, M. A., van Sinderen, D., Venema, G. & Serror, P. (2003a). The Bacillus subtilis transition state regulator AbrB binds to the –35 promoter region of comK. FEMS Microbiol Lett 218, 299–304.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hamoen, L. W., Venema, G. & Kuipers, O. P. (2003b). Controlling competence in Bacillus subtilis: shared use of regulators. Microbiology 149, 9–17.
Hoa, T. T., Tortosa, P., Albano, M. & Dubnau, D. (2002). Rok (YkuW) regulates genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis by directly repressing comK. Mol Microbiol 9, 365–373.
Innes, M. A. & Gelfand, D. H. (1990). Optimization of PCRs. In PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications, pp. 3–12. Edited by M. A. Innes, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky & T. J. White. San Diego: Academic Press.
Israelsen, H., Madsen, S. M., Vrang, A., Hansen, E. B. & Johansen, E. (1995). Cloning and partial characterization of regulated promoters from Lactococcus lactis Tn917-lacZ integrants with the new promoter probe vector, pAK80. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 2540–2547.[Abstract]
Kong, L. & Dubnau, D. (1994). Regulation of competence specific gene expression by Mec-mediated protein-protein interaction in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 5793–5797.
Kuipers, O. P., Beerthuyzen, M. M., Siezen, R. J. & de Vos, W. M. (1993). Characterization of the nisin gene cluster nisABTCIPR of Lactococcus lactis: requirement of expression of the nisA and nisI genes for development of immunity. Eur J Biochem 216, 281–291.[Medline]
Kuipers, O. P., de Ruyter, P. G. G. A., Kleerebezem, M. & de Vos, W. M. (1998). Quorum-sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J Biotechnol 64, 15–21.[CrossRef]
Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.[CrossRef][Medline]
Larsen, R., Buist, G., Kuipers, O. P. & Kok, J. (2004). ArgR and AhrC are both required for regulation of arginine metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol 186, 1147–1157.
Leenhouts, K. J. & Venema, G. (1993). Plasmids, a Practical Approach, pp. 65–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Msadek, T., Dartois, V., Kunst, F., Herbaud, M. L., Denizot, F. & Rapoport, G. (1998). ClpP of Bacillus subtilis is required for competence development, motility, degradative enzyme synthesis, growth at high temperature and sporulation. Mol Microbiol 27, 899–914.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
Serror, P. & Sonenshein, A. L. (1996). CodY is required for nutritional repression of Bacillus subtilis genetic competence. J Bacteriol 178, 5910–5915.
Susanna, K. A., van der Werff, A. F., den Hengst, C. D., Calles, B., Salas, M., Venema, G., Hamoen, L. W. & Kuipers, O. P. (2004). Mechanism of transcription activation at the comG promoter by the competence transcription factor ComK of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 186, 1120–1128.
Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. & Gordon, J. (1979). Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedures and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76, 4350–4354.
Turgay, K., Hamoen, L. W., Venema, G. & Dubnau, D. (1997). Biochemical characterization of a molecular switch involving the heat shock protein ClpC, which controls the activity of ComK, the competence transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 11, 119–128.
Turgay, K., Hahn, J., Burghoorn, J. & Dubnau, D. (1998). Competence in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by regulated proteolysis of a transcription factor. EMBO J 17, 6730–6738.[CrossRef][Medline]
Van Sinderen, D. & Venema, G. (1994). comK acts as an autoregulatory control switch in the signal transduction route to competence in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 176, 5762–5770.
Van Sinderen, D., Luttinger, A., Kong, L., Dubnau, D., Venema, G. & Hamoen, L. (1995). comK encodes the competence transcription factor, the key regulatory protein for competence development in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 15, 455–462.[Medline]
Venema, G., Pritchard, R. H. & Venema-Schroder, T. (1965). Fate of transforming deoxyribonucleic acid in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 89, 1250–1255.
Werner, M. H., Huth, J. R., Gronenborn, A. M. & Clore, G. M. (1995). Molecular basis of human 46X, Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex. Cell 81, 705–714.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yuan, G. & Wong, S. L. (1995). Regulation of GroE expression in Bacillus subtilis: the involvement of the sigma A-like promoter and the roles of the inverted repeat sequence (CIRCE). J Bacteriol 177, 5427–5433.
Received 19 July 2005;
revised 19 October 2005;
accepted 2 November 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. A. Susanna, A. M. Mironczuk, W. K. Smits, L. W. Hamoen, and O. P. Kuipers A Single, Specific Thymine Mutation in the ComK-Binding Site Severely Decreases Binding and Transcription Activation by the Competence Transcription Factor ComK of Bacillus subtilis J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2007; 189(13): 4718 - 4728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
) or ComK-His6 (
), but not in cells with empty plasmid pNZ8048 (
). (b) DNA binding of purified His6-ComK shown using EMSAs. The comG promoter (with common K-box) was used as a probe. Binding of His6-ComK purified from L. lactis (L) was compared with ComK purified from the MBP-fusion system in E. coli (E). Both proteins show a similar shift relative to unbound DNA (–). (c)Binding of His-tagged ComK was tested directly from extracts of induced cells with pNZ8048 (NZ), pNZ-His6-ComK (H6-K) or pNZ-ComK-His6 (K-H6).
