|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Enteric Infections, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500, USA
2 18929 Fountain Hills Drive, Germantown, MD 20874, USA
Correspondence
Wyatt Byrd
dagmarbyrd{at}comcast.net
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Administering antigen directly to the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), such as the nasal mucosa, can act to induce both local and systemic specific immune responses (Eyles et al., 1998a
). This is particularly important considering that most pathogens enter the body via mucosal surfaces, and protection against such organisms most often requires local production of antibodies, most importantly, secretory IgA (sIgA) (Eyles et al., 1998b
). Native antigens can be weak immunogens when administered to mucosal surfaces as a result of adverse conditions and/or inadequate absorption (Eyles et al., 1998b
). However, mucosal delivery vehicles, such as PLGA microspheres, can act to protect antigens as well as increasing their absorption, thus enhancing the immunogenicity of the antigens (Byrd et al., 2005
; Eldridge et al., 1991b
).
In this study, the immune response in BALB/c mice intranasally administered CS3-loaded poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microspheres was compared to that of mice similarly given native CS3 and CS3 co-administered with a known mucosal adjuvant, the R192G mutant heat-labile enterotoxin (mLT). We found that CS3-PLGA microspheres induced significantly higher (P<0·001) levels of IgG and IgA systemic and mucosal antibodies than native CS3, and also induced antibody responses superior to those of the CS3 plus mLT formulation. The mLT mucosal adjuvant significantly enhanced (P<0·001) the immune response to the CS3 protein; however, signs of distress were seen in the mice, indicating that the mLT may have serious safety concerns when administered intranasally. In contrast, the CS3-PLGA microspheres when administered intranasally caused no observable distress to the mice.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intranasal immunization of mice.
Mice were anaesthetized with a 25 µl mixture of xylazine (Rompun, 20 mg ml1) (Bayer) and ketamine (Ketaset, 100 mg ml1) (Fort Dodge Animal Health) given intramuscularly in the right caudal muscle. Four micrograms of CS3, 4 µg CS3 plus 2 µg mLT or 0·364 mg solid CS3-encapsulated PLGA microspheres (4 µg CS3 protein) were administered in a 10 µl volume drop-wise to the external nares of each mouse using a 220 µl Pipetteman (Ranin Instrument). Immediately prior to immunization, the vaccines were diluted with PBS to a concentration of 4 µg CS3 protein 10 µl1. Control mice were likewise administered 10 µl PBS. The mice were observed for signs of distress for 14 days following immunization.
CS3.
CS3 was purified from ETEC strain E9034A (O8 : H9 : CS3 : LT+ : ST+). Bacteria were grown on colonization factor antigen agar plates overnight at 37 °C. The cells were suspended in PBS and heated to 60 °C for 30 min. The bacterial suspension was then centrifuged at 9000 g for 30 min and the supernatant filtered (0·2 µm) (Amicon; Millipore) to remove bacteria. The supernatant containing the CS3 was subjected to sequential ammonium sulfate precipitation (20 % and 45 % saturation) and the protein was recovered by centrifugation at 37 000 g for 30 min. The protein was dialysed extensively against PBS and stored at 40 °C. Approximately 107 endotoxin units per ml were measured in the CS3 preparation by the Limulus amoebocyte lysate Pyrotell assay (gel-clot method) (Associates of Cape Cod).
mLT.
The mutant form (R192G) of the heat-labile enterotoxin (mLT) was generously supplied by Dr Shahida Baqar, Department of Enteric Infections, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Dickinson & Clements, 1995
).
CS3 encapsulation.
CS3 was microencapsulated in 50 : 50 poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) using a water/oil/water double emulsion (w1/o/w2) method as previously described (de Lorimier et al., 2003
). Approximately 107 endotoxin units per ml were measured in the CS3-PLGA preparation as described above.
Particle size distribution.
Ten milligrams of CS3-PLGA microspheres was suspended by vortexing in 1 ml deionized water in a 1·5 ml microfuge tube. The resultant suspension was observed under an Olympus BH-2 optical microscope having a calibrated ocular micrometer at 1000x magnification. The diameters of 150 randomly chosen microspheres were measured (repeated three times) and the microsphere size calculated.
CS3 protein content determination.
Forty milligrams of CS3-PLGA microspheres was dissolved in a solution of 0·25 % SDS and 0·5 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (2·5 ml) with vortexing and incubated at 37 °C in a warm water-bath for 24 h (in triplicate). The solution was neutralized (pH 7) using NaOH and protein content measured by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Pierce), compared against a BSA standard (Pierce) and adjusted against PLGA microspheres without encapsulated protein (Jones, 2003
). The CS3 protein loading was calculated as the amount of encapsulated CS3 antigen in µg per mg PLGA microspheres, and expressed as percentage protein per unit weight.
Measurement of CS3 protein released and changes in pH.
Ninety-one milligrams of CS3-PLGA microspheres (1000 µg CS3 protein) was incubated in 1 ml PBS solution (0·1 M, pH 7·4, 0·02 % sodium azide) at 37 °C in 1·5 ml microfuge tubes with constant end-over-end rotary motion for 56 days (in triplicate). At 1 week intervals, the solutions were centrifuged at 10 000 g for 10 min in a tabletop microfuge, and 1 ml samples stored at 40 °C until protein content was determined. The collected samples were neutralized (pH 7) using NaOH prior to protein content determination by the BCA method (Pierce), compared against a BSA standard (Pierce) and adjusted against PLGA microspheres without encapsulated protein (Jones, 2003
). Following removal of the 1 ml samples, 1 ml fresh PBS solutions (pH 7·4) were immediately added to the microfuge tubes, microspheres suspended and incubation continued as before. The pH of the CS3 release solutions was measured daily for the first 2 weeks and weekly thereafter with a pH miniprobe.
Measurement of CS3 protein stability and antigenicity.
The CS3 protein stability and antigenicity were examined by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (Western blotting). CS3 samples (native and released from PLGA microspheres) were loaded and run on 16 % Tricine mini-gels (denaturing, 1 mm thickness) (Novex; Invitrogen) using the Invitrogen XCell SureLock Mini-Cell at constant 125 V. The gels were stained using the Invitrogen SimplyBlue Safe Stain (Coomassie G-250). The CS3 protein was blotted onto 0·2 µm nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen) using the Invitrogen XCell II Blot Module at constant 25 V. The bound CS3 was reacted with mouse anti-CS3 IgG monoclonal antibody and the Invitrogen WesternBreeze Chromogenic Immunodetection System was used to visualize the CS3 bands. The CS3-release samples were desalted and concentrated 10-fold by the Microcon Centrifugal Filter Device (10 kDa molecular mass limit) (Millipore) prior to loading into mini-gel wells.
ELISA for CS3 serum and mucosal antibodies.
Serum was collected and antibodies against CS3 measured by the use of a previously described ELISA (Byrd & Cassels, 2003
). Concentrations of IgG subclasses were determined from standard curves using mouse Immunoglobulin Isotype Panel (Southern Biotechnology), with values expressed as µg ml1. Faecal pellet elutions and bronchoalveolar and small intestinal lavages were collected and antibodies measured by an ELISA as described by VanCott et al. (1998)
. The mucosal sample concentrations were determined from standard curves using purified mouse IgA and IgG antibody (Southern Biotechnology) and the CS3-specific antibody concentrations were normalized based on total IgA and IgG content, with values expressed as µg CS3-specific IgA or IgG (mg total IgA or IgG)1.
ELISA for total serum IgE.
Total IgE antibody was measured in serum samples using the Pharmingen OptEIA Mouse IgE Set. Serum concentrations were determined from standard curves using purified mouse IgE antibody, with values expressed as ng ml1.
Capture ELISA for measurement of released CS3 protein.
A modified four-layer sandwich capture ELISA was used to measure CS3 proteins released from PLGA microspheres (Berdal et al., 1981
). Microtitre plates were coated with optimal concentration of mouse anti-CS3 IgG monoclonal antibody. All washes were done with PBS and 0·05 % Tween-20 (PBS-T), and the diluent for all samples was PBS-T and 0·1 % gelatin. Test samples (native CS3 and CS3 released from PLGA microspheres) were added and incubated for 2 h, wells washed, and rabbit anti-CS3 IgG affinity purified antibody added and incubated for 2 h. Following wash, goat anti-rabbit IgG (
) heavy-chain specific alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Kirkegaard & Perry) was added and incubated for 2 h. The p-NPP substrate (Sigma) was added and the plates read at 405 nm using a microplate reader. Sample concentrations were determined from standard curves using purified CS3 protein, with the values expressed as µg ml1.
Statistical analysis.
Antibody titres were log transformed for all analysis. Standard deviations (SD) were calculated using GraphPad Prism version 4.0b for Macintosh. A two-sided Student's t test for independent samples (GraphPad Prism) was used to compare the mean serum and mucosal antibody values of different groups of immunized mice, and of different groups of immunized mice with those of preimmune and non-immune mice, where differences in P values of <0·01 were considered to be significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Serum and mucosal antibody responses following intranasal immunization
Native CS3 administered intranasally to the mice induced serum and mucosal (bronchoalveolar, small intestinal and faecal) IgG, IgA and IgM antibody responses (Table 1
). The CS3-PLGA microspheres significantly enhanced (P<0·001) both serum and mucosal IgG and IgA antibody responses compared to native CS3. Likewise, the mLT mucosal adjuvant significantly enhanced (P<0·001) the serum and mucosal IgG and IgA antibody responses to the CS3 antigen. The CS3-PLGA serum and mucosal antibody responses were greater than those of CS3 plus mLT; however, the differences were not significant.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The nasal and pulmonary regions of the respiratory tract are inviting target areas for the delivery of vaccines (Eyles et al., 1998a
). Inhalation or introduction of an immunogen into the nose is relatively simple, allowing for greater patient compliance. The large surface areas of the nasal epithelium (being covered with microvilli) and the lungs, in which the epithelial barriers are reasonably permeable to macromolecules, make these regions very attractive for mucosal antigen delivery. Antigen delivery to nasopharyngeal passages, which contain nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) and associated M-cells, allows for induction of serum and mucosal immune responses. In addition, reduced levels of proteolytic enzymes and pH extremes as compared to the gastrointestinal tract further make the respiratory tract more advantageous for vaccine delivery. Encapsulated antigens (such as CS3-PLGA microspheres) administered to the respiratory tract may be less efficiently cleared by mucociliary activity compared to the soluble protein. Thus, intranasally administering the CS3-PLGA microspheres may allow for increased uptake via antigen-processing cells by prolonging the time in which the CS3-loaded microspheres contact the mucosal surface. This may in turn enhance the immune response to the encapsulated CS3 protein. Therefore, for this trial, the intranasal route was chosen as the most advantageous for delivery of the vaccine formulations to the mice.
MALT is the major B and T cells' inductive site and supplies the mucosa regularly with sIgA (Kiyono et al., 1992
). The gut-, nasal- and bronchus-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT, NALT and BALT) are specific MALT inductive sites giving rise to local mucosal responses involving most importantly IgA-committed cells (Sminia & Kraal, 1999
). The importance of sIgA in protection is that it is the primary immunoglobulin providing immune exclusion of bacteria and viruses at local surfaces (Mestecky et al., 1986
). It has been shown that sIgA in mucosal secretions has the ability to agglutinate bacteria, neutralize bacterial toxins and block adherence of bacteria to mucosal epithelial cells (Kilian et al., 1988
; McGhee et al., 1992
). Also, sIgA is enhanced in blocking bacterial adherence as compared to IgG due to its charge, extensive glycosylation and resistance to proteolysis (McGhee et al., 1992
).
Along with sIgA, it is important to note the presence of IgG in mucosal immunity. Following intranasal immunization with the CS3 vaccines, IgG was measured at elevated levels in the mucosal samples. It is known that IgG is found at high levels in the deep lung, and that pulmonary IgG, in addition to transudating from serum, is produced locally in BALT (Eyles et al., 2000
). Also, IgG antibody-producing cells have been shown to be present at high levels in nasal mucosa (Brandtzaeg, 1985
; Heritage et al., 1997
), with IgG and IgA being found in comparable amounts in nasal secretions (Rudin et al., 1998
). Serum IgG is found in the lungs and intestines comparable to locally secreted IgA (sIgA) (Pierce & Reynolds, 1974
; Robbins et al., 1997
). The high level of secreted and/or transudated IgG present coupled with the substantially decreased enzymic degradation of IgG in the respiratory tract as compared to the intestinal tract support the importance of IgG in protection in this tissue (Brandtzaeg, 1995
; Manzanec et al., 1992
; Steinmetz, 1997
). Others have reported that following intranasal immunization, IgA responses dominate throughout the respiratory tract, whereas IgG responses contribute to immunity in lungs but not in nasal passages (Hodge et al., 2001
). Results seen in several bacterial and viral vaccine trials indicate that serum IgG is important in immunity on epithelial surfaces, and specific IgG in sufficient amounts is able to prevent enteric infections (Robbins et al., 1992
, 1995
, 1997
).
An important factor of mucosal immunity is the trafficking of lymphocytes among distant mucosal sites. This communication between the mucosal lymphoid tissues, GALT, BALT and NALT, known as the common mucosal immune system, allows IgA-committed cells from one mucosal site to seed distant mucosal sites, where they differentiate into antibody-producing plasma cells, resulting in antigen-specific antibody mucosal sites throughout the body (Sminia & Kraal, 1999
). The anti-CS3 IgA mucosal antibody response measured in the intestinal and faecal samples of the mice immunized intranasally is a result of the trafficking of anti-CS3 antibody-secreting cells between the two mucosal sites, respiratory and gastrointestinal. Swallowing of some of the antigen administered intranasally appears not to be responsible as the swallow reflex of deeply anaesthetized mice is essentially eliminated, and in addition, only a small inoculating volume was administered to the mice (Byrd & Cassels, 2003
).
The CS3 vaccines administered intranasally induced primarily an IgG1 subclass response followed by IgG2a, with the IgG2b subclass measured at moderate levels (Fig. 4
). This is in agreement with the response seen in previous mouse trials involving CFA/I and CS6 (Alves et al., 1998
; Byrd & Cassels, 2003
). The IgG subclass responses induced by CS3 nasal vaccination strongly suggest that CS3 activates a mixed Th1/Th2 immune response, while PLGA encapsulation or co-administration of the mLT adjuvant did not alter the mixed Th1/Th2 profile. These results as well as others (Eyles et al., 1998b
) indicate that intranasal administration of native and microencapsulated antigens is Th2 skewed (IgG1 dominant). This indicates that antigens given by mucosal routes are processed by both antigen presenting cells and T lymphocytes.
It has been noted that the size of the microspheres can have an effect on the degree and time of an antibody response. Eldridge et al. (1991a
, b)
have suggested that the adjuvant effect of PLGA microspheres was the result of their size being <10 µm in diameter. The adjuvanticity of microspheres of <10 µm resides in their ability to allow phagocytosis of a relatively large quantity of antigen by macrophages and accessory cells followed by directed migration of these cells into draining lymph nodes at the injection site (Eldridge et al., 1991b
). Therefore, the size of the PLGA microspheres used in this mouse trial was <10 µm in diameter (Fig. 1
).
The adjuvant effect of microencapsulation on the CS3 antigen was compared to that of a known mLT mucosal adjuvant. The co-administration of the mLT was shown to induce greater antibody responses than CS3 given alone, but not when compared to those induced by the PLGA microspheres. Concerns have been raised as to potential problems that could be encountered with the use of cholera and heat-labile bacterial toxins and toxoids when administered intranasally (van Ginkel et al., 2000
). Involvement of nasal and respiratory surfaces with these adjuvants has the potential of inducing adverse inflammatory responses (Simecka et al., 2000
; van Ginkel et al., 2000
). Total serum IgE was elevated in mice intranasally administered mLT as a mucosal adjuvant, with no elevated levels of total serum IgE measured in mice intranasally administered native CS3 or the CS3-PLGA microspheres. These results are consistent with those seen by others (Beignon et al., 2002
; Boyaka et al., 2003
; Takahashi et al., 1996
), which have shown elevated levels of total serum IgE following administration of LT or toxoid forms of LT. Even though the exact role of IgE is still uncertain, there is concern that increased levels of IgE may be associated with risk of anaphylaxis (Beignon et al., 2002
). IgE is believed to be involved in human and mouse allergic airway inflammation (Coyle et al., 1996
; Zuberi et al., 2000
). The mice in this study showed definite signs of distress (loss of activity, increased huddling, ruffled fur) following intranasal administration of the mLT adjuvant, which is consistent with the mLT retaining some toxicity (Komase et al., 1998
; Rappuoli et al., 1999
). Thus, a critical factor in the use of the PLGA microspheres in nasal delivery is their documented safety. We did not detect a significant increase in IgE responses in the mucosal samples of the mice administered the mLT adjuvant. Likewise, Takahashi et al. (1996)
detected only low faecal IgE antibody responses following oral administration of 25 µg of ETEC LT. However, we feel that the measurement of total IgE in serum was sufficient to note that mLT can indeed induce this type of antibody response in the mice when administered to the nasal mucosa.
CS3 protein was released from the PLGA microspheres by a combination of pore diffusion and polymer erosion (Fig. 2
) (Kissel et al., 1997
). Upon exposure of the CS3-loaded microspheres to the aqueous environment, water diffused into the polymeric matrix, resulting in swelling of the microspheres along with the formation of pores through which the CS3 antigen was released. The porous core structure of the PLGA microspheres contained large cavities, resulting in a high initial burst release of the CS3 protein. A significant amount (approx. 40 %) of CS3 was released over a short period (24 h) with this initial burst release of antigen corresponding to a priming immunization dose. This initial burst effect is thought to be due to the rapid release of antigen located on or near the surface of the microspheres and poorly entrapped antigen (McGee et al., 1994
). The subsequent rate of CS3 release was a result of degradation of the polymer matrix. Therefore, following the initial burst release of CS3, the PLGA microspheres degraded over time, with the entrapped CS3 protein being slowly released. In addition, the acidic monomers, lactic acid and glycolic acid, were continuously released into the medium as the microspheres slowly degraded, significantly reducing the pH. Release studies conducted for this study (Fig. 2
) and by others (Kersten & Gander, 1996
) have shown that the pH can drop to 3 or lower towards the end of the degradation of the microspheres, even if the buffer is exchanged with fresh medium on a regular basis. The core itself of PLGA microspheres becomes increasingly more acidic (pH<3) as a result of hydrolytic chain scission of the polymer (Kissel et al., 1997
). The drop in pH can adversely affect the immunogenicity of an antigen.
The microencapsulation process itself as well as the degradation of the PLGA microspheres can result in antigen denaturation, fragmentation and aggregation (Jones, 2003
). The capture ELISA (Fig. 2
) showed a decrease in measurement of the CS3 protein that may indicate some level of denaturation and/or aggregation while the overall immunogenicity of the CS3 protein was not destroyed (Desai et al., 2000
; Sasiak et al., 2001
). We found that the released CS3 protein retained its antigenicity as determined by capture ELISA (Fig. 2
) and immunoblotting (Fig. 3b
), as well as serum and mucosal antibody responses (Table 1
) measured in mice following immunization with the CS3-PLGA microspheres, thus showing that the encapsulation procedure and release of CS3 following microsphere degradation were not detrimental to the CS3 antigenicity.
The intranasal administration of the CS3-PLGA microspheres induced systemic and mucosal responses in mice that were significantly greater (P<0·001) than those induced by native CS3. Importantly, the CS3-encapsulated PLGA microspheres caused no distress to the mice as well as no elevation of total serum IgE. Encouraged by these results, we plan to test other ETEC colonization factors encapsulated in PLGA microspheres in the intranasal mouse model and administered via other routes, such as intragastric and transcutaneous. The results from this and other such studies will aid in supporting future primate and human vaccine trials directed against ETEC.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Beignon, A.-S., Briand, J.-P., Rappuoli, R., Muller, S. & Partidos, C. D. (2002). The LTR72 mutant of heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli enhances the ability of peptide antigens to elicit CD4+ T cells and secrete gamma interferon after coapplication onto bare skin. Infect Immun 70, 30123019.
Berdal, B. P., Olsvik, Ø. & Omland, T. (1981). A sandwich ELISA method for detection of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Sect B 89, 411415.[Medline]
Black, R. E. (1990). Epidemiology of travelers' diarrhea and relative importance of various pathogens. Rev Infect Dis 12, S73S79.
Boyaka, P. N., Ohmura, M., Fujihashi, K. & 8 other authors (2003). Chimeras of labile toxin one and cholera toxin retain mucosal adjuvanicity and direct Th cell subsets via their B subunit. J Immunol 170, 454462.
Brandtzaeg, P. (1985). Cells producing immunoglobulins and other immune factors in human nasal mucosa. Protides Biol Fluids Proc Colloq 32, 363366.
Brandtzaeg, P. (1995). Basic mechanisms of mucosal immunity a major adaptive defense system. Immunologist 3, 8996.
Byrd, W. & Cassels, F. J. (2003). Mucosal immunization of BALB/c mice using enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli colonization factors CFA/I and CS6 administered with and without a mutant heat-labile enterotoxin. Vaccine 21, 18841893.[CrossRef][Medline]
Byrd, W., de Lorimier, A., Zheng, Z.-R. & Cassels, F. J. (2005). Microencapsulated subunit vaccine approach to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and other mucosal pathogens. Adv Drug Del Rev 57, 13621380.[CrossRef][Medline]
Coyle, A. J., Wagner, K., Bertrand, C., Tsuyuki, S., Bews, J. & Heusser, C. (1996). Central role of immunoglobulin (Ig) E in the induction of lung eosinophil infiltration and T helper 2 cell cytokine production: inhibition by a non-anaphylactogenic anti-IgE antibody. J Exp Med 183, 13031310.
de Lorimier, A. J., Byrd, W., Hall, E. R., Vaughan, W. M., Tang, D., Roberts, Z. J., McQueen, C. E. & Cassels, F. J. (2003). Murine antibody response to intranasally administered enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli colonization factor CS6. Vaccine 21, 25482555.[CrossRef][Medline]
Desai, M. P., Hilfinger, J. M., Amidon, G. L., Levy, R. J. & Labhasetwar, V. (2000). Immune response with biodegradable nanospheres and alum: studies in rabbits using staphylococcal enterotoxin B-toxoid. J Microencapsul 17, 215225.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dickinson, B. L. & Clements, J. D. (1995). Dissociation of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin adjuvanticity from ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. Infect Immun 63, 16171623.[Abstract]
Eldridge, J. H., Staas, J. K., Meulbroek, J. A., McGhee, J. R., Tice, T. R. & Gilley, R. M. (1991a). Biodegradable microspheres as a vaccine delivery system. Mol Immunol 28, 287294.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eldridge, J. H., Staas, J. K., Meulbroek, J. A., Tice, T. R. & Gilley, R. M. (1991b). Biodegradable and biocompatible poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres as an adjuvant for staphylococcal enterotoxin B toxoid which enhances the level of toxin-neutralizing antibodies. Infect Immun 59, 29782986.
Eyles, J. E., Spiers, I. D., Williamson, E. D. & Alpar, H. O. (1998a). Analysis of local and systemic immunological responses after intra-tracheal, intra-nasal and intra-muscular administration of microsphere co-encapsulated Yersinia pestis sub-unit vaccines. Vaccine 16, 20002009.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eyles, J. E., Sharp, G. J. E., Williamson, E. D., Spiers, I. D. & Alpar, H. O. (1998b). Intranasal administration of poly-lactic acid microsphere co-encapsulated Yersinia pestis subunits confers protection from pneumonic plaque in the mouse. Vaccine 16, 698707.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eyles, J. E., Williamson, E. D., Spiers, I. D. & Alpar, H. O. (2000). Protection studies following bronchopulmonary and intramuscular immunization with Yersinis pestis F1 and V subunit vaccines coencapsulated in biodegradable microspheres: a comparison of efficacy. Vaccine 18, 32663271.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gaastra, W. & Svennerholm, A.-M. (1996). Colonization factors of human enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). Trends Microbiol 4, 444452.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heritage, P. L., Underdown, B. J., Arsenault, A. L., Snider, D. P. & McDermott, M. R. (1997). Comparison of murine nasal-associated lymphoid tissue and Peyer's patches. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156, 12561262.
Hodge, L. M., Marinaro, M., Jones, H. P., McGhee, J. R., Kiyono, H. & Simecka, J. W. (2001). Immunoglobulin A (IgA) responses and IgE-associated inflammation along the respiratory tract after mucosal but not systemic immunization. Infect Immun 69, 23282338.
Hyams, K. C., Bourgeois, A. L., Merrell, B. R. & 9 other authors (1991). Diarrheal disease during Operation Desert Shield. N Engl J Med 325, 14231428.[Abstract]
Jones, D. H. (2003). Microencapsulation of vaccine antigens. In Methods in Molecular Medicine, vol. 87, Vaccine Protocols, pp. 211222. Edited by A. Robinson, M. J. Hudson & M. P. Cranage. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
Kersten, G. F. A. & Gander, B. (1996). Biodegradable microspheres as vehicles for antigens. In Concepts in Vaccine Development, pp. 265302. Edited by S. H. E. Kaufmann. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kilian, M., Mestecky, J. & Russell, M. W. (1988). Defense mechanisms involving Fc-dependent functions of immunoglobulin A and their subversion by bacterial immunoglobulin A proteases. Microbiol Rev 52, 296303.
Kissel, T., Hilbert, A. K., Koneberg, R. & Bittner, B. (1997). Microencapsulation of antigens for parenteral vaccine delivery systems. In Antigen Delivery Systems: Immunological and Technological Issues, pp. 159190. Edited by B. Gander, H. P. Merkle & G. Corradin. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Kiyono, H., Bienenstock, J., McGhee, J. R. & Ernst, P. B. (1992). The mucosal immune system: features of inductive and effector sites to consider in mucosal immunization and vaccine development. Reg Immunol 4, 5462.[Medline]
Komase, K., Tamura, S.-I., Matsuo, K., Watanabe, K., Hattori, N., Odaka, A., Suzuki, Y., Kurata, T. & Aizawa, C. (1998). Mutants of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin as an adjuvant for nasal influenza vaccine. Vaccine 16, 248254.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lewis, D. H. (1990). Controlled release of bioactive agents from lactide/glycolide polymers. In Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems, pp. 141. Edited by M. Chasin & R. Langer. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Manzanec, M. B., Lamm, M. E., Lyn, D., Portner, A. & Nedrud, J. G. (1992). Comparison of IgA versus IgG monoclonal antibodies for passive immunisation of the murine respiratory tract. Virus Res 23, 112.[CrossRef][Medline]
McGee, J. P., Davis, S. S. & OHagan, D. T. (1994). The immunogenicity of a model protein entrapped in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles prepared by a novel phase separation technique. J Control Release 31, 5560.
McGhee, J. R., Mestecky, J., Dertzbaugh, M. T., Eldridge, J. H., Hirasawa, M. & Kiyono, H. (1992). The mucosal immune system: from fundamental concepts to vaccine development. Vaccine 10, 7588.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mestecky, J., Russell, M. W., Jackson, S. & Brown, T. A. (1986). The human IgA system: a reassessment. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 40, 105114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pierce, N. F. & Reynolds, H. Y. (1974). Immunity to experimental cholera: I. Protective effect of humoral IgG antitoxin demonstrated by passive immunization. J Immunol 113, 10171023.
Rappuoli, R., Pizza, M., Douce, G. & Dougan, G. (1999). Structure and mucosal adjuvanticity of cholera and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxins. Immunol Today 20, 493500.[CrossRef][Medline]
Robbins, J. B., Chu, C. & Schneerson, R. (1992). Hypothesis for vaccine development: protective immunity to enteric diseases caused by nontyphoidal salmonellae and shigellae may be conferred by serum IgG antibodies to the O-specific polysaccharide of their lipopolysaccharides. Clin Infect Dis 15, 346361.[Medline]
Robbins, J. B., Schneerson, R. & Szu, S. C. (1995). Perspective: hypothesis: serum IgG antibody is sufficient to confer protection against infectious diseases by inactivating the inoculum. J Infect Dis 171, 13871398.[Medline]
Robbins, J. B., Schneerson, R. & Szu, S. C. (1997). O-specific polysaccharide-protein conjugates for prevention of enteric bacterial diseases. In New Generation Vaccines, pp. 803815. Edited by M. M. Levin, G. C. Woodrow, J. B. Kaper & G. S. Cobon. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Rudin, A., Johansson, E.-L., Bergquist, C. & Holmgren, J. (1998). Differential kinetics and distribution of antibodies in serum and nasal and vaginal secretions after nasal and oral vaccination of humans. Infect Immun 66, 33903396.
Sasiak, A. B., Bolgiano, B., Crane, D. T., Hockley, D. J., Corbel, M. J. & Sesardic, D. (2001). Comparison of in vitro and in vivo methods to study stability of PLGA microencapsulated tetanus toxoid vaccines. Vaccine 19, 694705.[CrossRef]
Simecka, J. W., Jackson, R. J., Kiyono, H. & McGhee, J. R. (2000). Mucosally induced immunoglobulin E-associated inflammation in the respiratory tract. Infect Immun 68, 672679.
Sminia, T. & Kraal, G. (1999). Nasal-associated lymphoid tissue. In Mucosal Immunology, pp. 357364. Edited by P. L. Ogra, J. Mestecky, M. E. Lamm, W. Strober, J. Bienenstock & J. R. McGhee. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Steinmetz, I. (1997). Comparative in vivo analysis of IgA- and IgG-mediated mucosal defense against bacterial pathogens. Behring Inst Mitt 98, 5355.
Takahashi, I., Marinaro, M., Kiyono, H. & 7 other authors (1996). Mechanisms for mucosal immunogenicity and adjuvancy of Escherichia coli labile enterotoxin. J Infect Dis 173, 627635.[Medline]
VanCott, T. C., Kaminski, R. W., Mascola, J. R., Kalyanaraman, V. S., Wassef, N. M., Alving, C. R., Ulrich, J. T., Lowell, G. H. & Birx, D. L. (1998). HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies in the genital and respiratory tracts of mice intranasally immunized with oligomeric gp160. J Immun 160, 20002012.
van Ginkel, F. W., Jackson, R. J., Yuki, Y. & McGhee, J. R. (2000). Cutting edge: the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin redirects vaccine proteins into olfactory tissues. J Immunol 165, 47784782.
Zuberi, R. I., Apgar, J. R., Chen, S.-S. & Liu, F.-T. (2000). Role for IgE in airway secretions: IgE immune complexes are more potent inducers than antigen alone of airway inflammation in a murine model. J Immunol 164, 26672673.
Received 5 November 2005;
accepted 5 December 2005.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |