Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 152 (2006), 1287-1296; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.28754-0
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lety, M.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lety, M.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lety, M.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, A.
Microbiology 152 (2006), 1287-1296; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.28754-0
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology

Exploring the role of the CTL epitope region of listeriolysin O in the pathogenesis of Listeria monocytogenes

Marie-Annick Lety{dagger}, Claude Frehel{dagger}, Catherine Raynaud, Marion Dupuis and Alain Charbit

Faculté de Médecine Necker-Enfants Malades, INSERM U-570, 156, rue de Vaugirard, 75730 Paris Cedex 15, France

Correspondence
Alain Charbit
charbit{at}necker.fr


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular bacterial pathogen responsible for severe opportunistic infections in humans and animals. The secreted cholesterol-dependent cytolysin, listeriolysin O (LLO), mediates phagosomal escape and allows bacterial growth in the cytosol of infected cells. In order to identify new LLO determinants participating in bacterial pathogenesis, this study focused on a major target of LLO proteolytic cleavage in vitro, the CTL epitope region (residues 91–99). Mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis in the epitope or in the two clusters of positive charges flanking the epitope. Two LLO mutants (a single mutation K103A and a double mutation R89G, K90G) were normally and stably secreted by L. monocytogenes. In contrast, a mutant carrying four amino acid substitutions in the epitope itself (Y92K, D94A, E97K, Y98F) was highly susceptible to proteolytic degradation. While these three LLO mutant proteins showed a reduced haemolytic activity, they all promoted efficient phagosomal escape and intracellular multiplication in different cell types, and were non-cytotoxic. The deletion of the epitope ({Delta}91–99), as well as the substitution of two, three or four of the four lysine residues (K103 to K106) by alanine residues did not lead to the production of a detectable protein. These results confirm the lack of correlation between haemolytic activity and phagosomal membrane disruption. They reveal the importance of the 91–99 region in the production of a stable and functional LLO. LD50 determinations in the mouse model suggest a possible link between LLO stability and virulence.


Abbreviations: BMM, bone-marrow-derived macrophage; CDC, cholesterol-dependent pore-forming cytolysin; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LLO, listeriolysin O; PFO, perfringolysin O; SLO, streptolysin O

A supplementary table of primer sequences is available with the online version of this paper.

{dagger}These authors contributed equally to this work.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive bacterium widespread in nature and responsible for sporadic severe infections in humans and other animal species (Berche, 1995Down; Vazquez-Boland et al., 2001Down). This pathogen is a facultative intracellular micro-organism, capable of invading a wide variety of eukaryotic cells (Dramsi et al., 1995Down; Gaillard et al., 1986Down, 1996Down; Kuhn & Goebel, 1989Down), including endothelial cells (Drevets et al., 1995Down) and macrophages (Mackaness, 1962Down). Each step of intracellular parasitism by L. monocytogenes is dependent upon the production of virulence factors (Cossart, 2002Down; Goebel & Khun, 2000Down). The major virulence genes identified so far are clustered into two distinct loci on the chromosome and are controlled by a single pleiotropic regulatory activator, PrfA, which is required for virulence (Johansson et al., 2002Down; Renzoni et al., 1999Down). Among these virulence factors, listeriolysin O (LLO, encoded by the hly gene) plays a crucial role in the escape of bacteria from the phagosomal compartment to the cytoplasm of infected host cells. LLO-negative mutants remain trapped in the vacuole, do not grow intracellularly and are avirulent in the mouse model of infection (Gaillard et al., 1986Down; Portnoy et al., 1988Down).

LLO belongs to a family of cholesterol-dependent, pore-forming cytolysins (CDCs) (Alouf, 2000Down). The best-characterized members of the CDCs are perfringolysin O (PFO) and streptolysin O (SLO), which are both secreted by extracellular bacterial pathogens: Clostridium perfringens and Streptococcus pyogenes, respectively. The three-dimensional structure of LLO is currently unknown but that of monomeric PFO has been determined by X-ray crystallography (Rossjohn et al., 1997Down). Replacement of LLO with PFO in L. monocytogenes results in a strain that is able to escape from a vacuole, albeit at a reduced efficiency, but that kills the infected cells (Jones & Portnoy, 1994aDown). Thus, LLO is apparently unique among the CDCs in that it can disrupt a vacuolar membrane, but does not kill the host cell upon growth in the cytosol. The molecular mechanism of LLO-dependent phagosomal escape of intracellular L. monocytogenes remains unknown. It is believed that a rapid degradation of LLO in the cytosol, controlled by host-cell-mediated degradation, may ensure that the host cytoplasmic membrane remains intact during infection by L. monocytogenes (Bubert et al., 1999Down; Moors et al., 1999Down). Several motifs or residues that might control intracytosolic degradation of LLO have been proposed and/or studied. In particular, a region rich in proline, glutamate, serine and threonine residues (called the PEST motif) has been identified close to the N-terminus of the mature protein. PEST motifs are thought to target eukaryotic proteins for phosphorylation and/or rapid degradation by the proteasome (Decatur & Portnoy, 2000Down; Lety et al., 2002Down; and references therein).

A series of immunological studies demonstrated that the induction of acquired cellular immunity is crucial in the elimination of L. monocytogenes. In particular, the generation of antigen-specific cytotoxic T-cells leads to the killing of infected cells. Intracytosolic multiplication of L. monocytogenes induces, in mice, strong MHC class I-restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses (Busch et al., 1997Down; Finelli et al., 1999Down; Sijts et al., 1996Down). One LLO epitope (residues 91–99) was shown to elicit a very large, dominant response (Busch & Pamer, 1998Down; Pamer, 1994Down; Pamer et al., 1997Down; Vijh & Pamer, 1997Down; Vijh et al., 1999Down; Villanueva et al., 1995Down). These studies provided the only direct evidence of a proteasome-mediated cytosolic degradation of LLO.

Correct cleavage of a CTL epitope by the proteasome is a crucial step in the formation of precursor peptides leading to MHC presentation, and a single residue exchange in the flanking region may abolish accurate proteasome-mediated cleavage (Beekman et al., 2000Down; Yellen-Shaw & Eisenlohr, 1997Down; Yellen-Shaw et al., 1997Down).

These observations led us to pursue the systematic analysis of the different motifs (or regions) comprised within the LLO sequence that may contribute to its biological activities. We addressed here the role of the CTL epitope region, focusing on the relation between LLO stability and haemolytic activity in broth; and phagosomal escape and cytotoxicity, in eukaryotic cells.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and culture conditions.
EGD{Delta}hly is a derivative of EGD-e (serotype 1/2a), which contains an in-frame chromosomal deletion of 1080 bp in the hly gene (Guzman et al., 1995Down). EGD{Delta}hly was transformed with the different recombinant plasmids by electroporation, as previously described (Park & Stewart, 1990Down). Bacteria were grown in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Difco) at 37 °C without antibiotics, except for the pAT28-transformed strains, which were grown on BHI broth containing 60 µg spectinomycin (Spc) ml–1.

Construction of the recombinant cytolysins.
Chromosomal DNA, plasmid isolation, restriction enzyme analyses and amplification by PCR were performed according to standard protocols (Ausubel et al., 1990Down; Sambrook et al., 1989Down).

Seven LLO mutants were constructed by site-directed in vitro mutagenesis. Residues R89 and K90 were changed to glycine residues (denoted LLO-RK/GG), in the region upstream of the 91–99 epitope. Four mutants were constructed in the KKKK downstream region, substituting to alanine: one, two, three or all four K residues (mutations K103A; K103A, K104A; K103A, K104A, K105A; and K103A, K104A, K105A, K106A, respectively). For simplicity, the corresponding proteins were denoted LLO-K1/A1, LLO-K2/A2, LLO-K3/A3 and LLO-K4/A4, respectively. Two types of mutations were generated within the 91–99 epitope: an in-frame deletion of residues 91 to 99 (mutant protein LLO-{Delta}91–99), and a substitution of the 91–99 epitope of LLO by the corresponding residues of PFO, which introduces four amino acid substitutions (Y92K, D94A, E97K and Y98F; denoted LLO-91–99P).

The LLO mutants LLO-RK/GG, LLO-K1/A1, LLO-K2/A2, LLO-K3/A3, LLO-K4/A4 and LLO-{Delta}91–99 were constructed by using the GeneTailor Site-Directed Mutagenesis System (Invitrogen). Mutagenesis was performed on pAT28-phly-hly according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

The LLO mutant LLO-91–99P was generated by in vitro site-directed mutagenesis on M13mp18-phly-hly as described previously (Lety et al., 2001Down). The mutation was then transferred onto pAT28, a Gram-positive/Gram-negative shuttle vector, by restriction enzyme excision from the replicative form (BamHI–SalI) and insertion into the corresponding sites of pAT28. All the constructs were checked by PCR sequence analysis. Recombinant pAT28 plasmids were transferred into EGD{Delta}hly by electroporation, as described previously (Lety et al., 2001Down). EGD{Delta}hly expressing wild-type LLO (LLOwt) was used as a positive control and EGD{Delta}hly as a negative control.

The mature form of LLO-K4/A4 protein was expressed in Escherichia coli with an N-terminal His-tag. For this, the portion of the mutant hly gene (carried on plasmid pAT28) encoding the mature form of the protein was amplified by PCR. The amplified product was cut with restriction enzymes BamHI and XhoI and inserted into the BamHI and XhoI sites of the expression vector pET28a (Novagen), downstream of the His-tag cloning sequence. The recombinant protein was denoted LLO-K4/A4 His-tag. The construct was transferred by transformation into the E. coli recipient strain BL21star (Invitrogen). Transformed bacteria were grown on LB medium containing ampicillin. Expression of the LLO-K4/A4 His-tag protein was induced by addition of IPTG (1 mM final concentration). After several hours of induction (up to 22 h), bacteria were harvested by centrifugation. The bacterial pellets were resuspended directly into SDS-PAGE loading buffer (typically a 2 ml culture was resuspended into 50 µl loading buffer) and the samples were boiled for 5 min before loading onto gels.

The primers used to create the different LLO mutants are listed in supplementary Table S1 (available as supplementary material with the online version of this paper).

Protein preparations and analyses.
Proteins were prepared from cell culture supernatants of bacteria grown in LB supplemented with 10 % BHI. Concentrated culture supernatants were prepared as described previously (Lety et al., 2003Down). Cell-free supernatants were filtered through a 0·22 mm pore size Millipore filter and concentrated by centrifugation through ultrafree Biomax units. The LLO-mutant proteins were identified by Western blot analysis, using polyclonal anti-LLO antibody. Identical amounts of each concentrated culture supernatant were loaded per well (except mutant LLO-91–99P, for which the concentrated supernatant was further concentrated by TCA precipitation).

Intracellular LLO analysis.
LLO produced by cytosolic bacteria was detected by immunoprecipitation with anti-LLO monoclonal antibodies SE1 and SE2, essentially as described previously (Lety et al., 2002Down). Briefly, monolayers of bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMM) from BALB/c mice, seeded into 60 mm dishes, were infected at a bacterium : macrophage ratio of 10 : 1. After 30 min, monolayers were washed and reincubated for 2 h. The medium was then replaced with methionine-free RPMI minimal medium containing 10 % dialysed fetal calf serum and 225 µg cycloheximide ml–1. After 30 min, monolayers were pulsed-labelled for 1 h with 100 µCi (3·7 MBq) [35S]methionine (Amersham). Cells were then lysed and LLO was immunoprecipated with anti-LLO monoclonal antibodies. The immunoprecipitated material was finally subjected to SDS-PAGE and subsequent analysis on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).

Anti-Listeria and anti-LLO antibodies.
The polyclonal anti-LLO serum was purchased from Diatheva. It was used in Western blot at a final dilution of 1/1000, according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The polyclonal rabbit anti-Listeria antibody (J. Rocourt, Institut Pasteur) was used in immunofluorescence at a final dilution of 1/200. Anti-LLO monoclonal antibodies SE1 and SE2 were kindly provided by Dr A. J. Ainsworth, Mississippi State University.

Infection of macrophages and microscopic analyses.
For confocal microscopy analyses, BMM from BALB/c mice were cultured and infected at a bacterium : macrophage ratio of 10–20 : 1 (Frehel et al., 2003Down). Growth in J774 macrophage-like cells was performed as described previously (Jones & Portnoy, 1994bDown) in the absence or the presence of gentamicin (50 µg ml–1 final concentration), at a bacterium : macrophage ratio of 50 : 1.

Processing for confocal microscopy.
Double fluorescence labelling of F-actin and bacteria was performed, using phalloidin coupled to Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes) and a rabbit anti-Listeria polyclonal antibody revealed with anti-IgG antibody coupled to Alexa 546 (Molecular Probes). Images were scanned on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope.

Cytotoxicity.
Monolayers of BMM from BALB/c mice, seeded into 60 mm dishes, were infected with the same ratios of bacteria per cell as those used for the immunofluorescence assays. Supernatants were removed from each well 4 and 6 h after infection and assayed for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity by using the Cyto Tox 96 kit (Promega), as recommended by the manufacturer.

Two independent experiments were performed. In each experiment, three wells were counted per point. Percentage cytotoxicity=100x(experimental LDH release–spontaneous LDH release)/(maximal LDH release–spontaneous LDH release). Spontaneous LDH release was measured in supernatants of non-infected macrophages. Maximal LDH release corresponds to the macrophages lysed after treatment with 0·9 % Triton X-100 (final concentration), for 45 min at 37 °C. The percentage indicated in the text corresponds to the mean of three wells of a single experiment. For example, the background of spontaneous LDH release was 348±13 (mean±SD) and the value of maximal LDH release was 9530±339. With LLOwt, after 6 h, a value of 4460±155 was recorded. The percentage cytotoxicity thus corresponded to 100x(4460–335)/(9530–335)=44·7 %.

Invasion assays.
The human colon carcinoma cell line Caco-2 (ATCC HTB37) and the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG-2 (ATCC HB 8065, kindly provided by P. Cossart, Institut Pasteur) were propagated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; 25 mM glucose; Gibco). Cells were seeded at 8x104 cells cm–2 in 24-well tissue culture plates (Falcon). Monolayers were used 24 h after seeding. The invasion assays were carried out essentially as described previously (Garandeau et al., 2002Down). Briefly, cells were inoculated with bacteria at an m.o.i. of ~50 bacteria per cell. They were incubated 1 h to allow the adherent bacteria to enter and were then washed three times with RPMI and overlaid with fresh DMEM containing gentamicin (10 µg ml–1) to kill extracellular bacteria. At selected intervals, cells were washed three times and processed for counting of infecting bacteria. Cells were lysed by adding cold distilled water. The titre of viable bacteria released from the cells was determined by spreading onto BHI plates. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate and repeated three times.

Infection of mice and virulence assays.
The virulence of the L. monocytogenes mutant strains was estimated by determining the LD50, in pathogen-free, 6–8-weeks-old female Swiss mice (Janvier). Groups of five mice were intravenously inoculated with bacterial suspension (0·5 ml in 0·15 M NaCl) in the lateral tail vein. Animals were pretreated with Spc (1 mg per mouse per day) in order to overcome in vivo instability of the recombinant plasmids, as described previously (Lety et al., 2002Down). The mortality was followed for 7–10 days. The virulence of the strains was estimated, using the graphic Probit method (Roth, 1961Down). For example, the LD50 of 105·5, recorded with the strain expressing LLOwt, corresponded to 100 % death at a dose of 106 bacteria per mouse (5/5 mice died within 1 week) and 0 % death at a dose of 105 bacteria per mouse; the LD50 of 107·5, recorded with the strain expressing LLO-RK/GG, corresponded to 100 % death at a dose of 108 bacteria per mouse and 0 % of death at a dose of 107 bacteria per mouse.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Expression of the LLO mutants by L. monocytogenes
Constructs.
Seven LLO mutants were constructed by site-directed in vitro mutagenesis (Fig. 1Down). Residues R89 and K90 were changed to glycine residues (denoted LLO-RK/GG), in the region upstream of the 91–99 epitope. Four mutants were constructed in the KKKK downstream region, changing one, two, three or all four K residues to alanine (Fig. 1bDown). Two types of mutations were generated within the 91–99 epitope: an in-frame deletion of residues 91 to 99 (mutant protein LLO-{Delta}91–99) and a substitution of the 91–99 epitope of LLO by the corresponding residues of PFO (see Methods for details).


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Constructs. (a) The LLO mutants. LLO-RK/GG: residues R89 and K90 were substituted by two glycine residues (GG, underlined). LLO-K1/A1: residue K103 was substituted by an alanine residue (A, underlined). LLO-K2/A2: residues K103 and K104 were substituted by two alanine residues. LLO-K3/A3: residues K103, K104 and K106 were substituted by three alanine residues. LLO-K4/A4: residues K103, K104, K105 and K106 were substituted by four alanine residues. LLO-91–99P: residues G91 to I99 were substituted by the corresponding sequence from PFO (the mutated residues are underlined). LLO-{Delta}91–99: in-frame deletion of residues 91 to 99. (b) Alignment of the N-terminal portions of LLO and PFO. Sequence alignments were produced with CLUSTALW (available at www.infobiogen.fr/services/analyseq/cgi-bin/clustalw_in.pl). The vertical arrow represents the cleavage sites of the signal peptides (experimentally determined: Lety et al., 2003Down; Tweten, 1988Down). Asterisks correspond to identical residues. Numbers to the right refer to amino acid position in the mature sequence. The putative PEST motif and the 91–99 CTL epitope are shaded in grey. The positive charges flanking the CTL epitope areboxed. (c) Alignment of the 91–99 region portions of several cytolysins. LISMO, listeriolysin O from L. monocytogenes EGD-e; LISIV, ivanolysin O from L. ivanovii; LISSE, seeligeriolysin O from L. seeligeri; STRP1, streptolysin O from S.pyogenes (serotype M1); STRPN, pneumolysin O from S. pneumoniae; CLOPE, perfringolysin O from C. perfringens. The positive charges flanking the CTL epitope are in bold. The conserved charged residues are shaded in grey. (d) Localization on the predicted three-dimensional model of LLO folding. The N-terminal (N-ter) and C-terminal (C-ter) ends of the monomer areindicated. D1,2,3, 4, refer to the four structural domains of the monomer. Domains D1–3 are in grey and D4 is in black. The CTL epitope atthe tip of D2 is in dark grey. A magnification of the CTL epitope region is shown to the right. The numbers correspond to theamino acid position (preprotein numbering) of the two clusters of positively charged residues, flanking the epitope.

 
As shown on the alignment of the N-terminal residues of the mature forms of PFO and of LLO (Fig. 1bUp), LLO residues 10–36 comprise a putative PEST motif (Decatur & Portnoy, 2000Down; Lety et al., 2001Down) that has no counterpart in PFO. The 91–99 epitope is located 40 residues downstream of this motif. In the cytolysins secreted by two other members of the genus Listeria, ivanolysin O from Listeria ivanovii (ILO) and seeligeriolysin O from Listeria seeligeri (LSO), the 91–99 epitope sequence is highly conserved, with only one E97Q substitution in ILO and one N96S in LSO (as compared to six, six and four substitutions in the cytolysins secreted by S. pyogenes (SLO) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (PLY) and C. perfringens (PFO) respectively; Fig. 1cUp). The KKKK cluster downstream of the epitope is fully conserved in the three cytolysins of the genus Listeria. In the other cytolysins, in spite of sequence divergence, at least three positive charges are conserved. The RK sequence upstream is not conserved, but at least one positively charged residue is present in all cases.

On the predicted three-dimensional model of LLO folding (Dubail et al., 2001Down), the 91–99 region is located at the tip of domain 2 (Fig. 1dUp). The turn corresponds to G95, N96, and is conserved in the LLO, ILO and PFO sequences.

Immunodetection.
The two mutant proteins LLO-RK/GG and LLO-K1/A1 were efficiently secreted in the culture supernatant of L. monocytogenes grown in BHI (Fig. 2aDown). The amounts of LLO-RK/GG and LLO-K1/A1 detected by anti-LLO antibodies in Western blot (Fig. 2bDown) were comparable to that of wild-type LLO (LLOwt). LLO-91–99P, which was also secreted into the culture supernatant, appeared to be significantly more degraded. The band corresponding to the full-size protein was less abundant than that of LLOwt (or LLO-RK/GG and LLO-K1/A1) and several additional bands of lower molecular mass, most likely corresponding to degradation products, were detected by the anti-LLO antibody in the supernatant of bacteria grown to stationary phase (Fig. 2aDown). These low-molecular-mass bands were not detected in the supernatant of exponentially grown bacteria (Fig. 2cDown), suggesting that LLO-91–99P degradation occurred mainly during the stationary phase of growth.


Figure 2
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Immunodetection and haemolytic activities. (a, b) Western blot analyses of LLO from L. monocytogenes. Concentrated culture supernatants from EGD{Delta}hly expressing LLOwt (WT), LLO-RK/GG, LLO-K1/A1, LLO-K4/A4 or LLO-91–99P were loaded onto SDS-10 % polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred electrophoretically onto nitrocellulose and detected with anti-LLO polyclonal antibody at a final dilution of 1 : 1000. (a) Ten microlitres of each concentrated supernatant from bacteria grown to stationary phase, adjusted to the same number of bacteria, were loaded per well (~4x108 bacteria), for LLOwt, LLO-RK/GG, LLO-K1/A1, LLO-{Delta}91–99 and LLO-K4/A4. For better visualization of the numerous degradation products in LLO-91–99P, a five-fold more concentrated supernatant was prepared (the amount loaded per well corresponding to ~2x109 bacteria). To the left of the figure, the numbers refer to apparent molecular masses (in kDa). The black triangle points to the full-size denatured monomer, the white triangle to minor LLO species and the grey triangles to the two major degradation products detected in the supernatant from LLO-91–99P producing strain only. (b) Decreasing amount of concentrated supernatant (adjusted to the same number of bacteria) from EGD{Delta}hly expressing LLOwt (WT), LLO-RK/GG, or LLO-K1/A1 were loaded. Numbers above correspond to the amount of concentrated supernatant (in µl) loaded per well. (c)Immunoprecipitation of LLO secreted by intracellular L. monocytogenes. Proteins were metabolically labelled with [35S]methionine during growth in BMM and LLO was immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-LLO antibody (see Methods). Cells were infected at rate of 10–50 bacteria per cell. LLOwt and derivatives were imunoprecipitated after 3 h infection. The full-length protein is indicated by a black triangle. The vertical bar below indicates the degradation products. The gel was scanned with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager and the resulting image was analysed with Imagequant software. The autoradiograph corresponds to 72 h exposure. (d) Haemolytic activities. The haemolytic activity of culture supernatants from exponentially growing bacteria at 37 °C in BHI medium was tested essentially as described previously (Jones & Portnoy, 1994aDown). Serial twofold dilutions of each supernatant (starting from 40 µl non-diluted sample) were tested on horse erythrocytes, at pH 7·4. The maximal OD450 value recorded was taken as 100 % haemolysis. {square}, LLOwt; {blacksquare}, LLO-RK; {blacktriangleup}, LLO-K1; +, LLO-91–99P.

 
Four mutant proteins, LLO-{Delta}91–99, LLO-K2/A2, LLO-K3/A3 and LLO-K4/A4, were not detectable by the anti-LLO antibody (in exponential or stationary phase of growth). We tested whether LLO-K4/A4 could be expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag (see Methods for details). Whole-cell extracts from IPTG-induced cultures were loaded onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels (data not shown). Both the anti-LLO antibody and the Ni-NTA conjugate detected a band corresponding to the full-size recombinant protein. This experiment demonstrated that the recombinant protein LLO-K4/A4 could be stably expressed in E. coli, confirming the assumption that it is produced but rapidly degraded in L. monocytogenes.

Haemolytic activities.
The haemolytic activities of culture supernatants of the EGD{Delta}hly derivatives were measured on horse erythrocytes (Lety et al., 2002Down). The activities recorded did not strictly correlate with the apparent stability of the LLO proteins in Western blot (Fig. 2dUp). Mutants LLO-K1/A1 and LLO-91–99P showed only a twofold lower haemolytic activity than LLOwt. In contrast, the activity recorded with mutant LLO-RK-GG was eightfold lower than that of LLOwt. No haemolytic activity was detected with the mutants LLO-{Delta}91–99, LLO-K2/A2, LLO-K3/A3 and LLO-K4/A4, confirming the Western blot observations.

Phagosomal escape and intracellular survival
Phagosomal escape and intracellular multiplication was first studied in BMM from BALB/c mice, by confocal microscopy (Lety et al., 2001Down). Bacterial uptake was monitored up to 4 h after infection (Fig. 3aDown). The capacity of the mutant strains to promote phagosomal escape was determined by calculating the ratio between the number of bacteria surrounded by polymerized actin and the total number of bacteria in infected cells. These values were determined on an average of at least 50 infected cells. After 2 h infection, ~33 % of the bacteria expressing LLOwt had reached the cytosol and were surrounded by polymerized actin (Fig. 3a, dDown). Phagosomal escape of the three mutant strains was even more efficient, with at least 61 % escape after 2 h. No bacterial multiplication and no actin polymerization were observed with the strain expressing LLO-{Delta}91–99 or LLO-K4/A4 (Fig. 3eDown).


Figure 3
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Phagosomal escape and intracellular survival. Cells were exposed to L. monocytogenes expressing LLOwt (WT) or LLO mutants at a ratio of 50 bacteria per cell. The kinetics of infection was followed by immunofluorescence microscopy over a 4 to 6 h period. (a) BMM. (b) HepG-2 cells. Intracellular multiplication was evaluated by determining the number of bacteria per infected cell. Each point is the mean of at least 50 infected cells. The assay was performed twice; values presented correspond to a typical experiment. (c, d, e) BMM. Images were scanned on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. F-actin isstained with phalloidin (green) and bacteria are labelled with anti-Listeria antibodies (red). (c) EGD{Delta}hly expressing LLO-RK/GG at t0 (similar pictures were obtained with the other LLO-derivatives at t0; not shown). (d). EGD{Delta}hly expressing LLO-RK/GG after 4 h infection (similar pictures were obtained with LLOwt, LLO-91–99P and LLO-K1/A1). (e) EGD{Delta}hly expressing LLO-K4/A4 (similar pictures were obtained with LLO-{Delta}91–99 or EGD{Delta}hly alone). Bar 10 µm.

 
We next examined, by the same method, the intracellular survival of the LLO mutant in HepG-2 hepatocytes (Fig. 3bUp). Bacterial uptake was monitored up to 6 h after infection. Phagosomal escape of the three mutant strains was also very efficient, confirming the BMM observations. After 2 h, the three mutant strains had already started to multiply. After 4 h, the percentage of bacteria surrounded by polymerized actin was roughly comparable with LLOwt and with the three LLO mutants tested, ranging between 49 and 71 %. After 6 h, the mean number of bacteria per infected cell was almost twofold higher with LLO-RK/GG and LLO-K1/A1 than with LLOwt and LLO-91–99P (with 8–9 and 5–6 bacteria per cell, respectively).

Altogether, the confocal microscopy analyses showed that phagosomal escape and actin polymerization were not affected in LLO-RK/GG, LLO-K1/A1, or LLO-91–99P, in a phagocytic as well as in a non-phagocytic host cell.

We also measured the kinetics of bacterial invasion in the mouse macrophage-like cell line J774 (Fig. 4aDown) and in the enterocyte-like cell line Caco-2 (Fig. 4bDown). Cells were inoculated with bacteria, and, at selected intervals, cells were processed for counting of infecting bacteria (see Methods). In J774 cells, intracellular multiplication of LLO-K1/A1, LLO-RK/GG and LLO-91–99P was followed over an 8 h period, in the absence (not shown) as well as in the presence of gentamicin (50 µg ml–1 final concentration). If any of the LLO mutants had damaged the host cell membrane, intracellular entry of gentamicin should have led to an inhibition of bacterial multiplication. The three mutants showed normal growth properties, in the absence or presence of gentamicin (Fig. 4aDown), thus indicating their lack of cytotoxicity. In Caco-2 cells, the three mutants also showed a normal growth over the infection period tested (Fig. 4bDown). After 3 h, bacteria started to multiply actively and during the next 2 h the growth rates of the mutant strains were almost identical to that of the strain expressing wild-type LLO, reflecting normal phagosomal escape and intracytoplasmic survival in these cells.


Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Invasion assays. Cells were exposed to L. monocytogenes expressing LLOwt (WT) or LLO mutants (LLO-K1/A1, LLO-91–99P, LLO-RK/GG), at a ratio of 50 bacteria per cell. The number of viable bacteria was determined by spreading onto BHI plates. (a) J774 macrophages. Invasion and intracellular multiplication was monitored over a 5 h period, in the presence of 50 µg gentamicin ml–1 (final concentration), essentially as described by Glomski et al. (2003)Down. (b) Caco-2 cells. Invasion and intracellular multiplication was monitored over a 5 h period as described previously (Bonnemain et al., 2004Down).

 
LLO expression in infected macrophages, cytotoxicity and impact on virulence
LLO produced by bacteria multiplying in infected BMM was immunoprecipitated with anti-LLO mAbs, after 3 h infection (see Methods for details). The three mutant proteins LLO-RK/GG, LLO-K1/A1, LLO-91–99P and LLOwt, were specifically immunoprecipitated by the anti-LLO MAbs (Lety et al., 2002Down). In all cases, a single major band was detected (Fig. 2cUp). However, the intensity of the major band detected with the three LLO mutants was weaker than that of LLOwt (37 %, 10 % and 5 % of LLOwt for LLO-K1/A1, LLO-RK/GG and LLO-91–99P, respectively: Table 1Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Immunoprecipitation, cytotoxicity, phagosomal escape and LD50

Immunoprecipitations (Ipp) were performed in infected BMM from BALB/c mice. Intensities of the LLO bands (%) were quantified by using the ImageQuant program. The value recorded with LLOwt was taken as 100 %. Cytotoxicity (LDH release; %) was determined on BMM from BALB/c mice, using the Cyto Tox 96 Kit (Promega). The values indicated correspond to 6 h infection. Phagosomal escape (%) was determined in BMM from BALB/c mice on an average of 50 infected cells. The values indicatedcorrespond to 4 h infection. Virulence (LD50) was determined by the Probit method after intravenous infection of groups of Swiss mice (five mice per point) with serial tenfold dilutions of the different strains.

 
To test a possible cytotoxic effect of LLO-K1/A1, LLO-RK/GG and LLO-91–99P expressed by cytosolic bacteria, we measured the release of a host cytosolic enzyme, LDH, in the culture medium of infected BMM (Lety et al., 2002Down). Less than 1 % LDH release was recorded in macrophages infected with the LLO-negative strain EGD{Delta}hly. In agreement with our earlier observations, ~44·7 % LDH release was recorded with the strain expressing wild-type LLO after 6 h infection, reflecting cell death (Barsig & Kaufmann, 1997Down). A comparable value was obtained with mutant LLO-K1/A1 (53 % LDH release after 6 h). The values recorded with LLO-RK/GG and LLO-91–99P ranged between 24·3 % and 31 % LDH release (Table 1Up). These results indicated a lack of cytotoxicity of the three LLO mutants tested.

Finally, the virulence of the L. monocytogenes mutants was evaluated in the mouse infection model by determining LD50, using the graphic Probit method (Roth, 1961Down). Groups of outbred female Swiss mice were inoculated by intravenous injection with different doses, in tenfold dilutions. As previously shown, EGD{Delta}hly is totally avirulent and expression of plasmid-encoded wild-type LLO restores virulence to the strain (LD50 105·5). The strains expressing LLO-RK/GG and LLO-K1/A1 showed a strong attenuation of virulence (>=100-fold decrease) and the strain expressing LLO-91–99P was almost avirulent (LD50>108) (Table 1Up).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mutations in LLO that lead to inappropriate activity in the cytosol may damage the host cell and decrease virulence (Decatur & Portnoy, 2000Down; Glomski et al., 2002Down, 2003Down; Villanueva et al., 1995Down). The identification of a putative PEST-like sequence close to the N-terminus of the protein suggested that this region might control intracytosolic LLO degradation and therefore prevent cytotoxicity (Decatur & Portnoy, 2000Down; Lety et al., 2001Down). However, the direct role of this region in cytosolic degradation of LLO is not yet established. In order to identify additional LLO motifs involved in optimal intracellular adaptation of L. monocytogenes, we focused here on the immunologically well characterized 91–99 CTL epitope region. Out of the seven LLO mutants constructed, only three could be detected in the supernatant of L. monocytogenes, indicating that the 91–99 region is important for protein stability.

Earlier studies on integral membrane protein had led to the notion of permissive and non-permissive sites in proteins (Charbit et al., 1986Down and references therein). A permissive site was defined as a site that accommodates local sequence modifications without complete loss of protein stability and/or functionality, whereas a non-permissive site does not tolerate changes without extensive protein degradation. According to this terminology, residues 91–99 can be considered as a non-permissive region of LLO. Due to the complex structural organization of the LLO molecule and to the conformational changes occurring upon interaction with a cholesterol-containing membrane (Schuerch et al., 2005Down and references therein), probably many other sites or regions of the LLO molecule are also non-permissive.

The KKKK stretch downstream of the epitope deserves particular attention since only a single amino acid substitution was tolerated. One hypothesis to account for this result could be that the loss of two positive charges in this region is not acceptable to maintain a stable structure. Based on the sequence similarities between LLO and PFO, on the folded monomer, the tip of D2 is close to the autonomously folded domain D4. Mutations at the tip of D2 may thus alter the proper interaction between these domains. The fact that the mutant protein bearing all four K residues changed to alanine (LLO-K4/A4) could be produced in E. coli suggests that the protein produced in L. monocytogenes is abnormally folded and therefore rapidly degraded by proteases (this may also hold for the other proteins that were not detectable).

While secreted as monomers by bacteria, the CDCs form oligomers upon binding to cholesterol-containing membrane. In the case of LLO, complete pore-like structures have been visualized on erythrocyte membranes (Jacobs et al., 1998Down). However, the notion of pore formation in the acidic phagosomal compartment, where LLO expression is induced, is as yet purely speculative. The mechanisms of LLO-mediated phagosomal disruption are probably quite distinct from the pore-formation process observed on erythrocyte membranes and may not imply any oligomerization. Indeed, in spite of a two- to eightfold reduction of haemolytic activity, the three mutants LLO-K1/A1, LLO-RK/GG and LLO-91–99P allowed efficient phagosomal escape and intracellular survival of L. monocytogenes, in both phagocytic and non-phagocytocic cells.

In conclusion, the present work showed that three LLO mutants bearing mutations in the 91–99 region, LLO-K1/A1, LLO-RK/GG and LLO-91–99P, could grow efficiently in vitro (in different cell lines) but had a severe reduction of virulence in the mouse model. This novel phenotype contrasts with that of mutants in the PEST region we had generated previously (Lety et al., 2001Down, 2002Down). Indeed, all the LLO-PEST mutants were secreted by L. monocytogenes in normal amounts and were fully haemolytic but they were all impaired to different extents in phagosomal escape. At this stage, one may hypothesize that both the PEST and the CTL region would control cytosolic LLO stability, limiting the possible toxicity of the LLO molecule produced during intracytosolic multiplication of L. monocytogenes.

Mutations reducing the cytosolic stability of LLO without altering intracellular survival of L. monocytogenes were not expected to impair bacterial virulence. The drastic effect of the mutations in LLO on the LD50 of L. monocytogenes could be due for example to reduced haemolytic activity. Indeed, the development of the infection leading to brain invasion requires an initial multiplication in the infected target organs and a subsequent transitory bacteraemia (Berche, 1995Down). Other mechanisms may also be involved in vivo, requiring specific LLO properties distinct from those necessary for in vitro multiplication.

Finally, from an immunological point of view, it would be interesting to monitor quantitatively the capacity of the stable cytolysins LLO-RK/GG and LLO-K1/A1 to be processed by the proteasome to produce CTL epitopes as well as their ability to trigger a protective immune response.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported by CNRS, INSERM and Université Paris V and the EEC (BMH-4 CT 960659). Catherine Raynaud was supported by a fellowship from the INSERM.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Alouf, J. E. (2000). Cholesterol-binding cytolytic protein toxins. Int J Med Microbiol 290, 351–356.[Medline]

Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A. & Struhl, K. (editors) (1990). In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: Wiley Interscience.

Barsig, J. & Kaufmann, S. H. (1997). The mechanism of cell death in Listeria monocytogenes-infected murine macrophages is distinct from apoptosis. Infect Immun 65, 4075–4081.[Abstract]

Beekman, N. J., van Veelen, P. A., van Hall, T. & 7 other authors (2000). Abrogation of CTL epitope processing by single amino acid substitution flanking the C-terminal proteasome cleavage site. J Immunol 164, 1898–1905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berche, P. (1995). Bacteremia is required for invasion of the murine central nervous system by Listeria monocytogenes. Microb Pathog 18, 323–336.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bonnemain, C., Raynaud, C., Reglier-Poupet, H., Dubail, I., Frehel, C., Lety, M. A., Berche, P. & Charbit, A. (2004). Differential roles of multiple signal peptidases in the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol 51, 1251–1266.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bubert, A., Sokolovic, Z., Chun, S. K., Papatheodorou, L., Simm, A. & Goebel, W. (1999). Differential expression of Listeria monocytogenes virulence genes in mammalian host cells. Mol Gen Genet 261, 323–336.[Medline]

Busch, D. H. & Pamer, E. G. (1998). MHC class I/peptide stability: implications for immunodominance, in vitro proliferation, and diversity of responding CTL. J Immunol 160, 4441–4448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Busch, D. H., Bouwer, H. G., Hinrichs, D. & Pamer, E. G. (1997). A nonamer peptide derived from Listeria monocytogenes metalloprotease is presented to cytolytic T lymphocytes. Infect Immun 65, 5326–5329.[Abstract]

Charbit, A., Boulain, J. C., Ryter, A. & Hofnung, M. (1986). Probing the topology of a bacterial membrane protein by genetic insertion of a foreign epitope; expression at the cell surface. EMBO J 5, 3029–3037.[Medline]

Cossart, P. (2002). Molecular and cellular basis of the infection by Listeria monocytogenes: an overview. Int J Med Microbiol 291, 401–409.[CrossRef][Medline]

Decatur, A. L. & Portnoy, D. A. (2000). A PEST-like sequence in listeriolysin O essential for Listeria monocytogenes pathogenicity. Science 290, 992–995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dramsi, S., Biswas, I., Maguin, E., Braun, L., Mastroeni, P. & Cossart, P. (1995). Entry of Listeria monocytogenes into hepatocytes requires expression of inIB, a surface protein of the internalin multigene family. Mol Microbiol 16, 251–261.[Medline]

Drevets, D. A., Sawyer, R. T., Potter, T. A. & Campbell, P. A. (1995). Listeria monocytogenes infects human endothelial cells by two distinct mechanisms. Infect Immun 63, 4268–4276.[Abstract]

Dubail, I., Autret, N., Beretti, J. L., Kayal, S., Berche, P. & Charbit, A. (2001). Functional assembly of two membrane-binding domains in listeriolysin O, the cytolysin of Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiology 147, 2679–2688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Finelli, A., Kerksiek, K. M., Allen, S. E., Marshall, N., Mercado, R., Pilip, I., Busch, D. H. & Pamer, E. G. (1999). MHC class I restricted T cell responses to Listeria monocytogenes, an intracellular bacterial pathogen. Immunol Res 19, 211–223.[Medline]

Frehel, C., Lety, M. A., Autret, N., Beretti, J. L., Berche, P. & Charbit, A. (2003). Capacity of ivanolysin O to replace listeriolysin O in phagosomal escape and in vivo survival of Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiology 149, 611–620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gaillard, J. L., Berche, P. & Sansonetti, P. (1986). Transposon mutagenesis as a tool to study the role of hemolysin in the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun 52, 50–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gaillard, J. L., Jaubert, F. & Berche, P. (1996). The inlAB locus mediates the entry of Listeria monocytogenes into hepatocytes in vivo. J Exp Med 183, 359–369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garandeau, C., Reglier-Poupet, H., Dubail, I., Beretti, J. L., Berche, P. & Charbit, A. (2002). The sortase SrtA of Listeria monocytogenes is involved in processing of internalin and in virulence. Infect Immun 70, 1382–1390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glomski, I. J., Gedde, M. M., Tsang, A. W., Swanson, J. A. & Portnoy, D. A. (2002). The Listeria monocytogenes hemolysin has an acidic pH optimum to compartmentalize activity and prevent damage to infected host cells. J Cell Biol 156, 1029–1038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glomski, I. J., Decatur, A. L. & Portnoy, D. A. (2003). Listeria monocytogenes mutants that fail to compartmentalize listerolysin O activity are cytotoxic, avirulent, and unable to evade host extracellular defenses. Infect Immun 71, 6754–6765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goebel, W. & Khun, M. (2000). Bacterial replication in the host cell cytosol. Curr Opin Microbiol 3, 49–53.[CrossRef][Medline]

Guzman, C. A., Rohde, M., Chakraborty, T., Domann, E., Hudel, M., Wehland, J. & Timmis, K. N. (1995). Interaction of Listeria monocytogenes with mouse dendritic cells. Infect Immun 63, 3665–3673.[Abstract]

Jacobs, T., Darji, A., Frahm, N., Rohde, M., Wehland, J., Chakraborty, T. & Weiss, S. (1998). Listeriolysin O: cholesterol inhibits cytolysis but not binding to cellular membranes. Mol Microbiol 28, 1081–1089.[CrossRef][Medline]

Johansson, J., Mandin, P., Renzoni, A., Chiaruttini, C., Springer, M. & Cossart, P. (2002). An RNA thermosensor controls expression of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes. Cell 110, 551–561.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jones, S. & Portnoy, D. A. (1994a). Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis in a strain expressing perfringolysin O in place of listeriolysin O. Infect Immun 62, 5608–5613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jones, S. & Portnoy, D. A. (1994b). Intracellular growth of bacteria. Methods Enzymol 236, 463–467.[Medline]

Kuhn, M. & Goebel, W. (1989). Identification of an extracellular protein of Listeria monocytogenes possibly involved in intracellular uptake by mammalian cells. Infect Immun 57, 55–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lety, M. A., Frehel, C., Dubail, I., Beretti, J. L., Kayal, S., Berche, P. & Charbit, A. (2001). Identification of a PEST-like motif in listeriolysin O required for phagosomal escape and for virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol 39, 1124–1140.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lety, M. A., Frehel, C., Berche, P. & Charbit, A. (2002). Critical role of the N-terminal residues of listeriolysin O in phagosomal escape and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol 46, 367–379.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lety, M. A., Frehel, C., Beretti, J. L., Berche, P. & Charbit, A. (2003). Modification of the signal sequence cleavage site of listeriolysin O does not affect protein secretion but impairs the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiology 149, 1249–1255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mackaness, G. B. (1962). Cellular resistance to infection. J Exp Med 116, 381–406.[Abstract]

Moors, M. A., Levitt, B., Youngman, P. & Portnoy, D. A. (1999). Expression of listeriolysin O and ActA by intracellular and extracellular Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun 67, 131–139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pamer, E. G. (1994). Direct sequence identification and kinetic analysis of an MHC class I-restricted Listeria monocytogenes CTL epitope. J Immunol 152, 686–694.[Abstract]

Pamer, E. G., Sijts, A. J., Villanueva, M. S., Busch, D. H. & Vijh, S. (1997). MHC class I antigen processing of Listeria monocytogenes proteins: implications for dominant and subdominant CTL responses. Immunol Rev 158, 129–136.[CrossRef][Medline]

Park, S. F. & Stewart, G. S. (1990). High efficiency transformation of Listeria monocytogenes by electroporation of penicillin-treated cells. Gene 94, 129–132.[CrossRef][Medline]

Portnoy, D. A., Jacks, P. S. & Hinrichs, D. J. (1988). Role of hemolysin for the intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes. J Exp Med 167, 1459–1471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Renzoni, A., Cossart, P. & Dramsi, S. (1999). PrfA, the transcriptional activator of virulence genes, is upregulated during interaction of Listeria monocytogenes with mammalian cells and in eukaryotic cell extracts. Mol Microbiol 34, 552–561.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rossjohn, J., Fell, S. C., McKinstry, W. J., Tweten, R. K. & Parker, M. W. (1997). Structure of a cholesterol-binding, thiol-activated cytolysin and a model of its membrane form. Cell 89, 685–692.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roth, Z. (1961). A graphic probit method for the calculation of LD50 and relative toxicity. Cesk Fysiol 10, 408–422.[Medline]

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Expression of cloned genes in Escherichia coli. In Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, pp. 17.37–17.41. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Schuerch, D. W., Wilson-Kubalek, E. M. & Tweten, R. K. (2005). Molecular basis of listeriolysin O pH dependence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 12537–12542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sijts, A. J., Neisig, A., Neefjes, J. & Pamer, E. G. (1996). Two Listeria monocytogenes CTL epitopes are processed from the same antigen with different efficiencies. J Immunol 156, 683–692.[Abstract]

Tweten, R. K. (1988). Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of the perfringolysin O (theta-toxin) gene from Clostridium perfringens and characterization of the gene product. Infect Immun 56, 3228–3234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vazquez-Boland, J. A., Kuhn, M., Berche, P., Chakraborty, T., Dominguez-Bernal, G., Goebel, W. & Gonzalez-Zorn, B. (2001). Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants. Clin Microbiol Rev 14, 584–640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vijh, S. & Pamer, E. G. (1997). Immunodominant and subdominant CTL responses to Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Immunol 158, 3366–3371.[Abstract]

Vijh, S., Pilip, I. M. & Pamer, E. G. (1999). Noncompetitive expansion of cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for different antigens during bacterial infection. Infect Immun 67, 1303–1309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Villanueva, M. S., Sijts, A. J. & Pamer, E. G. (1995). Listeriolysin is processed efficiently into an MHC class I-associated epitope in Listeria monocytogenes-infected cells. J Immunol 155, 5227–5233.[Abstract]

Yellen-Shaw, A. J. & Eisenlohr, L. C. (1997). Regulation of class I-restricted epitope processing by local or distal flanking sequence. J Immunol 158, 1727–1733.[Abstract]

Yellen-Shaw, A. J., Wherry, E. J., Dubois, G. C. & Eisenlohr, L. C. (1997). Point mutation flanking a CTL epitope ablates in vitro and in vivo recognition of a full-length viral protein. J Immunol 158, 3227–3234.[Abstract]

Received 9 December 2005; revised 25 January 2006; accepted 30 January 2006.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lety, M.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lety, M.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lety, M.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Charbit, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 Society for General Microbiology.