|
|
||||||||

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2 Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
3 Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Correspondence
Mary E. Lidstrom
lidstrom{at}u.washington.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Present address: Institute for Systems Biology, 1441 N 34th St, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of functions have been proposed for S layers, which in some cases have been experimentally confirmed (Beveridge et al., 1997
; Rachel et al., 1997
; Sleytr et al., 1993
). These include adhesion, enzyme attachment, prevention of adsorption of macromolecules, and cellular stability and rigidity (Beveridge et al., 1997
; Rachel et al., 1997
; Sleytr et al., 1993
). The surface layers of Deinococcus radiodurans strains SARK and R1 have been closely studied since the early 1960s, the initial interest being rooted in the extreme radiation resistance of these organisms (Thornley et al., 1965
). The role of S layers in this extreme resistance has not yet been demonstrated, but a role in response to radiation damage has been proposed (Gentner & Mitchel, 1975
). A diagram of the cell envelope structure in D. radiodurans as proposed by Emde et al. (1980)
is shown in Fig. 1
. Stacked upon the inner membrane face are a peptidoglycan layer, an interstitial layer, and the pink envelope. The pink envelope contains the S layer [hexagonally packed intermediate (HPI) layer and lipid-rich backing], lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, four to five carotenoids, and most likely the outer membrane (Kübler & Baumeister, 1978
; Thompson et al., 1982
; Work & Griffiths, 1968
). The outermost layer of the pink envelope is a long-chain carbohydrate coat, and in 510 % of the cell population it is only minimally present (Baumeister et al., 1981
; Emde et al., 1980
). Of the pink envelope components, the hexagonal network of the outer surface array has received the most attention. The S layer is predominantly made up of one protein, Hpi (Baumeister et al., 1982
; Peters & Baumeister, 1986
). It has been proposed that hydrophobic interactions are responsible for attachment of the S layer to the outer membrane in the backing layer, as well as for the association of the S-layer units (Thompson et al., 1982
). Although the HPI layer itself has been characterized relatively well, the mechanism of the unusually strong attachment of the HPI layer to the rest of the pink envelope has not yet been determined. Therefore, we performed phenotypic tests and conducted electron microscopy to determine the role of HPI and another potential S-layer protein, SlpA, in the maintenance of cell envelope integrity in D. radiodurans.
|
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chromosomal DNA preparation.
A protocol for chromosomal DNA mini-preparation from D. radiodurans was developed, based on the larger-scale method published earlier (Udupa et al., 1994
), as follows. Cells were harvested from 1 ml culture in late-exponential to stationary-phase growth by centrifugation for 2 min at 16 000 g in a tabletop centrifuge. Cells were resuspended in 500 µl lysis buffer, consisting of 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM EDTA, 0.2 M NaCl, 2 mg lysozyme ml1, 200 µg ml1 each of proteinase K and Pronase E (Epicentre), and 0.6 % SDS. Cells were incubated in this solution for 424 h, until lysis was apparent. Protein was removed by one or two extractions by phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (Roche), followed by one extraction by 0.5 ml chloroform. The upper layer was added to 1.2 vols 2-propanol and inverted 15 times to precipitate DNA. The DNA was collected by centrifugation or spooled onto a glass rod, washed with ice-cold 70 % (v/v) ethanol, allowed to dry, and dissolved in 50200 µl 0.1 M Tris buffer, pH 8.0.
Electroporation.
A new method for generating competent cells was developed and optimized as follows. Cells were grown in 50 ml TGY to early exponential phase (OD600=0.40.6), chilled on ice for 30 min, and pelleted by centrifugation at 4 °C for 8 min at 2700 g. Cells were then resuspended in 10 ml 0.1 mM HEPES buffer, pH 8.0, pelleted as above, resuspended in the same volume of buffer, pelleted again and resuspended in 5 ml of the buffer. Cells were pelleted once again and resuspended in 10 ml sterile ice-cold 10 % (v/v) glycerol, pelleted again and finally resuspended in 1 ml 10 % glycerol. Aliquots (100 µl) were frozen at 80 °C for up to 6 months. The highest transformation efficiencies were obtained when the cells were electroporated at 10 kV cm1 in a 0.2 cm electrode gap cuvette (data not shown). This voltage was routinely used with a capacitance of 25 µF and resistance of 200
. TGY broth (1 ml) was added, following by incubation at 30 °C with shaking for 1 h (plasmids) or 1218 h (to complete chromosomal insertion), and then plating to selective media.
Colony PCR.
A sterile platinum wire was used to transfer cells from a single colony to 20 µl PCR master-mix (Invitrogen), to which 5 % (v/v) DMSO was added. PCR was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen), with an additional 5 min at 95 °C before the first cycle, and an annealing temperature of 52 °C. Primers used are listed in Table 1
.
|
Generation of deletion mutants
hpi (DR2508) and
slpA (DR2577).
The allelic exchange vector pCM184 (Marx & Lidstrom, 2002
) was modified for use in D. radiodurans by cutting out the tetracycline-resistance cassette and the IncP origin of transfer, and replacing them with a fragment of pI8 (Meima & Lidstrom, 2000
) containing a promoter originally obtained from D. radiodurans SARK followed by the chloramphenicol-resistance gene, to generate pHMR173. This promoter is not found in the D. radiodurans R1 chromosome and was chosen to avoid undesirable recombinations within the chromosome. This vector was further modified by the addition of a minimal groESL promoter upstream of the kanamycin cassette but still within the loxP sites. The primers mini-PgroF and mini-PgroR (Table 1
) were designed to amplify the 48 bp region of the D. radiodurans R1 groESL promoter containing the transcription start site and the 10 and 35 regions. Each primer was designed to contain a DraIII site (in bold type in Table 1
) to facilitate cloning. The 72 bp PCR product was generated with the D. radiodurans R1 chromosomal DNA as template, cut with DraIII, and inserted directionally into the non-palindromic DraIII site upstream of the kanamycin cassette to drive kanamycin resistance in D. radiodurans R1. The insertion was verified by PCR. The resulting vector, pHMR186, contained multiple cloning sites on either side of the loxP-flanked kanamycin cassette. To generate the deletion mutants, PCR products were generated complementary to the regions upstream and downstream of hpi and slpA. Primers were specifically designed to delete the entire target genes, essentially as described by Marx & Lidstrom (2002)
. The PCR products were sequenced to ensure that no errors were introduced during PCR. The resulting allelic exchange vectors pHMR202 (containing hpi) and pHMR195 (containing slpA) were transformed into D. radiodurans R1, and colonies selected in the presence of kanamycin. To identify double-crossover recombinants, colonies were screened for chloramphenicol sensitivity on plates. Complete deletion was further confirmed by negative PCR tests with primers targeted to the 5' and 3' regions of each gene. Primer sets used in this study are listed in Table 1
. We also constructed pHMR179 expressing Cre recombinase on the D. radioduransE. coli shuttle vector pRAD1 (Meima & Lidstrom, 2000
), appropriate for generating unmarked mutants by excising the kanamycin-resistance cassette (data not shown).
Transmission electron microscopy.
Cells were washed with double-distilled water and fixed in modified Karnovsky's fixative (2 % paraformaldehyde, 2.5 % glutaraldehyde, 8 mM CaCl2 in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for 2 h at 4 °C. Samples were washed in cacodylate buffer and post-fixed in 1 % osmium tetroxide in buffer for 2 h at room temperature. Following three 5 min wash steps, cells were embedded in 1.5 % Noble agar and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (35, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95, 100 %). Blocks were then infiltrated at three concentrations of Spurr's reagent using propylene oxide as the transition solvent, and ending in 100 % Spurr's resin. Thin sections of samples were stained with 7 % uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate for 20 and 10 min, respectively. Samples were viewed using a JEOL 1200 Ex II transmission electron microscope operated at 80 kV.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Cells were fixed as described above, washed three times for 5 min with double-distilled water, spotted onto plastic cover slips coated with 1 % poly-L-lysine, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol to 100 %, and critical point dried. Samples were sputter coated with gold/palladium, and viewed with a JEOL, JSM 6300F scanning electron microscope at 15 kV.
Protein analysis.
Overnight cultures of D. radiodurans R1 and HMR195 were left without shaking for 1216 h to allow natural settling of cells. After settling, the supernatant of the D. radiodurans HMR195 mutant was cloudy and contained visible flocs, whereas that of the wild-type strain was clear. Proteins were extracted from 3 ml of the supernatants using chloroform : methanol (1 : 2). The D. radiodurans R1 wild-type pellet was resuspended in 25 µl SDS-PAGE loading buffer (Sambrook et al., 1989
), and the HMR195 pellet was resuspended in 50 µl loading buffer, and both were boiled for 5 min at 95 °C, after which equal volumes were loaded onto an 8 % polyacrylamide gel along with molecular mass markers (Fermentas). Three of the most prominent bands from the D. radiodurans HMR195 supernatant were cut out of the gel.
Gel slice digestion and protein identification were performed by the Proteomics and Spectroscopy Laboratory at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, by the following method. Proteolytic digestion of Coomassie-stained gel slices was carried out as described by Shevchenko et al. (1996)
. Following digestion, samples were desalted using a microC18 ZipTip (Millipore) and dried. Samples were then resuspended in 7 µl 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and analysed by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI MS/MS) with an LCQ DECA XP mass spectrometer (ThermoElectron), using an instrument configuration described by Gatlin et al. (1998)
. Data were collected in a data-dependent mode in which a MS scan was followed by MS/MS scans of the three most abundant ions from the preceding MS scan. MS data were searched against the D. radiodurans protein database (White et al., 1999
), using the software search algorithm COMET (Institute for Systems Biology). Protein identifications were considered valid if at least two peptides were matched to a protein and if the peptide matches had raw scores greater than 200 for +1 ions, 300 for +2 ions, and 300 for +3 ions, Z scores greater than 4, and percentage ions of greater than 15 %.
Shear stress survival assay.
Overnight cultures of D. radiodurans R1 and the deletion mutants in hpi (HMR202) and slpA (HMR195) were diluted to OD600 0.5 in 1 ml 1 mM HEPES buffer with 500 µl of 0.1 mm zirconiumsilica beads added. Cell suspensions were exposed to shear stress by vortexing for varying lengths of time (0, 30, 120 or 240 s). Survival was assessed by serial dilutions, spotting 5 µl aliquots of each dilution in triplicate onto TGY plates. c.f.u. were calculated from the spot of each dilution series with countable colonies. Because of the aggregation of slpA mutant cells, the survival rate was underrepresented at 0 min, but after samples were vortexed for 30 s, the colony count increased. To adjust for this factor, all cultures were normalized to the c.f.u. counts after 30 s of vortexing.
Growth in the presence of toluene.
Cells were streaked from frozen stocks onto TGY plates containing antibiotics, as appropriate. A single colony was grown overnight at 30 °C with shaking in 2 ml TGY broth with antibiotics if needed, and 0.251 ml was transferred to 25 ml TGY without antibiotics in a 250 ml flask. After growth overnight, the OD was measured using a Klett colorimeter (KlettSummerson) that had been calibrated to a spectrophotometer at 600 nm. Cultures were diluted in Klett flasks to the OD corresponding to early exponential phase (a Klett value of 2025, OD600 of about 0.160.2) in 12.5 ml TGY broth, and were capped with rubber stoppers. The initial OD was recorded and deviations in readings due to the vials were subtracted from this and subsequent readings. The cultures were grown with shaking at 30 °C and checked hourly until reaching a density of 4045 Klett units. At this point, the vials were briefly removed from the shaker to add the appropriate amount of toluene, restoppered tightly, and the stoppers were sealed with Parafilm to prevent loosening. The stoppers were not removed after this time, and measurements were taken using the Klett colorimeter until readings stabilized in stationary phase.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Deletion of the hpi and slpA genes
We first tested the expression of hpi and slpA in D. radiodurans R1 via RT-PCR, and obtained positive results (data not shown), indicating that hpi and slpA are actively expressed in D. radiodurans wild-type. In order to determine the possible roles of Hpi and SlpA in cell growth, morphology, and resistance to shear and solvent stresses, deletion mutants in both genes were generated, resulting in the mutants HMR202 (defective in hpi) and HMR195 (defective in slpA). We further attempted to generate a double hpi/slpA mutant, but these efforts were not successful, possibly due to alterations in the cell envelope that might have either interfered with cell competency or reduced viability during electroporation and CaCl2 treatment (data not shown).
Growth phenotypes of the HMR202 (hpi) and HMR195 (slpA) mutants
When grown in TGY broth at 30 °C, the HMR202 (hpi) mutant and wild-type demonstrated equivalent doubling times, whereas that of the HMR195 mutant was about twice the doubling time of the wild-type (Fig. 2
), although a similar OD was eventually reached after several days of growth. Mutant HMR195 (slpA) revealed a tendency toward clumping, with the clumps resembling highly disordered masses of cells under phase-contrast light microscopy (data not shown). Furthermore, we observed that one of the pair of dividing cells in D. radiodurans tetrads would often be much smaller than the other. This suggested that normal cellular division was impaired in the slpA mutant strain (data not shown). The colony morphology of mutant HMR195 (slpA) also differed from that of the wild-type: the normally smooth and shiny colonies instead appeared rugose and powdery, and were easily broken up with an inoculating loop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of supernatant proteins in the HMR195 mutant
If left without shaking overnight, D. radiodurans R1 wild-type cells settle at the bottom of the flask, leaving a visually clear supernatant. This is also true of D. radiodurans HMR202 (hpi mutant). However, in D. radiodurans HMR195 (slpA mutant) culture, flocs of material were visible, even after several days without shaking. To examine this material, proteins were extracted from the supernatant, concentrated, and analysed by SDS-PAGE along with the 2x concentrated supernatant from the D. radiodurans R1 culture. Much more protein was extracted from the HMR195 mutant supernatant compared to the wild-type supernatant, as seen on the gels (Fig. 8
). In particular, two bands of around 100 kDa, and one band of around 35 kDa, seemed to be significantly and specifically enriched in the mutant supernatant. The two 100 kDa bands (labelled 1 and 2 in Fig. 8
) and the 35 kDa band (labelled 3) were removed from the gel and analysed by MS (Table 2
). Bands 1 and 2 were both identified as the Hpi (DR2508) protein. The 35 kDa band was very clearly dominated by the DR1185 protein, annotated as an S-layer-like, array-related protein in the genomic database (White et al., 1999
). Together with the electron microscopy results, this suggests that the flocculent material in the slpA mutant supernatants consists of shed membrane components.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The structural phenotype of the HMR195 (slpA) mutant was much more dramatic. From the microscopy studies, it appeared that layers were peeling from the surface of the mutant cells. Tests for supernatant proteins in the HMR195 mutant revealed that these layers must have contained Hpi and DR1185, a protein annotated as an S-layer-like, array-related protein (White et al., 1999
). This phenotype is similar to that of the SlpA mutant of T. thermophilus HB8 (Olabarria et al., 1996
). In T. thermophilus HB8, SlpA is an S-layer protein possessing the SLH domain near its N terminus, which is implicated in having a role in attaching to the peptidoglycan layer (Olabarria et al., 1996
). The removal of this SLH domain has been shown to result in shedding S layers (Olabarria et al., 1996
). In D. radiodurans, the S-layer protein Hpi does not contain an SLH domain. However, our results suggest that D. radiodurans SlpA may provide this anchoring function. As it is not possible to identify the HPI layer in thin sections (Thornley et al., 1965
), and due to difficulties in determining the structure of such an extremely perturbed cell envelope, we were not able to directly discern which layers were peeling off. However, it is clear that the layers peeling away from the cell surface do not have the original curvature of the cell wall. It has been previously determined that the backing layer of the pink envelope, rather than the HPI layer, provides the rigidity and the curvature of the cell envelope (Baumeister et al., 1981
), suggesting that the SlpA protein interacts with the backing layer. The slpA mutant of D. radiodurans was also strikingly more sensitive than the wild-type and hpi mutant to both shear and toluene stress, resistance to which is known to be imparted by the cell envelope, thus underscoring the importance of SlpA in outer layer integrity.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baumeister, W., Kübler, O. & Zingsheim, H. P. (1981). The structure of the cell envelope of Micrococcus radiodurans as revealed by metal shadowing and decoration. J Ultrastruct Res 75, 6071.[CrossRef][Medline]
Baumeister, W., Karrenberg, F., Rachel, R., Engel, A., Ten Heggeler, B. & Saxton, W. O. (1982). The major cell envelope protein of Micrococcus radiodurans (R1). Structural and chemical characterization. Eur J Biochem 125, 535544.[Medline]
Baumeister, W., Barth, M., Hegerl, R., Guckenberger, R., Hahn, M. & Saxton, W. O. (1986). Three-dimensional structure of the regular surface layer (HPI layer) of Deinococcus radiodurans. J Mol Biol 187, 241250.[CrossRef][Medline]
Beveridge, T. J., Pouwels, P. H., Sára, M. & 22 other authors (1997). Functions of S-layers. FEMS Microbiol Rev 20, 99149.[Medline]
Couture-Tosi, E., Delacroix, H., Mignot, T., Mesnage, S., Chami, M., Fouet, A. & Mosser, G. (2002). Structural analysis and evidence for dynamic emergence of Bacillus anthracis S-layer networks. J Bacteriol 184, 64486456.
Emde, B., Wehrli, E. & Baumeister, W. (1980). The topography of the cell wall of Micrococcus radiodurans. Electron Microsc 2, 460461.
Gatlin, C. L., Kleemann, G. R., Hays, L. G., Link, A. J. & Yates, J. R., 3rd (1998). Protein identification at the low femtomole level from silver-stained gels using a new fritless electrospray interface for liquid chromatography-microspray and nanospray mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 263, 93101.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gentner, N. E. & Mitchel, R. E. (1975). Ionizing radiation-induced release of a cell surface nuclease from Micrococcus radiodurans. Radiat Res 61, 204215.[Medline]
Kübler, O. & Baumeister, W. (1978). The structure of a periodic cell wall component (HPI-layer of Micrococcus radiodurans). Cytobiologie 17, 19.[Medline]
Kuen, B. & Lubitz, W. (1996). Analysis of S-layer proteins and genes. Chapter 4 in Crystalline Bacterial Cell Surface Proteins, pp. 77102. Edited by P. M. U. B. Sleytr, D. Pum & M. Sára. Austin, TX: R. G. Landes.
Kuen, B., Sára, M. & Lubitz, W. (1996). Heterologous expression and self-assembly of the S-layer protein SbsA of Bacillus stearothermophilus in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 19, 495503.[CrossRef][Medline]
Marx, C. J. & Lidstrom, M. E. (2002). Broad-host-range cre-lox system for antibiotic marker recycling in Gram-negative bacteria. Biotechniques 33, 10621067.[Medline]
Meima, R. & Lidstrom, M. E. (2000). Characterization of the minimal replicon of a cryptic Deinococcus radiodurans SARK plasmid and development of versatile Escherichia coli-D. radiodurans shuttle vectors. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 38563867.
Murray, R. G. E. (1992). The deinococci. In The Prokaryotes: a Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria: Ecophysiology, Isolation, Identification, Applications. Edited by H. G. T. A. Ballows, M. Dworkin W. Hader & K. Schleifer. New York: Springer.
Olabarria, G., Carrascosa, J. L., de Pedro, M. A. & Berenguer, J. (1996). A conserved motif in S-layer proteins is involved in peptidoglycan binding in Thermus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 178, 47654772.
Peters, J. & Baumeister, W. (1986). Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of the gene for the surface (HPI)-layer protein of Deinococcus radiodurans in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 167, 10481054.
Peters, J., Peters, M., Lottspeich, F., Schäfer, W. & Baumeister, W. (1987). Nucleotide sequence analysis of the gene encoding the Deinococcus radiodurans surface protein, derived amino acid sequence, and complementary protein chemical studies. J Bacteriol 169, 52165223.
Rachel, R., Pum, D.,
marda, J.,
majs, D., Komrska, J., Krzyzánek, V., Rieger, G. & Stetter, K. O. (1997). Fine structure of S-layers. FEMS Microbiol Rev 20, 1323.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
Schmid, A. K., Howell, H. A., Battista, J. R., Peterson, S. N. & Lidstrom, M. E. (2005). Global transcriptional and proteomic analysis of the Sig1 heat shock regulon of Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol 187, 33393351.
Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O. & Mann, M. (1996). Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 68, 850858.[Medline]
Sleytr, U. B., Messner, P., Pum, D. & Sára, M. (1993). Crystalline bacterial cell surface layers. Mol Microbiol 10, 911916.[Medline]
Thompson, B. G., Murray, R. G. E. & Boyce, J. F. (1982). The association of the surface array and the outer membrane of Deinococcus radiodurans. Can J Microbiol 20, 10811088.
Thornley, M. J., Horne, R. W. & Glauert, A. M. (1965). The fine structure of Micrococcus radiodurans. Arch Mikrobiol 51, 267289.[CrossRef][Medline]
Udupa, K. S., O'Cain, P. A., Mattimore, V. & Battista, J. R. (1994). Novel ionizing radiation-sensitive mutants of Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol 176, 74397446.
White, O., Eisen, J. A., Heidelberg, J. F. & 29 other authors (1999). Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Science 286, 15711577.
Work, E. & Griffiths, H. (1968). Morphology and chemistry of cell walls of Micrococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol 95, 641657.
Received 3 March 2006;
revised 31 May 2006;
accepted 14 June 2006.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |