Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 153 (2007), 428-441; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2006/001297-0
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gunton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gunton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. E.
Microbiology 153 (2007), 428-441; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2006/001297-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology

Interaction between the co-inherited TraG coupling protein and the TraJ membrane-associated protein of the H-plasmid conjugative DNA transfer system resembles chromosomal DNA translocases

James E. Gunton1, Matthew W. Gilmour2, Kelly P. Baptista1, Trevor D. Lawley3 and Diane E. Taylor1

1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, 1-63 Medical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada
2 National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3R2, Canada
3 Department of Medical Microbiology, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA

Correspondence
Diane E. Taylor
diane.taylor{at}ualberta.ca


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial conjugation is a DNA transfer event that requires three plasmid-encoded multi-protein complexes: the membrane-spanning mating pair formation (Mpf) complex, the cytoplasmic nucleoprotein relaxosome complex, and a homo-multimeric coupling protein that links the Mpf and relaxosome at the cytoplasmic membrane. Bacterial two-hybrid (BTH) technology and immunoprecipitation were used to demonstrate an interaction between the IncH plasmid-encoded transfer protein TraJ and the coupling protein TraG. TraJ is essential for conjugative transfer but is not required for the formation of the conjugative pilus, and is therefore not regarded as an Mpf component. Fractionation studies indicated that TraJ shared a similar cellular domain to that of TraG at the cellular membrane. Protein BLAST analyses have previously identified TraJ homologues encoded in a multitude of plasmid and chromosomal genomes that were also found to encode an adjacent TraG homologue, thus indicating co-inheritance. BTH analysis of these TraJ and cognate TraG homologues demonstrated conservation of the TraJ–TraG interaction. Additional occurrences of the traJ–traG module were also detected in genomic sequence data throughout the Proteobacteria, and phylogenetic comparison of these IncH-like TraG proteins with the coupling proteins encoded by other conjugative transfer systems (including IncP, IncW and IncF) that lack TraJ homologues indicated that the H-like coupling proteins were distinct. Accordingly, the IncP, IncW and IncF coupling proteins were unable to interact with TraJ, but were able to interact with IncH plasmid-encoded TrhB, an Mpf component known to complex with its cognate coupling protein TraG. The divergence of the IncH-type coupling proteins may partly be due to the requirement of TraJ interaction, and notably, TraG and TraJ cumulatively represent the domain architecture of the known translocase family FtsK/SpoIIIE. It is proposed that TraJ is a functional part of the IncH-type coupling protein complex required for translocation of DNA through the cytoplasmic membrane.


Abbreviations: BTH, bacterial two-hybrid; Mpf, mating pair formation; T4SS, type IV secretion system; TM, transmembrane; UPGMA, unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial conjugation is a mechanism of horizontal gene transfer, which has both evolutionary and medical implications. Plasmids can represent a major contribution to overall genetic content, and conjugation is the principal route for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance determinants (Mazel & Davies, 1999Down). The conjugative pilus initiates plasmid transfer from the donor cell by recruitment of recipient cells. A membrane-spanning protein complex called the mating pair formation (Mpf) complex, which constitutes the greater part of the conjugative type IV secretion system (T4SS), enables the production of conjugative pili, and facilitates the transfer of plasmid DNA from donor to recipient bacteria (for reviews, see Cascales & Christie, 2003Down, 2004Down; Lawley et al., 2003aDown). Plasmid DNA is processed to a transfer intermediate in the cytoplasm by the relaxosome, a DNA–protein complex containing the relaxase and accessory proteins (Furste et al., 1989Down). The T4SS also includes the coupling protein at the cytoplasmic membrane, and by serving as the link between the relaxosome and Mpf complex, the transferring DNA strand contacts the cell envelope and then proceeds onwards to the recipient cell.

The incompatibility group HI1 plasmid (IncHI1) R27 is a large (180 kb) self-transmissible resistance plasmid (Sherburne et al., 2000Down). There has been some confusion over the years as to the origin of R27, but Datta & Olarte (1974)Down have clearly distinguished it as a plasmid characteristic of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. However, R27 and a related plasmid Tp117 have been isolated from Salmonella typhimurium strain 1M1407 (Lawn et al., 1967Down; Smith et al., 1973Down). The proteins required for R27 transfer are located within two separate transfer regions, Tra1 and Tra2 (Lawley et al., 2002Down, 2003bDown). Encoded within Tra1 are the relaxosome, the coupling protein and part of the Mpf complex, and the remainder of the Mpf is encoded in Tra2. Interactions between the relaxosome and coupling protein have been identified in the IncW, IncP and IncF plasmid families (Disque-Kochem & Dreiseikelmann, 1997Down; Llosa et al., 2003Down; Schroder et al., 2002Down). The coupling protein then interacts with the Mpf/T4SS at the cytoplasmic membrane through the TraB/VirB10 protein (Gilmour et al., 2003Down; Llosa et al., 2003Down). The R27 coupling protein is termed TraG, and this family of proteins has been structurally characterized. The hexameric ring structure of the IncW plasmid-coupling protein TrwB resembles the tertiary structure of a number of P-loop ATPases, such as the F1 ATPase, suggesting that this complex is actively involved in DNA translocation (Gomis-Ruth et al., 2001Down).

Three other essential genes encoded in the Tra1 region (traI, traH and traJ) are not required for the production of the H-conjugative pilus, and consequently are not components of the Mpf complex (Lawley et al., 2002Down). The TraI protein shares homology with the relaxase family of proteins, whereas TraH contains a DNA-binding motif and an N-terminal coiled-coil domain (Lawley et al., 2002Down). TraJ homologues from a variety of genomic sources have been identified (Gilmour et al., 2004Down), and an alignment of these homologues has indicated that the predicted four transmembrane (TM) domains are well-conserved among this family of proteins. A conserved module of traI–traG–traJ has been identified in each of the genomic sources that encode a TraJ homologue (Gilmour et al., 2004Down). Few of the TraJ-encoding genomes encode R27-like Mpf genes, suggesting that the module of traI–G–J genes can be inherited independently from other transfer determinants.

The objective of the present study was to identify additional R27-encoded interaction partners for the coupling protein TraG. Here, we identified an interaction between TraJ and TraG, and propose that because of co-localization at the cytoplasmic membrane, binary heterologous interaction, and co-inheritance with conserved domain organization of known DNA translocases, TraJ is a protein which associates with the coupling protein TraG and is involved in DNA translocation.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
Escherichia coli strains used in this study are listed in Table 1Down. All strains were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth, Lennox formulation (Difco) at 37 °C with shaking at 200 r.p.m., unless otherwise stated. Antibiotics used in this broth were as follows: ampicillin (100 µg ml–1), kanamycin (50 µg ml–1), tetracycline (10 µg ml–1), rifampicin (50 µg ml–1), nalidixic acid (20 µg ml–1) and trimethoprim (25 µg ml–1). For the bacterial two-hybrid (BTH) assay, conjugative transfer proteins were fused to catalytic domain fragments of adenylate cyclase from Bordetella pertussis by cloning into the BTH vectors pKT25 and pUT18C (Karimova et al., 1998Down). Plasmids encoding fused proteins were co-transformed into competent BTH101 cells, processed and analysed as previously described (Gilmour et al., 2003Down). Liquid conjugative matings and complementation experiments with a derepressed derivative of R27, which contains an insertion in the htdA gene that causes a derepressed phenotype, were performed as described previously (Lawley et al., 2002Down; Taylor & Levine, 1980Down). Complementation experiments with the F plasmid were performed similarly, with the exception that donor and recipient cells were grown at 37 °C, and mating experiments were performed at 37 °C for 16 h. For solid matings, conjugative transfer of RP4 and R388 plasmids was performed as described by Bradley et al. (1980)Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Abbreviations: Nalr, nalidixic acid resistance; Rifr, rifampicin resistance; Tcr, tetracycline resistance; Kanr, kanamycin resistance; Ampr, ampicillin resistance; Strr, streptomycin resistance; Cmr, chloramphenicol resistance; Tpr, trimethoprim resistance.

 
DNA manipulation and cloning.
Standard recombinant DNA methods were used, as described by Sambrook et al. (1989)Down. PCR products were amplified with terminal restriction enzymes added within the primer sequences (Table 2Down). Amplified DNA was initially cloned into pGEM-T (Promega), digested with appropriate enzymes, and subcloned into the expression vector pMS119EH/pMS119HE or the adenylate cyclase fusion vectors pKT25 and pUT18C. Restriction enzyme endonucleases were used according to the manufacturer's specifications, and digested products were resolved on agarose gels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Primers used in this study

 
Production of coupling protein homologues.
A His6 tag was incorporated into the primer design for coupling protein amplification, such that each protein contained a C-terminal histidine tag for detection of the recombinant proteins. E. coli strain DH5{alpha}, containing pMS119EH encoding each tagged coupling protein, was grown at 28 °C to OD600 0.5–0.7. The bacteria were induced for 1 h at 28 °C with IPTG at a final concentration of 0.4 mM. Whole-cell lysates were resolved on 10 % SDS-PAGE, and following transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, a primary mouse anti-His6 mAb (Invitrogen) and a secondary goat anti-mouse–horseradish peroxidase (HRP) antibody conjugate were used to probe for protein synthesis.

Immunoprecipitation.
Immunoprecipitation of R27 transfer proteins was performed as described by Couturier et al. (2006)Down. Briefly, E. coli DH5{alpha} cells containing the plasmid pUT18C-TraJ were co-transformed with pBAD33-TraGFLAG or pBAD33-TrhBFLAG for the interaction studies. Cells were induced at mid-logarithmic growth phase (OD600 0.5–0.7) with 0.4 mM IPTG and 0.2 % arabinose for 1 h prior to cell lysis. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in a threefold volume of lysis buffer [150 mM PBS, 7.15 % (w/v) sucrose, 1 % Nonidet P-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1/66 vol. 15 µg ml–1 lysozyme). The cells were frozen and thawed three times, and lysed cells were removed by centrifugation at 14 000 r.p.m. for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and anti-FLAG M2 agarose (Sigma) beads were added. The beads had been incubated at 4 °C overnight with rotation in a 5 % BSA solution to avoid non-specific precipitation. The supernatant and beads were incubated at 4 °C with rotation for 2 h. The supernatant was removed after centrifugation at 14 000 r.p.m. for 30 s, and the beads were washed three times with lysis buffer. The immunoprecipitate fraction was collected by resuspending the beads in 50 µl 1xLaemmli sample buffer (5 % beta-mercaptoethanol). Upon resolution of the cleared lysate and immunoprecipitation by 10 % SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with the anti-adenylate cyclase mAb 3D1 (List Biological Laboratories). This mAb is specific for the distal portion of the adenylate cyclase catalytic domain (aa 377–399) (Lee et al., 1999Down).

Membrane preparations.
Overnight culture (20 ml) of E. coli DH5{alpha} (pUT18C-TraJ) with ampicillin was used to inoculate 500 ml LB–Lennox broth. Cells were grown to mid-exponential phase at 28 °C and 225 r.p.m., and induced with 0.4 mM IPTG for 20 min. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (7000 g, 7 min), resuspended in 10 ml buffer A [10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.6, 5 mM MgCl2, one Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablet (Roche), 1 mM PMSF, 100 U micrococcal nuclease, 1 mg RNase]. One milligram of lysozyme was added to cells for 30 min on ice, and cells were lysed using sonication for 3 min (Fisher model 300 sonicator). Unlysed cells were removed by centrifugation (twice at 6800 g for 10 min), and this preparation was called the whole-cell lysate. The cytoplasmic/periplasmic fraction was obtained by ultracentrifugation (100 000 g for 2 h at 4 °C) and the supernatant fraction was transferred to a new tube. The resulting pellet containing the membrane fraction was resuspended in 1 ml buffer B [55 % sucrose (w/v), 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.6, 5 mM EDTA].

Immunodetection of proteins.
Protein preparations were boiled for 10 min and separated using 10 % SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and blocked overnight in 1 % (w/v) skimmed milk and 0.1 % Tween 20 in PBS. Membranes were probed with the anti-adenylate cyclase mAb 3D1, anti-DnaK mouse antibody (Stressgen) or anti-CpxA rabbit antibody (Raivio et al., 1999Down) for 1 h at room temperature, washed, and the secondary anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma) was applied. Detection was performed using the ECL kit (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Phylogenetic analysis.
Protein sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL_W (Gonnet matrix, gap penalty=10, extension penalty=0.2) (Thompson et al., 1994Down), and phylogenetic trees were constructed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPMGA) algorithm of MEGA3 (Kumar et al., 2004Down). To test the statistical significance of the tree, 500 bootstrap samples were generated from the alignment data.

Web-based computer programs.
PSI-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/), ScanProsite (http://au.expasy.org/tools/scanprosite/), TMHMM (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/), CLUSTAL_W (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/) and EMBOSS pairwise local alignment (Blosum40 matrix, gap penalty=10, extension penalty=0.5; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/emboss/align/) were used.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although it has been difficult to identify interacting partners within the membrane-associated components of the conjugative apparatus because of the extracytoplasmic locations of the interacting proteins, BTH studies with the IncH plasmid R27 have previously demonstrated an interaction between the coupling protein TraG and VirB10 homologue TrhB (Gilmour et al., 2003Down). Elegant studies have identified similar interactions between TrwB (coupling protein) and TrwE (VirB10 homologue) from the IncW plasmid R388, as well as VirB10 homologues in IncN and IncX plasmids (Llosa et al., 2003Down). In this study, BTH technology was used to investigate TraG and potential interactions with non-Mpf proteins TraJ, TraH and TraI, located contiguously in the Tra1 region of R27 (Lawley et al., 2002Down).

In vivo detection of the R27 TraG and TraJ interaction
The R27 relaxase gene traI, non-Mpf gene traH and non-Mpf gene traJ (encoding a putative membrane-associated transfer protein) were each cloned into the BTH vector pUT18C. The R27 coupling protein gene traG was cloned in the appropriate reading frame of the pKT25 vector, and the resulting gene product TraGAC25 was a fusion between the 78 kDa coupling protein and the C-terminal 25 kDa region of the adenylate cyclase catalytic domain. Screening for pairwise interactions using the BTH system did not identify an interaction that involved R27 relaxase TraI or TraH. However, co-production of R27 TraJAC18 with TraGAC25 allowed for functional complementation of the B. pertussis adenylate cyclase domains, which were initially screened by plating transformed BTH101 cells onto media containing X-Gal. More than 99 % of the colonies containing TraJAC18 with TraGAC25 constructs were blue within 48 h of plating. The BTH positive control (vectors containing leucine zippers) showed similar blue colonies, whereas the BTH101 cells containing empty BTH vectors were white. A standard Miller assay was used to quantify beta-galactosidase activity (Fig. 1Down). The in vivo interaction between TraJ and TraG was found to produce comparable levels of beta-galactosidase activity to those of the BTH leucine zipper-positive control (Fig. 1Down).


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. In vivo BTH interactions between the R27 coupling protein TraG and R27 transfer protein TraJ. Conjugative proteins were fused with adenylate cyclase domains and co-produced in BTH101. The BTH controls were BTH101 cells containing pUT18C and pKT25 (negative control), and pUT18C-leucine zipper with pKT25-leucine zipper (positive control). Liquid cultures of transformed BTH101 cells were analysed for beta-galactosidase activity using a Miller assay (Miller, 1972Down). Results of a representative experiment are shown.

 
Both TraG and TraJ contain multiple, well-conserved predicted TM domains (Gilmour et al., 2004Down), and to ensure that this interaction was not a non-specific interaction of membrane-spanning domains caused by overexpression of R27 transfer proteins, the R27 virB10 homologue trhB was cloned into the BTH vector pUT18C. The VirB10 family of proteins are cytoplasmic membrane-associated conjugative proteins that have been shown to interact with coupling proteins (Gilmour et al., 2003Down; Llosa et al., 2003Down). When TraJAC18 was co-produced with TrhBAC25 in BTH101, >99 % of the colonies were white after 48 h incubation on media containing X-Gal. The inability of TrhB to interact with TraJ implies that the productive TraG–TraJ interaction was not simply due to predicted co-localization of transfer proteins at the cytoplasmic membrane.

Immunoprecipitation of a TraG and TraJ complex
To confirm the interaction between the R27 coupling protein and TraJ, we purified R27-tagged protein complexes using an immunoprecipitation technique. The C termini of TraG and TrhB were fused with a FLAG octapeptide Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys tag. Cell lysates were prepared after co-production of TraJAC18 and TraGFLAG, and in the presence of Sepharose beads conjugated with anti-FLAG antibody, the TraJAC18 construct was precipitated by TraGFLAG (Fig. 2Down). The mAb 3D1, which recognizes an epitope in the 18 kDa adenylate cyclase fragment of B. pertussis (Lee et al., 1999Down), was used to detect precipitated TraJAC18. When TraGFLAG was omitted from the immunoprecipitation experiment, no TraJAC18 was recovered by the anti-FLAG bead matrix (Fig. 2Down), ensuring that TraJ was not bound non-specifically by a component of the immunoprecipitation reaction. Additionally, to ensure that the TraG and TraJ interaction was not due to overproduction of two membrane-associated proteins, TrhB was included in an immunoprecipitation experiment with TraJ. Although TraJAC18 was soluble and detectable in the cleared lysate prior to immunoprecipitation, TrhBFLAG did not precipitate TraJAC18 (Fig. 2Down). Furthermore, the inability of TraJ to interact with TrhB confirmed that the interaction of TraJAC18 and TraGFLAG was not due to non-specific interaction between the 18 kDa adenylate cyclase domain and TraGFLAG. The precipitation of a TraG–TraJ complex confirmed the BTH data, which showed that the R27 coupling protein interacted with the non-Mpf protein TraJ.


Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Co-immunoprecipitation of an IncH R27 TraJ–TraG complex. The cellular lysates (CL) of E. coli DH5{alpha} cells expressing TraJAC18 and TraGFLAG were mixed with M2 anti-FLAG affinity gel beads, washed, and resolved with 10 % SDS-PAGE. After transfer to nitrocellulose, the samples were probed with the anti-adenylate cyclase mAb 3D1, which detected TraJ in the immunoprecipitate samples (IP). As a control for non-specific precipitation of TraJAC18, cellular lysates containing TraJAC18 and TrhBFLAG, or TraJAC18 alone were mixed with M2 anti-FLAG affinity gel beads, and resolved as described above.

 
TraJ localizes to the cellular membrane
Sequence alignments of R27-encoded TraJ and TraJ homologues have identified that this group of proteins are similar in size (~220 aa), and contain four conserved hydrophobic TM regions (Gilmour et al., 2004Down). To determine if the predicted TM regions correlated with localization of TraJ to the cellular membrane, a fractionation study was performed on E. coli containing pUT18C-TraJ. Separation of the cytoplasmic membrane and outer membranes (M fractions) from the soluble cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions (S fractions), and subsequent Western blot analysis revealed that TraJAC18 associated exclusively with the membrane fraction (Fig. 3ADown).


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. TraJAC18 localizes to the cellular membrane. Bacteria containing pUT18C-TraJ were fractionated into a cytoplasmic and periplasmic soluble fraction (S), and a total membrane fraction (M). Whole-cell lysate (L) samples were also run on SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were individually probed with (A) anti-AC 3D1 to detect TraJAC18, (B) anti-DnaK and (C) anti-CpxA. There was evidence of non-specific banding with the application of the polyclonal anti-CpxA antibody.

 
To ensure the efficacy of the fractionation procedure, the M and S fractions were probed with antibodies specific for cytoplasmic and membrane-associated proteins. DnaK is a well-characterized cytoplasmic heat shock protein that is essential for {lambda} replication (Liberek et al., 1988Down), and an anti-DnaK antibody identified this protein exclusively in the S fraction (Fig. 3BUp). CpxA is a component of the Cpx pathway involved in the envelope stress response (see Raivio, 2005Down, for a review), and anti-CpxA antibody detected this protein exclusively in the M fraction (Fig. 3CUp).

Immunofluorescent analysis of the R27 coupling protein TraG has previously demonstrated a similar membrane localization (Gunton et al., 2005Down). Fluorescently labelled R27 coupling protein was visualized as discrete foci in the periphery of the cell. The discovery that TraJ is membrane bound and able to interact with the membrane-associated R27 coupling protein indicates that TraJ may act as an interacting partner for the coupling protein during conjugation.

Non-cognate coupling protein interactions with the IncH Mpf
Complementation of conjugative plasmids containing coupling protein mutations by non-cognate coupling proteins has indicated that the Mpf–coupling protein interaction is non-specific (Cabezon et al., 1994Down; Hamilton et al., 2000Down; Llosa et al., 2003Down). Furthermore, recent studies on the coupling proteins and VirB10 homologues from the IncW R388 plasmid, IncN plasmid pKM101 and IncX plasmid R6K have demonstrated that each coupling protein is able to interact with cognate and heterologous VirB10 proteins (Llosa et al., 2003Down). To expand upon these studies, the coupling proteins from the conjugative plasmids R27 (IncH), RP4 (IncP), F (IncF) and R388 (IncW) were cloned into the pUT18C BTH vector. When each coupling protein was co-produced in BTH101 cells with the R27 Mpf construct TrhBAC25, there were successful interactions between each coupling protein and the VirB10-homologue TrhB (Fig. 4ADown). The values obtained in the BTH studies of the interactions between the coupling proteins and TrhB were similar to those produced by the BTH leucine-zipper positive control. This seemed remarkable, given the low level of overall similarity shared between members of the coupling protein family. The coupling proteins from the RP4, R388 and F plasmids had similar levels of sequence identity with TraGR27: TraGRP4, 19.6 % identity over an alignment length of 749 aa; TraDF, 19.5 % identity over an alignment length of 845 aa; and TrwBR388, 20.1 % identity over an alignment length of 750 aa.


Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. BTH data for R27 transfer protein TraJ or the Mpf protein TrhB produced with the coupling protein from IncH (R27), IncF (F plasmid), IncP (RP4) and IncW (R388) plasmids. The BTH plasmid pKT25 was used to produce IncH R27–adenylate cyclase fusion proteins TraJAC25 and TrhBAC25. The coupling protein homologues were cloned into pUT18C, resulting in the expression of TraGH, TraDF, TraGP and TrwBW. Protein interaction was determined by assaying for the beta-galactosidase activity produced by co-expression of (A) TrhBH or (B) TraJH with TraGH, TraDF, TraGP and TrwBW. The BTH controls were BTH101 cells containing pUT18C and pKT25 (negative control), and pUT18C-leucine zipper with pKT25-leucine zipper (positive control). Results of a representative experiment are shown.

 
As the interface between coupling protein and Mpf is proposed to occur at the cytoplasmic membrane, an interaction was also investigated between the membrane-associated protein TraJ and the non-cognate coupling proteins TraGRP4, TraDF and TrwBR388. These BTH studies should have indicated if the lack of specificity in the coupling protein–TrhB interaction extended to the coupling proteins and TraJ, although a limitation of the BTH analysis is that the adenylate cyclase fusions may create steric interference that prevents interactions. The only in vivo interaction that was detected using the BTH technology was between the R27 coupling protein and the R27 TraJ protein (Fig. 4BUp). These data suggest that the coupling protein–TraJ interaction is specific to conjugative systems that encode traJ.

Because the coupling proteins TraGRP4, TraDF and TrwBR388 did not interact with TraJ in a BTH screen, and because TraJ is essential for conjugation (Lawley et al., 2002Down), it is unlikely that these non-cognate coupling proteins would be functionally interchangeable with the R27 coupling protein TraGR27 in context with the remainder of the R27 conjugative apparatus. To investigate this, E. coli DY330R cells containing an R27 traG insertional mutant were transformed with the expression vector pMS119 expressing C-terminal His-tagged TraGR27, TraGRP4, TraDF and TrwBR388. Immunoblot analysis confirmed expression of each coupling protein (data not shown), and RP4, R388 and F plasmids encoding coupling protein mutations were successfully complemented by the constructs expressing their cognate coupling proteins (data not shown). The TraG coupling protein from R27 was the only protein that restored conjugative transfer of the R27 traG mutant.

Functional co-inheritance of TraJ and TraG homologues
Bioinformatic analyses of the IncHI2 plasmid R478 have revealed that traG and traJ homologues are encoded by a number of genomic sources, including plasmids, conjugative elements and chromosomes (Gilmour et al., 2004Down). Similar genomic analyses were repeated, and adjacent determinants encoding proteins similar to TraG and TraJ were observed in 38 gamma- and beta-proteobacteria strains, including many members of the order Burkholderiales (Table 3Down). The newly observed TraJ homologues were all of a similar size (201–252 aa), and typically encoded four or five predicted TM domains. Phylogenetic analysis of TraJ homologues encoded within this co-inherited module revealed that the majority of the plasmid-encoded determinants clustered on a different node from the chromosomal determinants (Fig. 5Down). Not all of the presented sequences were fully annotated, so the genomic location (chromosome versus plasmid) was uncertain in some instances, although the majority of TraJ homologues encoded from a chromosomal source had an additional ~30 aa at the N terminus of the protein, and the traJ and traG coding sequences overlapped (Table 3Down). The protein sequences similar to TraG were also examined, and a tree with very similar topology to that of TraJ was observed, except that IncP, IncF and IncW coupling proteins, and Ti plasmid-coupling plasmid orthologue VirD4 were included, and these were divergent from the IncH TraG-like sequences (Fig. 6Down). This comparison of coupling protein homologues indicates that the IncP, IncW and IncF, and Ti plasmid sequences are distinct from the IncH-type coupling proteins, and the requirement for TraJ as an interacting partner may partly explain the divergence of the IncH-type coupling proteins.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Distribution of the traJ–traG module in gamma- and beta-Proteobacteria

The criteria for selection were gene products that were similar to R27-encoded TraG and TraJ (by protein sequence identity by BLAST, similar size in amino acids and similar number of predicted TM domains), and were also encoded by adjacent or nearly adjacent coding sequences.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. TraJ protein phylogeny. The bootstrap support values of the phylogenetic tree are from the UPGMA method. Accession numbers and other details are indicated in Table 3Up. The distance score scale bar is shown at the bottom.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. TraG protein phylogeny. The bootstrap support values of the phylogenetic tree are from the UPGMA method. Accession numbers and other details are indicated in Table 3Up. The distance score scale bar is shown at the bottom.

 
To ascertain if an interaction between the coupling protein and TraJ was a common feature within this module of traG–traJ genes, we selected representative TraJ homologues from different nodes in the TraJ comparison. TraJ homologues encoded on R27, R478, R391 and Pseudomonas fluorescens chromosomal DNA were cloned into the BTH vector pKT25. The coupling protein homologues encoded on each respective genomic source were cloned into the BTH vector pUT18C. The in vivo BTH interaction data demonstrated that the cognate TraJ–TraG interaction from each distinct genomic source was conserved (Fig. 7Down). The diversity of this TraJ–TraG interaction was further characterized by using the BTH technology to determine if non-cognate TraJ homologues interacted with each coupling protein homologue. As expected, the highly related IncH plasmids R27 and R478 encoded TraJ homologues that were interchangeable in interactions with their coupling proteins (Fig. 6Up). The R391 plasmid-encoded TraJ and TraG homologues were not able to interact with the respective proteins from the other three genomic sources. Intriguingly, the coupling protein homologue from the P. fluorescens genome showed a strong interaction with TraJ from R27. In contrast, there was no evidence of an interaction with the opposite configuration, in which TraG from R27 was tested with the P. fluorescens TraJ homologue.


Figure 7
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. BTH data for TraJ and TraG homologues. The traJ homologous genes from R27, R478, R391 and P. fluorescens (Pfl) were cloned into the BTH plasmid pKT25. The traG homologous genes from the same genomic sources were cloned into pUT18C, and co-transformed into BTH101 in a pairwise combination with each pKT25–TraJ construct. The BTH controls were BTH101 cells containing pUT18C and pKT25 (negative control), and pUT18C-leucine zipper with pKT25-leucine zipper (positive control). Liquid cultures of BTH101 containing the BTH vectors were analysed for beta-galactosidase activity using a Miller assay (Miller, 1972Down). Results of a representative experiment are shown.

 
Architectural evidence that TraJ is a functional part of the IncH-type coupling protein complex
During the search of GenBank for homologues of TraJ, we identified that TraJ has sequence identity to the FtsK/SpoIIIE family of proteins. The sequence and structural similarity of coupling proteins to FtsK/SpoIIIE-type proteins is already known (Errington et al., 2001Down; Wu et al., 1995Down). These DNA translocase ATPases are essential for coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division (FtsK; Weiss, 2004Down), or for mediating DNA partitioning during the process of sporulation (SpoIIIE; Wu & Errington, 1994Down). The similarity to conjugative coupling proteins is located primarily within the region surrounding the Walker A and B boxes, which are essential for nucleoside triphosphate binding and hydrolysis (Walker et al., 1982Down). At the N terminus of the DNA translocases, R27-encoded TraJ is 27 % identical over 110 aa, and has 20.1 % identity over an alignment length of 249 aa to Streptococcus pneumoniae SpoIIIE (GenBank accession no. NP_345365). This region of the DNA translocases contains between four and five TM domains that target SpoIIIE and FtsK to the site of cell division (Bath et al., 2000Down; Sharp & Pogliano, 2003Down; Wang & Lutkenhaus, 1998Down). This coincides with the well-conserved TM domains of TraJ, and an alignment of R27-encoded TraJ and TraG to FtsK of Shewanella oneidensis illustrates the domains with which the conjugative transfer proteins share homology (TraJ, 21.4 % identity over an alignment length of 243 aa; TraG, 21.1 % identity over an alignment length of 913 aa) (Fig. 8Down).


Figure 8
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Schematic representation of the homology shared by R27-encoded TraG and TraJ proteins with an FtsK DNA translocase, Sh. oneidensis MR-1 (NP_717901). Arrows indicate the region of FtsK with which the R27 transfer proteins share the greatest level of homology. The level of this homology is represented as a percentage identity with the alignment length represented in parentheses, as determined by EMBOSS pairwise local alignment. TM regions are indicated by hatched regions, as predicted by TMHMM. Walker A boxes determined by ScanProsite are on the left and Walker B boxes with the motif (R/K-X(7-8)-h(4)-D) (Walker et al., 1982Down) are on the right. A scale bar for amino acids is indicated.

 
The co-inheritance of the traG–traJ genes (and interacting gene products) within this module across multiple genetic elements suggests that both plasmid and chromosomal sequences share a common ancestor, but the cellular function of the chromosomal sequences has not been determined. Notably, many of these sequences are present in genomes that do not encode IncH-type Mpf components, indicating that traG–traJ forms a module that is inherited independently from the Mpf genes, and that the chromosomal determinants may be involved in functions other than conjugation. The majority of conjugative DNA transfer systems do not encode a TraJ homologue; however, in genetic elements producing both TraG and TraJ, the latter protein may play an essential role in the function of the coupling protein. We propose that the domains comprising TraG and TraJ cumulatively resemble the domain architecture of the FtsK/SpoIIIE DNA translocase proteins. This study confirms that TraJ and TraG interact in vivo, and it is possible that these proteins function together to transport plasmid DNA molecules through the cytoplasmic membrane.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Daniel Ladant, Institut Pasteur, Paris, for providing all of the BTH vectors and strains, and we thank Eric Lanka, Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Berlin, Laura Frost, University of Alberta, and Fernando de la Cruz, Universidad de Cantabria, for generously providing pDB127, pOX38 : : TraD411 and pSU1456, respectively. We thank Tracy Raivio, University of Alberta, for the generous gift of the CpxA antibody. We are grateful to Bart Hazes, Mark Peppler, Joanne Simala-Grant and Marc Couturier for revision of the manuscript. This work was supported by grant MOP6200 to D. E. T. from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). J. E. G. and M. W. G. are recipients of a training award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR), and T. D. L. is a recipient of a training award from both AHFMR and CIHR. D. E. T. is a Senior Investigator with AHFMR.

Edited by: C. W. Chen


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Anthony, K. G., Kathir, P., Moore, D., Ippen-Ihler, K. & Frost, L. S. (1996). Analysis of the traLEKBP sequence and the TraP protein from three F-like plasmids: F, R100-1 and ColB2. J Bacteriol 178, 3194–3200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Balzer, D., Pansegrau, W. & Lanka, E. (1994). Essential motifs of relaxase (TraI) and TraG proteins involved in conjugative transfer of plasmid RP4. J Bacteriol 176, 4285–4295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bath, J., Wu, L. J., Errington, J. & Wang, J. C. (2000). Role of Bacillus subtilis SpoIIIE in DNA transport across the mother cell-prespore division septum. Science 290, 995–997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bradley, D. E., Taylor, D. E. & Cohen, D. R. (1980). Specification of surface mating systems among conjugative drug resistance plasmids in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 143, 1466–1470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cabezon, E., Lanka, E. & de la Cruz, F. (1994). Requirements for mobilization of plasmids RSF1010 and ColE1 by the IncW plasmid R388: trwB and RP4 traG are interchangeable. J Bacteriol 176, 4455–4458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cascales, E. & Christie, P. J. (2003). The versatile bacterial type IV secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 1, 137–149.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cascales, E. & Christie, P. J. (2004). Definition of a bacterial type IV secretion pathway for a DNA substrate. Science 304, 1170–1173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Couturier, M. R., Tasca, E., Montecucco, C. & Stein, M. (2006). Interaction with CagF is required for translocation of CagA into the host via the Helicobacter pylori type IV secretion system. Infect Immun 74, 273–281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Datta, N. & Olarte, J. (1974). R factors in strains of Salmonella typhi and Shigella dysenteriae 1 isolated during epidemics in Mexico: classification by compatibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 5, 310–317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Disque-Kochem, C. & Dreiseikelmann, B. (1997). The cytoplasmic DNA-binding protein TraM binds to the inner membrane protein TraD in vitro. J Bacteriol 179, 6133–6137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Errington, J., Bath, J. & Wu, L. J. (2001). DNA transport in bacteria. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2, 538–545.[CrossRef][Medline]

Furste, J. P., Pansegrau, W., Ziegelin, G., Kroger, M. & Lanka, E. (1989). Conjugative transfer of promiscuous IncP plasmids: interaction of plasmid-encoded products with the transfer origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86, 1771–1775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gilmour, M. W., Gunton, J. E., Lawley, T. D. & Taylor, D. E. (2003). Interaction between the IncHI1 plasmid R27 coupling protein and type IV secretion system: TraG associates with the coiled-coil mating pair formation protein TrhB. Mol Microbiol 49, 105–116.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gilmour, M. W., Thomson, N. R., Sanders, M., Parkhill, J. & Taylor, D. E. (2004). The complete nucleotide sequence of the resistance plasmid R478: defining the backbone components of incompatibility group H conjugative plasmids through comparative genomics. Plasmid 52, 182–202.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gomis-Ruth, F. X., Moncalian, G., Perez-Luque, R., Gonzalez, A., Cabezon, E., de la Cruz, F. & Coll, M. (2001). The bacterial conjugation protein TrwB resembles ring helicases and F1-ATPase. Nature 409, 637–641.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gunton, J. E., Gilmour, M. W., Alonso, G. & Taylor, D. E. (2005). Subcellular localization and functional domains of the coupling protein, TraG, from IncHI1 plasmid R27. Microbiology 151, 3549–3561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guzman, L. M., Belin, D., Carson, M. J. & Beckwith, J. (1995). Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol 177, 4121–4130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hamilton, C. M., Lee, H., Li, P. L., Cook, D. M., Piper, K. R., von Bodman, S. B., Lanka, E., Ream, W. & Farrand, S. K. (2000). TraG from RP4 and TraG and VirD4 from Ti plasmids confer relaxosome specificity to the conjugal transfer system of pTiC58. J Bacteriol 182, 1541–1548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Karimova, G., Pidoux, J., Ullmann, A. & Ladant, D. (1998). A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 5752–5756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumar, S., Tamura, K. & Nei, M. (2004). MEGA3: integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5, 150–163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lawley, T. D., Gilmour, M. W., Gunton, J. E., Standeven, L. J. & Taylor, D. E. (2002). Functional and mutational analysis of conjugative transfer region 1 (Tra1) from the IncHI1 plasmid R27. J Bacteriol 184, 2173–2180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lawley, T. D., Klimke, W. A., Gubbins, M. J. & Frost, L. S. (2003a). F factor conjugation is a true type IV secretion system. FEMS Microbiol Lett 224, 1–15.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lawley, T. D., Gilmour, M. W., Gunton, J. E., Tracz, D. M. & Taylor, D. E. (2003b). Functional and mutational analysis of conjugative transfer region 2 (Tra2) from the IncHI1 plasmid R27. J Bacteriol 185, 581–591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lawn, A. M., Meynell, E., Meynell, G. G. & Datta, N. (1967). Sex pili and the classification of sex factors in the Enterobacteriaceae. Nature 216, 343–346.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lee, S. J., Gray, M. C., Guo, L., Sebo, P. & Hewlett, E. L. (1999). Epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies against Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase toxin. Infect Immun 67, 2090–2095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liberek, K., Georgopoulos, C. & Zylicz, M. (1988). Role of the Escherichia coli DnaK and DnaJ heat shock proteins in the initiation of bacteriophage lambda DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85, 6632–6636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Llosa, M., Zunzunegui, S. & de la Cruz, F. (2003). Conjugative coupling proteins interact with cognate and heterologous VirB10-like proteins while exhibiting specificity for cognate relaxosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 10465–10470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maher, D., Sherburne, R. & Taylor, D. E. (1991). Bacteriophages for incompatibility group H plasmids: morphological and growth characteristics. Plasmid 26, 141–146.[CrossRef][Medline]

Maneewannakul, K., Kathir, P., Endley, S., Moore, D., Manchak, J., Frost, L. & Ippen-Ihler, K. (1996). Construction of derivatives of the F plasmid pOX-tra715: characterization of traY and traD mutants that can be complemented in trans. Mol Microbiol 22, 197–205.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mazel, D. & Davies, J. (1999). Antibiotic resistance in microbes. Cell Mol Life Sci 56, 742–754.[CrossRef][Medline]

Miller, J. H. (1972). Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Raivio, T. L. (2005). Envelope stress responses and Gram-negative bacterial pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol 56, 1119–1128.[CrossRef][Medline]

Raivio, T. L., Popkin, D. L. & Silhavy, T. J. (1999). The Cpx envelope stress response is controlled by amplification and feedback inhibition. J Bacteriol 181, 5263–5272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Schroder, G., Krause, S., Zechner, E. L., Traxler, B., Yeo, H. J., Lurz, R., Waksman, G. & Lanka, E. (2002). TraG-like proteins of DNA transfer systems and of the Helicobacter pylori type IV secretion system: inner membrane gate for exported substrates? J Bacteriol 184, 2767–2779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sharp, M. D. & Pogliano, K. (2003). The membrane domain of SpoIIIE is required for membrane fusion during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. J Bacteriol 185, 2005–2008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sherburne, C. K., Lawley, T. D., Gilmour, M. W., Blattner, F. R., Burland, V., Grotbeck, E., Rose, D. J. & Taylor, D. E. (2000). The complete DNA sequence and analysis of R27, a large IncHI plasmid from Salmonella typhi that is temperature sensitive for transfer. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 2177–2186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith, H. R., Grindley, N. D. F., Humphreys, G. O. & Anderson, E. S. (1973). Interactions of group H resistance factors with the F factor. J Bacteriol 115, 623–628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Strack, B., Lessl, M., Calendar, R. & Lanka, E. (1992). A common sequence motif, -E-G-Y-A-T-A-, identified within the primase domains of plasmid-encoded I- and P-type DNA primases and the alpha protein of the Escherichia coli satellite phage P4. J Biol Chem 267, 13062–13072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Taylor, D. E. (1983). Transfer-defective and tetracycline-sensitive mutants of the incompatibility group HI plasmid R27 generated by insertion of transposon 7. Plasmid 9, 227–239.[CrossRef][Medline]

Taylor, D. E. & Levine, J. G. (1980). Studies of temperature-sensitive transfer and maintenance of H incompatibility group plasmids. J Gen Microbiol 116, 475–484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walker, J. E., Saraste, M., Runswick, M. J. & Gay, N. J. (1982). Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J 1, 945–951.[Medline]

Wang, L. & Lutkenhaus, J. (1998). FtsK is an essential cell division protein that is localized to the septum and induced as part of the SOS response. Mol Microbiol 29, 731–740.[CrossRef][Medline]

Weiss, D. S. (2004). Bacterial cell division and the septal ring. Mol Microbiol 54, 588–597.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wu, L. J. & Errington, J. (1994). Bacillus subtilis SpoIIIE protein required for DNA segregation during asymmetric cell division. Science 264, 572–575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wu, L. J., Lewis, P. J., Allmansberger, R., Hauser, P. M. & Errington, J. (1995). A conjugation-like mechanism for prespore chromosome partitioning during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 9, 1316–1326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu, B., Ellis, H. M., Lee, E. C., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G. & Court, D. L. (2000). An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 5978–5983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 16 August 2006; revised 16 October 2006; accepted 16 October 2006.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
L. Ding, Y. Wang, Y. Hu, S. Atkinson, P. Williams, and S. Chen
Functional characterization of FlgM in the regulation of flagellar synthesis and motility in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis
Microbiology, June 1, 2009; 155(6): 1890 - 1900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
R. J. F. Haft, E. G. Gachelet, T. Nguyen, L. Toussaint, D. Chivian, and B. Traxler
In Vivo Oligomerization of the F Conjugative Coupling Protein TraD
J. Bacteriol., September 15, 2007; 189(18): 6626 - 6634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gunton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gunton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 Society for General Microbiology.