Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Microbiology 153 (2007), 667-675; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2006/003673-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology

The Bacillus subtilis NatK–NatR two-component system regulates expression of the natAB operon encoding an ABC transporter for sodium ion extrusion

Mitsuo Ogura, Kensuke Tsukahara, Kentaro Hayashi and Teruo Tanaka

Institute of Oceanic Research and Development, Tokai University, 3-20-1 Orido-Shimizu, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan

Correspondence
Mitsuo Ogura
oguram{at}scc.u-tokai.ac.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A previous microarray analysis suggested that multicopy yccH, encoding a function-unknown response regulator, enhances expression of natAB, which encodes a two-gene ATP-binding cassette transporter involved in the extrusion of sodium ions. The two-component regulatory system YccG–YccH was therefore renamed NatK–NatR. Here, this observation was confirmed by a lacZ fusion analysis using a strain carrying natA–lacZ. Further, in both natK and natR mutants, natA–lacZ expression was completely abolished, indicating that the NatK–NatR system positively regulates the expression of natAB. In a gel retardation analysis, NatR bound to the natA promoter region. Using purified His-tagged NatR, DNase I footprinting analysis of the natA promoter region suggested that a direct repeat of [TTCA(G)CGACA], separated by a 12 bp space, would be recognized by NatR. Deleted and mutagenized promoter regions of natA were analysed using a lacZ fusion, and it was confirmed that the direct repeat is critical for natA activation by NatR.


Abbreviations: ABC, ATP-binding cassette

A supplementary figure showing the structure of plasmid pDG-N17 is available with the online version of this paper.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacteria employ elaborate signal transduction mechanisms to respond to environmental fluctuations. The two-component systems are a large family of proteins, and they are typically composed of a sensor kinase and its cognate response regulator (Stock et al., 2000Down). The catalytic part of the kinase autophosphorylates a histidine residue in response to an environmental signal. The phosphoryl group is then transferred to a conserved aspartate residue on the cognate response regulator, which acts as a transcription factor in most cases.

In the Bacillus subtilis genome, 35 response regulators, and 30 operonic kinase-regulator pairs, have been identified (Kunst et al., 1997Down). Following the completion of genomic sequencing, several newly identified operons that encode two-component systems have been characterized, e.g. the BceRS, CitST, CssSR, DesKR, GlnKL, LiaRS, MalKR, YdbFG, YdfHI, YxdJK and YycFG systems (Aguilar et al., 2001Down; Asai et al., 2000Down; Doan et al., 2003Down; Fukuchi et al., 2000Down; Hyyrylainen et al., 2001Down; Joseph et al., 2004Down; Mascher et al., 2004Down; Ohki et al., 2003Down; Satomura et al., 2005Down; Serizawa & Sekiguchi, 2005Down; Tanaka et al., 2003Down; Yamamoto et al., 2000Down). In addition, close relationships have been identified between some operons encoding two-component systems and genes for ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter homologues, e.g. YccGH, YclJK, YfiJK, YvcPQ, YvfTU and YxdJK (Joseph et al., 2002Down).

Comprehensive DNA microarray analyses of response regulators, using gene amplification in a sensor-deficient strain, have contributed to the identification of the target genes for these systems (Kobayashi et al., 2001Down; Ogura et al., 2001Down). In those studies, the NatR (YccH) response regulator was identified as an activator for the natAB operon encoding a two-gene ABC transporter involved in Na+ extrusion (Cheng et al., 1997Down; Kobayashi et al., 2001Down). This ABC transporter is a member of a small subfamily named ABC-2, which includes the two-component daunomycin- and doxorubicin-efflux system in Streptomyces peucetius Drr (Guilfoile & Hutchinson, 1991Down; Reizer et al., 1992Down). It has been reported that NatAB has a physiological role in Na+ resistance at alkaline pH, since a high concentration of cellular Na+ is toxic to the cell, and plays a role in ethanol resistance at neutral pH (Cheng et al., 1997Down; Padan & Schuldiner, 1994Down).

In this paper, we investigated whether or not NatK–NatR (formerly YccG–YccH) positively regulates the natAB operon. Gel retardation and footprint assays revealed direct binding of NatR to the promoter of natAB. Furthermore, we investigated the role of a direct repeat sequence, located within the natA promoter, in NatR recognition.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and culture media.
All the B. subtilis strains used for this study are listed in Table 1Down. One-step competence medium (MC) was used for the determination of beta-galactosidase activity (Ogura & Tanaka, 1996Down; Ogura et al., 1997Down). TKM medium was used for growth tests in the presence of NaCl or ethanol (Cheng et al., 1997Down). Escherichia coli JM103 cells for DNA manipulation were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium. Concentrations of antibiotics used have been described previously (Ogura & Tanaka, 1996Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Strains and plasmids used for this study

 
Plasmid construction.
Synthetic oligonucleotides were commercially prepared by the Tsukuba Oligo Service (Ibaraki, Japan). The plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Tables 1 and 2UpDown, respectively. The vector pMutInIII (Vagner et al., 1998Down), and a PCR product spanning the 310 bp upstream region from the first nucleotide of the 24th codon of natA, prepared using the natA-FH and natA-RB primers, were digested with HindIII and BglII, and ligated to form pMutIn-natA. To construct pDG-N17 (see supplementary Fig. S1, available with the online version of this paper), pDG-His-degU (Shimane & Ogura, 2004Down) was digested with BamHI, and the large fragment was ligated with a double-stranded oligonucleotide, made by annealing single-stranded NotI-I and NotI-II oligonucleotides, after which the reaction mixture was used to transform E. coli. The presence of the 6x His tag, followed by the BamHI–NotI sites, on pDG-N17 was confirmed by sequencing using a 377 DNA Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer), and a Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). In order to construct pDG-N17-natR, which has a histidine tag at the N-terminus of NatR, pDG-N17 and a PCR product, prepared using the NatR-Bam and NatR-NotI primers, were digested with BamHI and NotI, and ligated. Sequencing of the cloned fragment in pDG-N17-natR confirmed the absence of PCR amplification errors. The plasmid pPhl2 (Ogura et al., 1997Down), and a PCR product prepared using the natK-E and natK-Sa primers, were digested with EcoRI and SalI, and ligated to form pPhl2-natK. PCR products were prepared using the primer pairs NatA-pISB1 and NatA-pISH, NatA-pISB2 and NatA-pISH, NatA-pISB2M and NatA-pISH, NatA-pISB3 and NatA-pISH, and YccK-pISB and YccK-pISH. The fragments were digested with BamHI and HindIII, and ligated into the similarly digested pIS284, in order to construct pIS-natA1, pIS-natA2, pIS-natA2M, pIS-natA3 and pIS-yccK, respectively. The plasmid pIS-natA1M was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis of pIS-natA1 using the oligonucleotide-based PCR method described previously (NatA-pISB1, NatA-M1, NatA-M2 and NatA-pISH; Ogura & Tanaka, 1996Down). The sequences cloned into pIS284 were confirmed by sequencing.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Oligonucleotides used for this study

 
Construction of strains.
The natR-disruption mutant was constructed by homologous recombination with PCR fragments containing the upstream and downstream regions of natR, flanking a chloramphenicol-resistance gene. PCR amplification of the upstream and downstream regions of natR was conducted using the primers natR-F1 and natR-R1, and natR-F2 and natR-R2, respectively. PCR amplification of the chloramphenicol-resistance gene from pCBB31 was conducted using the primers pUC-F and pUC-R. The three PCR fragments were used as templates for a PCR reaction with the primers natR-F1 and natR-R2, and the amplified DNA fragment was used to transform B. subtilis 168. Disruption of natR in the resulting chloramphenicol-resistant strain was confirmed by PCR.

Primer-extension analysis.
The isolation of total RNA, and primer-extension analysis, were performed as described previously (Yoshida et al., 2001Down; Ogura & Tanaka, 1996Down; respectively). Sequencing was performed using a Cycle sequencing kit (Toyobo), and detection of biotinylated DNA was performed using a chemiluminescence DNA detection kit (Toyobo).

Protein purification.
The induction and purification procedures for preparation of protein expressed in E. coli have been described previously (Ogura et al., 2003Down; Shimane & Ogura, 2004Down). His-tagged NatR was expressed as a soluble protein in E. coli M15 cells carrying pRep4, and step-wise elution with imidazole from a Ni-affinity column was used for the purification. Following SDS-PAGE analysis of fractions, the purified protein was dialysed against TEDG buffer (Mukai et al., 1990Down).

Gel shift and DNase I footprinting assays.
We used biotinylated DNA probes for the gel shift assay (Ogura et al., 2003Down); the DNase I footprinting assay was carried out as described previously (Hayashi et al., 2005Down).

beta-Galactosidase assays.
Samples were taken at hourly intervals, and the level of beta-galactosidase activity was determined as described previously (Ogura & Tanaka, 1996Down).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Confirmation of the DNA microarray analysis results
Our DNA microarray analysis of the NatR response regulator, using a multicopy plasmid expressing natR in the natK mutant, showed three candidate gene targets for NatR located in tandem (natA, natB and yccK; Kobayashi et al., 2001Down). Northern analysis has indicated that natA forms an operon with natB, but not with yccK located immediately downstream of natAB (Cheng et al., 1997Down). There is no ORF immediate downstream of yccK on the same DNA strand, and this strongly suggests that yccK is monocistronic. This notion was reinforced by two observations. (1) The presence of a putative rho-independent terminator downstream of natB (Fig. 1aDown; Cheng et al., 1997Down). (2) The promoter activity of the yccK upstream region at an ectopic amyE locus; yccK shows a temporal expression pattern that is different from that of natA–lacZ (data not shown). YccK is predicted to encode a soluble protein with similarity to members of the aldo/keto reductase family (BSORF; http://bacillus.genome.jp/).


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Structure of the natAB region, and expression of natA–lacZ in wild-type, natK and natR cells. (a) P, phosphoryl groups; boxes, genes; ovals, NatR proteins; stem–loop structures, rho-independent terminators; bent arrows, promoters; SK, sensor kinase; RR, response regulator. (b, c) Cells were grown in MC medium and beta-galactosidase activities were determined. Labels on the x-axis represent growth time in hours relative to the end of vegetative growth (t0). All strains carried a transcriptional natA–lacZ fusion. The result shown is a representative experiment from at least three independent experiments. (b) Open and filled symbols correspond to the presence and absence of 1 mM IPTG, respectively. Circles, OAM298 (wild-type) carrying pDG148-natR; squares, OAM269 (natK) carrying pDG148-natR. (c) Open circles, OAM298 (wild-type); open squares, OAM269 (natK); filled circles, OAM270 (natR).

 
A multicopy plasmid [pDG148-natR (formerly pDG148-yccH), Table 1Up)] expressing natR was introduced into the natK strain carrying a transcriptional natA–lacZ or yccK–lacZ fusion. Each of the fusions was generated by Campbell-type recombination of derivatives of the plasmid pMutIn (Table 1Up). Next, beta-galactosidase activities were examined in the presence and absence of IPTG. The induction of natR by the addition of IPTG resulted in 35- and 5-fold increases in the levels of expression of natA–lacZ (Fig. 1bUp) and yccK–lacZ (data not shown), respectively. Thus, the observations obtained with the lacZ fusions confirmed the results of DNA microarray analysis. However, the promoter of yccK was not a target of NatR, because induction of natR on pDG148-natR did not enhance the expression of yccK–lacZ at the amyE locus (data not shown). Thus, the apparent induction of yccK expression detected by microarray analysis was most probably caused by artificial read-through of the yccK gene resulting from the increased activity of the natAB promoter under the condition of natR overexpression. In addition, in the presence of an intact natK gene, induction of natR on pDG148-natR resulted in a ninefold increase in the expression of natA–lacZ (Fig. 1bUp).

natAB is located adjacent to natRK, but on the complementary strand (Fig. 1aUp). The chromosomal structure of the region that contains the transcription control elements for natRK and natAB raised the possibility that natR and natK genes might be part of an autoregulatory loop under the control of NatR. To examine this, we introduced pDG148-natR into cells carrying natR–lacZ, and measured beta-galactosidase activities in the presence and absence of IPTG. We did not observe any change in the expression of natR–lacZ when the natR gene was induced by IPTG (data not shown). This indicates that natR expression itself is not regulated by NatR.

Expression of natA was abolished in the mutants natK and natR
To examine the notion that natR is a positive regulator of natAB, we measured the beta-galactosidase activities of the fusions natA–lacZ in wild-type, natK and natR strains. The expression level of natA–lacZ in the wild-type cells was significantly high compared with that in cells carrying the same fusion and pDG148-natR, without addition of IPTG (Fig. 1b, cUp). The reason for this is unknown; however, it is possible that addition of kanamycin affects the expression level of the fusion. The expression of natA–lacZ was almost abolished in both natK and natR backgrounds (Fig. 1cUp). Thus, we concluded that natK and natR are required for natA expression. In addition, the expression of yccK–lacZ at the yccK locus was not affected by the disruption of natR, reinforcing the notion that yccK is not a member of the NatR regulon (data not shown).

Functional analysis of the natR strain
It was expected that introduction of the natR disruption mutation would decrease Na+ resistance at alkaline pH, and ethanol resistance at neutral pH, because NatR positively regulates the natAB operon, whose product is responsible for the resistant phenotypes (Cheng et al., 1997Down). Thus, we examined the growth properties of the natR and natA strains in the presence or absence of 200 mM NaCl in TKM medium. The medium composition, pH, concentration of NaCl or ethanol, and culture conditions, including temperature and culture volume, were the same as those used by Cheng et al. (1997)Down, with the exception that we used B. subtilis 168 as a control strain, and not the BD99 strain, which is a derivative of 168. As shown in Fig. 2(b, d)Down, the natA and natR strains showed a delay in growth, and a low cell density at the end of the exponential phase, compared with the control strain (Fig. 2a, cDown), indicating that NaCl sensitivity at alkaline pH, and ethanol sensitivity at neutral pH, were higher in both strains. These observations confirmed our prediction regarding the phenotypes of the natR strain. The natK strain showed similar phenotypes to the natR strain under both alkaline and neutral conditions (data not shown). We used strain 168, which was more resistant to NaCl at alkaline pH, and ethanol at neutral pH, than BD99. Subtle genetic differences between our strain and the one used by Cheng et al. (1997)Down may explain these differences.


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Growth properties of B. subtilis 168, natA and natR strains at alkaline pH in the presence and absence of 200 mM NaCl, and at neutral pH in the presence and absence of 3 % ethanol. The results shown are a representative experiment from three independent experiments. Growth was started by diluting an overnight culture 100-fold in TKM medium (pH 8.3 for a and b, and pH 7.0 for c and d). Growth was monitored at hourly intervals by using a Klett spectrometer; cell densities are shown in arbitrary units. Circles, 168 control strain; triangles, NATAd (natA); squares, NATRd (natR). (a, b) Cells were grown in 50 ml TKM medium at 30 °C (pH 8.3). Filled and open symbols correspond to the absence and presence of 200 mM NaCl, respectively. (c, d) Cells were grown in 50 ml TKM medium at 30 °C (pH 7.0). Filled and open symbols correspond to the absence and presence of 3 % ethanol.

 
Determination of the transcription start site of natA
To characterize natAB operon expression, we used primer extension to determine the transcription start site of natA. We isolated RNA from the wild-type strain carrying pDG148-natR (Table 1Up), which was grown in MC medium with and without 1 mM IPTG. According to the above results, natAB expression should be enhanced by the addition of IPTG. The transcription start was clearly indicated by a band that was detected using a natA-specific primer in the reaction with RNA from the cells grown with 1 mM IPTG, and not from those grown without IPTG (Fig. 3Down). Using the RNA from the wild-type cells without multicopy natR, we observed a faint band of the same size as that in Fig. 3Down, indicating that natA transcription starts at the same nucleotide position, irrespective of the presence of multicopy natR (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Determination of the 5' end of the natA transcript, using primer extension and a natA-specific primer. Total RNA was isolated from wild-type cells carrying pDG148-natR, and grown in MC medium with and without 1 mM IPTG. The cells were harvested at early stationary phase. The natA template for a sequencing ladder was prepared by PCR amplification with NatA-pISB1 and NatA-up-R, and is shown in lanes G, A, T and C. The NatA-bio primer was used for sequencing and primer extension analysis of natA. The nucleotide sequence of natA is shown below the gel. The asterisk indicates the transcription start site, and the deduced –35 and –10 sequences are in bold; + and – indicate the presence and absence of 1 mM IPTG, respectively.

 
NatR binds to the natA promoter
The observations described above led us to hypothesize that NatR directly regulates natA expression by binding to the natA promoter. We produced a His-tagged NatR protein in E. coli, and purified it from a cleared cell lysate. Gel retardation analysis indicated that the recombinant His-tagged NatR bound to the natA promoter (Fig. 4aDown). The binding was specific, because the reaction contained a 500-fold excess amount of poly dI-dC.


Figure 4
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Gel retardation and footprint assays revealed binding of NatR to the natA promoter. (a) Gel retardation assay. Samples were separated using 6 % native PAGE. Reactions contained poly dI-dC (1.0 µg per 25 µl). The DNA probe (2 nM) spans the –116 to +52 region of the natA promoter, and it was prepared by PCR amplification using the primers NatA-up-F and NatA-R-trpH. The probes were incubated with His-tagged NatR (lanes: 1, no addition; 2, 0.3 µM; 3, 0.6 µM; 4, 1.2 µM); c, DNA–protein complexes; f, a free probe. (b) Footprint assays. The top and bottom strand probes were prepared by PCR amplification with the primer pairs NatA-up-F and NatA-R-trpH, and NatA-pISB1 and NatA-RB, respectively. Probes (8 nM) were incubated with His-tagged NatR (0.5 and 2 µM), and subjected to DNase I cleavage. A sequencing ladder is shown in lanes G, A, T and C. Brackets and filled triangles indicate protected regions and cleavage at DNase-I-hypersensitive sites, respectively. (c) Nucleotide sequences of the natA promoter region. Brackets and filled triangles indicate protected regions and cleavage at DNase-I-hypersensitive sites, respectively, and the direct repeat identified is denoted in bold. The numbers at either end of the sequence indicate nucleotide positions relative to the transcription start site.

 
Footprinting analysis of NatR
To characterize the natA promoter sequence(s) bound by NatR, we performed DNase I footprinting analysis. Protection of the regions spanning –72 to –37, and –79 to –37, relative to the transcription start site, was observed for both strands; protection was also observed for the –31 to –17 region on the top strand (Fig. 4bUp). These results are consistent with the observations made using gel retardation. The commonly protected region of both strands contains a direct repeat of 5'-TTCRCGACA-3', separated by 12 bp. This relatively long space between directly repeated motifs is characteristic of the LytTR family of DNA-binding proteins (see Discussion).

Confirmation that the direct repeat in the natA promoter region acts as a positive cis-element for NatR
Transcriptional lacZ fusions were constructed using three distinct promoter regions, with different 5' ends of natA, at the amyE locus. The common 3' end of the promoter regions was 1 nt upstream from the initiation codon. Since the fusion expression levels were very low, we introduced multicopy natR on pDG148-natR, driven by an IPTG-inducible promoter. The beta-galactosidase activities of the strains were examined in the presence and absence of IPTG. As expected, a high level of expression of the fusions carrying the direct repeat recognized by NatR, i.e. natA1–lacZ (–116 to +27) and natA2–lacZ (–79 to +27), was induced by the addition of IPTG (Fig. 5Down). The deletion of the –116 to –79 region resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in fusion expression when natR was overexpressed, suggesting that there is a negative regulatory region in this region. However, the expression of natA3–lacZ (–57 to +27), which carries the downstream repeat only, was not induced by IPTG. This indicates that the complete direct repeat is required for expression of natA. Further, we mutagenized both of the direct repeat sequences in the fusions, and examined their beta-galactosidase activities. The expression of both fusions carrying disruptions in the direct repeat was severely decreased in the presence of IPTG compared with the reference strains. These results demonstrate that the direct repeat, recognized by NatR, is important for the regulation of natA.


Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Deletion and mutation experiments using the natA–lacZ fusion. Cells carrying the five fusions at the amyE locus, and pDG148-natR, were grown in MC medium. Sampling from the late exponential phase was hourly, and five samples were taken. The beta-galactosidase activities from the transcriptional natA–lacZ fusions were determined, and the peak values are shown; + and – indicate the presence and absence of 1 mM IPTG, respectively. The result shown is a representative experiment from at least three independent experiments – the SD did not exceed 15 %. The 5' and 3' termini of the natA promoter region used are shown relative to the transcription start site. Open boxes indicate the direct repeat sequences, and lower case letters indicate replaced nucleotides.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study demonstrated that the NatK–NatR two-component system is a positive regulator of the natAB operon. Multicopy natR enhanced expression of both natA–lacZ fusions in the natural context, and at the amyE locus in the wild-type cells (Figs. 1b, 5Up). In the several B. subtilis two-component regulatory systems, i.e. DegS–DegU, ComP–ComA and PhoP–PhoR, multicopy of the response regulator gene can only induce the expression of the target genes when the cognate sensor kinase gene is absent (Ogura et al., 2001Down). In the NatK–NatR system, however, the multicopy natR gene was able to enhance the expression of natA–lacZ, even in the presence of the cognate natK gene, with a slightly decreased level compared with that obtained in the absence of natK (Fig. 1bUp). The discrepancy might be due to the nature of the sensor kinase. For example, it is known that some sensor kinases have both kinase and phosphatase activities for the cognate response regulator, while, on the other hand, other kinases lack the phosphatase activity (Stock et al., 2000Down).

The NatK sensor kinase has three transmembrane domains, and is classified as a group IIIA kinase (Fabret et al., 1999Down). Generally, the kinases in this group are paired with group IIIA regulators. However, NatR is distinct from the other members of the group because it has characteristics that are specific to the LytTR family; these characteristics include response regulators involved in the biosynthesis of extracellular polysaccharides, fimbriation, expression of exoproteins (including toxins), and quorum sensing (Nikolskaya & Galperin, 2002Down). The regulators in this family have been reported to bind to imperfect direct repeat sequence patterns composed of nine nucleotides [T/A] [A/C] [C/A]GTTN[A/G] [T/G] separated by a 12–13 bp spacer. Although the NatR-binding sequence that was identified, i.e. TTCACGACA-N12-TTCGCGACA, does not contain this sequence, it does maintain the 9-12-9 bp structure. This conforms to the idea that regulators within the same protein family may have evolved to recognize different sequence motifs.

In the footprint analysis, NatR protected not only the upstream region, but also the core promoter region of natA on the top strand, from the DNase I digestion. Since this region does not contain the NatR-recognition sequence, protection might be generated by the spatial proximity of DNA-bound NatR to the core promoter region. This raised the possibility that NatR may interact with RNA polymerase in the natA promoter, leading to activation of natAB transcription, although how NatR activates natAB expression remains unknown. In the gel retardation assay, at the highest concentration of the protein (1.2 µM), a significant amount of the probe was not bound by NatR. Similarly, in the footprint analysis, a large amount of NatR (2.0 µM) was required for the clear footprint pattern. These results suggested that a significant portion of purified protein was not active.

To examine the possibility that other genes might be directly regulated by NatR, we searched the NatR-recognition sequence in the B. subtilis genome using GRASP-DNA sequence software (Schilling et al., 2000Down). However, we did not find a candidate target of NatR.

It has been reported that the expression of natABlacZ is induced fourfold by the addition of 2 % ethanol (Cheng et al., 1997Down). The expression of the fusion was measured in the natB background (Cheng et al., 1997Down). We also observed the induction of natA–lacZ expression by ethanol in natA cells; however, there was no ethanol induction in the wild-type cells (unpublished results). It is speculated that the lack of NatAB may perturb cellular ionic homeostasis, which affects the activity of the natAB promoter.

The basal expression of the natA1–lacZ fusion at the amyE locus was very low compared with the natA–lacZ fusion in the natural context. There could be several possible reasons for this: (1) some regulatory cis-element might be lost in natA1–lacZ, since –116 relative to the transcription start site is the 5' end of the fusion; (2) a local topology of the natA promoter region might be changed in the natA fusions at the amyE locus, leading to low expression; (3) different mRNA structures of the two fusions might result in altered mRNA stability, leading to different expression levels. However, the reason for the discrepancy is yet to be determined.

Response regulators demonstrating close similarities to NatR have been found in many bacterial genomes, including those of E. coli, Bacillus halodurans, Shigella flexneri and Streptococcus thermophilus. However, we investigated over 20 genomes, among which only the Str. thermophilus genome has conserved the genomic structure as shown in Fig. 1(a)Up (Bolotin et al., 2004Down). In the case of Str. thermophilus LMG18311, the LytTR-type response regulator (stu0543) is associated with a putative ABC-transporter for extrusion of an unknown substrate.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank I. Smith (TB Center, The Public Health Research Institute, Newark, NJ, USA) for the kind gift of plasmid. We also thank M. Tanaka and Y. Hanawa for technical assistance. This work was supported by a Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (C) ‘Genome Biology’ to T. T., and a Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (C) to M. O., and (B) to T. T., from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.

Edited by: J. M. van Dijl


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Aguilar, P. S., Hernandez-Arriaga, A. M., Cybulski, L. E., Erazo, A. C. & de Mendoza, D. (2001). Molecular basis of thermosensing: a two-component signal transduction thermometer in Bacillus subtilis. EMBO J 20, 1681–1691.[CrossRef][Medline]

Asai, K., Baik, S. H., Kasahara, Y., Moriya, S. & Ogasawara, N. (2000). Regulation of the transport system for C4-dicarboxylic acids in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 146, 263–271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bolotin, A., Quinquis, B., Renault, P., Sorokin, A., Ehrlich, S. D., Kulakauskas, S., Lapidus, A., Goltsman, E., Mazur, M. & other authors (2004). Complete sequence and comparative genome analysis of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Nat Biotechnol 22, 1554–1558.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cheng, J., Guffanti, A. A. & Krulwich, T. A. (1997). A two-gene ABC-type transport system that extrudes Na+ in Bacillus subtilis is induced by ethanol or protonophore. Mol Microbiol 23, 1107–1120.[CrossRef][Medline]

Doan, T., Servant, P., Tojo, S., Yamaguchi, H., Lerondel, G., Yoshida, K., Fujita, Y. & Aymerich, S. (2003). The Bacillus subtilis ywkA gene encodes a malic enzyme and its transcription is activated by the YufL/YufM two-component system in response to malate. Microbiology 149, 2331–2343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fabret, C., Feher, V. A. & Hoch, J. A. (1999). Two-component signal transduction in Bacillus subtilis: how one organism sees its world. J Bacteriol 181, 1975–1983.[Free Full Text]

Fukuchi, K., Kasahara, Y., Asai, K., Kobayashi, K., Moriya, S. & Ogasawara, N. (2000). The essential two-component regulatory system encoded by yycF and yycG modulates expression of the ftsAZ operon in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 146, 1573–1583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guilfoile, P. G. & Hutchinson, C. R. (1991). A bacterial analog of the mdr gene of mammalian tumor cells is present in Streptomyces peucetius, the producer of daunorubicin and doxorubicin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88, 8553–8557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hayashi, K., Ohsawa, T., Kobayashi, K., Ogasawara, N. & Ogura, M. (2005). The H2O2 stress-responsive regulator PerR positively regulates srfA expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 187, 6659–6667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hayashi, K., Kensuke, T., Kobayashi, K., Ogasawara, N. & Ogura, M. (2006). Bacillus subtilis RghR (YvaN) represses rapG and rapH, which encode inhibitors of expression of the srfA operon. Mol Microbiol 59, 1714–1729.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hyyrylainen, H. L., Bolhuis, A., Darmon, E., Muukkonen, L., Koski, P., Vitikainen, M., Sarvas, M., Pragai, Z., Bron, S. & other authors (2001). A novel two-component regulatory system in Bacillus subtilis for the survival of severe secretion stress. Mol Microbiol 41, 1159–1172.[CrossRef][Medline]

Joseph, P., Fichant, G., Quentin, Y. & Denizot, F. (2002). Regulatory relationships of two-component and ABC transport systems and clustering of their genes in the Bacillus/Clostridium group suggest a functional link between them. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 5, 503–513.

Joseph, P., Guiseppi, A., Sorokin, A. & Denizot, F. (2004). Characterization of the Bacillus subtilis YxdJ response regulator as the inducer of expression for the cognate ABC transporter YxdLM. Microbiology 150, 2609–2617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kobayashi, K., Ogura, M., Yamaguchi, H., Yoshida, K., Ogasawara, N., Tanaka, T. & Fujita, Y. (2001). The comprehensive DNA microarray analysis of Bacillus subtilis two-component regulatory systems. J Bacteriol 183, 7365–7370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kunst, F., Ogasawara, N., Moszer, I., Albertini, A. M., Alloni, G., Azevedo, V., Bertero, M. G., Bessieres, P., Bolotin, A. & other authors (1997). The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390, 249–256.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mascher, T., Zimmer, S. L., Smith, T. A. & Helmann, J. D. (2004). Antibiotic-inducible promoter regulated by the cell envelope stress-sensing two-component system LiaRS of Bacillus subtilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48, 2888–2896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mukai, K., Kawata, M. & Tanaka, T. (1990). Isolation and phosphorylation of the Bacillus subtilis degS and degU gene products. J Biol Chem 265, 20000–20006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nikolskaya, A. N. & Galperin, M. Y. (2002). A novel type of conserved DNA-binding domain in the transcriptional regulators of the AlgR/AgrA/LytR family. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 2453–2459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ogura, M. & Tanaka, T. (1996). Transcription of Bacillus subtilis degR is {sigma}D-dependent and suppressed by multicopy proB through {sigma}D. J Bacteriol 178, 216–222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ogura, M., Ohshiro, Y., Hirao, S. & Tanaka, T. (1997). A new Bacillus subtilis gene, med, encodes a positive regulator of comK. J Bacteriol 179, 6244–6253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ogura, M., Yamaguchi, H., Yoshida, K., Fujita, Y. & Tanaka, T. (2001). DNA microarray analysis of Bacillus subtilis DegU, ComA and PhoP regulons: an approach to comprehensive analysis of B. subtilis two-component regulatory systems. Nucleic Acids Res 29, 3804–3813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ogura, M., Shimane, K., Asai, K., Ogasawara, N. & Tanaka, T. (2003). Binding of response regulator DegU to the aprE promoter is inhibited by RapG, which is counteracted by extracellular PhrG in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 49, 1685–1697.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ohki, R., Giyanto, Tateno, K., Masuyama, W., Moriya, S., Kobayashi, K. & Ogasawara, N. (2003). The BceRS two-component regulatory system induces expression of the bacitracin transporter, BceAB, in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 49, 1135–1144.[CrossRef][Medline]

Padan, E. & Schuldiner, S. (1994). Molecular physiology of Na+/H+ antiporters, key transporters in circulation of Na+ and H+ in cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1185, 129–151.[Medline]

Reizer, J., Reizer, A. & Saier, M. H., Jr (1992). A new subfamily of bacterial ABC-type transport systems catalyzing export of drugs and carbohydrates. Prot Sci 1, 1326–1332.[Abstract]

Satomura, T., Shimura, D., Asai, K., Sadaie, Y., Hirooka, K. & Fujita, Y. (2005). Enhancement of glutamine utilization in Bacillus subtilis through the GlnK–GlnL two-component regulatory system. J Bacteriol 187, 4813–4821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schilling, C. H., Held, L., Torre, M. & Saier, M. H. (2000). GRASP-DNA: a web application to screen prokaryotic genomes for specific DNA-binding sites and repeat motifs. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2, 495–500.[CrossRef][Medline]

Serizawa, M. & Sekiguchi, J. (2005). The Bacillus subtilis YdfHI two-component system regulates the transcription of ydfJ, a member of the RND superfamily. Microbiology 151, 1769–1778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shimane, K. & Ogura, M. (2004). Mutational analysis of the helix–turn–helix region of Bacillus subtilis response regulator DegU, and identification of cis-acting sequences for DegU in the aprE and comK promoters. J Biochem 136, 387–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stock, A. M., Robinson, V. L. & Goudreau, P. N. (2000). Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 69, 183–215.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stragier, P., Bonamy, C. & Karmazyn-Campelli, C. (1988). Processing of a sporulation sigma factor in Bacillus subtilis: how morphological structure could control gene expression. Cell 52, 697–704.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tanaka, K., Kobayashi, K. & Ogasawara, N. (2003). The Bacillus subtilis YufLM two-component system regulates the expression of the malate transporters MaeN (YufR) and YflS, and is essential for utilization of malate in minimal medium. Microbiology 149, 2317–2329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vagner, V., Dervyn, E. & Ehrlich, S. D. (1998). A vector for systematic gene inactivation in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 144, 3097–3104.[Abstract]

Yamamoto, H., Murata, M. & Sekiguchi, J. (2000). The CitST two-component system regulates the expression of the Mg-citrate transporter in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 37, 898–912.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yoshida, K.-I., Kobayashi, K., Miwa, Y., Kang, C.-M., Matsunaga, M., Yamaguchi, H., Tojo, S., Yamamoto, M., Nishi, R. & other authors (2001). Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis as a powerful approach to study genes under glucose repression in Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res 29, 683–692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 23 October 2006; revised 13 December 2006; accepted 14 December 2006.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ogura, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 Society for General Microbiology.