|
|
||||||||
1 Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
2 Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
3 Division of Bioenvironmental Science, Frontier Science Research Center, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kiyotake, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan
4 Nationales Referenzlabor für Escherichia coli, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Diedersdorfer Weg 1, D-12277 Berlin, Germany
5 Centre for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
6 Fundación Caubet-Cimera, Recinto Hospital Joan March, Carretera Soller Km 1207110 Bunyola, Mallorca, Spain
Correspondence
Gad Frankel
g.frankel{at}imperial.ac.uk
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the sequences determined in this paper are AB271153 (O111 : H2 strain CB07077), AB271154 (O111 : H2 strain CB03447) and AB271155 (O111 : H2 strain CB03454).
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
of the outer-membrane adhesin intimin (Adu-Bobie et al., 1998
Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is a subgroup of Verocytotoxin (VT)-producing E. coli (VTEC) that can cause bloody diarrhoea, haemorrhagic colitis and haemolytic–uraemic syndrome (HUS). E. coli O157 : H7 is the most common and virulent EHEC serotype that is implicated worldwide in human disease (reviewed by Karch et al., 2005
).
EPEC and EHEC colonize the gut mucosa via attaching and effacing (A/E) lesion formation, which is characterized by intimate attachment of the pathogen to the host intestinal epithelium, localized effacement of the brush border microvilli (Knutton et al., 1987
), and localized actin polymerization. A/E lesion formation and actin polymerization are dependent on the LEE-encoded type III secretion system (T3SS) (Jarvis et al., 1995
), the adhesin intimin (Jerse et al., 1990
), and translocation of the effector protein Tir (translocated intimin receptor) (Kenny et al., 1997
). Once translocated, Tir is integrated into the host-cell plasma membrane, in which it adopts a hairpin loop topology (Hartland et al., 1999
), with the extracellular loop presented above the plasma membrane acting as a receptor for the bacterial adhesin intimin (reviewed by Frankel et al., 2001
). Intimin-mediated clustering of Tir (Campellone et al., 2004b
) leads to accretion of several cytoskeletal proteins to the intracellular amino- and carboxy-terminal Tir domains, linking the extracellular bacterium to the host-cell cytoskeleton (Goosney et al., 2001
) and triggering actin remodelling into pedestal-like structures. Tir of the prototype EPEC O127 : H6 strain E2348/69, which belongs to EPEC 1, harbours a tyrosine residue Y474 that is present in the context of a consensus binding site for the mammalian adaptor protein Nck (YPDEP/D/V) (Campellone et al., 2002
; Gruenheid et al., 2001
). Tyrosine phosphorylation of Tir [Tir(Y-P)] by host-cell kinases (Phillips et al., 2004
; Swimm et al., 2004
) recruits Nck to the site of bacterial attachment, which in turn binds the actin nucleation-promoting factor neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP), initiating actin polymerization via activation of the actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex (Lommel et al., 2001
). In contrast, the equivalent position in Tir EHEC O157 : H7 is occupied by serine [Tir(S)], and as such, Nck is not involved in actin polymerization by EHEC O157 : H7 (Gruenheid et al., 2001
). Instead, EHEC O157 : H7 requires a second bacterial T3SS effector protein, TccP (Tir-cytoskeleton coupling protein; also termed EspFU, because it shares 35 % identity with the T3SS effector EspF), which binds, recruits and activates N-WASP to trigger localized actin polymerization (Campellone et al., 2004a
; Garmendia et al., 2004
). The minimal region of Tir EHEC O157 that is needed for recruitment of TccP and induction of actin polymerization is a 12 aa motif at the C terminus (Campellone et al., 2006
; Allen-Vercoe et al., 2006
). This 12 aa motif is conserved in Tir EPEC O127 : H6, and has been implicated in an Nck-independent actin-remodelling pathway during infection with O127 : H6 EPEC (Campellone and Leong, 2005
). Importantly, TccP does not bind Tir directly (Campellone et al., 2004a
; Garmendia et al., 2004
).
tccP is carried on prophage CP-933U/Sp14 (Campellone et al., 2004a
; Garmendia et al., 2004
) and consists of a unique 80 aa N-terminal region (involved in protein translocation) and several almost identical 47 aa proline-rich repeats (PRRs) (Garmendia et al., 2006
). In a recent survey of clinical and environmental strains, tccP was found in 100 % of EHEC O157 : H7 and in a minority of EPEC and non-O157 EHEC strains (Garmendia et al., 2005
). Of particular importance is the fact that in tccP-positive EPEC, Tir is tyrosine-phosphorylated [Tir(Y-P)] and simultaneously recruits Nck and TccP under attached bacteria during infection of cultured epithelial cells (Whale et al., 2006
).
EHEC O157 : H7 strains Sakai and EDL933 also contain pseudo tccP genes (ECs1126 and Z1385, respectively, which have also been referred to as espFM by Campellone et al. 2004a
), which are carried on prophage Sp4/CP-933M. A deletion of a single (T/A) base pair at position 28 introduces a translational frameshift and a premature stop codon. However, we have recently found that β-glucuronidase-positive/sorbitol-fermenting strains of EHEC O157 harbour an intact ECs1126 gene, in addition to tccP (Ogura et al., 2007
). In order to discriminate between the tccP alleles, we named ECs1126, which is carried on prophage Sp4/CP-933M, tccP2. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution and function of tccP2 in typical EPEC belonging to serogroups O55, O84, O111, O114, O127 and O142, which we have previously reported to be tccP gene-negative (Garmendia et al., 2005
) O119 : H6.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Preparation of TccP rabbit antiserum.
A PCR fragment encoding a truncated TccPEDL933 derivative comprising the unique N terminus and two PRRs (TccPN2R) was cloned into pET28-a as described previously (Ogura et al., 2007
); TccPN2R-His was purified as described by Hartland et al. (1999
), and polyclonal TccPN2R-His antiserum was produced in rabbits at Covalab.
Preparation of protein samples for detection of TccP and TccP2 by Western blotting.
Protein preparations from whole-cell extracts were dissolved in protein-denaturing buffer before PAGE and Western blotting. TccP was detected using a rabbit polyclonal anti-TccP primary antibody (diluted 1 : 1000) and porcine anti-rabbit IgG–horseradish peroxidase conjugate secondary antibody (Dako).
Bacterial strains, growth conditions and plasmids.
Bacterial strains used for the functional analysis are listed in Table 3
. Bacteria were grown at 37 °C, with aeration in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium or Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg ml–1) or kanamycin (50 µg ml–1), or both, when necessary. E. coli B171
tccP2 mutant was constructed using the
Red recombinase method (Datsenko & Wanner, 2000
). Disruption of tccP2 was performed with a kanamycin-resistance cassette generated with primers B171tccP-F1 and B171tccP-R1 using pKD4 as template. Purified PCR product was electroporated into E. coli B171(pKD46). Clones were grown on LB medium+kanamycin to select for kanamycin (
tccP2) resistance. pKD46 was cured from the resulting strains by growth at 43 °C. Primers flanking the deleted region and inside the kanamycin-resistance cassette were used in PCR to verify the deletion (primer pairs K1 and tccP2-F, and K2 and tccP2-R).
|
pICC365 and pICC366 are derivatives of pSA10 (Schlosser-Silverman et al., 2000
), a vector containing multiple cloning sites downstream of the tac promoter. An 894 bp fragment containing tccP2 was amplified by PCR from B171 genomic DNA using primers pkk-tccP2-F1 and pkk-tccP2-R1. A 1176 bp fragment containing tccP2 was amplified by PCR from EPEC O111 : H2 strain ICC215 genomic DNA using primers pkk-tccP2-F1 and pkk-tccP2-R1. The 970 bp (B171 tccP2) and 1252 (ICC215 tccP2) bp PCR products, containing terminal EcoRI and PstI sites, were digested and ligated into pSA10, generating pICC365 and pICC366, respectively.
Antibodies and reagents.
Anti-E. coli O157 : H7 goat polyclonal antibody (Fitzgerald Industries International) was diluted 1 : 500. EPEC ICC199 and B171 strains were detected with rabbit polyclonal Int280β antiserum (Adu-Bobie et al., 1998
), and EPEC E2348/69 was detected with rabbit polyclonal Int280
antiserum (Adu-Bobie et al., 1998
), both diluted 1 : 500. Rabbit polyclonal TirEPEC antiserum was diluted 1 : 500. Phosphotyrosine and Nck were detected using monoclonal mouse anti-phosphotyrosine clone 4G10 (Sigma) and rabbit polyclonal anti-Nck (Upstate) antibodies, diluted 1 : 250 and 1 : 150, respectively. Mouse anti-haemagglutinin (HA) mAb HA.11 (Covance) was diluted 1 : 200. Rhodamine-, Alexa 633- and Oregon Green-conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen) were used at dilutions of 1 : 500, 1 : 500 and 1 : 100, respectively. Cy5-conjugated donkey anti-goat, rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-goat, donkey anti-rabbit and Cy2-conjugated donkey anti-mouse antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories) were diluted 1 : 200. Samples were analysed using either a Zeiss LSM510 confocal laser scanning microscope or a Zeiss Axio Imager fluorescence microscope. Infected cells were fixed and fluorescent actin staining (FAS) used to determine the ability of each strain to trigger the formation of actin-rich pedestals. The efficiency of pedestal formation was quantified by measuring the percentage of adherent bacteria that associated with intense actin accretion. Randomly chosen cells harbouring discrete regions of 2–30 bacteria per cell were examined for each strain, and 300 bacteria, 50 per coverslip, from two or three independent infections carried out in duplicate, were counted in a blinded fashion. Statistical differences between groups were determined by ANOVA. To quantify the adherence of strains B171 and B171
tccP2 to HeLa cells, the percentage of cells with at least three adhering bacteria was counted. For each strain, 200 randomly chosen cells from two independent infections carried out in duplicate were examined.
Cell culture and infection.
HeLa cells (clone HtTA1) and mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) N-WASP–/–, N-WASP+/+ (a kind gift from S. Snapper, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA), Nck1–/Nck2– and Nck1+/Nck2+ cell lines were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10 or 15 % fetal calf serum (FCS), respectively, containing 2 mM glutamine at 37 °C in 5 % CO2. Cells were seeded onto glass coverslips (12 mm diameter) in 24-well plates at a density of 5x104 cells per well, 24 h before infection. Bacterial cultures grown in LB medium for 8 h were diluted 1 : 500 into DMEM and incubated as static cultures at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 overnight, and were used to infect cells for 3 h (EPEC strains) or 5 h (EHEC strains). For immunofluorescence, cell monolayers were fixed in 3.7 % paraformaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4, for 15 min at room temperature, and washed three times with PBS. Antibodies were diluted in 10 % horse serum, 0.1 % saponin in PBS. Coverslips were washed twice in PBS containing 0.1 % saponin, incubated for 30 min with primary antibodies, washed twice with 0.1 % saponin in PBS, and incubated for 30 min with secondary antibodies. Coverslips were washed twice in 0.1 % saponin in PBS, once in PBS and once in water, and mounted with Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences).
Effector-protein translocation assay.
Overnight EPEC cultures were diluted 1 : 100 into 5 ml DMEM containing 10 % FCS and 2 mM glutamine, and incubated at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 for 3.5 h (preactivation). HeLa cells were infected with the preactivated bacteria for 30 min before IPTG was added at a final concentration of 1 mM, and the infection was allowed to proceed for an additional 1 h. Cell monolayers were washed three times with PBS, and covered with 100 µl PBS and 25 µl 6x concentrated β-lactamase substrate CCF2/AM (Charpentier and Oswald, 2004
). The cells were incubated for 2.5 h at room temperature, washed three times with PBS, covered with coverslides, and live cells were observed under a Nikon Eclipse E600 fluorescence microscope using a UV-2A filter set (330–380 nm excitation). Pictures were taken under a Nikon digital camera DXM1200.
Human intestinal in vitro organ culture (IVOC).
Tissue was obtained with fully informed parental consent and local ethical committee approval, using grasp forceps during routine endoscopic investigation of intestinal disorders. Small intestinal mucosal biopsies, which appeared macroscopically normal, were taken for organ-culture experiments as described by Hicks et al. (1998
). Adherence of strains B171 and B171
tccP2 was examined using tissue from two patients (aged 159 and 181 months) for scanning electron microscopy, and two further cases (aged 194 and 195 months) for cryosectioning and immunostaining. In each experiment, a non-infected sample was included to exclude endogenous bacterial adhesion. Samples for scanning electron microscopy were processed as described by Hicks et al. (1998
). For immunofluorescence, samples were embedded in OCT compound (Sakura), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –70 °C until use. Serial sections of 8 µm were cut with an MTE cryostat (SLEE Technik), picked up on poly-L-lysine-coated slides, and air-dried. Tissue sections were fixed in formalin for 10 min, and blocked with 0.5 % BSA and 2 % normal goat serum in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. Slides were incubated in primary antibody (rabbit anti-Nck, rabbit anti-TccP) for 60 min at room temperature, and washed and incubated in Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes) for 30 min. Counterstaining of bacteria and cell nuclei was performed using propidium iodide (Sigma). Epithelial cells were stained with mouse anti-cytokeratin (Dako) and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes). Sections were analysed with a Radiance 2100 confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with an argon–krypton laser and a red diode (Bio-Rad).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
TccP2 is a translocated effector protein
Antiserum raised against TccP is cross-reactive with TccP2 due to the sequence identity of the PRRs. Using the antiserum to analyse whole-cell extracts of tccP-negative/tccP2-positive EPEC 2 lineage strains B171 (O111 : H–) and ICC215 (O111 : H2), and tccP-positive/tccP2-negative strains EHEC EDL933 (O157 : H7) and EPEC non-1 non-2 lineage ICC199 (O119 : H6) as controls, revealed reactive bands of different sizes that correlated with differences in the number of PRRs; no band was detected in the tccP-negative/tccP2-negative EPEC 1 strain E2348/69 (O127 : H6) or in EDL933
tccP (Fig. 2a
). These results show that tccP2 is expressed in EPEC 2 strains.
|
escN mutant EPEC strains carrying pICC364, a plasmid that encodes a translational fusion of TccP2_B171 to TEM-1. Expression of the fusion protein in these strains was verified by Western blot (data not shown), and translocation of the protein into infected HeLa cells was analysed (Fig. 2b
escN (pICC364) (Fig. 2b
B171 triggers Nck-independent actin polymerization
Activation of the phospho-Tir [Tir(P)]–Nck actin-remodelling pathway is necessary for induction of actin-rich pedestals during infection with EPEC 1 strain E2348/69 (O127 : H7) (Campellone et al., 2004b
). In contrast, Nck is not recruited to the site of bacterial adhesion during infection with EHEC O157 : H7 (EDL933) (Gruenheid et al., 2001
), at which Tir and TccP are necessary for A/E lesion formation (Campellone et al., 2004a
; Garmendia et al., 2004
). In order to characterize TccP2-positive EPEC 2, HeLa cells were infected with strains B171 and ICC215. As controls, HeLa cells were infected with strains E2348/69 and EDL933. Immunostaining revealed tyrosine phosphorylation (a signal that previous studies have shown to correspond to Tir(Y-P); Kenny et al., 1997
) below adherent E2348/69, B171 and ICC215, but not EDL933 (Fig. 3a
).
|
Functional analysis of TccP2
In order to elucidate the function of TccP2, we carried out infections of Nck1–/Nck2– fibroblast cell lines with EPEC 1 E2348/69 expressing tccP2_B171 (pICC365). Phalloidin staining and quantification of efficiency of pedestal formation revealed that expression of tccP2 in E2348/69 significantly enhanced its ability to trigger actin polymerization in Nck1–/Nck2– cells (Fig. 4a
), suggesting that translocated TccP2 is able to promote host-cell actin polymerization under adherent E2348/69 in the absence of a functional Tir(P)–Nck actin-remodelling pathway.
|
tccP2 (ICC216). Infection of HeLa cells revealed that B171
tccP2 induced actin polymerization under attached bacteria in a similar manner to wild-type B171 (Fig. 4b
tccP2 adhered to 48±13 % of cells; in comparison, wild-type B171 adhered to 99.5±1 % of cells). However, B171
tccP2 was unable to trigger actin polymerization beneath adherent bacteria during infection of Nck1–/Nck2– fibroblasts (Fig. 4c
tccP2 interacted with Nck-deficient fibroblasts at levels too low to allow strict quantification of pedestal formation. The ability of B171
tccP2 to trigger actin accretion was completely restored by introduction of plasmids encoding TccP_EDL933 (pICC281) (Fig. 4c
In order to determine whether both the Nck pathway and the TccP pathway are activated at the site of bacterial attachment, pICC365 encoding C-terminal HA-tagged TccP2_B171 was introduced into B171. Co-immunostaining with HA and Nck antibodies revealed that Nck and TccP2 were simultaneously concentrated in actin-rich pedestals beneath adherent bacteria (Fig. 5a
), indicating that B171 has the ability to simultaneously utilize the Nck- and TccP2-mediated actin-remodelling pathways. To confirm that TccP2 functions upstream of N-WASP in the actin-polymerization cascade, we infected an N-WASP-deficient fibroblast cell line (N-WASP–/– MEFs with B171
tccP2(pICC365) (expressing HA-tagged TccP2). Co-immunostaining of infected cells with TirEPEC antiserum and HA antibodies revealed that both Tir and TccP2-HA were recruited to the site of bacterial attachment in the absence of N-WASP (Fig. 5b
). As expected, no TccP-HA was detected beneath B171
tccP2 (data not shown), and neither strain was able to trigger formation of actin pedestals on N-WASP–/– MEFs. Infection and immunostaining of control N-WASP-proficient cells (N-WASP+/+ MEFs) revealed that Tir and TccP2 were recruited to sites of adherent B171
tccP2 expressing HA-tagged TccP2, but crucially, actin pedestals were triggered. Taken together, these data show that TccP2 is recruited in the absence of N-WASP, and suggest that N-WASP is not required for the indirect interaction between Tir and TccP2, and that N-WASP is a critical factor in the B171-induced actin-polymerization cascade.
|
tccP2). As shown in Fig. 6
tccP2 bacteria; in contrast, and as expected, no TccP2 staining was observed in B171
tccP2-infected samples (Fig. 7
|
|
tccP2 (Fig. 4c
tccP mutant strain. To this end, tccP2 from strains B171 (consisting of four PRRs) and ICC215 (consisting of six PRRs), cloned under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter and tagged with a C-terminal HA epitope (pICC365 and pICC366, respectively), was introduced into strain ICC185 (EDL933
tccP). The ability to complement the tccP mutation and induce actin-pedestal assembly during infection was analysed by immunofluorescence. Phalloidin staining revealed that tccP2_B171 and tccP2_ICC215 complemented the ability of EDL933
tccP to generate A/E lesions following infection of HeLa cells (Fig. 8
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
EPEC 1 strains are characterized by expression of flagellar antigens H6 or H34 (Whittam et al., 1993
), possession of a complete tra region (Brinkley et al., 2006
), and intimin
. In this study, we have shown that other characteristics of EPEC 1 strains are expression of Tir(Y-P) and lack of tccP and tccP2. Importantly, strains belonging to O119 : H6 are unique, as they do not belong to EPEC 1 (Whittam & McGraw, 1996
), express intimin type β (Adu-Bobie et al., 1998
), almost harbour tccP (Garmendia et al., 2005
), and may have a complete tra region (Brinkley et al., 2006
). These characteristics suggest that the evolution of this serotype followed a distinct path, through which it acquired virulence determinants horizontally. The EPEC 2 lineage is characterized by expression of flagellar antigens H2 or H– (Whittam et al., 1993
), intimin β (Adu-Bobie et al., 1998
) and Tir(Y-P). Unexpectedly, we found that with the exception of only one isolate, all of the EPEC 2 strains tested contained intact tccP2. Sequence analysis of TccP2 from different isolates showed that, other than variation in the number of PRRs, the protein sequences were identical. The identification of TccP2 in prototypic EPEC strain B171 highlights the fortuitous nature of studying pathogenesis in prototypical strains, as the commonly used E2348/69, which is tccP- and tccP2-negative, allowed the identification of the role of Nck in A/E lesion formation.
Using B171 as a representative of EPEC 2 tccP2-expressing strains, we have shown that TccP2 is a T3SS-translocated effector involved in triggering actin remodelling during infection. In a similar manner to tccP-positive EPEC and EHEC strains, but in contrast to prototypical EPEC 1 strains, B171 was able to efficiently trigger Nck-independent actin polymerization, an activity dependent on tccP2. Due to the high level of sequence conservation between TccP and TccP2, we observed functional redundancy between the two TccP homologues: TccP2 was able to restore actin-polymerization ability to EDL933
tccP during infection of HeLa cells, and TccP was able to complement B171
tccP2 for triggering actin remodelling during infection of Nck1–/Nck2– fibroblasts. Nevertheless, due to the difference between the N termini of TccP and TccP2, we cannot exclude the possibility of subtle functional differences.
In a similar way to TccP-positive EPEC strains, TccP2 is localized at the tip of the pedestal and co-localizes with Nck during B171 infection of epithelial cells. Of note, TirB171 harbours both a Y474 equivalent in the context of a consensus Nck binding site, and a second tyrosine residue within a region that shares 75 % amino acid identity with a motif responsible for TccP/EspFU recruitment in TirEHEC (Campellone et al. 2006
). Moreover, both TccP2 and Nck are recruited to the site of B171 adhesion to human intestinal IVOC. In the absence of TccP2 (i.e. during infection with B171
tccP2), Nck was still recruited, suggesting that recruitment of Nck, bacterial adhesion and A/E lesion formation are not dependent on TccP2. A model describing the actin-polymerization cascades induced by EPEC 1, EPEC 2 and non-1 non-2 EPEC O119 : H6 is shown in Fig. 9
. The ability of strains belonging to EPEC 2 to trigger actin polymerization using apparently redundant mechanisms raises intriguing questions regarding the possible spatial and temporal specificities of their function.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Edited by: P. H. Everest
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, β,
, and
, four intimin derivatives expressed by attaching and effacing microbial pathogens. J Clin Microbiol 36, 662–668.Allen-Vercoe, E., Waddell, B., Toh, M. C. & Devinney, R. (2006). Amino acid residues within EHEC O157 : H7 Tir involved in phosphorylation,
-actinin recruitment and Nck-independent pedestal formation. Infect Immun 74, 6196–6205.
Baldini, M. M., Kaper, J. B., Levine, M. M., Candy, D. C. & Moon, H. W. (1983). Plasmid-mediated adhesion in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2, 534–538.[Medline]
Brinkley, C., Burland, V., Keller, R., Rose, D. J., Boutin, A. T., Klink, S. A., Blattner, F. R. & Kaper, J. B. (2006). Nucleotide sequence analysis of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adherence factor plasmid pMAR7. Infect Immun 74, 5408–5413.
Campellone, K. G. & Leong, J. M. (2005). Nck-independent actin assembly is mediated by two phosphorylated tyrosines within enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Tir. Mol Microbiol 56, 416–432.[CrossRef][Medline]
Campellone, K. G., Giese, A., Tipper, D. J. & Leong, J. M. (2002). A tyrosine-phosphorylated 12-amino-acid sequence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Tir binds the host adaptor protein Nck and is required for Nck localization to actin pedestals. Mol Microbiol 43, 1227–1241.[CrossRef][Medline]
Campellone, K. G., Robbins, D. & Leong, J. M. (2004a). EspFU is a translocated EHEC effector that interacts with Tir and N-WASP and promotes Nck-independent actin assembly. Dev Cell 7, 217–228.[CrossRef][Medline]
Campellone, K. G., Rankin, S., Pawson, T., Kirschner, M. W., Tipper, D. J. & Leong, J. M. (2004b). Clustering of Nck by a 12-residue Tir phosphopeptide is sufficient to trigger localized actin assembly. J Cell Biol 164, 407–416.
Campellone, K. G., Brady, M. J., Alamares, J. G., Rowe, D. C., Skehan, B. M., Tipper, D. J. & Leong, J. M. (2006). Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli Tir requires a C-terminal 12-residue peptide to initiate EspFU-mediated actin assembly and harbours N-terminal sequences that influence pedestal length. Cell Microbiol 8, 1488–1503.[CrossRef][Medline]
Charpentier, X. & Oswald, E. (2004). Analysis of type III translocation signals of enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli effectors using TEM-1 beta-lactamase as a fluorescence-based reporter. J Bacteriol 186, 5486–5495.
Chen, H. D. & Frankel, G. (2005). Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: unravelling pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29, 83–98.[CrossRef][Medline]
Datsenko, K. A. & Wanner, B. L. (2000). One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 6640–6645.
Frankel, G., Phillips, A. D., Trabulsi, L. R., Knutton, S., Dougan, G. & Matthews, S. J. (2001). Intimin and the host cell – is it bound to end in Tir(s)?. Trends Microbiol 9, 214–218.[CrossRef][Medline]
Garmendia, J., Phillips, A., Chong, Y., Schuller, S., Marches, O., Dahan, S., Oswald, E., Shaw, R. K., Knutton, S. & Frankel, G. (2004). TccP is an enterohaemorrhagic E. coli O157 : H7 type III effector protein that couples Tir to the actin-cytoskeleton. Cell Microbiol 6, 1167–1183.[CrossRef][Medline]
Garmendia, J., Ren, Z., Tennant, S., Vieira, M. A. M., Chong, Y., Whale, A., Azzopardi, K., Dahan, S., Palma Sircili, M. & other authors (2005). Distribution of tccP in clinical enterohaemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. J Clin Microbiol 43, 5715–5720.
Garmendia, J., Carlier, M. F., Egile, C., Didry, D. & Frankel, G. (2006). Characterisation of TccP-mediated N-WASP activation during enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection. Cell Microbiol 8, 1444–1455.[CrossRef][Medline]
Girón, J. A., Ho, A. S. & Schoolnik, G. K. (1991). An inducible bundle-forming pilus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science 254, 710–713.
Goosney, D. L., DeVinney, R. & Finlay, B. B. (2001). Recruitment of cytoskeletal and signaling proteins to enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli pedestals. Infect Immun 69, 3315–3322.
Gruenheid, S., DeVinney, R., Bladt, F., Goosney, D., Gelkop, S., Gish, G. D., Pawson, T. & Finlay, B. B. (2001). Enteropathogenic E. coli Tir binds Nck to initiate actin pedestal formation in host cells. Nat Cell Biol 3, 856–859.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hartland, E. L., Batchelor, M., Delahay, R. M., Hale, C., Matthews, S., Dougan, G., Knutton, S., Connerton, I. & Frankel, G. (1999). Binding of intimin from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to Tir and to host cells. Mol Microbiol 32, 151–158.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hicks, S., Frankel, G., Kaper, J. B., Dougan, G. & Phillips, A. D. (1998). Role of intimin and bundle-foming pili in enteropathgenic Escherichia coli adhesion to pediatric intestine in vitro. Infect Immun 66, 1570–1578.
Jarvis, K. G., Girón, J. A., Jerse, A. E., McDaniel, T. K., Donnenberg, M. S. & Kaper, J. B. (1995). Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli contains a putative type III secretion system necessary for the export of proteins involved in attaching and effacing lesion formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 7996–8000.
Jerse, A. E., Yu, J., Tall, B. D. & Kaper, J. B. (1990). A genetic locus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli necessary for the production of attaching and effacing lesions on tissue culture cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87, 7839–7843.
Kaper, J. B. (1996). Defining EPEC. Rev Microbiol (Suppl. 1) 27, 130–133.
Karch, H., Tarr, P. I. & Bielaszewska, M. (2005). Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli in human medicine. Int J Med Microbiol 295, 405–418.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kenny, B., DeVinney, R., Stein, M., Reinscheid, D. J., Frey, E. A. & Finlay, B. B. (1997). Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) transfers its receptor for intimate adherence into mammalian cells. Cell 91, 511–520.[CrossRef][Medline]
Knutton, S., Lloyd, D. R. & McNeish, A. S. (1987). Adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to human intestinal enterocytes and cultured human intestinal mucosa. Infect Immun 55, 69–77.
Levine, M. M., Berquist, E. J., Nalin, D. R., Waterman, D. H., Hornick, R. B., Young, C. R. & Rowe, B. (1978). Escherichia coli that cause diarrhoea but do not produce heat-labile or heat-stable enterotoxins and are non-invasive. Lancet 1, 1119–1122.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lommel, S., Benesch, S., Rottner, K., Franz, T., Wehland, J. & Kuhn, R. (2001). Actin pedestal formation by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and intracellular motility of Shigella flexneri are abolished in N-WASP-defective cells. EMBO Rep 2, 850–857.[CrossRef][Medline]
McDaniel, T. K., Jarvis, K. G., Donnenberg, M. S. & Kaper, J. B. (1995). A genetic locus of enterocyte effacement conserved among diverse enterobacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 1664–1668.
Mellies, J. L., Elliott, S. J., Sperandio, V., Donnenberg, M. S. & Kaper, J. B. (1999). The Per regulon of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: identification of a regulatory cascade and a novel transcriptional activator, the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE)-encoded regulator (Ler). Mol Microbiol 33, 296–306.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ogura, Y., Ooka, T., Whale, A., Garmendia, J., Beutin, L., Tennant, S., Krause, G., Morabito, S., Chinen, I. & other authors (2007). TccP2 of O157 : H7 and non-O157 enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC): challenging the dogma of EHEC-induced actin polymerisation. Infect Immun 75, 604–612.
Orskov, F., Whittam, T. S., Cravioto, A. & Orskov, I. (1990). Clonal relationships among classic enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) belong to different O groups. J Infect Dis 162, 76–81.[Medline]
Phillips, N., Hayward, R. D. & Koronakis, V. (2004). Phosphorylation of the enteropathogenic E. coli receptor by the Src-family kinase c-Fyn triggers actin pedestal formation. Nat Cell Biol 6, 618–625.[CrossRef][Medline]
Riley, L. W., Junio, L. N., Libaek, L. B. & Schoolnik, G. K. (1987). Plasmid-encoded expression of lipopolysaccharide O-antigenic polysaccharide in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 55, 2052–2056.
Schlosser-Silverman, E., Elgrably-Weiss, M., Rosenshine, I., Kohen, R. & Altuvia, S. (2000). Characterization of Escherichia coli DNA lesions generated within J774 macrophages. J Bacteriol 182, 5225–5230.
Swimm, A., Bommarius, B., Li, Y., Cheng, D., Reeves, P., Sherman, M., Veach, D., Bornmann, W. & Kalman, D. (2004). Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli use redundant tyrosine kinases to form actin pedestals. Mol Biol Cell 15, 3520–3529.
Trabulsi, L. R., Keller, R. & Gomes, T. A. (2002). Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis 8, 508–513.[Medline]
Whale, A. D., Garmendia, J., Gomes, T. A. & Frankel, G. (2006). A novel category of enteropathogenic E. coli simultaneously utilises the Nck and TccP pathways to induce actin remodelling. Cell Microbiol 8, 999–1008.[CrossRef][Medline]
Whittam, T. S. & McGraw, E. A. (1996). Clonal analysis of EPEC serogroups. Rev Microbiol (Suppl. 1) 27, 7–16.
Whittam, T. S., Wolfe, M. L., Wachsmuth, I. K., Orskov, F., Orskov, I. & Wilson, R. A. (1993). Clonal relationships among Escherichia coli strains that cause hemorrhagic colitis and infantile diarrhea. Infect Immun 61, 1619–1629.
Received 14 November 2006;
revised 22 January 2007;
accepted 1 February 2007.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Girard, F. Dziva, M. P. Stevens, and G. Frankel Interactions of Typical and Atypical Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Strains with the Calf Intestinal Mucosa Ex Vivo Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 15, 2009; 75(18): 5991 - 5995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Arbeloa, M. Blanco, F. C. Moreira, R. Bulgin, C. Lopez, G. Dahbi, J. E. Blanco, A. Mora, M. P. Alonso, R. C. Mamani, et al. Distribution of espM and espT among enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli J. Med. Microbiol., August 1, 2009; 58(8): 988 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Girard, V. F. Crepin, and G. Frankel Modelling of Infection by Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in Lineages 2 and 4 Ex Vivo and In Vivo by Using Citrobacter rodentium Expressing TccP Infect. Immun., April 1, 2009; 77(4): 1304 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hemrajani, O. Marches, S. Wiles, F. Girard, A. Dennis, F. Dziva, A. Best, A. D. Phillips, C. N. Berger, A. Mousnier, et al. Role of NleH, a Type III Secreted Effector from Attaching and Effacing Pathogens, in Colonization of the Bovine, Ovine, and Murine Gut Infect. Immun., November 1, 2008; 76(11): 4804 - 4813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ogura, H. Abe, K. Katsura, K. Kurokawa, M. Asadulghani, A. Iguchi, T. Ooka, K. Nakayama, A. Yamashita, M. Hattori, et al. Systematic Identification and Sequence Analysis of the Genomic Islands of the Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Strain B171-8 by the Combined Use of Whole-Genome PCR Scanning and Fosmid Mapping J. Bacteriol., November 1, 2008; 190(21): 6948 - 6960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bai, S. Schuller, A. Whale, A. Mousnier, O. Marches, L. Wang, T. Ooka, R. Heuschkel, F. Torrente, J. B. Kaper, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O125:H6 Triggers Attaching and Effacing Lesions on Human Intestinal Biopsy Specimens Independently of Nck and TccP/TccP2 Infect. Immun., January 1, 2008; 76(1): 361 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |