|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Plant Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
2 Department of Plant and Animal Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
3 Center for Lab Services/RJ Lee Group, 2710 North 20th Ave, Pasco, WA 99301, USA
4 Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, The Volcani Center, ARO, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel
5 Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Peru Escuela Post Grado, Facultad de Biologia, Andes Amazon Guianas Herbario Vargas (CUZ), Peru
Correspondence
Gary Strobel
uplgs{at}montana.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the partial ITS-5.8S rDNA-ITS sequence data of M. albus isolate E-6 is EF183509.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ecuador is widely recognized as a world centre for biodiversity because it has a multitude of natural habitats ranging from the vast reaches of the upper Amazonian basin and the cloud forests of the high Andes to a number of coastal dry-monsoonal forests. These areas harbour rich plant and animal diversity and many of these species are endemic. Thus, it may follow that great microbial diversity is also associated with the diversity of the macro flora and fauna of this region (Strobel & Daisy, 2003
). A search was launched in areas of Ecuador bearing biological resemblance to those parts of the world where other isolates of M. albus have been obtained. Plant parts were harvested and submitted to a selective isolation procedure to determine if they harbour novel Muscodor isolates (Daisy et al., 2002
; Ezra et al., 2004a
).
From this study, we identified one endophyte that resembled Muscodor spp. and produced VOCs with antibiotic activity. This organism has unique properties, relative to all other M. albus isolates, in terms of the VOCs that it produces as well as its biological properties. It also possesses some unusual mycelial structural features involving intricate hyphal intertwining and cementing that allows the entire mycelial mat, on an agar surface, to be easily lifted from it. In turn, with the successful cultivation of Guazuma ulmifolia, the host plant, we have succeeded in re-establishing the fungus in its host. It has not previously been possible to obtain a successful introduction and establishment of Muscodor spp. in any plant. This finding has enormous implications for the eventual use of these organisms as inoculants on plants or plant parts to provide protection against certain pests and pathogens. The isolation of the fungus, its biological features and activities, along with studies showing its re-establishment in its host plant, are described in this report.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Test fungi and bacteria.
All plant-pathogenic fungi used in the bioassay test system were obtained from Drs Don Mathre and Nina Zidak of the MSU Department of Plant Sciences. Candida albicans and bacterial cultures were supplied by the MSU Department of Microbiology. All fungi were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA), and bacteria on Luria Broth agar (LBA) at 23 °C; only freshly transferred cultures (4–7 days old), unless otherwise stated, were used in the fungal bioassay tests.
Scanning (SEM) and other electron microscopies.
Isolate E-6, grown on PDA, was processed for SEM. Many agar pieces containing the fungus were placed into filter paper packets and suspended in 2 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2–7.4) with Triton X (a wetting agent). Tissues were aspirated for 5 min and left overnight as previously described (Ezra et al., 2004a
). For SEM the fungal material was critical-point dried, gold sputter-coated and images were recorded with a Philips XL30 ESEM FEG in high-vacuum mode using the Everhart–Thornley detector.
Because it appeared that exploratory hyphae of the fungus were developing within 24 h of a mycelial mat being placed near to its host, observations of this relationship could not be seen by regular SEM techniques. Instead, carefully prepared samples were examined by environmental SEM (ESEM) as described by Castillo et al. (2005)
. Since this technique is non-disruptive and relies on the presence of free water to generate images, it was successfully used to examine the interactions occurring between the tightly interwoven fungal mat and various plant surfaces. Thus, freshly prepared specimens with intact hyphal connections from the mycelial mat to the plant were examined by ESEM and images were recorded with an XL30 ESEM FEG. A gaseous secondary electron detector was used with a spot size of 3, at 15 kV. The temperature was 4 °C, with a chamber pressure which ranged from 5 to 6 torr (666–800 Pa), providing humidity up to 100 % at the sample.
Tissues were prepared for thin-section transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies by fixation in 2 % glutaraldehyde in sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2–7.4) for 2 h at room temperature. After fixation, tissues were washed six times with 1 : 1 water-buffer solution, and post-fixed and stained with buffered 1 % osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 0–4 °C. After washing six times with the water-buffer, the tissues were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and embedded in Spurr's resin (Spurr, 1969
). Tissues were sectioned, stained with Reynolds' alkaline lead citrate (Reynolds, 1963
) and images were recorded with an FEI Technai 12 transmission electron microscope.
Fungal DNA isolation and acquiring ITS-5.8S rDNA sequence information.
A pure E-6 culture, growing on PDA, was used as a source of DNA after incubation for 7–10 days at 25 °C using the Rapid Homogenization: Plant Leaf DNA Amplification kit (Cartagen). Some of the techniques used were similar to those used to genetically characterize other M. albus isolates from Australia (Ezra et al., 2004a
). Squares of the cultured mycelia (0.5 cm2) were cut from 1 week old cultures. The agar was scraped from the bottom of the pieces, in order to exclude as much agar as possible. The pieces were placed into 1.5 ml Eppendorf vials and incubated for about 10 min at –80 °C. The DNA was then extracted according to the instructions of the kit manufacturer. Extracted DNA was diluted (1 : 9) in double-distilled, sterile water and 1 µl samples were used for PCR amplification. The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA sequence was amplified by PCR using the primers ITS1 (TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGGG) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC). The PCR procedure was carried out in a 14 µl reaction mix containing 1 µl DNA extracted from the fungal culture (1 : 9 dilution), 0.5 µl primer ITS1 and 0.5 µl primer ITS4, 7 µl RedMix plus PCR mix with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (GeneChoice) and 5 µl ddH2O PCR grade (Fisher Scientific). The PCR amplification was performed in a Biometra personal cycler: 96 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 50 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s, followed by a 72 °C cycle for 5 min. The PCR products were examined using gel electrophoresis, on a 1.3 % agarose gel for 30 min at 100 V with TAE buffer (GelXLUltra V-2 from Labnet International) or the Wealtec GES cell system. Gels were soaked in a 0.5 µg ml–1 ethidium bromide solution for 5 min and then washed in distilled water for 5 min. Gel imaging was performed under UV light in a Bio-Imaging System (model 202D; DNR-Imaging Systems). A
500 bp PCR product was purified using the UltraClean PCR Clean Up DNA Purification kit (MO BIO Laboratories). Purified products were sent to Danyel Biotech, Rehovot, Israel, for direct PCR sequencing. Sequencing was performed on both strands of the PCR product using ITS1 and ITS4 primers and DYEnamic ET terminators on a MegaBACETM1000 analysis system. Sequences were submitted to GenBank on the NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Sequences obtained in this study were compared to the GenBank database using the BLAST software on the NCBI website: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/).
Bioassay test for volatile antimicrobials.
A relatively simple bioassay test system was devised that allowed only for VOCs from the fungus being the active agents for any microbial inhibition being examined, as previously described (Strobel et al., 2001
). A 2.5 cm wide strip of agar was removed from the mid-portion of a standard PDA Petri dish, then M. albus was inoculated and grown on one side of the plate for varying time periods prior to testing. The test fungus or bacterium was placed on to the agar half moon strip on the opposite side of the plate. Individual fungi were then inoculated on the test side of the plate on a 3 mm3 plug of agar. Bacteria and the yeast culture were simply streaked (1.5 cm long) on to the PDA on the test side of the plate. The plate was wrapped with two individual pieces of Parafilm and incubated at 23 °C. The growth of test organisms was visually judged on the basis of any new microbial density appearing on the area of the agar that had been inoculated. Eventually, the linear growth of the filamentous fungi (as measured from the edge of the agar inoculum plugs) as well as the viability of each test fungus and bacterium were evaluated. The test with each designated assay organism was repeated at least three times.
Qualitative analysis of M. albus E-6 volatiles.
The method used to analyse the gases in the air space above the 7-day old culture of the M. albus mycelium growing in Petri plates was similar to that used for the original isolate of M. albus, strain CZ-620 (Strobel et al., 2001
). First, a baked solid-phase micro-extraction syringe (Supelco) consisting of 50/30 divinylbenzene/carburen on polydimethylsiloxane on a stable flex fibre was placed through a small hole drilled in the side of the Petri plate and exposed to the vapour phase for 45 min. The syringe was then inserted into the splitless injection port of a Hewlett Packard 6890 gas chromatograph (GC) containing a 30 mx0.25 mm i.d. ZB Wax capillary column with a film thickness of 0.50 µm. The column was temperature programmed as follows: 30 °C for 2 min, then increasing to 220 °C at 5 °C min–1. The carrier gas was ultra-high-purity helium (local distributor) and the initial column head pressure was 50 kPa. Prior to trapping the volatiles, the fibre was conditioned at 240 °C for 20 min under a flow of helium gas. A 30 s injection time was used to introduce the sample fibre into the GC. The GC was interfaced to a Hewlett Packard 5973 mass selective detector (mass spectrometer, MS) operating at unit resolution. The MS scanned at a rate of 2.5 scans per second over a mass range of 35–360 Da. Data acquisition and data processing were performed on the Hewlett Packard ChemStation software system. Initial identification of the unknowns produced by M. albus was made through library comparison using the NIST database (National Institute of Standards and Technology).
Comparable analyses were conducted on Petri plates containing only PDA, and the compounds obtained therefrom, mostly styrene and its derivatives, were subtracted from the analyses done on plates containing the fungus. Tentative identification, based on comparative mass spectral information between observed data and those in the NIST database, was made for 22 fungal VOCs. Final confirmatory identification was made on 9 of the 22 compounds by comparing GC/MS data of authentic standards with the data on the fungal VOCs.
Sourcing of authentic standards for fungal VOCs.
Many of the organic alcohols, esters and acids were purchased from Aldrich/Sigma; bulnesene was a gift of Dr C. H. Heathcote, University of California, Berkeley. Acetic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester was prepared by standard organic synthesis by Dr Chris Markworth of Montana State University using previously described methods (Hoefle et al., 1978
).
Inoculation of G. ulmifolia and recovery of M. albus E-6.
Seeds of G. ulmifolia were recovered from several fruit pods of this plant. The seeds were scarified by exposing them to boiling water for 30 s and then placing them on wetted paper mats in a disinfected plastic box for 3–4 weeks, after which germination began. Ultimately, the young seedlings were planted in sterilized soil, watered with sterile distilled water and fertilized every 2 weeks with an inorganic fertilizer containing N, P, K at a ratio of 20/10/20. The plants were placed in a high-humidity greenhouse having both natural and incandescent light sources for several months until used. When the plants had grown 5–7 cm (2 months old) they were used for inoculation studies. All plant inoculations were done by placing a 2-week-old mycelial mat 0.70x1.3–1.5 cm, carefully teased from the PDA agar surface, over the young growing leaf, followed by making small pin-point punctures through the mat into the plant surface below with a sterilized sharp knife point. The mats, with no added sticking agent, readily adhered to the leaf surface and a few droplets of water were added on alternate days. All inoculated plants (seedlings or larger plants) were always intact in the presence of 100 % relative humidity, indirect light, and an exposure of at least 6 days to the fungal mats. At the end of the incubation time, the fungal mats were lifted away from the plant surfaces and the plant or plant part swabbed with a Kimwipe having been dampened with a 70 % ethanolic/water solution. Effectively, this treatment decontaminated the plant surface from unwanted microbes along with any surface-borne hyphae of M. albus. The surface-treated leaves were then placed on PDA containing 10 p.p.m. chloroamphenicol to discourage bacterial growth and encourage the emergence of any M. albus hyphae that had become established within the leaf tissues of G. ulmifolia. Plants not having been inoculated with M. albus, but wounded with the knife blade, served as controls. In addition, at least 12 seeds of G. ulmifolia having been scarified and also treated with 95 % ethanol and then flamed and plated on PDA, served as an additional control to determine if the plants were already likely carriers of the fungus E-6.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Partial ITS-5.8S rDNA-ITS sequence data of isolate E-6 were obtained and deposited as entry EF183509 in GenBank. A BLAST search of the database indicated at least 99 % sequence identity (564/567 bases) between the sequence of isolate E-6 and the original isolate of M. albus, CZ-620 (GenBank accession no. AF324336). This sequence information on E-6 further adds to an exceedingly tight and clustered relationship among the ITS-5.8S rDNAs among all of the organisms whose sequences are now on deposit at GenBank listed as Muscodor spp. (Atmosukarto et al., 2005
; Ezra et al., 2004a
). Therefore, this fungus will be referred to as Muscodor albus E-6 in this report.
VOC production from M. albus E-6
M. albus E-6 produced at least 22 VOCs and 9 of these could be positively identified on the basis of a GC/MS comparison with authentic standards obtained from commercial sources as well as organic synthesis (Table 1
) (Strobel et al., 2001
). The remaining compounds were identified primarily on the basis of their mass spectral properties as compared to the NIST database. Of the compounds produced by this organism the most abundant was propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, followed by propanoic acid, 2-methyl-methyl ester and 1 butanol, 2-methyl (Table 1
). Although these compounds have been detected in M. albus CZ-620, they are present in relatively low abundance (Strobel et al., 2001
). Interestingly, none of the other isolates of M. albus produce the butanoic or butenal derivatives as does E-6, making it unique in this respect (Table 1
) (Strobel et al., 2001
; Atmosukarto et al., 2005
; Ezra et al., 2004a
). Likewise, a number of other volatiles appear that are unique to this isolate, including guaiol; formamide, N-(1-methylpropyl); 2-furanmethanol; and 1-octene, 3-ethyl-; along with some azulene and naphthalene compounds (Table 1
). Furthermore, other compounds usually seen in M. albus isolates also appeared in the VOCs of isolate E-6, including caryophyllene; phenylethyl alcohol; acetic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester; bulnesene; and various propanoic acid, 2-methyl- derivatives.
|
|
Plant inoculation studies
Attempts have been made by various investigators to artificially establish M. albus CZ-620 into a plethora of agriculturally important crop plants but with no success (G. Strobel & D. Ezra, unpublished; D. Manker, unpublished). Ultimately, the idea of these experiments was to determine if the host/endophyte relationship may confer disease or pest resistance to the host crop plant. In no case, however, in any of these studies was the original host of M. albus plant tested since all plants from which M. albus has been isolated have been tropical trees or vines not usually found in temperate areas or research facilities located therein. However, in the case of M. albus E-6 its tropical host is Guazuma ulmifolia, and it was possible to grow a multitude of these plants in the MSU plant growth facility. Leaves on the developing seedlings were inoculated directly with mycelial mats, followed by puncture wounds through the mats into the leaf surface (Fig. 1C
). Initially, as examined by ESEM, the fungus seemed to develop exploratory hyphae which were produced by the mycelial mat after 24 h (Fig. 1D
). These hyphae were numerous and were directed towards the plant tissue itself. Initially, it appeared that each directional hypha became intertwined with other developing hyphae after it became attached to the host plant tissues (Fig. 1D
). The fungus then apparently entered the host plant tissues.
A week after inoculation, the mycelial mats were removed from the leaves. No apparent damage to the leaves was noted except for the puncture wounds themselves. A control set of leaves was also tested but without the fungal inoculum having been placed on the leaves. The leaves were excised and treated with 70 % ethanol on a Kimwipe tissue to kill surface contaminating microflora. Small leaf pieces cut through the original inoculation sites were placed on PDA with chloroamphenicol and incubated for several days. A fungus with mycelia resembling M. albus (Fig. 1E
) developed after 48 h in 4/8 of the inoculation spots on leaf designated A and in 8/15 of the spots on the leaf designated leaf B. In at least four of these cases the fungus emerged at least 2–4 mm from the original wound site, suggesting that tissue colonization had occurred well away from the inoculation site. The recovered fungi (representative isolates A and B) were both subjected to partial ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis and the results in both cases were identical to the original M. albus E-6 (GenBank EF183509). Isolates A and B were subsequently reinoculated into young leaves of G. ulmifolia and the results successfully repeated.
Furthermore, both isolates A and B had biological activities against the bioassay fungal test organisms identical to those of M. albus E-6, and each had the same ropy mycelium as seen in the original isolate of M. albus E-6 (Fig. 1B
). In the control experiments, it was not possible to isolate a fungus resembling M. albus E-6 from the leaves (successful recoveries per lesion per control test leaf were 0/13 and 0/12 in leaf A, and 0/14 and 0/14 in leaf B). Furthermore, it was not possible to isolate the fungus from 14 G. ulmifolia seeds that had been pre-treated with 70 % ethanol, flamed to remove the excess alcohol and then placed on to water agar plates for 3 weeks. Thus, the evidence supports the conclusion that it was possible to get M. albus E-6 re-established in its native host plant under the conditions described and that the fungus had not been pre-established in the plants that were under investigation.
The host plant/fungus relationship was further examined by TEM. The tissues examined were those in which only M. albus E-6, as the sole endophyte, was present as determined by culturing of test locations on the leaf. It appeared that the fungal hyphae were mostly developing intercellularly (Fig. 1F
). This condition is probably the most common since if the hyphae were mainly intracellular one would expect a greater manifestation of a pathological condition in the host tissues (Fig. 1F
). Some intracellular hyphae were observed, but this was probably in cells that had been injured by wounding in the original inoculation technique. In nature, the hyphae of M. albus are probably primarily located intercellularly since intracellular locations may result in tissue pathology and this condition is not observed either in nature or in the inoculated G. ulmifolia seedlings in the greenhouse.
Conclusions
The relationship of M. albus E-6 to its host seems intriguing since there were no external symptoms or signs on its original host plant, G. ulmifolia, that suggested the presence of a micro-organism. M. albus E-6 can be considered a true endophytic micro-organism, as is M. albus CZ-620 (Strobel et al., 2001
). G. ulmifolia is in the plant family Sterculicaeae (now Malvaceae); this now makes at least eight tropical plant families with which the fungal genus Muscodor is associated. It is now becoming clear that Muscodor is more widely distributed than originally supposed (Strobel et al., 2001
).
M. albus E-6 makes a series of compounds that collectively act to kill other microbes (Table 2
). It is tempting to consider that this fungus lives in its host in a symbiotic condition, providing protection from pathogens while surviving and growing on plant nutrients. Now, as a result of the work on this isolate of Muscodor, this hypothesis can be tested using G. ulmifolia trees that have been inoculated with E-6, which has become established therein. Appropriate generalized pathogens could be used to challenge seedlings that have the endophytic E-6 organism.
One of the biggest mysteries surrounding Muscodor spp. is an understanding of any aspect of their life cycle. For instance, spore production under laboratory conditions has never been observed, making it difficult to imagine how the organism may be dispersed in nature. It was not possible to acquire a successful establishment of E-6 in wounded hypocotyls of young germinating seedlings. This experiment was repeated at least 10 times with no success. It would seem that the hypocotyl would be vulnerable tissue if the fungus were associated with moist plant litter, wherein it could easily become associated with the newly developing plant. However, one conclusion from this study is that M. albus E-6 can enter its host via a wound in an appropriate host tissue such as a leaf (Fig. 1
). Because they seem to be vulnerable, it may be that insect-produced wounds on developing leaves serve as a portal of entry for the fungus, which may move into leaf tissues from plant debris previously infested with the fungus. The newly inoculated plant could then serve as a host for the fungus as it moves throughout its tissues in the course of time.
It seems as if M. albus E-6 is behaving in a comparable manner to its relatives on other continents (Ezra et al., 2004a
; Strobel et al., 2001
). That is, it makes antibiotic volatiles but the composition of these gases is unique to this organism (Table 1
). Only a few of these compounds were acquired to confirm compound identity, but not enough were available to carry out inhibition studies with the compounds themselves (Strobel et al., 2001
). Nevertheless, the spectrum of biological activity is generally unique to this isolate since both representative Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, E. coli and B. subtilis, were killed on exposure to the VOCs and reduced activity was seen against organisms such as R. solani and S. sclerotiorum (Strobel et al., 2001
)(Table 2
).
The potential uses of Muscodor for agriculture, industrial and medicinal applications have not escaped our attention (Strobel & Daisy, 2003
; Mercier & Jimenez, 2004
; Stinson et al., 2003
). It seems as if, for each new Muscodor that is found, additional potential applications become apparent. For instance, the discovery of M. vitigenus, making only naphthalene as its primary VOC product, has implications for causing aversion to insects as its main use. In the case of M. albus E-6, it seems that for the first time a Muscodor isolate has been found that can kill a Gram-positive bacterium (Table 2
).
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Edited by: H. A. B. Wösten
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Castillo, U., Myers, S., Browne, L., Strobel, G. A., Hess, W. M., Hanks, J. & Reay, D. (2005). Scanning electron microscopy of some endophytic streptomycetes in snakevine – Kennedia nigricans. Scanning 27, 305–311.[Medline]
Daisy, B. H., Gary, A., Strobel, G. A., Castillo, U., Sears, J., Weaver, D. K. & Runyon, J. B. (2002). Naphthalene production by Muscodor vitigenus, a novel endophytic fungus. Microbiology 148, 3737–3741.
Ezra, D., Hess, W. M. & Strobel, G. A. (2004a). New endophytic isolates of Muscodor albus, a volatile antibiotic-producing fungus. Microbiology 150, 4023–4031.
Ezra, D., Jasper, J., Rogers, T., Knighton, B., Grimsrud, E. & Strobel, G. A. (2004b). Proton-transfer reaction-mass spectroscopy as a technique to measure volatile emissions of Muscodor albus. Plant Sci 166, 1471–1477.
Hoefle, G., Steglich, W. & Vorbrueggen, H. (1978). 4-Dialkyl aminopyridines as highly active acylation catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 17, 569–583.[CrossRef]
Mercier, J. & Jimenez, J. I. (2004). Control of decay of apples and peaches by the biofumigant fungus Muscodor albus. Postharvest Biol Technol 31, 1–8.[CrossRef]
Reynolds, E. S. (1963). The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 17, 208–212.
Sopalun, K., Strobel, G. A., Hess, W. M. & Worapong, J. (2003). A record of Muscodor albus, an endophyte from Myristica fragrans, in Thailand. Mycotaxon 88, 239–247.
Spurr, A. R. (1969). A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26, 31–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stinson, A. M., Zidack, N. K., Strobel, G. A. & Jacobsen, B. J. (2003). Effect of mycofumigation with Muscodor albus and Muscodor roseus on seedling diseases of sugarbeet and Verticillium wilt of eggplant. Plant Dis 87, 1349–1354.[CrossRef]
Strobel, G. A. & Daisy, B. (2003). Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67, 491–502.
Strobel, G. A., Dirksie, E., Sears, J. & Markworth, C. (2001). Volatile antimicrobials from Muscodor albus, a novel endophytic fungus. Microbiology 147, 2943–2950.
Worapong, J., Strobel, G. A., Ford, E. J., Li, J. Y., Baird, G. & Hess, W. M. (2001). Muscodor albus anam. gen. et sp. nov., an endophyte from Cinnamomum zeylanicum. Mycotaxon 79, 67–79.
Worapong, J., Strobel, G. A., Daisy, B., Castillo, U., Baird, G. & Hess, W. M. (2002). Muscodor roseus anam. sp. nov., an endophyte from Grevillea pteridifolia. Mycotaxon 81, 463–475.
Received 6 April 2007;
revised 1 May 2007;
accepted 7 May 2007.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |