| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, L8N 3Z5, Canada
Correspondence
Radhey S. Gupta
gupta{at}mcmaster.ca
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The alignment of several DNA gyrase B sequences is available with the online version of this paper.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Garrity et al., 2005; Schelsner et al., 2006; Ward et al., 2006). Of these, all known chlamydiae species are obligate intracellular parasites of eukaryotic hosts and they are responsible for a wide spectrum of diseases in humans and animals (Everett et al., 1999; Corsaro & Greub, 2006). The verrucomicrobia and planctomycetes species are found in a wide variety of terrestrial and aquatic environments (Strous et al., 2006; Schelsner et al., 2006; Ward et al., 2006). Although most of them are free-living bacteria, several live in close association with eukaryotic hosts, including some verrucomicrobia species that are endosymbionts of nematodes and ciliates (Wagner & Horn, 2006; Schelsner et al., 2006; Ward et al., 2006). Of these three groups, chlamydiae and planctomycetes, unlike most other bacteria, contain no detectable peptidoglycan in their cell envelopes (Konig et al., 1984; Fox et al., 1990; Ward et al., 2006). The evolutionary relationships among these three lineages are presently not resolved (Ward et al., 2000; Jenkins & Fuerst, 2001; Teeling et al., 2004; Ciccarelli et al., 2006; Wagner & Horn, 2006; Strous et al., 2006; Schelsner et al., 2006; Ward et al., 2006). Wagner & Horn (2006) reported a monophyletic grouping of these three lineages in the 16S rRNA trees, but the bootstrap support of the combined clade was not high. A grouping of the Planctomycetes with chlamydiae was also seen in phylogenetic trees based on concatenated sequences for several proteins (Teeling et al., 2004; Strous et al., 2006), but these trees lacked any verrucomicrobia species. In contrast, other studies based on either 16S and 23S rRNA (Ward et al., 2000), or sequences for individual or concatenated proteins (Jenkins & Fuerst, 2001; Ciccarelli et al., 2006), have found no statistical support for a specific relationship between the Verrucomicrobia, Planctomycetes and Chlamydiales lineages. Hence, it is important to examine the evolutionary relationships among these three groups using other approaches.
In recent years, sequence information for numerous genomes including many chlamydiae (Stephens et al., 1998; Kalman et al., 1999; Read et al., 2000, 2003; Horn et al., 2004), as well as two planctomycetes (Glockner et al., 2003; Strous et al., 2006), has become available (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/lproks.cgi). In addition, sequencing of genomes from several other species from these groups including Simkania negevensis (Chlamydiales), Blastopirellula marina and Gemmata obscuriglobus (Planctomycetes) and Verrucomicrobium spinosum is under way, and sequence information for many genes/proteins from these species is available at The Institute for Genomic Research web site (http://www.tigr.org). The resulting vast expansion in sequence information makes it now possible to examine the evolutionary relationship among these bacteria by both traditional phylogenetic methods and novel approaches. The shared presence of rare genomic changes (RGCs) such as conserved inserts or deletions (i.e. indels) in protein sequences provides a powerful tool for evolutionary relationships among distantly related groups (Gupta & Griffiths, 2006). In earlier work, we have described many conserved indels in protein sequences that are either specific for the chlamydiae species or provide information regarding their branching relative to other bacterial phyla (Griffiths & Gupta, 2001; Griffiths et al., 2005; Gupta & Griffiths, 2006). In this work, we have examined the evolutionary relationships among chlamydiae, Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetes by traditional phylogenetic methods as well as by identifying conserved indels in protein sequences that are uniquely shared by species from these groups.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
, β and β' subunits (RpoA, RpoB and RpoC, respectively), SecA and SecY] for 33 species covering all main phyla of bacteria were retrieved from the NCBI database. Sequence alignments for individual proteins were created using the CLUSTAL X (1.83) program using the default settings and then concatenated into a large dataset. The poorly aligned regions from this alignment were removed using the Gblocks 0.91 program (Castresana, 2000). The final alignment file, which contained 5093 positions, is available as Supplementary Data with online version of this paper. Bootstrapped phylogenetic trees for this alignment were constructed by neighbour-joining (NJ), maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony (MP) methods, as described in our recent work (Gupta & Sneath, 2006).
The conserved insert in RpoB that is specific for the chlamydiae and Verrucomicrobia was identified by visual inspection of different sequence alignments (Griffiths et al., 2005). The insert in the lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) was previously identified as a Chlamydiales-specific signature (Griffiths et al., 2005). The species distribution of various conserved inserts was determined by carrying out BLASTP searches against the NCBI non-redundant (nr) database on a short segment of the sequence (between 80 and 120 aa) containing the insert and its flanking regions (Griffiths et al., 2005). The preliminary sequence data for V. spinosum, B. marina and G. obscuriglobus were obtained by BLAST searches against the partial genomes of these species at The Institute for Genomic Research web site (http://www.tigr.org).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
. In the trees obtained using different methods, the species corresponding to various main phyla within Bacteria (e.g. Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Spirochaetes, Deinococcus-Thermus, Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi, Proteobacteria, etc.) formed distinct clades with high bootstrap scores, but their relative branching was not resolved. All chlamydiae species formed a strongly supported clade in these trees and V. spinosum formed its outgroup with high statistical support (>90 % bootstrap score) by different methods. The Planctomycetes species showed no specific association with the chlamydiae-Verrucomicrobium clade in the ML tree (Fig. 1), although in the NJ tree they formed the immediate outgroup of the chlamydiae-Verrucomicrobium clade with high (97 %) bootstrap score (results not shown). A similar relationship of the Planctomycetes to the chlamydiae-Verrucomicrobium was seen in the MP tree, although the bootstrap score was only 55 % (results not shown).
|
). We recently described a number of conserved indels in proteins such as RpoA, EF-Tu, EF-P, gyrase B and LysRS, that based upon the available information were distinctive characteristics of the Chlamydiales species (Griffiths et al., 2005). Due to lack of sequence information, the presence of these signatures in Verrucomicrobium was not determined. To determine whether any of these indels are also present in V. spinosum and various available Planctomycetales species, BLAST searches on these proteins were carried out against the genomes of these species to obtain sequence information for the corresponding homologues. These studies have revealed that the indels in RpoA, EF-Tu, EF-P and gyrase B are specific for the Chlamydiales and were not found in either V. spinosum or any of the planctomycetes species (viz. Rhodopirellula baltica, B. marina, G. obscuriglobus and also Candidatus Kuenenia stuttgartiensis) (results not shown). However, the 6 aa insert in LysRS, which was previously indicated to be Chlamydiales-specific, was also present in the V. spinosum homologue in the same position (Fig. 2), although it was not present in any of the planctomycetes species. For this insert, while the sequence on the left is highly conserved, the sequence downstream to that shown here is not conserved in distantly related species (not shown). However, there is a reasonable degree of conservation on both sides of the insert to ascertain that it is not present in other species.
|
). The sequence of this insert (i.e. RRK) is completely conserved in all Chlamydiales and it is very similar to that found in V. spinosum (RRR). The RpoB homologues from most bacteria, including chlamydiae and V. spinosum, contain another RRR or RKR motif adjacent to this insert. Hence, this insert has very likely resulted from a duplication of this conserved motif in the in Chlamydiales-Verrucomicrobium. The RR(K)R motif in RpoB lies downstream of a region that is involved in binding of the transcription repair coupling factor Mfd (Park et al., 2002). However, the function of this motif or why it was duplicated in these bacteria is presently not known. The identical lengths and locations of the conserved inserts in the LysRS and RpoB proteins in various Chlamydiales and V. spinosum strongly suggest that these RGCs were introduced in a common ancestor of these two groups, exclusive of all other bacteria.
|
, 2004). These studies have suggested the placement of Chlamydiae species in the same position as the Fibrobacteres-Chlorobi-Bacteroidetes (FCB) groups. The bacterial phyla consisting of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Deinococcus-Thermus, Cyanobacteria and Spirochaetes were inferred to branch prior to the Chlamydiae-FCB groups, whereas Aquificales and different divisions of Proteobacteria were indicated as late branching groups (Griffiths & Gupta, 2001, 2004). Due to lack of sequence information for Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetes, the branching positions of these groups were not inferred. We have examined the presence and absence of various main-line indels in the above proteins in the Planctomycetes and Verrucomicrobia species. For the described indels in all of these proteins, except AlaRS, various Planctomycetes and V. spinosum showed similar distribution profiles, as reported in earlier work for the chlamydiae species (Griffiths & Gupta, 2001, 2004) (results not shown). Whereas the insert in AlaRS was present in all chlamydiae, V. spinosum and G. obscuriglobus, it was absent from other planctomycetes species. The observed heterogeneity in the distribution profile of this indel could be a result of lateral gene transfer. Overall, the species distribution profiles of these indels provide evidence that Verrucomicrobia as well as Planctomycetes branch at a similar position as the Chlamydiae-FCB groups of bacteria.
A prominent insert in the DNA gyrase B protein now provides clarification regarding the branching position of the Planctomycetes, Chlamydiales and Verrucomicrobia relative to the FCB groups of bacteria. This indel was earlier described in relation to its effects on gyrase function, but its species distribution profile or evolutionary implications were not discussed (Chatterji et al., 2000). In this highly conserved protein, which plays an essential role in the transcription and replication processes in bacteria, a large insert (>150 aa) in a conserved region is uniquely present in all Proteobacteria, Aquificales, different Chlamydiales, as well as in V. spinosum and all four Planctomycetes species (see Supplementary Fig. S1, available with the online version of this paper). However, this insert is not present in the gyrase B homologues from other bacterial phyla or archaea, indicating that the bacterial groups lacking this insert have branched off prior to those containing the insert (see interpretive diagram in Supplementary Fig. S1). The presence of this indel in various chlamydiae, V. spinosum and Planctomycetes species, but its absence in different Fibrobacteres-Chlorobi-Bacteroidetes species now provides evidence that the latter groups (FCB) have branched off prior to the Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia and Chlamydiales.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
and other results discussed above). Thus, it is possible that in the future some novel RGCs might be discovered that are uniquely shared by these three groups. However, until such a specific relationship is demonstrated, the placement of Planctomycetes in a single superphylum with Verrucomicrobia and Chlamydiales is not warranted (Wagner & Horn, 2006).
All known chlamydiae species are obligate intracellular parasites of the eukaryotic cells (Everett et al., 1999; Kalman et al., 1999; Schachter & Stamm, 1999; Corsaro & Greub, 2006). A specific relationship between them and the Verrucomicrobia, as suggested by this work, indicates that Verrucomicrobia are the closest free-living relatives of the chlamydiae. In view of this, it is of much interest to determine what other biochemical and physiological properties are uniquely shared by these two groups (or present in Verrucomicrobia but lacking in the chlamydiae), which could provide important insights into the adaptation of the chlamydiae to the parasitic life-style. The signature sequences that are uniquely shared by these groups should also prove useful in the identification of other species that are specifically related to them, some of which may turn out to be even closer relatives of the chlamydiae.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Edited by: T. P. Hatch
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Chatterji, M., Unniraman, S., Maxwell, A. & Nagaraja, V. (2000). The additional 165 amino acids in the B protein of Escherichia coli DNA gyrase have an important role in DNA binding. J Biol Chem 275, 22888–22894.
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C. J., Snel, B. & Bork, P. (2006). Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283–1287.
Corsaro, D. & Greub, G. (2006). Pathogenic potential of novel chlamydiae and diagnostic approaches to infections due to these obligate intracellular bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 19, 283–297.
Everett, K. D., Bush, R. M. & Andersen, A. A. (1999). Emended description of the order Chlamydiales, proposal of Parachlamydiaceae fam. nov. and Simkaniaceae fam. nov., each containing one monotypic genus, revised taxonomy of the family Chlamydiaceae, including a new genus and five new species, and standards for the identification of organisms. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 415–440.
Fox, A., Rogers, J. C., Gilbart, J., Morgan, S., Davis, C. H., Knight, S. & Wyrick, P. B. (1990). Muramic acid is not detectable in Chlamydia psittaci or Chlamydia trachomatis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Infect Immun 58, 835–837.
Garrity, G. M., Bell, J. A. & Lilburn, T. G. (2005). The Revised Road Map to the Manual. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 2, part A, Introductory Essays, pp. 159–220. Edited by D. J. Brenner, N. R. Krieg & J. T. Staley. Springer: New York.
Glockner, F. O., Kube, M., Bauer, M., Teeling, H., Lombardot, T., Ludwig, W., Gade, D., Beck, A., Borzym, K. & other authors (2003). Complete genome sequence of the marine planctomycete Pirellula sp. strain 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 8298–8303.
Griffiths, E. & Gupta, R. S. (2001). The use of signature sequences in different proteins to determine the relative branching order of bacterial divisions: evidence that Fibrobacter diverged at a similar time to Chlamydia and the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides division. Microbiology 147, 2611–2622.
Griffiths, E. & Gupta, R. S. (2004). Signature sequences in diverse proteins provide evidence for the late divergence of the order Aquificales. Int Microbiol 7, 41–52.[Medline]
Griffiths, E., Petrich, A. & Gupta, R. S. (2005). Conserved indels in essential proteins that are distinctive characteristics of Chlamydiales and provide novel means for their identification. Microbiology 151, 2647–2657.
Gupta, R. S. & Griffiths, E. (2006). Chlamydiae-specific proteins and indels: novel tools for studies. Trends Microbiol 14, 527–535.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gupta, R. S. & Sneath, P. H. A. (2006). Application of the character compatibility approach to generalized molecular sequence data: branching order of the proteobacterial subdivisions. J Mol Evol 64, 90–100.[CrossRef][Medline]
Horn, M., Collingro, A., Schmitz-Esser, S., Beier, C. L., Purkhold, U., Fartmann, B., Brandt, P., Nyakatura, G. J., Droege, M. & other authors (2004). Illuminating the evolutionary history of chlamydiae. Science 304, 728–730.
Jenkins, C. & Fuerst, J. A. (2001). Phylogenetic analysis of evolutionary relationships of the planctomycete division of the domain Bacteria based on amino acid sequences of elongation factor Tu. J Mol Evol 52, 405–418.[Medline]
Kalman, S., Mitchell, W., Marathe, R., Lammel, C., Fan, J., Hyman, R. W., Olinger, L., Grimwood, J., Davis, R. W. & Stephens, R. S. (1999). Comparative genomes of Chlamidia pneumoniae and C. trachomatis. Nat Genet 21, 385–389.[CrossRef][Medline]
Konig, E., Schlesner, H. & Hirsch, P. (1984). Cell wall studies on budding bacteria of the Planctomyces/Pasteuria group and on a Prosthecomicrobium sp. Arch Microbiol 138, 200–205.[CrossRef]
Park, J. S., Marr, M. T. & Roberts, J. W. (2002). E. coli transcription repair coupling factor (Mfd protein) rescues arrested complexes by promoting forward translocation. Cell 109, 757–767.[CrossRef][Medline]
Read, T. D., Brunham, R. C., Shen, C., Gill, S. R., Heidelberg, J. F., White, O., Hickey, E. K., Peterson, J., Utterback, T. & other authors (2000). Genome sequences of Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn and Chlamydia pneumoniae AR39. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 1397–1406.
Read, T. D., Myers, G. S. A., Brunham, R. C., Nelson, W. C., Paulsen, I. T., Heidelberg, J., Holtzapple, E., Khouri, H., Federova, N. B. & other authors (2003). Genome sequence of Chlamydophila caviae (Chlamydia psittaci GPIC): examining the role of niche-specific genes in the evolution of the Chlamydiaceae. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 2134–2147.
Schachter, J. & Stamm, W. E. (1999). Chlamydia. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, pp. 795–806. Edited by P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover & R. H. Yolken. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
Schelsner, H., Jenkins, C. & Staley, J. T. (2006). The phylum Verrucomicrobia: a phylogenetically heterogeneous bacterial group. In The Prokaryotes, pp. 881–896. Edited by M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, K. H. Schleifer & E. Stackebrandt. New York: Springer.
Stephens, R. S., Kalman, S., Lammel, C., Fan, J., Marathe, R., Aravind, L., Mitchell, W., Olinger, L., Tatusov, R. L. & other authors (1998). Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282, 754–759.
Strous, M., Pelletier, E., Mangenot, S., Rattei, T., Lehner, A., Taylor, M. W., Horn, M., Daims, H., Bartol-Mavel, D. & other authors (2006). Deciphering the evolution and metabolism of an anammox bacterium from a community genome. Nature 440, 790–794.[CrossRef][Medline]
Teeling, H., Lombardot, T., Bauer, M., Ludwig, W. & Glockner, F. O. (2004). Evaluation of the phylogenetic position of the planctomycete ‘Rhodopirellula baltica' SH 1 by means of concatenated ribosomal protein sequences, DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit sequences and whole genome trees. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 791–801.
Wagner, M. & Horn, M. (2006). The Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chlamydiae and sister phyla comprise a superphylum with biotechnological and medical relevance. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17, 241–249.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ward, N. L., Rainey, F. A., Hedlund, B. P., Staley, J. T., Ludwig, W. & Stackebrandt, E. (2000). Comparative phylogenetic analyses of members of the order Planctomycetales and the division Verrucomicrobia: 23S rRNA gene sequence analysis supports the 16S rRNA gene sequence-derived phylogeny. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 1965–1972.[Abstract]
Ward, N., Staley, J. T., Fuerst, J. A., Giovannoni, S., Schlesner, H. & Stackebrandt, E. (2006). The order Planctomycetales, including the genera Planctomycetes, Pirellula, Gemmata, Isosphaera and the Candidatus genera Brocadia, Kuenenia and Scalindua. In The Prokaryotes, pp. 757–793. Edited by M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, K. H. Schleifer & E. Stackebrandt. New York: Springer.
Received 19 March 2007;
revised 16 April 2007;
accepted 19 April 2007.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Pilhofer, K. Rappl, C. Eckl, A. P. Bauer, W. Ludwig, K.-H. Schleifer, and G. Petroni Characterization and Evolution of Cell Division and Cell Wall Synthesis Genes in the Bacterial Phyla Verrucomicrobia, Lentisphaerae, Chlamydiae, and Planctomycetes and Phylogenetic Comparison with rRNA Genes J. Bacteriol., May 1, 2008; 190(9): 3192 - 3202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |
