Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 154 (2008), 72-80; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2007/010637-0
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Walter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G. W.
Microbiology 154 (2008), 72-80; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2007/010637-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology

Glucosyltransferase A (GtfA) and inulosucrase (Inu) of Lactobacillus reuteri TMW1.106 contribute to cell aggregation, in vitro biofilm formation, and colonization of the mouse gastrointestinal tract

Jens Walter1,3, Clarissa Schwab2, Diane M. Loach1, Michael G. Gänzle2 and Gerald W. Tannock1

1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
2 Department of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
3 Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0919, USA

Correspondence
Jens Walter
jwalter2{at}unl.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Members of the genus Lactobacillus are common inhabitants of the proximal gastrointestinal tract of animals such as mice, rats, chickens and pigs, where they form epithelial biofilms. Little is known about the traits that facilitate biofilm formation and gut colonization. This study investigated the ecological role of a glucosyltransferase (GtfA) and inulosucrase (Inu) of Lactobacillus reuteri TMW1.106 and a fructosyltransferase (FtfA) of L. reuteri LTH5448. In vitro experiments using isogenic mutants revealed that GtfA was essential for sucrose-dependent autoaggregation of L. reuteri TMW1.106 cells under acidic conditions, while inactivation of Inu slowed the formation of cell aggregates. Experiments using an in vitro biofilm assay showed that GtfA and Inu contributed to biofilm formation of L. reuteri TMW1.106. Experiments using ex-Lactobacillus-free mice revealed that the ecological performance of the inu mutant, but not of the gtfA or ftfA mutant, was reduced in the gastrointestinal tract when in competition with the parental strain. In the absence of competition, the gtfA mutant showed delayed colonization of the murine gut relative to the wild-type. In addition, the gtfA mutant showed reduced ecological performance in competition experiments with Lactobacillus johnsonii #21. From the evidence provided in this study we conclude that GtfA and Inu confer important ecological attributes of L. reuteri TMW1.106 and contribute to colonization of the mouse gastrointestinal tract.


Abbreviations: EPS, extracellular polysaccharides; FOS, fructo-oligosaccharides; GOS, gluco-oligosaccharides; HoPS, homopolysaccharides; OS, oligosaccharides; TEM, transmission electron microscopy


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The gastrointestinal tract of mammals is colonized by a complex collection of micro-organisms (the gut microbiota) that influences biochemical, physiological, immunological and non-specific disease-resistance characteristics of the host (Gordon & Pesti, 1971Down). Bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus are commonly detected as inhabitants of gut ecosystems and predominate in the proximal (gastric) regions of animals such as pigs, chickens, mice and rats (Tannock, 1992Down; Walter, 2005Down). The high population levels of lactobacilli in the gut of these animals are facilitated through bacterial adherence to the non-secretory, stratified, squamous epithelia present in the forestomach, pars oesophagea and crop of mice and rats, pigs and chickens, respectively. The epithelial associations formed by lactobacilli show characteristics of bacterial biofilms (Donlan & Costerton, 2002Down) because the bacteria are firmly attached to a surface (epithelium) and are embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (Fuller & Brooker, 1974Down; Savage et al., 1968Down). The mechanisms by which lactobacilli form these epithelial associations are not well understood, but preliminary in vitro investigations have shown that carbohydrate molecules are likely to be involved, while a large surface protein (Lsp) appears to initiate adherence in vivo (Tannock, 1997Down; Walter et al., 2005Down).

Extracellular polysaccharides (exopolysaccharides, EPS) are synthesized by a wide variety of bacteria including lactic acid bacteria, and they have been shown to contribute to dental biofilm formation and cell aggregation of streptococci (Burne et al., 1996Down; Munro et al., 1991Down; Yamashita et al., 1993Down). Many strains of lactobacilli produce homopolysaccharides (HoPS) and oligosaccharides (OS) consisting of either glucose residues (glucans and gluco-oligosaccharides, GOS) or fructose residues (fructans and fructo-oligosaccharides, FOS) (Gänzle & Schwab, 2005Down; Korakli & Vogel, 2006Down; van Hijum et al., 2006Down). These compounds are synthesized from sucrose by the single action of extracellular enzymes termed glycosyltransferases, or more specifically glucosyltransferases and fructosyltransferases, respectively. Research on EPS of lactobacilli has focused on their properties as viscosifying, stabilizing, emulsifying, gelling, water-binding and prebiotic agents in the food industry (Bello et al., 2001Down; Korakli & Vogel, 2006Down; van Hijum et al., 2006Down). However, whereas the importance of streptococcal glycosyltransferases for colonization of the oral cavity is clearly established, the ecological importance of these enzymes and their products has not been revealed for lactobacilli (Korakli & Vogel, 2006Down).

Strains of Lactobacillus reuteri are commonly detected in the gastrointestinal tract of humans, pigs, chickens, mice and rats (Reuter, 2001Down; Walter, 2005Down). They often produce glucans and fructans of different linkage types, and some glycosyltransferases responsible for their production have been biochemically characterized (Kralj et al., 2002Down, 2004Down; Tieking et al., 2005Down; van Hijum et al., 2002Down, 2006Down). HoPS and OS formation of L. reuteri TMW1.106 and LTH5448 and its regulation under different environmental conditions has been previously investigated in detail (Gänzle & Schwab, 2005Down; Schwab & Gänzle, 2006Down; Schwab et al., 2007Down). L. reuteri TMW1.106 forms large amounts of a high molecular mass glucan and GOS and low amounts of FOS from sucrose and expresses the gtfA and inu genes encoding a glucosyltransferase and an inulosucrase, respectively (Schwab & Gänzle, 2006Down; Tieking et al., 2003Down). L. reuteri LTH5448 produces a high molecular mass fructan and FOS and expresses the ftfA gene encoding a levansucrase (Schwab & Gänzle, 2006Down). Insertional inactivation of these genes eliminated the synthesis of corresponding poly- and oligosaccharides in L. reuteri TMW1.106 and L. reuteri LTH5448, but did not impair the growth and metabolism of maltose and glucose (Schwab et al., 2007Down).

The prevalence of HoPS and OS production among lactobacilli isolated from gut ecosystems and the importance of these compounds in cell aggregation and biofilm formation of bacteria indigenous to the oral cavity led us to hypothesize that EPS production might constitute an important phenotypic trait of lactobacilli in colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. The availability of well-characterized, isogenic gtfA, inu and ftfA mutants of L. reuteri (Schwab et al., 2007Down) and the Lactobacillus-free mouse model (Tannock et al., 1988Down) provided an excellent opportunity to test this hypothesis.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains, media and incubation conditions.
The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1Down. The mutants were derived by insertional mutagenesis of genes encoding the respective glycosyltransferases by site-specific integration of pORI28 into the chromosome (Schwab et al., 2007Down). Cultures were propagated anaerobically at 37 °C in Lactobacilli MRS medium (Difco) unless otherwise stated. Erythromycin (5 µg ml–1) was added to the growth medium for culture and maintenance of the mutant strains. Given that the plasmid insertion of the mutants showed high stability in the absence of antibiotics (Schwab et al., 2007Down), functional assays and phenotypic comparisons were performed using media without erythromycin. Bacterial growth in vitro was investigated by monitoring optical densities (OD600) as described previously (Tannock et al., 2005Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Lactobacillus strains used in this study

 
Aggregation assays.
Strains listed in Table 1Up were grown for 16 h (0.5 % inoculum) in either MRS medium or MRS medium supplemented with 1 % (w/v) sucrose. Cells were harvested from 1 ml of culture by centrifugation at 6000 g for 7 min at room temperature, washed once in 1 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) adjusted to either pH 4 or 7, and resuspended in the initial volume of the same solution. Cell suspensions were kept at room temperature and autoaggregation was monitored visually. For determination of coaggregation, two tubes containing 1 ml cell suspension were prepared as described above using PBS (pH 4). Then 100 µl of a 10x concentrated cell suspension of the second strain was added to one of the tubes. After 1 h at room temperature, the optical densities were determined in both tubes. The degree of coaggregation between the two strains was recorded as the difference in optical densities following addition of cells of the second strain.

Biofilm experiments.
L. reuteri TMW1.106, the gtfA mutant and the inu mutant were grown for 12 h in MRS medium. Cells were harvested from 0.5 ml culture by centrifugation at 6000 g for 7 min at room temperature and resuspended in 1 ml prewarmed (37 °C) half-strength MRS medium containing 0.5 % sucrose (pH 4.5). Disposable flow cells (Stovall Life Science) were connected to a sterile reservoir of the same medium stored at 37 °C. Flow was generated using a Barnant Manostat Multichannel Pump (Carter). The flow rate was adjusted individually for each channel to 12 ml h–1. The flow condition used was at least 50 times faster than the doubling time of L. reuteri TMW1.106. Medium flow was stopped, and the flow cell was aseptically inoculated with bacterial cultures using sterile syringes as described by the manufacturer of the flow cell. After 1 h, flow was started again, and biofilm formation was monitored at different time points using a Nikon Optiphot microscope. Images of mature biofilms were acquired using an Olympus SZX12 dissecting microscope.

Experiments with mice.
Lactobacillus-free mice (males and females) were maintained throughout the experiments in isolators using gnotobiotic technology (Tannock et al., 1988Down). The Lactobacillus-free status was verified on a regular basis. The animals had free access to water and a standard rat diet (NRM Diet 86, Tegel). The feed contained about 1.25 % sucrose from molasses. The animals were 3–6 weeks of age at the start of the experiments. All animal experiments were conducted with approval from the University of Otago Animal Ethics Committee (approval number 104/02).

Testing the ability of L. reuteri TMW1.106 and LTH5448 to colonize Lactobacillus-free mice.
The ability of L. reuteri strains TMW1.106 and LTH5448 to colonize the gastrointestinal tract of Lactobacillus-free mice was tested by distributing 10 ml of overnight culture (~5x109 bacteria) per cage over the feed and fur of the animals (three mice per bacterial strain). Animals were killed 14 days later, and gut samples (forestomach, jejunum, caecum) were collected for bacteriological culture of serial dilutions of organ homogenates on Rogosa SL agar (Difco), as described previously (Walter et al., 2003Down).

Ecological competitiveness of the gtfA, inu and ftfA mutants.
Measurements of ecological competitiveness of strains were made by inoculating Lactobacillus-free mice (intragastric gavage) with 1 : 1 mixtures (total dose of 106 lactobacilli) of mutant and respective wild-type strains as described previously (Walter et al., 2005Down). Quantification of the mutant strain and the total Lactobacillus populations in faecal (after 7 days colonization), forestomach and caecal (14 days colonization) samples was achieved by determining counts on Rogosa SL agar plates with or without erythromycin as described previously (Walter et al., 2005Down). In competition experiments with L. reuteri TMW1.106 and Lactobacillus johnsonii #21 (both erythromycin-sensitive), differentiation of strains was achieved by plating gut samples (forestomach and caecum) after 7 days on Rogosa SL agar containing 0.05 % bromocresol green (Sigma). Each strain was quantified based on its distinctive colony morphologies. Correct differentiation of TMW1.106 and #21 was confirmed by picking representative colonies to MRS agar supplemented with 5 % sucrose, where TMW1.106 but not #21 produced large amounts of EPS (slimy phenotype). Ninety-eight per cent of colonies were identified correctly based on colony morphology on bromocresol green agar.

Experiments in Lactobacillus-free mice with pure cultures of L. reuteri TMW1.106, gtfA mutant and inu mutant to study colonization dynamics, in vivo metabolism and biofilm formation.
Lactobacillus-free mice were inoculated by intragastric gavage with pure cultures (dose of 105 lactobacilli) of either TMW1.106, or the gtfA or inu mutant strain. Bacterial populations were quantified in faecal samples 2 days after inoculation by plating dilutions of homogenates on Rogosa SL agar (Difco) with or without erythromycin. The animals were killed 7 days after inoculation, and the size of Lactobacillus populations in the caecum was determined. Comparison of colony counts on media with or without erythromycin indicated that the mutational insert of both mutants was stably maintained throughout the experiment (data not shown).

Stomach contents of seven Lactobacillus-free mice and of five mice colonized for 7 days by either L. reuteri TMW1.106 or the gtfA or inu mutant were collected, pooled and freeze-dried. Carbohydrates in stomach contents were extracted using double-distilled H2O at 80 °C for 2 h. Maltose, glucose and lactate were separated using an Aminex HPX 87H column (Bio-Rad) with 5 mM H2SO4 as solvent at 0.4 ml min–1 and detected with a refractive index detector as described previously (Schwab et al., 2007Down).

Bacterial associations formed on the epithelial surface of the murine forestomach were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as described previously (Walter et al., 2007Down). Briefly, stomachs from two mice colonized by either L. reuteri TMW1.106, the inu mutant or the gtfA mutant (see above), excised from the animals, were fixed in a 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7) containing 3 mg ruthenium red ml–1 and 3 % glutaraldehyde for 4 h at room temperature and then at 4 °C for 4–5 days. Forestomach pieces of ~1 mm3 were successively fixed, dried and washed before embedding in resin. Sections of 80 nm thickness were examined by TEM.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Autoaggregation and coaggregation
L. reuteri TMW1.106 was the only strain shown in Table 1Up whose cells autoaggregated. At pH 7, cells aggregated whether sucrose was present in the growth medium or not, and autoaggregation was not affected by inactivation of the gtfA and inu genes (data not shown). At pH 4, L. reuteri TMW1.106 cells aggregated when grown with sucrose, and autoaggregation of the gtfA and the inu mutant was adversely affected. Aggregation of the inu mutant cells was slower, while the gtfA mutant did not aggregate (Fig. 1a, bDown). None of the strains aggregated at pH 4 when grown in the absence of sucrose, but autoaggregation could be initiated for L. reuteri TMW1.106 and the inu mutant, but not for the gtfA mutant, by the addition of ≥1 mg sucrose ml–1 to the cell suspensions and incubation at 37 °C for ~5 h (data not shown). These findings indicated that glucan production mediated by GtfA was involved in autoaggregation of TMW1.106 cells.


Figure 1
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Autoaggregation and coaggregation of L. reuteri TMW1.106 and its gtfA and inu mutants. (a) Autoaggregation under acidic conditions (pH 4) of L. reuteri TMW1.106, gtfA and inu mutants grown in MRS medium with an additional 1 % sucrose at 5 min and 10 min. One representative of five individual experiments is shown. (b) Autoaggregation after 30 min under acidic conditions (pH 4) of L. reuteri TMW1.106, gtfA and inu mutants grown in MRS medium with an additional 1 % sucrose and L. reuteri TMW1.106 grown without sucrose. One representative of five individual experiments is shown. (c) Characterization of coaggregation at pH 4 of Lactobacillus strains (Table 1Up) that do not autoaggregate with L. reuteri TMW1.106 (black bars), gtfA (grey bars) and inu (white bars) mutants by determining the difference in optical density arising from the addition of the latter strains. All strains were grown in MRS medium with an additional 1 % sucrose. Means±SEM (error bars) of three individual experiments are shown.

 
To gain information about the aggregative mechanism of L. reuteri TMW1.106, the ability of the gtfA mutant to coaggregate with cells producing glucan at pH 4 was tested. Addition of wild-type and inu mutant cells, but not of the gtfA mutant, resulted in a reduction in optical density of the gtfA mutant cell suspension (Fig. 1cUp). Therefore, gtfA cells could still coaggregate with L. reuteri TMW1.106 and the inu mutant. The ability of the gtfA mutant to coaggregate was not dependent on sucrose, but required sucrose in the growth medium of the wild-type strain (data not shown).

Biofilms in the proximal gut are composed of different Lactobacillus strains and species. Therefore the effect of mutation of gtfA and inu on coaggregation with other strains of L. reuteri (LTH5448, its ftfA mutant and 100-23) and L. johnsonii (strains #21 and 100-100) was tested. All the strains coaggregated with L. reuteri TMW1.106 at pH 4, resulting in a reduction in optical density (Fig. 1cUp). Inactivation of gtfA, but not inu, adversely affected coaggregation with strains of L. reuteri. Inactivation of ftfA of L. reuteri LTH5448 had no effect. Coaggregation of L. reuteri TMW1.106 with strains of L. johnsonii (#21 and 100-100) was not affected by inactivation of gtfA.

Evaluation of in vitro biofilm formation of L. reuteri TMW1.106, the gtfA mutant and the inu mutant
Biofilm formation was assessed by direct, non-destructive examination of the cells adhering to a glass surface. As shown in Fig. 2(a)Down, wild-type TMW1.106 formed a biofilm that was visible under a light microscope within 18 h. The gtfA and the inu mutant showed impaired biofilm formation. Intense cell aggregation could be observed for the wild-type and the inu mutant. In contrast, cell aggregation of the gtfA mutant was virtually absent at 12 h, and greatly reduced at 18 h. Biofilms became macroscopically visible after around 30 h. When observed with a dissecting microscope, the biofilms formed by the mutants showed reduced density compared to the wild-type (Fig. 2bDown). Although clearly impaired when compared with the wild-type, the inu mutant performed slightly better than the gtfA mutant in two independent experiments (Fig. 2Down).


Figure 2
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Examination of biofilm formation of L. reuteri TMW1.106 and the gtfA and inu mutants using an in vitro biofilm assay. (a) Light micrographs (taken at 800x magnification, shown at 500x magification) of biofilms of wild-type TMW1.106 (WT), the gtfA mutant and the inu mutant after 12 and 18 h. (b) Examination of macroscopic biofilms after 38 h. Enlarged photographs were taken at 90x magnification (shown at 60x magification) using a dissecting microscope. Representative findings of two independent experiments are shown.

 
Ecological performance of the gtfA, inu and ftfA mutants in the murine gut in competition experiments with the respective wild-type strain
L. reuteri TMW1.106 and LTH5448 colonized the murine gastrointestinal tract of Lactobacillus-free mice (n=3) after a single inoculation (data not shown), and formed population sizes comparable to the rodent strain L. reuteri 100-23 used in previous studies (Tannock et al., 2005Down; Walter et al., 2003Down, 2005Down, 2007Down). Further animal experiments were carried out to determine whether the L. reuteri glycosyltransferase mutant strains exhibit an impaired competitiveness in the murine gut. Competitive colonization experiments using 1 : 1 mixtures of wild-type and mutant strains as inoculum (n=9–11) revealed that the inu mutant competed poorly with L. reuteri TMW1.106 (see Fig. 3bDown). The gtfA and ftfA mutant populations were not different from that of the wild-type TMW1.106 and LTH5448, respectively (Fig. 3a, cDown).


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Competition between wild-type and mutant strains in the gastrointestinal tract of mice. Mixtures of mutant and the respective wild-type (1 : 1) were used to inoculate Lactobacillus-free mice, and the percentage of mutants in the total Lactobacillus population was determined in faecal samples (7 days) and forestomach (FS) and caecum (14 days). The bars show the range of values obtained with different animals (n=9–11), with the box indicating the 25 and 75 % percentile. The bars in the boxes indicate medians. (a) gtfA mutant, (b) inu mutant, and (c) ftfA mutant.

 
Colonization dynamics of L. reuteri TMW1.106, gtfA and inu mutants in the gut of mice
As the ftfA mutant of L. reuteri LTH5448 was not adversely affected in aggregation or gut colonization, we focused further studies on strain L. reuteri TMW1.106 and its gtfA and inu mutants. Groups of Lactobacillus-free mice were inoculated with a single strain to determine the population sizes in faecal (2 days) and caecal (7 days) samples, as well as to detect growth substrates, bacterial metabolites and biofilm formation in the stomach (see below). Inactivation of gtfA and inu of L. reuteri TMW1.106 did not result in decreased population levels in the caecal samples when the bacteria were given time to establish (data not shown). However, colonization by the gtfA mutant was delayed because mice (n=7) colonized with this strain had statistically significant (Student's t-test, P=0.013) lower numbers of lactobacilli (6.91 log10 c.f.u.) in faecal samples 2 days after inoculation compared to mice inoculated with the wild-type (7.63 log10 c.f.u.; n=7). Counts of the inu mutant were lower than wild-type counts (7.40 log10 c.f.u.; n=6), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Metabolism of lactobacilli during growth in the stomach of mice
Lactobacilli inhabiting the forestomach utilized maltose and glucose and produced lactate (Table 2Down). Sucrose was present in the stomach of mice not colonized with lactobacilli but the peak was too small for quantification (data not shown). Interestingly, stomach contents of mice colonized with the inu mutant contained higher maltose and lower lactate concentrations compared to stomach contents of mice colonized with the wild-type or the gtfA mutant, indicating that the utilization of maltose by the inu mutant was reduced in vivo. We compared the in vitro growth of L. reuteri TMW1.106, the gtfA and the inu mutant in MRS broth containing glucose or maltose as the only carbohydrates, but the mutant strains did not differ from the wild-type with respect to growth rate (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Concentrations (mmol per g dried stomach content) of fermentable sugars and lactate in pooled stomach contents of Lactobacillus-free (n=8) and ex-Lactobacillus-free (n=5) mice colonized with L. reuteri TMW1.106, the gtfA and the inu mutant

 
Epithelial association studied by electron microscopy
TEM of forestomach epithelium after 7 days of colonization revealed that L. reuteri TMW1.106 adhered to the surface of the stratified squamous epithelium of the forestomach (Fig. 4Down). The organisms formed cell layers and aggregates on the epithelium, and bacterial densities were highest in inversions (infoldings) of the epithelium and on epithelial cells that had been shed into the lumen. The gtfA mutant and the inu mutant formed epithelial associations that were qualitatively similar to the wild-type (Fig. 4b, cDown).


Figure 4
View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Characterization of epithelial associations of L. reuteri TMW1.106 (a), the gtfA mutant (b) and the inu mutant (c) on the forestomach epithelium of ex-Lactobacillus-free mice 7 days after inoculation, assessed by TEM.

 
Competition experiments with L. johnsonii
Given the possibility that glucan produced by wild-type cells might have complemented the gtfA mutant in competition experiments with the mice, we tested if GtfA contributes to the ecological performance of L. reuteri TMW1.106 when colonizing the gut in competition with an organism that does not produce glucan. Competitive colonization assays (six mice) with L. johnsonii #21 revealed that L. reuteri TMW1.106 formed an average of 39.7 % (SD 27.4) and 36 % (SD 6.0) of the total population in the forestomach and caecum, respectively. The proportion of the total population formed by the gtfA mutant was 9.8 % (SD 6.9) and 22.2 % (SD 20.2) respectively (n=6). The difference in population levels between L. reuteri TMW1.106 and the gtfA mutant was statistically significant in the forestomach (Student's t-test, P=0.027).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mechanisms involved in attachment and coaggregation that may be relevant to biofilm formation remain largely unexplored for commensal gut bacteria (Flint et al., 2007Down). Here we present evidence that gtfA and inu contribute to cell aggregation and in vitro biofilm formation of L. reuteri TMW1.106. Furthermore, by using the well-characterized Lactobacillus-free mouse model, we could show that both genes contribute to the ecological performance of the organism during gut colonization. In contrast, inactivation of ftfA did not affect coaggregation or ecological performance of L. reuteri LTH5448 in the experiments presented here.

According to Rickard et al. (2003)Down, bacterial aggregation is an integral process of biofilm formation which proceeds in the form of a succession of adhesion and multiplication events. Autoaggregation of L. reuteri TMW1.106 at neutral pH was independent of sucrose, and inactivation of gtfA and inu had no effect. In contrast, under acidic conditions (pH 4), autoaggregation required both sucrose and GtfA. These findings indicate that the glucan produced by GtfA from sucrose mediates aggregation of L. reuteri TMW1.106. Glucan production has been shown to play an important role in cell aggregation in Gram-positive bacteria (Banas & Vickerman, 2003Down; Gibbons & Fitzgerald, 1969Down; Lynch et al., 2007Down). A possible explanation for the impaired aggregation of the inu mutant is that Inu functions as a glucan-binding protein in L. reuteri TMW1.106. Accordingly, homologues of Inu function as glucan-binding proteins in Streptococcus mutans (Rozen et al., 2004Down; Russell et al., 1983Down). The gtfA mutant could still coaggregate with wild-type cells that had been grown in medium containing sucrose, showing that the ability to bind glucan was not mediated by GtfA. Coaggregation with non-aggregating strains of L. reuteri (100-23, LTH5448) was adversely affected (but not eliminated) by inactivation of gtfA. These findings indicated that some L. reuteri strains possess glucan-binding proteins that contribute to coaggregation, even though they do not produce glucan.

We tested the ability of L. reuteri TMW1.106, the gtfA mutant and the inu mutant to form biofilms under acidic conditions (pH 4.5) on a glass surface. Biofilm formation was adversely affected for both mutants. Microscopic evaluation revealed that cell aggregation on the glass slides was basically absent for the gtfA mutant after 12 h, while the inu mutant showed clear signs of cell aggregation. These findings are consistent with those obtained in the aggregation tests. We conclude that GtfA and Inu contribute to biofilm formation by allowing individual cells to form cell aggregates.

Due to production of lactic acid by the bacteria and host acid secretion, the milieu encountered by lactobacilli during colonization of the forestomach is likely to be acidic (Baumgartner & Montrose, 2004Down). The lactate levels in the forestomach of mice (Table 2Up) correspond to those that are typical for stationary cultures of lactobacilli on cereal substrates, which show a pH of around 4 (Gänzle et al., 1998Down). The importance of GtfA and Inu for cell aggregation and biofilm formation under acidic conditions therefore provides a potential explanation for the decreased ecological performance of the two mutant strains when colonizing the gut of Lactobacillus-free mice. As shown in Fig. 4Up, L. reuteri TMW1.106 forms epithelial associations that are characterized by the formation of cell aggregates while colonizing the forestomach. These formations resemble natural biofilms detected on forestomach (rodents), crop (chicken), and pars oesophagea (pigs) epithelia, which are dominated by lactobacilli (Fuller & Brooker, 1974Down; Fuller et al., 1978Down; Savage et al., 1968Down). Although the gtfA and inu mutants were still able to form epithelial associations that were qualitatively similar to the wild-type, our in vitro data imply that GtfA and Inu enhance the ability to form these cell aggregates on the forestomach epithelium.

A striking finding of this study was that the disruption of inu impaired colonization of mice by L. reuteri TMW1.106 in competition experiments using the wild-type strain, while disruption of gtfA had no adverse effect. On the other hand, GtfA did contribute to ecological performance when TMW1.106 colonized the gut alone or in competition with L. johnsonii #21. Thus both enzymes contribute to the colonization phenotype of L. reuteri TMW1.106 but they appear to play different roles. A possible explanation is that Inu is a glucan-binding protein and a receptor for the glucan produced by GtfA. Inactivation of Inu would then impair binding to the glucan matrix of the biofilm, resulting in decreased ecological performance in competition experiments with the wild-type. In contrast, assuming that GtfA is only involved in glucan synthesis but not in binding, the gtfA mutant would remain competitive when extracellular glucan is provided by the wild-type strain. Determination of the exact role of GtfA and Inu in cell aggregation and biofilm formation requires further experimentation.

Although we clearly show the importance of GtfA and Inu for cell aggregation and biofilm formation, we cannot exclude other functions for these enzymes in the murine gut. Previous work showed that glycosyltransferases of L. reuteri could have several functions under different environmental conditions (Gänzle & Schwab, 2005Down; Schwab et al., 2007Down). For example, the gtfA and inu mutants showed a lower resistance to lactic acid when compared to wild-type TMW1.106 (Schwab et al., 2007Down). This could account for the reduced metabolic turnover of the inu mutant in the murine stomach (Table 2Up). However, growth rates of both mutants were not impaired in media containing maltose and glucose (Schwab et al., 2007Down), which are the main growth substrates available in the gut, and the preferred carbon sources for L. reuteri.

In conclusion, our study has shown the importance of two EPS-producing enzymes, GtfA and Inu, for the ecological performance of a gut commensal. Moreover, this is to our knowledge the first report on the importance of glycosyltransferases for cell aggregation and biofilm formation in the genus Lactobacillus. A high proportion of Lactobacillus isolates from gut environments produce EPS and possess orthologues of GtfA and Inu (Gänzle & Schwab, 2005Down; Korakli & Vogel, 2006Down; Tieking et al., 2003Down, 2005Down; van Hijum et al., 2006Down). Taken together, this study and the literature data indicate that GtfA and Inu confer important ecological attributes on L. reuteri TMW1.106 and contribute to colonization of the gastrointestinal tract.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Richard Easingwood, Liz Girvan and the Otago Centre for Electron Microscopy for excellent support in electron microscopy. We are grateful to Greg Somerville and Yefei Zhu (University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA) for introduction to the biofilm assay. This work was supported by grants of the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) and the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Clarissa Schwab's research period at the University of Otago was supported by a DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst) scholarship. M. G. G. acknowledges the Canada Research Chairs Program for financial support.

Edited by: P. W. O'Toole


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Banas, J. A. & Vickerman, M. M. (2003). Glucan-binding proteins of the oral streptococci. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 14, 89–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bateup, J. M., McConnell, M. A., Jenkinson, H. F. & Tannock, G. W. (1995). Comparison of Lactobacillus strains with respect to bile salt hydrolase activity, colonization of the gastrointestinal tract, and growth rate of the murine host. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 1147–1149.[Abstract]

Baumgartner, H. K. & Montrose, M. H. (2004). Regulated alkali secretion acts in tandem with unstirred layers to regulate mouse gastric surface pH. Gastroenterology 126, 774–783.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bello, F. D., Walter, J., Hertel, C. & Hammes, W. P. (2001). In vitro study of prebiotic properties of levan-type exopolysaccharides from lactobacilli and non-digestible carbohydrates using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Syst Appl Microbiol 24, 232–237.[CrossRef][Medline]

Burne, R. A., Chen, Y. Y., Wexler, D. L., Kuramitsu, H. & Bowen, W. H. (1996). Cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans strains with defects in fructan metabolism assessed in a program-fed specific-pathogen-free rat model. J Dent Res 75, 1572–1577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Donlan, R. M. & Costerton, J. W. (2002). Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15, 167–193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Flint, H. J., Duncan, S. H., Scott, K. P. & Lois, P. (2007). Interactions and competition within the microbial community of the human colon: links between diet and health. Environ Microbiol 9, 1101–1111.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fuller, R. & Brooker, B. E. (1974). Lactobacilli which attach to the crop epithelium of the fowl. Am J Clin Nutr 27, 1305–1312.[Abstract]

Fuller, R. P., Barrow, P. A. & Brooker, B. E. (1978). Bacteria associated with the gastric epithelium of neonatal pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol 35, 582–591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gänzle, M. G. & Schwab, C. (2005). Exopolysaccharide production by intestinal lactobacilli. In Probiotics and Prebiotics: Scientific Aspects, pp. 83–96. Edited by G. W. Tannock. Wymondham: Horizon Scientific Press.

Gänzle, M. G., Ehmann, M. & Hammes, W. P. (1998). Modeling of growth of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis and Candida milleri in response to process parameters of sourdough fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 64, 2616–2623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gibbons, R. J. & Fitzgerald, R. J. (1969). Dextran-induced agglutination of Streptococcus mutans, and its potential role in the formation of microbial dental plaques. J Bacteriol 98, 341–346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gordon, H. A. & Pesti, L. (1971). The gnotobiotic animal as a tool in the study of host–microbial relationships. Bacteriol Rev 35, 390–429.[Free Full Text]

Korakli, M. & Vogel, R. F. (2006). Structure/function relationship of homopolysaccharide producing glycansucrases and therapeutic potential of their synthesised glycans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71, 790–803.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kralj, S., van Geel-Schutten, G. H., Rahaoui, H., Leer, R. J., Faber, E. J., van der Maarel, M. J. E. C. & Dijkhuizen, L. (2002). Molecular characterization of a novel glucosyltransferase from Lactobacillus reuteri strain 121 synthesizing a unique, highly branched glucan with {alpha}-(1->4) and {alpha}-(1->6) glucosidic bonds. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 4283–4291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kralj, S., van Geel-Schutten, G. H., Dondorff, M. M. G., Kirsanovs, S., van der Maarel, M. J. E. C. & Dijkhuizen, L. (2004). Glucan synthesis in the genus Lactobacillus: isolation and characterization of glucansucrase genes, enzymes and glucan products from six different strains. Microbiology 150, 3681–3690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lundeen, S. G. & Savage, D. C. (1990). Characterization and purification of bile salt hydrolase from Lactobacillus sp. strain 100-100. J Bacteriol 172, 4171–4177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lynch, D. J., Fountain, T. L., Mazurkiewicz, J. E. & Banas, J. A. (2007). Glucan-binding proteins are essential for shaping Streptococcus mutans biofilm architecture. FEMS Microbiol Lett 268, 158–165.[CrossRef][Medline]

Munro, C., Michalek, S. M. & Macrina, F. L. (1991). Cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans V403 glycosyltransferase and fructosyltransferase mutants constructed by allelic exchange. Infect Immun 59, 2316–2323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reuter, G. (2001). The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium microflora of the human intestine: composition and succession. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 2, 43–53.[Medline]

Rickard, A. H., Gilbert, P., High, N. J., Kolenbrander, P. E. & Handley, P. S. (2003). Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms. Trends Microbiol 11, 94–100.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rozen, R., Steinberg, D. & Bachrach, G. (2004). Streptococcus mutans fructosyltransferase interactions with glucans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 232, 39–43.[CrossRef][Medline]

Russell, R. R., Donald, A. C. & Douglas, C. W. (1983). Fructosyltransferase activity of a glucan-binding protein from Streptococcus mutans. J Gen Microbiol 129, 3243–3250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Savage, D. C., Dubos, R. & Schaedler, R. W. (1968). The gastrointestinal epithelium and its autochthonous bacterial flora. J Exp Med 127, 67–76.[Abstract]

Schwab, C. & Gänzle, M. G. (2006). Effect of membrane lateral pressure on the expression of fructosyltransferases in Lactobacillus reuteri. Syst Appl Microbiol 29, 89–99.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schwab, C., Walter, J., Tannock, G. W., Vogel, R. F. & Gänzle, M. G. (2007). Sucrose utilization and impact of sucrose on glycosyltransferase expression in Lactobacillus reuteri. Syst Appl Microbiol 30, 433–443.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tannock, G. W. (1992). Lactic microflora of pigs, mice and rats. In The Lactic Acid Bacteria, vol. 1. The Lactic Acid Bacteria in Health and Disease, pp. 21–48. Edited by B. J. B. Wood. London, UK: Elsevier Applied Science.

Tannock, G. W. (1997). Normal microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract of rodents. In Gastrointestinal Microbiology, vol. II, pp. 187–215. Edited by R. I. Mackie, B. A. White & R. E. Isaacson. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.

Tannock, G. W., Crichton, C., Welling, G. W., Koopman, J. P. & Midtvedt, T. (1988). Reconstitution of the gastrointestinal microflora of lactobacillus-free mice. Appl Environ Microbiol 54, 2971–2975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tannock, G. W., Ghazally, S., Walter, J., Loach, D., Cook, G., Surette, M., Simmers, C., Bremer, P., Dal Bello, F. & Hertel, C. (2005). Ecological behavior of Lactobacillus reuteri is affected by mutation of the luxS gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 8419–8425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tieking, M., Korakli, M., Ehrmann, M. A., Gänzle, M. G. & Vogel, R. F. (2003). In situ production of exopolysaccharides during sourdough fermentation by cereal and intestinal isolates of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 945–952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tieking, M., Kaditzky, S., Valcheva, R., Korakli, M., Vogel, R. F. & Gänzle, M. G. (2005). Extracellular homopolysaccharides and oligosaccharides from intestinal lactobacilli. J Appl Microbiol 99, 692–702.[CrossRef][Medline]

van Hijum, S. A. F. T., van Geel-Schutten, G. H., Rahaoui, H., van der Maarel, M. J. E. C. & Dijkhuizen, L. (2002). Characterization of a novel fructosyltransferase from Lactobacillus reuteri that synthesizes high-molecular-weight inulin and inulin oligosaccharides. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 4390–4398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van Hijum, S. A. F. T., Kralj, S., Ozimek, L. K., Dijkhuizen, L. & van Geel-Schutten, G. H. (2006). Structure–function relationships of glucansucrase and fructansucrase enzymes from lactic acid bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70, 157–176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walter, J. (2005). The microecology of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract. In Probiotics and Prebiotics: Scientific Aspects, pp. 51–82. Edited by G. W. Tannock. Wymondham: Horizon Scientific Press.

Walter, J., Heng, N. C. K., Hammes, W. P., Loach, D. M., Tannock, G. W. & Hertel, C. (2003). Identification of Lactobacillus reuteri genes specifically induced in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 2044–2051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walter, J., Chagnaud, P., Tannock, G. W., Loach, D. M., Dal Bello, F., Jenkinson, H. F., Hammes, W. P. & Hertel, C. (2005). A high-molecular-mass surface protein (Lsp) and methionine sulfoxide reductase B (MrsB) contribute to the ecological performance of Lactobacillus reuteri in the murine gut. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 979–986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walter, J., Loach, D. M., Alqumber, M., Rockel, C., Hermann, C., Pfitzenmaier, M. & Tannock, G. W. (2007). D-Alanyl ester depletion of teichoic acids in Lactobacillus reuteri 100-23 results in impaired colonization of the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Environ Microbiol 9, 1750–1760.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wesney, E. & Tannock, G. W. (1979). Association of rat, pig and fowl biotypes of lactobacilli with the stomach of gnotobiotic mice. Microb Ecol 5, 35–42.[Medline]

Yamashita, Y., Bowen, W. H., Burne, R. A. & Kuramitsu, H. K. (1993). Role of Streptococcus mutans gtf genes in caries induction in the specific-pathogen-free rat model. Infect Immun 61, 3811–3817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 14 June 2007; revised 14 September 2007; accepted 16 October 2007.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
S. P. Li, X. J. Zhao, and J. Y. Wang
Synergy of Astragalus polysaccharides and probiotics (Lactobacillus and Bacillus cereus) on immunity and intestinal microbiota in chicks
Poult. Sci., March 1, 2009; 88(3): 519 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
S. Lebeer, J. Vanderleyden, and S. C. J. De Keersmaecker
Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2008; 72(4): 728 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. A. Lozupone, M. Hamady, B. L. Cantarel, P. M. Coutinho, B. Henrissat, J. I. Gordon, and R. Knight
The convergence of carbohydrate active gene repertoires in human gut microbes
PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 15076 - 15081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. Walter
Ecological Role of Lactobacilli in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Implications for Fundamental and Biomedical Research
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 15, 2008; 74(16): 4985 - 4996.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Walter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.