|
|
||||||||

1 Theoretical Biology, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115 Bonn, Germany
2 Institute for Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 168, 53115 Bonn, Germany
3 Centre for Systems Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Correspondence
Andreas Dötsch
Andreas.Doetsch{at}helmholtz-hzi.de
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Present address: Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Inhoffenstraße 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adjustment of the intracellular solute pool involves uptake or synthesis of compatible solutes when extracellular osmolarity is rising and export of compatible solutes when extracellular osmolarity decreases. The first response to osmotic upshifts and the resulting efflux of cellular water is uptake of K+ and synthesis of counter-ions, e.g. glutamate in Escherichia coli (Morbach & Krämer, 2002
). Following this fast response, cells start to accumulate compatible solutes by uptake or de novo synthesis, replacing K+-glutamate (Kempf & Bremer, 1998
). Some of the stimuli which trigger activation of solute uptake systems have been revealed, and sensing of K+ concentration in the cytoplasm appears to play an important role (Wood, 2006
). It has also been postulated that K+-glutamate acts as a second messenger (Kempf & Bremer, 1998
; Lee & Gralla, 2004
). However, details of the osmosensing mechanisms are not well understood. Mechanical properties of the cytoplasmic membrane, ionic strength, osmolality, macromolecular crowding and degree of hydration have all been suggested as potential stimuli for osmosensors (Poolman & Glaasker, 1998
; Wood, 1999
, 2006
; Poolman et al., 2002
).
Osmotic downshifts necessitate the reduction of intracellular solute pools to prevent influx of water that could lead to the bursting of the cells. As a safety valve, mechanosensitive channels open if the turgor pressure rises beyond a certain threshold, forming a pore that allows the unselective efflux of water and small molecules like compatible solutes (Morbach & Krämer, 2002
; Poolman et al., 2002
). The activity of these channels is also used to harvest compatible solutes from productive strains using alternating osmotic shifts in a process called bacterial milking (Sauer & Galinski, 1998
).
The bacterium Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T was first isolated from solar salterns (Vreeland et al., 1980
) and can be classified as extremely halotolerant since it is able to grow over a very broad range of salt concentrations (<1 to 25 %, w/v, in minimal media) and as moderately halophilic because its growth optimum is near the salinity of seawater (
0.5 mol NaCl l–1). H. elongata is a relatively well-studied member of the family Halomonadaceae, belonging to the
-Proteobacteria (Vreeland, 1999
). It can adapt to different osmotic conditions by synthesizing the compatible solute ectoine and its derivative hydroxyectoine (Severin et al., 1992
). It is assumed that ectoine synthesis is triggered by the initial accumulation of K+-glutamate after osmotic upshifts (Kraegeloh & Kunte, 2002
). The pathway of ectoine synthesis from aspartate (Peters et al., 1990
), and specific uptake systems for ectoine (Grammann et al., 2002
) and potassium (Kraegeloh et al., 2005
), have been described.
We have chosen H. elongata as model organism, because it has the broadest salt tolerance of the better-studied organisms, allowing the investigation of salt effects over a wide range of salinities.
In the present work, we describe the development of a mathematical model for the growth of halophilic micro-organisms in continuous culture, including the regulation of uptake and synthesis of compatible solutes. We show that the salt dependence of the growth rate can be described by substrate inhibition models and that the regulation of accumulation of compatible solutes can be modelled as a two-step process with potassium acting as a second messenger.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All batch cultures were grown aerobically at 30 °C with glucose as sole carbon and energy source and in various NaCl concentrations (0.17 to 3.57 mol l–1). Batch cultures were first grown in 30 ml of complex medium K3, K12 or K20 (Severin et al., 1992
) (numbers indicate the NaCl concentration in %, w/v), to allow the cells to accommodate to the desired NaCl concentration (accommodation culture). In a second step, 5 ml (or less) of adaptation culture was transferred to 100 ml MM63 minimal medium (Larsen et al., 1987
) (pre-culture). NaCl concentrations in pre-cultures were the same as in the main cultures. The main cultures were inoculated with up to 5 ml of pre-culture and grown in 100 ml MM63 in 250 ml baffled shake flasks with side arms for measuring turbidity. Batch cultures for determining growth rate as a function of salt concentration were set up with the glucose mineral salt medium described as G10 by Severin et al. (1992)
. GXX media with NaCl concentrations (XX) from 1 to 25 (%, w/v) were used, which varied only in NaCl concentration.
Continuous cultures were grown in a 2-litre Biostat M fermenter (Braun), which was run as a chemostat or turbidostat with 1.5 l VVM medium at 30 °C, 0.15 l min–1 aeration and 1000 r.p.m. stirring speed. The turbidostat mode was used at higher dilution rates to prevent accidental washout of the culture. Steady-state biomass density was controlled online using a flow-through cell (thickness 0.1 cm) fitted to a Novaspec II photometer (Pharmacia Biotech). VVM medium consisted of (g l–1): glucose (10), MgSO4.7H2O (6.5), NH4Cl (3), KCl (1), CaCl2.2H2O (0.01), KH2PO4 (0.5), FeSO4.7H2O (0.005), yeast extract (Difco) (0.1), trace element solution (Claus et al., 1983
) (1 ml l–1) and vitamin solution VA (Imhoff & Trüper, 1977
) (1 ml l–1). NaCl was added to adjust salt concentration.
Analytical methods.
Optical density was measured in a Novaspec II photometer (Pharmacia Biotech) at 600 nm against air. From steady states of continuous cultures, samples of 1.5 ml were rapidly taken and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The thawed cell suspensions were centrifuged (5 min at 15 000 g) to determine the remaining substrate concentration in the supernatant. To estimate dry mass, further samples of exactly 1.5 ml were centrifuged directly and the pellet was dried for 48 h at 100 °C. For further analysis of biomass composition, about 150 ml cell suspension from selected steady states was harvested by centrifugation (15 min at 27 000 g) and freeze-dried. The inorganic salt content of this biomass was determined by incinerating 100 mg freeze-dried biomass for 1 h at 600 °C in order to correct the dry mass for differences in salt content. Ectoine was extracted from 30 mg freeze-dried cell material using a modified Bligh & Dyer method and analysed by HPLC (Wohlfarth et al., 1990
).
The concentration of glucose in samples of culture medium was determined by a photometric enzyme assay that couples glucose consumption to NADPH production (kit from R-Biopharm). Protein content was determined using bicinchoninic acid (Smith et al., 1985
) with a kit from Pierce.
Computational methods.
The model consists of a set of ordinary differential equations that were solved numerically using algorithms for stiff systems (Klopfenberg–Shampine and Rosenbrock formulae; Shampine & Reichelt, 1997
). Nonlinear regression was carried out using a least-squares method (Seber & Wild, 1989
). The coefficients of determination (R2 value) for nonlinear fits were calculated with EzyFit (free Matlab toolbox available at: http://www.fast.u-psud.fr/ezyfit/) based on the equation
|
|
The model.
The model is based on the assumption of a well-mixed environment (e.g. chemostat) and thus spatial homogeneity. The state variables are biomass density (B), substrate concentration (S), and the cytoplasmic contents and extracellular concentrations of ectoine (Ecyt, Eex) and potassium (Kcyt, Kex); each variable's dynamics is described by an ordinary differential equation (Table 1
). Since intracellular ectoine and potassium are components of the cell, their amount is not expressed as a concentration (amount per volume) but as a content (amount per biomass B), in accordance with experimental practice. An overview of the model processes and variables is provided in Fig. 1
.
|
|
(S), for the dependence on the carbon and energy substrate, and another factor,
(N), for salt dependence, with the maximum specific growth rate, gmax, as a common factor:|
|
|
|
Salt is usually regarded to be an inhibitor of growth rather than a substrate, but even non-halophiles require a certain amount of salt to grow, and in this sense salt can be considered as a growth substrate. Therefore, in addition to other candidate models, we tested standard models of substrate inhibition of enzymes (Tables 2a
and 2b
) for their suitability to describe the salt dependence of growth,
(N), by fitting these models to data from our growth experiments with H. elongata covering a wide range of salt concentrations. The model of Yano and Koga (Yano & Koga, 1969
; Schröder et al., 1997
) assumes that substrate molecules can inhibit enzymes by binding to different sites. We tested this model for the case of two inhibitory sites (using the full version YanoKoga-F and the reduced YanoKoga-R). For only one inhibitory site, the YanoKoga models reduce to the well-known inhibition model of Haldane (Andrews, 1968
) (Haldane). In addition to the enzyme kinetic models, we evaluated other published models such as that of Luong (1987)
, where growth becomes completely inhibited at the salt concentration Nmax. The second parameter, n, determines the steepness of the growth rate decline from the maximum rate (Luong). Edwards (1970)
introduced a model that assumes an exponential decrease in growth rate due to substrate inhibition (Edwards), based on an analogous model for product inhibition previously published by Aiba et al. (1968)
. In addition, we also tested the so-called Arrhenius-type model (McMeekin et al., 1993
) that was previously used for modelling the combined effect of temperature and water activity (aw) on growth rates of food-related micro-organisms. We fitted this model (Arrhenius-type) assuming constant temperature and calculating aw from the salinity.
|
|
Osmoregulation.
Osmoregulation, the proper adjustment of intracellular solute pools in response to a certain salinity, requires some mechanism of osmosensing, such as sensing of physical membrane stress, or concentration of solutes or macromolecules (macromolecular crowding) (Kempf & Bremer, 1998
; Wood et al., 2001
; Morbach & Krämer, 2002
). While the actual stimulus is unknown, all these properties are coupled so we chose turgor pressure as a proxy for osmoregulation in our model for simplicity. It is a direct measure of the difference between the internal and external osmotic pressure: 
=
cyt–
ex. The osmotic pressure of a non-ideal solution can be approximated using the Van't Hoff relation (Potts, 1994
):
|
|
, osmotic pressure; R, gas constant; T, absolute temperature; ci, molar concentration of solute i, used to approximate the activity of a compound).
Using this relation, the osmotic pressure of both compartments can be calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
the relative concentration of counter-ions that are coaccumulated with K+ to balance the charge and
) assuming that a certain concentration
of counter-ions accumulates (e.g. glutamate–). The term
Since the actual mechanism of osmoregulation is unknown, we evaluated the potential of hypothetical mechanisms of osmoregulation to explain available data on solute changes upon osmotic shocks, starting from the simplest possible mechanism (Table 3
). Generally, osmoregulation begins with the perception of a stimulus, which is followed by the production of a signal. The intensity of perception,
, of a given stimulus (turgor or potassium, respectively) is described by the following saturating function (
i
[0;1]):
|
|
|
, the level of a hypothetical intracellular signal molecule. Three hypothetical mechanisms were investigated that differ in the stimulus that triggers accumulation of ectoine (turgor or potassium) and in the characteristic of the signal function (direct or delayed) (Table 3
/
assumes a direct regulation of potassium and ectoine accumulation by turgor pressure alone. (2) In the regulatory mechanism 
/K, a two-step regulation is assumed where turgor pressure regulates the potassium content, which in turn stimulates ectoine accumulation. (3) In the regulatory mechanism 
/K-d, the osmoregulatory signals (
K,
E) are produced at a rate proportional to
and degraded at a constant rate. Hence, the level of the signal follows the intensity of the stimulus with a delay that depends on a time constant
i.
The above-described mechanisms only regulate the accumulation of compatible solutes. Adaptation to decreasing salt concentrations is assumed to rely on the dilution of the cytoplasm resulting from cell growth or – in the case of a sudden drop in salt concentration – the opening of mechanosensitive channels. This is in line with observations of the cellular potassium content in H. elongata, which remains elevated well above the required level for several hours after an osmotic upshift (Kraegeloh & Kunte, 2002
).
Cellular water content (water accessible volume).
The first event upon changes in osmolarity is an alteration of cell volume due to osmotic water fluxes (Wood, 1999
). Usually, adjusting the cytoplasmic solute pool restores the volume. Besides this transient volume change, a permanent reduction of the cell's volume with higher salinities has been observed (Miguelez & Gilmour, 1994
; Cayley et al., 2000
). This decrease is primarily based on a decreasing amount of free cytoplasmic water, while the amounts of periplasmic water and permanently bound cytoplasmic water (e.g. in protein hydration shells) are independent of osmolarity (Cayley et al., 2000
). An estimate of the amount of free cytoplasmic water is needed to calculate the concentrations of solutes in the cytoplasm. According to Cayley et al. (2000)
, a hyperbolical function describes the decrease of overall cellular water volume with increasing osmolarity, which is described by the following equation:
|
|
1 and
2 are parameters of the hyperbolical fit (Fig. 2|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ectoine is taken up by the TeaABC system in H. elongata (Grammann et al., 2002
). Since cells growing under constant conditions maintain a constant level of compatible solutes, the kinetics of ectoine uptake can be derived from the whole-cell growth kinetics of an ectoine-synthesis-deficient mutant, whose growth is limited by ectoine uptake (Grammann et al., 2002
). The uptake rate of ectoine is then – analogous to equation 10 – given by:
|
|
Passive transport of ectoine (leakage).
Mutants of H. elongata lacking a functional TeaABC uptake system accumulate ectoine in the medium. It is therefore believed that the main function of TeaABC is the recovery of ectoine leaked into the medium (Grammann et al., 2002
), since wild-type cultures do not show this extracellular accumulation. How ectoine leaks through the cytoplasmic membrane is not yet known. Since this translocation is down the concentration gradient it is likely to be passive, i.e. not energy dependent. Such passive transport is most simply modelled as a diffusion process where the leakage rate is proportional to the concentration difference.
|
|
Mechanosensitive channels.
The mechanosensitive channels in the cytoplasmic membrane work like safety valves that open when the turgor pressure exceeds a critical value, thus allowing a rapid efflux of water and solutes. We modelled the opening of mechanosensitive channels as a step increase of permeability
from a low value
0 to a high value
I when the critical turgor pressure 
crit is exceeded:
|
|
Energetics of biomass formation and ectoine synthesis.
Formation of biomass requires a carbon source, and usually also an energy source, which for chemo-organo-heterotrophic organisms is often the same substrate, especially in minimal media. Also, the synthesis of compatible solutes requires a carbon source, and may or may not require an energy source. For example, the synthesis of ectoine from glucose and ammonia (net reaction: Glucose+2 NH4+
ectoine+4 H2O+2 H+) would be energetically neutral (Oren, 1999
; Maskow & Babel, 2001
) if H. elongata used the same pathways as E. coli to produce aspartate, the precursor of ectoine (E. coli uses the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway for glycolysis, then PEP-carboxylase for synthesis of oxaloacetate, and glutamate dehydrogenase for ammonia assimilation when ammonia is present at high concentration; pathways taken from the KEGG database http://www.genome.jp/kegg), which is the case in all experimental studies we have undertaken or taken from the literature. The pathway of ectoine synthesis from aspartate is known in H. elongata and involves three enzymes (Peters et al., 1990
). The measured yield of 1 mol ectoine per mol glucose (Maskow & Babel, 2001
) confirms that ectoine synthesis is energetically neutral or near neutral if glucose is used as the carbon source. Note that the cost of ammonia uptake might be higher when it is limiting; e.g. at low ammonia concentrations, E. coli uses the GOGAT pathway, spending 1 mol ATP per mol ammonia taken up. Moreover, ectoine synthesis from glucose carries the opportunity cost of allocating glucose for ectoine synthesis instead of growth.
In contrast to ectoine synthesis, the formation of biomass from glucose requires energy that has to be generated by glucose catabolism; thus the biomass yield per unit of glucose is lower than the ectoine yield. Therefore, the yield of total dry mass (YX) increases with the fraction of ectoine in the dry mass according to
|
|
|
µ over the plasma membrane. Since ectoine bears no net charge, its electrochemical potential is
µ=RT log(acyt/aex) (Adam et al., 1977
concentration) of 106 : 1 at 298 K, the potential difference is about 34.3 kJ mol–1. Hence, the uptake of one molecule of ectoine requires the energy of less than one molecule of ATP (
G'=–48 kJ mol–1; Thauer et al., 1977
Balance equations.
Table 1
provides an overview of the model. The mass balance equations are assembled from the above-described building blocks. B, Eex, Kex and S flow out of the chemostat with dilution rate D. Eex, Kex and S also enter the system at rate D when present in the feed at concentrations Er, Kr and Sr (reservoir concentrations), respectively. Intracellular compounds are diluted by biomass growth.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
The models Edwards and YanoKoga-R gave the best fits of all tested models and were also the only two with well-defined parameters (Table 2b
). To compare these unrelated models we calculated the second-order Akaike's information criterion (Burnham & Anderson, 2002
):
|
|
Determination of model parameters
Growth kinetics.
The dependence of growth rate on glucose concentration was determined by measuring glucose concentrations in steady-state continuous cultures at different dilution rates (Table 4
).
|
|
|
(N), in equation (17) dimensionless. Now we can obtain equation (2) by defining|
|
Protein content.
Measurements of protein content in dry biomass from continuous cultures revealed a linear decrease of protein content with rising salt concentration (Table 5
). We used the fitted linear function for protein content to convert the protein specific data usually found in the literature to biomass specific data.
|
Grammann et al. (2002)
measured the growth rate of a strain that is deficient in ectoine synthesis (KB 1) under ectoine-limiting conditions. Since all intracellular ectoine in this strain must be taken up from the medium via the TeaABC transporter, it is possible to estimate ectoine uptake kinetics from the whole-cell growth kinetics determined in this experiment.
The ectoine permeability
E was assumed to be negligible since in wild-type cultures the steady-state extracellular concentration of ectoine is below the detection limit (Grammann et al., 2002
). The only way to determine this ectoine permeability is by monitoring the extracellular accumulation of ectoine in a strain deficient in ectoine uptake. The kinetics of the TrkI transporter for potassium uptake has been published recently (Kraegeloh et al., 2005
); parameters are listed in Table 6
.
Determining the yield of ectoine (YE) and biomass (YB).
Using equation (14), the yield coefficients for ectoine (YE) and biomass without ectoine (YB) can be derived from yield coefficients for total biomass (YX) measured at different ectoine contents (i.e. different salt concentrations). We determined the yield of ectoine to be 0.82 g Ect (g Glc)–1, i.e. 1.04 mol Ect (mol Glc)–1 (Fig. 3
), showing less than 5 % deviation from the theoretical value of 1.00 mol Ect (mol Glc)–1 that was discussed above.
The biomass yield YB depends on the amount of substrate that is used to form biomass and the amount catabolized to provide the necessary energy for biomass formation. It is described by the equation YB=(cassim+cdissim)–1, where cassim is the amount of substrate that is assimilated to form new biomass and cdissim is the amount of substrate that is dissimilated to provide the biochemical energy driving this process. The first can be estimated from the assimilation equation of the substrate, simplifying the synthesis of biomass to a single reaction that produces a hypothetical biomass molecule. Using glucose as substrate and assuming a biomass composition of CH1.8O0.5N0.2 – for aerobically growing cells (Stouthamer, 1979
) – a similar composition has been observed in H. elongata (Sauer, 1995
), but the value reported in Stouthamer (1979)
better represents ectoine-free biomass – leads to the following assimilation stoichiometry:
|
|
ATP of glucose oxidation via glycolysis, citric acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation and the YATP value: cdissim=(
ATPYATP)–1. To calculate the theoretical growth yield according to these equations, a standard YATP value of 10 g mol–1 can be assumed, together with an ATP yield
ATP of 26 or 38 mol ATP (mol Glc)–1, depending on the P : O quotient of the respiratory chain, assumed to be 2 or 3, respectively. The observed YB of 0.466±0.005 g B (g Glc)–1(Fig. 3
1.6.
Prediction of solute contents
In our model the process of osmoregulation should preserve turgor pressure (slightly higher pressure inside to allow growth) by adjusting the intracellular content of potassium and ectoine. The minimally required ectoine content (E0) for maintaining turgor pressure can be predicted using the following equation, which can be derived from equation (4) by setting
cyt=
th+
ex:
|
|

th and Kth correspond to the trigger values of the stimulus functions
i (Table 3
ex), and the cytoplasmic water volume
|
All of the different regulation models tend to a steady state after about 15 h (Fig. 6
). The development of both biomass and substrate concentration was similar for each regulation model. In all cases, the intracellular ectoine content initially dropped below Eopt due to growth-dependent dilution of the cytoplasm, leading to a decrease of 
and hence activation of the osmoregulatory machinery (Fig. 6b
). This in turn led to potassium uptake, and the further response was different for the different models. In the simplest model 
/
, the ectoine content decreased further to a very low level after the biomass had already reached its steady state (Fig. 6b
1). In the other model simulations, ectoine and potassium reached a steady state close to the optimum values Kth and Eopt (Fig. 6b
2 and b3). Since cells keep growing in the (dynamic!) steady state, a small deviation from the optimal solute contents remains. The delayed signal response model (
/K-d) showed damped oscillations of solute contents initially (Fig. 6b
3), but reached the same steady state as the corresponding model with instantaneous signal response (
/K, Fig. 6b
2).
|
Osmotic upshift.
After the sudden increase in osmolarity, the system entered a new steady state after a transient period of up to 20 h duration (Fig. 7a
). In simulations of the osmoregulatory mechanism 
/
, the osmotic balance was mostly restored by accumulation of potassium instead of adaptation of the ectoine content (Fig. 7a
1), as in the simulations with constant salinity (Fig. 6b
1). Ectoine content was very low before the osmotic shift and rose only by a small amount afterwards. In contrast, the two models using a two-step regulation mechanism reached a close to optimal steady state after an adaptation phase. In both cases, potassium initially accumulated to a high level, restoring the osmotic equilibrium (Fig. 7a
2 and a3). Following this, ectoine accumulated, enabling potassium content to decrease again until it reached the new steady state. This process took about 12 h in the model with direct signal response (
/K) and about twice as long (
24 h) in the delayed signal response model (
/K-d). Overshooting, i.e. an accumulation of ectoine above Eopt (and a concomitant decrease of potassium content below Kth), occurred in both two-step models but was much more pronounced in the delayed signal response model, because of the longer duration of the adaptation process.
|

/
) showed a large deviation from the optimum solute contents before and after the downshift (Fig. 7b
led to an initially steep decrease of the solute contents (Fig. 7b
crit for channel opening, the solute content changes were similar to the simulations without MSCs. Although the new steady state was reached only 2 h sooner than without MSCs, the high turgor pressure immediately after downshift relaxed much faster until falling below 
crit (turgor pressure not shown). | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
While a dependence of growth rate on free cytoplasmic water could be expected at higher salinities, the Hyperbolic model, which is based on the hyperbolic decrease of free cytoplasmic water with increasing salinity, could not be fitted to the data. We conclude that the decrease of free cytoplasmic water does not directly cause the decrease in growth rate.
How much ectoine is required?
By required we refer to the minimal ectoine content needed to maintain turgor pressure. This content, which can be calculated with equation (19), is in reasonable agreement with experimental data (Fig. 5
), although cells accumulate a limited amount of ectoine even if this would not be expected because of sufficiently low external osmolarity. A possible explanation is that ectoine might not be needed to maintain turgor pressure at lower medium osmolarity, but be accumulated for its direct protective properties (Galinski, 1993
). This higher ectoine content should come with an increased turgor pressure in cells at low medium osmolarity, as has indeed been observed for E. coli (Cayley et al., 2000
).
Prediction of the P : O ratio of the respiratory chain of H. elongata
We calculated the theoretical growth yield (YB) for aerobically growing cells to be 0.51 or 0.57 g B (g Glc)–1, assuming a P : O quotient of 2 or 3, respectively. Since we experimentally determined a yield of 0.47 g B (g Glc)–1 for H. elongata, we conclude that the highest P : O ratio in the respiratory chain of H. elongata is unlikely to be more than 2. The observed P : O ratio of
1.6 might result from a branched respiratory chain, with one branch having a P : O ratio of 2 and another having a P : O ratio of 1, or it could be due to a YATP slightly below the regularly assumed value of 10.
Osmoregulation can be modelled as a two-step process
We tested different hypothetical regulation mechanisms for their suitability to describe and explain the process of osmoregulation in H. elongata. The simplest model, where the accumulation of K+ and that of ectoine is triggered directly by turgor pressure, fails to reproduce the observed solute levels (Kth, Eopt). This model leads to preferential accumulation of potassium because its uptake rate is higher than the production rate of ectoine and there is no feedback regulation that reduces the potassium concentration back to the experimentally observed steady-state value, which seems to be independent of the salinity (Kraegeloh & Kunte, 2002
). The other two regulation models that we tested assume a two-step process where the potassium concentration is directly regulated by salinity-dependent properties (i.e. turgor pressure) and potassium in turn triggers the accumulation of ectoine. Both models show a steady-state value for ectoine that is close to the optimum value. There remains only a small deviation caused by the growth of the cells that permanently dilutes the cytoplasm. In a chemostat in steady state, cells keep growing in exponential phase and this apparently requires a permanent, though weak, upregulation of solute accumulation.
In the simulations of the regulation with delayed response (
/K-d), the overshoot of solute concentrations is much higher and it takes longer to reach the steady state. This is caused by the additional time delay (the second regulatory step itself already causes a delay) of signal accumulation. However, the results of the two two-step models do not differ qualitatively and the additional parameters of 
/K-d have not yet been determined experimentally. Thus the simpler model 
/K should be preferred. The overshoot is not an artefact but has also been observed in experiments (Kraegeloh & Kunte, 2002
). Also, the osmoadaptation after an osmotic upshift takes several hours, although accumulation of solutes itself is faster. In its natural habitat (e.g. solar salterns), H. elongata is subjected to fluctuations of osmolarity due to evaporation and rain. The overproduction of compatible solutes could be a pre-emptive strategy that would pre-adapt the cells to further increases of osmolarity due to continuing evaporation.
Concluding remarks
We have developed and validated a comprehensive mathematical model of growth and osmoregulation in halophilic bacteria based on a minimal set of simple assumptions. The response of the model to changes in external osmolarity is in line with experimental observations. The simplest assumptions that can reproduce all the essential aspects of growth and osmoregulation of halophiles are that growth depends on substrate concentration according to Monod kinetics and independently on salt concentration according to substrate inhibition kinetics, and that osmoregulation using compatible solutes follows a two-step mechanism, with turgor pressure regulating potassium uptake and potassium concentration in turn regulating ectoine production. We expect that the model will be straightforward to adapt and parameterize for other compatible-solute-producing halophiles since all the processes described in this model are common to all of them and are modelled in a simple, generic way.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Edited by: C. Picioreanu
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aiba, S., Shoda, M. & Nagatami, M. (1968). Kinetics of product inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 10, 845–864.[CrossRef]
Ajouz, B., Berrier, C., Garrigues, A., Besnard, M. & Ghazi, A. (1998). Release of thioredoxin via the mechanosensitive channel MscL during osmotic downshock of Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem 273, 26670–26674.
Andrews, J. F. (1968). A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng 10, 707–723.[CrossRef]
Brown, A. D. (1976). Microbial water stress. Bacteriol Rev 40, 803–846.
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cayley, D. S., Guttman, H. J. & Record, M. T., Jr (2000). Biophysical characterization of changes in amounts and activity of Escherichia coli cell and compartment water and turgor pressure in response to osmotic stress. Biophys J 78, 1748–1764.[Medline]
Claus, D., Fahmy, F., Rolf, H. J. & Tosunoglu, N. (1983). Sporosarcina halophila sp. nov., an obligate, slightly halophilic bacterium from salt marsh soils. Syst Appl Microbiol 4, 496–506.
Edwards, V. H. (1970). Influence of high substrate concentrations on microbial kinetics. Biotechnol Bioeng 12, 679–712.[CrossRef][Medline]
Galinski, E. A. (1993). Compatible solutes of halophilic eubacteria – molecular principles, water–solute interaction, stress protection. Cell Mol Life Sci 49, 487–496.
Galinski, E. A. (1995). Osmoadaptation in bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol 37, 272–328.[Medline]
Grammann, K., Volke, A. & Kunte, H. J. (2002). New type of osmoregulated solute transporter identified in halophilic members of the Bacteria domain: TRAP transporter TeaABC mediates uptake of ectoine and hydroxyectoine in Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T. J Bacteriol 184, 3078–3085.
Grant, W. D. (2004). Life at low water activity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359, 1249–1266.
Imhoff, J. F. & Trüper, H. G. (1977). Ectothiorhodospira halochloris sp. nov., a new extremely halophilic phototrophic bacterium containing bacteriochlorophyll b. Arch Microbiol 114, 115–121.[CrossRef]
Kempf, B. & Bremer, E. (1998). Uptake and synthesis of compatible solutes as microbial stress responses to high-osmolality environments. Arch Microbiol 170, 319–330.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kraegeloh, A. & Kunte, H. J. (2002). Novel insights into the role of potassium for osmoregulation in Halomonas elongata. Extremophiles 6, 453–462.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kraegeloh, A., Amendt, B. & Kunte, H. J. (2005). Potassium transport in a halophilic member of the Bacteria domain: identification and characterization of the K+ uptake systems TrkH and TrkI from Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T. J Bacteriol 187, 1036–1043.
Larsen, P. I., Sydnes, L. K., Landfald, B. & Strøm, A. R. (1987). Osmoregulation in Escherichia coli by accumulation of organic osmolytes: betaines, glutamic acid and trehalose. Arch Microbiol 147, 1–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, S. J. & Gralla, J. D. (2004). Osmo-regulation of bacterial transcription via poised RNA polymerase. Mol Cell 14, 153–162.[CrossRef][Medline]
Luong, J. H. T. (1987). Generalization of Monod kinetics for analysis of growth data with substrate inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng 29, 242–248.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maskow, T. & Babel, W. (2001). Calorimetrically obtained information about the efficiency of ectoine synthesis from glucose in Halomonas elongata. Biochim Biophys Acta 1527, 4–10.[Medline]
McMeekin, T. A., Olley, J. N., Ross, T. & Ratkowsky, D. A. (1993). Predictive Microbiology, Theory and Application, 1st edn. Taunton: Research Studies Press.
Miguelez, E. & Gilmour, D. J. (1994). Regulation of cell-volume in the salt-tolerant bacterium Halomonas elongata. Lett Appl Microbiol 19, 363–365.[CrossRef]
Morbach, S. & Krämer, R. (2002). Body shaping under water stress: osmosensing and osmoregulation of solute transport in bacteria. ChemBioChem 3, 384–397.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oren, A. (1999). Bioenergetic aspects of halophilism. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63, 334–348.
Peters, P., Galinski, E. A. & Trüper, H. G. (1990). The biosynthesis of ectoine. FEMS Microbiol Lett 71, 157–162.[CrossRef]
Poolman, B. & Glaasker, E. (1998). Regulation of compatible solute accumulation in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 29, 397–407.[CrossRef][Medline]
Poolman, B., Blount, P., Folgering, J. H. A., Friesen, R. H. E., Moe, P. C. & van der Heide, T. (2002). How do membrane proteins sense water stress? Mol Microbiol 44, 889–902.[CrossRef][Medline]
Potts, M. (1994). Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes. Microbiol Rev 58, 755–805.
Sauer, T. (1995). Untersuchung zur Nutzung von Halomonas elongata für die Gewinnung kompatibler Solute. PhD Thesis, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sauer, T. & Galinski, E. A. (1998). Bacterial milking: a novel bioprocess for production of compatible solutes. Biotechnol Bioeng 57, 306–313.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schröder, M., Müller, C., Posten, C., Deckwer, W.-D. & Hecht, V. (1997). Inhibition kinetics of phenol degradation from unstable steady-state data. Biotechnol Bioeng 54, 567–576.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seber, G. A. F. & Wild, C. J. (1989). Nonlinear Regression. New York: Wiley.
Severin, J., Wohlfahrt, A. & Galinski, E. A. (1992). The predominant role of recently discovered tetrahydropyrimidines for the osmoadaptation of halophilic eubacteria. J Gen Microbiol 138, 1629–1638.
Shampine, L. F. & Reichelt, M. W. (1997). The MATLAB ODE Suite. SIAM J Sci Comput 18, 1–22.[CrossRef]
Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J. & Klenk, D. C. (1985). Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150, 76–85.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stouthamer, A. H. (1979). The search for correlation between theoretical and experimental growth yields. In Microbial Biochemistry, pp. 1–47. Edited by J. R. Quayle. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K. & Decker, K. (1977). Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 41, 100–180.
Ventosa, A., Nieto, J. J. & Oren, A. (1998). Biology of moderately halophilic aerobic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 504–544.
Vreeland, R. H. (1999). The family Halomonadaceae. In The Prokaryotes, edn 3.0. Edited by M. Dworkin. New York: Springer.
Vreeland, R. H., Litchfield, C. D., Martin, E. L. & Elliot, E. (1980). Halomonas elongata, a new genus and species of extremely salt-tolerant bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30, 485–495.
Wohlfarth, A., Severin, J. & Galinski, E. A. (1990). The spectrum of compatible solutes in heterotrophic halophilic eubacteria of the family Halomonadaceae. J Gen Microbiol 136, 705–712.
Wood, J. M. (1999). Osmosensing by bacteria: signals and membrane-based sensors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63, 230–262.
Wood, J. M. (2006). Osmosensing by bacteria. Sci STKE 357, pe43
Wood, J. M., Bremer, E., Csonka, L. N., Kraemer, R., Poolman, B., van der Heide, T. & Smith, L. T. (2001). Osmosensing and osmoregulatory compatible solute accumulation by bacteria. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 130, 437–460.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yano, T. & Koga, S. (1969). Dynamic behavior of the chemostat subject to substrate inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng 11, 139–153.[CrossRef]
Received 3 August 2007;
revised 17 April 2008;
accepted 7 May 2008.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |