|
|
||||||||
Institute for Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
Correspondence
Ulrike Gerischer
ulrike.gerischer{at}uni-ulm.de
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Acinetobacter baylyi (Vaneechoutte et al., 2006
), carbon catabolite repression has been described affecting the expression of the pca-qui operon, the pob operon and the van genes (Dal et al., 2002
). These genes code for enzymes required for the utilization of protocatechuate (pca), p-hydroxybenzoate (pob), quinate, shikimate (qui) and vanillate (van). It could be shown that in the presence of the organic acids succinate and acetate in addition to the aromatic compounds the expression level of the pca-qui operon was repressed by at least 90 % during the growth phase. The pca genes are part of the β-ketoadipate pathway, which allows the organism to utilize a large variety of aromatic compounds (Williams & Kay, 2008
). This pathway consists of two parallel branches, starting with protocatechuate (3,4-dihydroxybenzoate) or catechol (Cánovas & Stanier, 1967
). The different aromatic substrates are converted to central metabolites via short funnelling pathways (Fig. 1
) (Harwood & Parales, 1996
). The expression of the genes required for catechol and protocatechuate degradation, respectively, and that of the genes for the funnelling pathways is regulated independently at the level of specific induction (Gerischer et al., 2008
). Most of the genes involved in aromatic catabolism are clustered in two of five islands of catabolic genes on the genome of A. baylyi (Barbe et al., 2004
).
|
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Plasmid and strain construction.
Standard methods were used for plasmid isolation, DNA purification, restriction endonuclease cleavage, ligation and transformation (Sambrook & Russell, 2001
). To obtain the DNA region of interest from the A. baylyi genome a PCR using Pfu-DNA polymerase was performed using the primers listed in Table 2
(benA1/benA2, hcaA1/hcaA2, dcaA1/dcaA2, areA1/areA2, antA1/antA2 for the respective genes). For the construction of pAC116 the PCR fragment containing the benA,B region was cleaved with HindIII and KpnI and inserted into the corresponding sites of pUC18. To create plasmid pAC117 the 3254 bp hca region PCR fragment was prepared using NheI and NsiI. To insert the fragment into pUC18, the vector was cleaved by PstI and XbaI and ligated with the PCR fragment using the compatibility between the PstI/NsiI and XbaI/NheI ends. The dca PCR fragment was treated with PshAI and KpnI and cloned into pUC18 using HincII and KpnI, yielding pAC118. The plasmid pAC119 was made by cloning a fragment of the are region digested by BstBI and SacI into the pUC18 AccI and SacI sites. To construct plasmid pAC123 the vector pBluescript II SK(+) was cleaved by BamHI and EcoRV and ligated with the EcoRV/BglII-treated PCR fragment containing the ant region of A. baylyi.
|
For the construction of A. baylyi strain ADPU92 the A. baylyi DNA containing the benA-luc transcriptional fusion was separated from the vector backbone of pAC120 using the DraIII and EcoRI sites. The linear fragment was used for transformation of A. baylyi strain ADP1. A selection for spectinomycin resistance encoded by aad9 of the luc-aad9 cassette was applied to ensure the homologous recombination of A. baylyi DNA. The other A. baylyi strains containing the transcriptional fusion were made as for strain ADPU92 except for the restriction sites used to remove the insert from the corresponding plasmids. To generate strain ADPU93, plasmid pAC121 was cleaved by BamHI and BglII; to obtain strain ADPU94 the dcaA-luc fusion was cut out from pAC122 by Eco47III and SacI. The plasmid pAC124 was linearized by PmlI and PstI and used to create strain ADPU95. ADPU96 was generated by transformation of A. baylyi with the PmlI–MluI fragment from pAC125.
PCR analysis was employed to verify the correct integration of the constructs into the corresponding location on the chromosome of A. baylyi strain ADP1. For this PCR the primer pair comprised one primer hybridizing in the luc-aad9 cassette (luc primer) and a second primer (ben3, hca3, dca3, are3, antA1) binding in the immediate vicinity of the fusion on the chromosome but outside the DNA used for transformation. In all strains the expected PCR fragment could be amplified, thus confirming the desired construction.
Transformation of A. baylyi strain ADP1.
For transformation of A. baylyi, 200 µl cell suspension of an overnight culture was transferred in fresh mineral medium supplied with 10 mM succinate and incubated for 2 h at 30 °C to allow the cells to start growing again. To 500 µl of these cells 0.1–1 µg linear DNA was added and incubated at 37 °C for 3 h or overnight. Then 100 µl volumes of the cells were spread on selective plates and incubated at 30 °C. Grown A. baylyi mutants were transferred on fresh selective plates several times to ensure a pure culture.
PCR.
Cells from a bacterial colony diluted in water were used as chromosomal templates. The conditions using Pfu DNA polymerase and Taq DNA polymerase were 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 25–30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 53–68 °C for 1 min (depending on the primers), and extension at 72 °C for an appropriate length of time. The primers used are listed in Table 2
. For working with Pfu DNA polymerase the extension time was doubled.
Determination of luciferase enzyme activity.
D-Luciferin was added to a sample of A. baylyi cells taken at different times during growth. The luciferase enzyme activity was detected as described earlier (Siehler et al., 2007
). The resulting light emission was measured and expressed in relative light units (RLU). The results were normalized by dividing the RLU by the respective OD600 value. The data presented for each culture are taken from mid-exponential-phase cultures and are means based on samples from at least three independent cultures. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carbon catabolite repression is observed in the ben and ant operons
Benzoate and anthranilate are independently converted to catechol, allowing further degradation to proceed via the β-ketoadipate pathway. The antABC genes coding for anthranilate dioxygenase (Bundy et al., 1998
; Eby et al., 2001
) and the benABC genes coding for benzoate dioxygenase (Neidle et al., 1991
) are homologous. The ben operon is regulated by BenM, a LysR family regulator able to activate transcription synergistically, responding to two effectors (benzoate and muconate) (Bundy et al., 2002
; Collier et al., 1998
; Ezezika et al., 2007a
, b
). In studies using a chromosomal antA-lacZ transcriptional fusion it could be shown that the antABC expression is induced by anthranilate, but a regulatory protein has not been identified (Bundy et al., 1998
). According to these data the ben-luc and ant-luc constructs were induced by adding benzoate or anthranilate, respectively, to the medium.
The expression of the antA gene in strain ADPU96 was investigated during growth on different non-inducing carbon sources with or without the inducer anthranilate (Fig. 2
). In all cases the inducing effect of anthranilate (16–58-fold) was obvious. Despite the presence of the same concentration of the inducer in all cultures, there were big differences in expression depending on the nature of the non-inducing carbon source. Growth on a combination of succinate plus acetate and inducer resulted in a repression by 95 % as compared to pyruvate. Growth on succinate and inducer had the same repressing effect whereas lactate and acetate each had an intermediate repressing effect. Pyruvate was the carbon source allowing the highest induction.
|
|
Using pyruvate in mineral medium supplied with benzyl alcohol led to the highest expression levels (Fig. 4
). The strongest reduction of activity was observed after simultaneous addition of succinate and acetate, or succinate alone (reduction by 96 % or 98 %, respectively). In summary, all three operons which funnel their substrates into the catechol branch show a transcriptional regulation which strongly depends on the nature of the carbon source(s) present in addition to the substrate inducer. In all cases succinate and acetate were the strongest repressing cosubstrates.
|
A combination of succinate and acetate in the presence of p-coumarate led to a 14-fold reduced luciferase activity in comparison with lactate (Fig. 5
). As in strain ADPU92 (benA-luc), lactate as a carbon source resulted in the highest hca operon expression, followed by pyruvate. Thus the hca operon underlies a strong catabolite repression following the same pattern as observed for other operons connected to the protocatechuate branch of the pathway.
|
The regulator protein of the dca operon is DcaR, which belongs to the IclR family (Parke et al., 2001
). For the luciferase activity assays the luc cassette was introduced into the dcaA gene. The specific gene expression was induced by adding 1 mM adipate to the medium, which was sufficient since the degradation of the inducer was prevented by the luc gene fusion. As shown in Fig. 6
the activity on succinate plus acetate with adipate decreased by 93 % in comparison to the combination of pyruvate and adipate. Lactate led to a slight repression, and acetate or succinate alone to a stronger repression of dcaA expression. These observations strengthened the evidence that all operons of the dca-pca-qui-pob-van-hca cluster show in principle the same expression pattern in response to the presence of additional carbon sources.
|
This pattern was observed in the presence of the respective substrate inducer as well as in its absence (black bars in Figs 2
–6
). Thus the differential expression on the non-inducing carbon sources investigated here is independent of the induction status, an observation that had been made earlier for the pca-qui operon (Siehler et al., 2007
; Trautwein & Gerischer, 2001
).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Operons affected by the repression in A. baylyi
Repression of catabolic enzymes forming the β-ketoadipate pathway was described about 40 years ago in Moraxella calcoacetica (Cánovas & Stanier, 1967
), an organism later renamed Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. More recent reports have documented the repression by succinate of many different genes. An A. baylyi strain with additional copies of the antABC genes carried on a plasmid lost the ability to use anthranilate as a carbon source (Bundy et al., 1998
). The expression of the antABC genes in trans in A. baylyi was likely to cause the formation of a higher-than-normal level of catechol during anthranilate catabolism. Catechol probably contributed to the inhibition of growth. The strain grew, however, when succinate was provided together with anthranilate. It was proposed that succinate allows growth by reducing the expression of the antABC genes, supporting the findings presented here that succinate is a substrate causing carbon catabolite repression of the antA,B,C genes.
Further evidence for repression caused by succinate was reported by Jones & Williams (2001)
. Benzyl esterase activity on the aromatic compound alone was 33 % higher than in the presence of succinate plus benzyl alcohol. Benzyl alcohol dehydrogenase activity was reduced by 63 % when succinate was provided together with benzyl alcohol as compared to benzyl alcohol alone.
In the hca operon, a transcriptional hcaE-lacZ fusion was used to detect the promoter activity (Parke & Ornston, 2004). The detected β-galactosidase activity at the expense of succinate and p-coumarate decreased by 53 % in comparison with the activity measured on p-coumarate alone. Using ferulate as substrate in the presence of succinate reduced the activity by 65 %.
All these data suggested that multiple operons are repressed in the presence of succinate and an aromatic compound. Our results provide more evidence for this. In terms of quantitative expression differences it has to be kept in mind which method was used. It has been documented that measurements based on luciferase or β-galactosidase do differ with respect to induction or repression factors, which is due to the lower stability of the luciferase protein (Siehler et al., 2007
).
All the operons investigated here are part of two large clusters that each encode pathways for catabolism of plant-derived carbon sources of mainly aromatic nature (are-sal-ben-cat and dca-pca-qui-pob-hca) (Young et al., 2005
).
Clues to the molecular mechanism
Several lines of evidence indicate an involvement of Cyo (cytochrome o ubiquinol oxidase) in catabolite repression (Dinamarca et al., 2002
; Morales et al., 2006
; Petruschka et al., 2001
). Furthermore, evidence for a role of protein IIANtr (PtsN) in catabolite repression of Pseudomonas putida has been presented (Cases et al., 2001
). In some cases evidence has been adduced that the specific regulator protein is the target of catabolite repression. An example is (methyl)phenol degradation in P. putida H (Müller et al., 1996
) or catabolite repression of the alk genes in P. putida GPo1 via downregulation of the level of the AlkS protein (Yuste & Rojo, 2001
). It should be noted that both alkane and phenol degradation pathways are encoded on a plasmid of P. putida. Furthermore, transcription requires
54 (RpoN)-containing (phl operon) or
S-containing (alk operon) RNA polymerase. Neither of these two conditions applies to the operons under catabolite repression control in A. baylyi (except for the are operon, which depends on
54). Nevertheless an involvement of the regulators cannot be ruled out at this point. For PcaU, the activator/repressor protein of the pca-qui operon, it has been documented that the pcaU transcript level corresponds to changes in the amount of the pca-qui transcript levels under all conditions tested. Whether the pcaU transcript level simply is affected by the same mechanism as the pca-qui transcript or is involved in causing the repression is unknown (Siehler et al., 2007
)
Crc is the best-studied known player in catabolite repression
The first potential component of the mechanism described is the Crc (catabolite repression control) protein (MacGregor et al., 1991
). Inactivation of the crc gene relieved the repression of a number of genes implicated in the metabolism of carbohydrates (Wolff et al., 1991
) and nitrogenated compounds in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. putida (Collier et al., 1996
; Hester et al., 2000a
).
In the P. putida OCT plasmid alkane degradation pathway Crc participates in the repression observed when cells grow in rich medium, but it plays no role in the repression caused in mineral medium by organic acids (Yuste & Rojo, 2001
). The number of genes that display an influence by Crc in their expression has been increased by proteome and RT-PCR analyses to include two of the three aromatic catabolic pathways (Morales et al., 2004
).
Crc seems to be involved in post-transcriptional regulation in P. putida (Hester et al., 2000b
). In recent reports it could be demonstrated that Crc can bind specifically to the translation initiation region of two mRNAs for transcriptional regulators (AlkS, BenR), suggesting that Crc modulates gene expression by hindering the access of ribosomes to the ribosome-binding site (Moreno & Rojo, 2007
; Moreno et al., 2007
).
A. baylyi contains a Crc homologue. Its inactivation caused withdrawal of catabolite repression upon pca-qui operon expression. In this organism a very strong increase in transcript stability was observed upon crc deletion for the pca-qui operon (U. Gerischer and others, unpublished data). This may be indicative of different activities of Crc in different organisms and/or at different genes. It will be exciting to explore Crc function with respect to the A. baylyi operons investigated here.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Edited by: Michael Hecker
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bundy, B. M., Campbell, A. L. & Neidle, E. L. (1998). Similarities between the antABC-encoded anthranilate dioxygenase and the benABC-encoded benzoate dioxygenase of Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. J Bacteriol 180, 4466–4474.
Bundy, B. M., Collier, L. S., Hoover, T. R. & Neidle, E. L. (2002). Synergistic transcriptional activation by one regulatory protein in response to two metabolites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 7693–7698.
Cánovas, J. L. & Stanier, R. Y. (1967). Regulation of the enzymes of the β-ketoadipate pathway in Moraxella calcoacetica. 1. General aspects. Eur J Biochem 1, 289–300.[Medline]
Cases, I., Lopez, J. A., Albar, J. P. & De Lorenzo, V. (2001). Evidence of multiple regulatory functions for the PtsN (IIANtr) protein of Pseudomonas putida. J Bacteriol 183, 1032–1037.
Collier, D. N., Hager, P. W. & Phibbs, P. V., Jr (1996). Catabolite repression control in the pseudomonads. Res Microbiol 147, 551–561.[Medline]
Collier, L. S., Gaines, G. L. & Neidle, E. L. (1998). Regulation of benzoate degradation in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1 by BenM, a LysR-type transcriptional activator. J Bacteriol 180, 2493–2501.
Dal, S., Steiner, I. & Gerischer, U. (2002). Multiple operons connected with catabolism of aromatic compounds in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1 are under carbon catabolite repression. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 4, 389–404.[Medline]
Dinamarca, M. A., Ruiz-Manzano, A. & Rojo, F. (2002). Inactivation of cytochrome o ubiquinol oxidase relieves catabolic repression of the Pseudomonas putida GPo1 alkane degradation pathway. J Bacteriol 184, 3785–3793.
Eby, D. M., Beharry, Z. M., Coulter, E. D., Kurtz, D. M. & Neidle, E. L. (2001). Characterization and evolution of anthranilate 1,2-dioxygenase from Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. J Bacteriol 183, 109–118.
Ezezika, O. C., Haddad, S., Clark, T. J., Neidle, E. L. & Momany, C. (2007a). Distinct effector-binding sites enable synergistic transcriptional activation by BenM, a LysR-type regulator. J Mol Biol 367, 616–629.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ezezika, O. C., Haddad, S., Neidle, E. L. & Momany, C. (2007b). Oligomerization of BenM, a LysR-type transcriptional regulator: structural basis for the aggregation of proteins in this family. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 63, 361–368.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerischer, U. (2002). Specific and global regulation of genes associated with the degradation of aromatic compounds in bacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 4, 111–121.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerischer, U., Jerg, B. & Fischer, R. (2008). Spotlight on the Acinetobacter baylyi β-ketoadipate pathway: multiple levels of regulation. In Acinetobacter Molecular Biology, pp. 203–230. Edited by U. Gerischer. Caister Scientific Press.
Hanahan, D. (1983). Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166, 557–580.[Medline]
Harwood, C. S. & Parales, R. E. (1996). The β-ketoadipate pathway and the biology of self-identity. Annu Rev Microbiol 50, 553–590.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hester, K. L., Lehman, J., Najar, F., Song, L., Roe, B. A., MacGregor, C. H., Hager, P. W., Phibbs, P. V., Jr & Sokatch, J. R. (2000a). Crc is involved in catabolite repression control of the bkd operons of Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 182, 1144–1149.
Hester, K. L., Madhusudhan, K. T. & Sokatch, J. R. (2000b). Catabolite repression control by Crc in 2xYT medium is mediated by posttranscriptional regulation of bkdR expression in Pseudomonas putida. J Bacteriol 182, 1150–1153.
Jones, R. M. & Williams, P. A. (2001). areCBA is an operon in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1 and is controlled by AreR, a
54-dependent regulator. J Bacteriol 183, 405–409.
Jones, R. M., Collier, L. S., Neidle, E. L. & Williams, P. A. (1999). areABC genes determine the catabolism of aryl esters in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. J Bacteriol 181, 4568–4575.
MacGregor, C. H., Wolff, J. A., Arora, S. K. & Phibbs, P. V., Jr (1991). Cloning of a catabolite repression control (crc) gene from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, expression of the gene in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 173, 7204–7212.
Morales, G., Linares, J. F., Beloso, A., Albar, J. P., Martinez, J. L. & Rojo, F. (2004). The Pseudomonas putida Crc global regulator controls the expression of genes from several chromosomal catabolic pathways for aromatic compounds. J Bacteriol 186, 1337–1344.
Morales, G., Ugidos, A. & Rojo, F. (2006). Inactivation of the Pseudomonas putida cytochrome o ubiquinol oxidase leads to a significant change in the transcriptome and to increased expression of the CIO and cbb3-1 terminal oxidases. Environ Microbiol 8, 1764–1774.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moreno, R. & Rojo, F. (2007). The target for the Pseudomonas putida Crc global regulator at the benzoate degradation pathway is the BenR transcriptional regulator. J Bacteriol 190, 1539–1545.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moreno, R., Ruiz-Manzano, A., Yuste, L. & Rojo, F. (2007). The Pseudomonas putida Crc global regulator is an RNA binding protein that inhibits translation of the AlkS transcriptional regulator. Mol Microbiol 64, 665–675.[CrossRef][Medline]
Müller, C., Petruschka, L., Cuypers, H., Burchhardt, G. & Herrmann, H. (1996). Carbon catabolite repression of phenol degradation in Pseudomonas putida is mediated by the inhibition of the activator protein PhlR. J Bacteriol 178, 2030–2036.
Neidle, E. L., Hartnett, C., Ornston, L. N., Bairoch, A., Rekik, M. & Harayama, S. (1991). Nucleotide sequences of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus benABC genes for benzoate 1,2-dioxygenase reveal evolutionary relationships among multicomponent oxygenases. J Bacteriol 173, 5385–5395.
Parke, D. & Ornston, L. N. (2004). Toxicity caused by hydroxycinnamoyl-coenzyme A thioester accumulation in mutants of Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 2974–2983.
Parke, D., Garcia, M. A. & Ornston, L. N. (2001). Cloning and genetic characterization of dca genes required for beta-oxidation of straight-chain dicarboxylic acids in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 4817–4827.
Petruschka, L., Burchhardt, G., Müller, C., Weihe, C. & Herrmann, H. (2001). The cyo operon of Pseudomonas putida is involved in carbon catabolite repression of phenol degradation. Mol Genet Genomics 266, 199–206.[CrossRef][Medline]
Podbielski, A., Woischnik, M., Leonard, B. A. & Schmidt, K. H. (1999). Characterization of nra, a global negative regulator gene in group A streptococci. Mol Microbiol 31, 1051–1064.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. W. (2001). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
Siehler, S. Y., Dal, S., Fischer, R., Patz, P. & Gerischer, U. (2007). Multiple-level regulation of genes for protocatechuate degradation in Acinetobacter baylyi includes cross-regulation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 232–242.
Smith, M. A., Weaver, V. B., Young, D. M. & Ornston, L. N. (2003). Genes for chlorogenate and hydroxycinnamate catabolism (hca) are linked to functionally related genes in the dca-pca-qui-pob-hca chromosomal cluster of Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 524–532.
Stülke, J. & Hillen, W. (1999). Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 2, 195–201.[CrossRef][Medline]
Trautwein, G. & Gerischer, U. (2001). Effects exerted by transcriptional regulator PcaU from Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. J Bacteriol 183, 873–881.
Vaneechoutte, M., Young, D. M., Ornston, L. N., De Baere, T., Nemec, A., Van Der Reijden, T., Carr, E., Tjernberg, I. & Dijkshoorn, L. (2006). Naturally transformable Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1 belongs to the newly described species Acinetobacter baylyi. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 932–936.
Williams, P. & Kay, C. M. (2008). The catabolism of aromatic compounds by Acinetobacter. In Acinetobacter Molecular Biology, pp. 99–118. Edited by U. Gerischer. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press.
Wolff, J. A., MacGregor, C. H., Eisenberg, R. C. & Phibbs, P. V., Jr (1991). Isolation and characterization of catabolite repression control mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO. J Bacteriol 173, 4700–4706.
Young, D. M., Parke, D. & Ornston, L. N. (2005). Oppotunities for genetic investigation afforded by Acinetobacter baylyi, a nutritionally versatile bacterial species that is highly competent for natural transformation. Annu Rev Microbiol 59, 519–551.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yuste, L. & Rojo, F. (2001). Role of the crc gene in catabolic repression of the Pseudomonas putida GPo1 alkane degradation pathway. J Bacteriol 183, 6197–6206.
Received 17 January 2008;
revised 29 May 2008;
accepted 20 June 2008.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |