|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Ariel University Center of Samaria, Ariel 44837, Israel
2 The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel
Correspondence
Rivka Cahan
rivkac{at}yosh.ac.il
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-endotoxin protein that is produced by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. It is a membrane pore-forming toxin that is lethal to insect larvae and is broadly cytolytic to vertebrate as well as invertebrate cells. Cyt1Aa is produced as a protoxin of 27 kDa. Proteolytic activation results in a reduction of the molecular mass to approximately 23–24 kDa and a threefold increase in activity. In this research, Cyt1Aa crystals were purified from B. thuringiensis IPS78/11 harbouring the expression vector pHT-cyAp20. The activity of the activated form of Cyt1Aa (23–24 kDa) was examined on a pathogenic strain of the Gram-negative Escherichia coli and the Gram-positive species Staphylococcus aureus. The Cyt1Aa minimal inhibitory concentration for E. coli and S. aureus was 1.25 and 5 µg ml–1, respectively. Cyt1Aa was found to be bactericidal for E. coli, whereas it was bacteriostatic for S. aureus. Furthermore, Cyt1Aa increased the lethal effect when acting in combination with antibiotics. The association of Cyt1Aa with cells of these two bacteria was demonstrated by Western blot analysis using antibodies against the whole
-endotoxin crystal. Scanning electron microscopy displayed damage to Cyt1Aa-treated cells. Ion imbalance due to damage of the cell walls and membranes was confirmed by X-ray microanalysis. These experiments show that Cyt1Aa has an antibacterial effect on pathogenic species and demonstrate, apparently for the first time, that exogenous Cyt1Aa has a bactericidal effect upon Gram-negative bacteria.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-endotoxin) which is composed of four main polypeptides, Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba, Cry11Aa and Cyt1Aa. These belong to two structurally distinct groups: receptor-specific Cry toxins which are active against insects and non-receptor-specific Cyt toxins that lyse a broad range of eukaryotic cells (Hofte & Whiteley, 1989
Cyt1Aa (249 amino acids; 27 kDa) is the major component (45–50 %) of the
-endotoxin and was the first cytolytic toxin to be isolated and comprehensively characterized (Bourgouin et al., 1986
). Its maximal toxicity is obtained upon alkaline solubilization and proteolysis from both the N- and the C-termini, which converts the protoxin into its active form (23–24 kDa). This is carried out by the insect gut proteases (Al-yahyaee & Ellar, 1995
; Dai & Gill, 1993
). Endogenous bacterial proteases and several other proteases such as trypsin, chymotrypsin and proteinase K can also activate Cyt1Aa (Donovan et al., 1997
; Nisnevitch et al., 2006
; Oppert, 1999
). Cyt1Aa's highly hydrophobic nature enables its interaction with unsaturated membrane phospholipids such as phosphatidylchloline, sphingomyelin and cholesterol (Promdonkoy & Ellar, 2003
; Thomas & Ellar, 1983
). Cyt1Aa forms pores 1–2 nm in diameter in the cell membrane, leading to cell lysis (Knowles et al., 1989
; Knowles & Ellar, 1987
). It belongs to the β-barrel subclass that enters the membrane by forming a β-barrel composed of β-sheet hairpins from each monomer (Bravo et al., 2007
; Parker & Feil, 2005
).
Cyt1Aa has a synergistic action with the other B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis toxins when used against insect larvae (Crickmore et al., 1995
; Khasdan et al., 2001
). Purified Cyt1Aa is cytolytic to cells of dipteran origin. At concentrations that are several fold higher, it is also toxic to a broad range of vertebrate and invertebrate cells (Gill et al., 1992
; Koni & Ellar, 1994
). We have recently demonstrated that Cyt1Aa can be specifically targeted towards multiple myeloma cancer cells which surface-express and secrete anti-myelin basic protein (MBPp) antibodies (Cohen et al., 2007
). This targeted delivery of Cyt1Aa has been carried out by chemical conjugation as well as by genetic fusion to the major epitope of MBPp. Both forms (chemically conjugated and genetically fused) were found to be toxic to the multiple myeloma cells.
Information on Cyt1Aa activity in prokaryotic cells is very limited. Expression of cyt1Aa in Escherichia coli (without the helper gene p20) leads to compaction of the nucleoid, associated with loss of colony-forming ability (Douek et al., 1992
; Manasherob et al., 2003
). The effect of exogenous Cyt1Aa on Gram-negative bacteria has not been reported previously. Several
-endotoxins from B. thuringiensis have antibacterial effects on Gram-positive bacteria as well as on archaea, detected by zones of inhibition on agar and morphological changes in the treated bacteria (Revina et al., 2005
; Yudina et al., 2003
, 2007
). Here, we examined the effect of exogenous Cyt1Aa on both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The results provide what appears to be the first evidence for the antibacterial effect of exogenous Cyt1Aa on Gram-negative bacteria, reflected in morphological changes, alteration in the ion balance and cell lysis. Combined treatment of Cyt1Aa and antibiotics increased the antibacterial effect several fold.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Wild-type strains of E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus were obtained from Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba, Israel, and grown in nutrient broth (NB) or on NB agar plates (Difco) overnight at 37 °C.
Crystal protein isolation, solubilization and activation.
The sediment of B. thuringiensis strain IPS78/11 harbouring pHT-cyAp20, containing crystals, spores and cell debris, was washed twice with cold distilled water (15 000 g for 45 min) followed by isolation on a stepwise sucrose gradient: 20 %, 40 %, 60 % and 80 % (4500 g for 2 h) (Debro et al., 1986
). The Cyt1Aa crystals were removed from the 60 % sucrose layer, washed with distilled water and solubilized in 50 mM Na2CO3, pH 10.5, at 37 °C for 1 h followed by centrifugation (4500 g for 45 min). The supernatant containing solubilized Cyt1Aa was adjusted to pH 8 with 1 M Tris/HCl, pH 6.5. Solubilized Cyt1Aa was activated by digestion with 1 % proteinase K for 1 h, followed by addition of 5 mM PMSF.
Purification of Cyt1Aa on DEAE-cellulose.
Activated Cyt1Aa was purified by an anion-exchange chromatography system (Pharmacia) on a DEAE-cellulose column (1x25 cm), pre-equilibrated with 50 mM Tris/HCl buffer, pH 8.5. Cyt1Aa was eluted with a 0–0.6 M NaCl gradient in the same buffer at a flow rate of 1.5 ml min–1. Fractions (3 ml) were collected and monitored at 280 nm. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (1976)
, with BSA as a standard.
Haemolysis assay.
Rabbit red blood cells (RBC) were washed with 0.1 M PBS, pH 6.5, and suspended to 0.1–1 % (v/v) in the same buffer. Aliquots of Cyt1Aa were mixed with 1 ml suspended RBC and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. The absorbance of the released haemoglobin in the supernatant was monitored at 540 nm. Percentage haemolysis was calculated from the equation [(A540–
)/(
–
)]x100=percentage haemolysis, where
(100 % lysis) was obtained by incubating the RBC with water, and
(0 % lysis) by incubating them in PBS.
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.
Protein homogeneity and molecular mass were determined by SDS-PAGE in 4 % stacking and 12.5 % separating polyacrylamide gels, using Dalton Mark VII-L mixtures (Sigma) as standards. The proteins in the gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from the gels to nitrocellulose was performed in 48 mM Trisma base, 39 mM glycine, 20 % methanol and 1.3 mM SDS, pH 9.2. The membranes were blocked with 5 % skim milk (Difco), followed by incubation with polyclonal antibodies against whole B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis crystal polypeptides [diluted 10–4 with Blatto (Difco)]. Cyt1Aa protein bands were visualized with alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma).
Association of Cyt1Aa with bacterial cells.
E. coli and S. aureus cultures, grown to the exponential phase, were divided into four tubes for each; the samples were treated with antibiotic and Cyt1Aa (less than the MIC for each species) separately and together. E. coli was treated with ampicillin, whereas S. aureus was treated with erythromycin. One portion of each bacterium remained untreated. All samples were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, followed by centrifugation. The pellet was washed thoroughly with PBS and sonicated. The cell lysates were loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels and the proteins were transferred from the gel to nitrocellulose for Western blot analysis.
Antibacterial activities.
Determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Cyt1Aa or antibiotics was performed in microtitre plates by twofold serial dilutions of antibacterial molecules in NB followed by addition of 0.5x105 cells ml–1 at the exponential phase. The microtitre plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and the absorbance was determined by an ELISA reader at 660 nm.
The minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the antibacterial molecules was determined using the MIC and several higher concentrations. Viability was determined by counting c.f.u. on NB agar plates following appropriate dilutions, after 24 h incubation at 37 °C. Determinations of the MIC and MBC of each antibiotic and Cyt1Aa were performed three times.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Cultures in the exponential phase were treated with Cyt1Aa, with an antibiotic compound and with both for 24 h. The cultures were then washed and fixed with 2 % glutaraldehyde for 2 h, followed by 1 % osmium tetroxide. The cells were then dehydrated by incubation in increasing concentrations of ethanol. The specimens were gold-coated using an LKB device. Scanning was performed with a JEOL 840 scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.
X-ray microanalysis (XRMA).
Cultures in the exponential phase were treated with Cyt1Aa, with an antibiotic compound and with both for 24 h. The cultures were then washed twice with 0.1 M ammonium acetate and resuspended in 30 µl ammonium acetate. Each suspension (20 µl) was attached to an aluminium grid, air-dried at room temperature for at least 24 h and then coated with a layer of carbon. XRMA was performed using an eXL Link X-ray system attached to a JEOL 840 scanning electron microscope. Each spectrum was determined with approximately 106 cells. The background level was the same during all measurements.
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis.
Intact molecular mass measurement and peptide mass mapping were performed on a Bruker Reflex III matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker) equipped with delayed ion extraction, a reflector and a 337 nm nitrogen laser. Each mass spectrum was generated from accumulated data of 200 laser shots. Both external and nearby calibration for proteins were achieved using BSA and myoglobin proteins, obtained from Sigma.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
An antibacterial effect of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis
-endotoxins has been demonstrated on the Gram-positive bacterium Micrococcus luteus by the agar diffusion and MIC methods (Yudina et al., 2003
). Those authors found that increasing the CytA concentration from 6.7 to 106 µg ml–1, for example, led to growth-suppression zones 12.2 and 22 mm wide, respectively. MIC values of CytA (28 kDa), Cry11A (70 kDa) and activated Cry4B (50 kDa) were 6.7, 6.7, and 33.4 µg ml–1, respectively.
Combined treatment with Cyt1Aa and antibiotics
To test the possibility that Cyt1Aa can enhance the antibacterial effect of antibiotics and thus lower the concentrations that are necessary to eradicate bacteria, the MIC values of several antibiotics were determined for both E. coli and S. aureus (Table 1
). For E. coli, the values for ampicillin, kanamycin and polymyxin B were 6.25, 2.5 and 2.5 µg ml–1, respectively (Table 1a
). The very high MIC of erythromycin (100 µg ml–1) is consistent with low penetration of erythromycin into Gram-negative bacteria through their cell wall to inhibit ribosomal activity. The MICs of ampicillin, kanamycin, polymyxin B and erythromycin for S. aureus were 10, 0.32, 20 and 5 µg ml–1, respectively (Table 1b
).
To test whether Cyt1Aa can contribute to the antibacterial activity of the above-tested antibiotics, Cyt1Aa was added, at a concentration fourfold lower than its MIC for each species, to wells containing serial dilutions of each drug, followed by addition of the bacteria. Addition of Cyt1Aa led to a two- to fourfold decrease in the antibiotics' MICs (right side of Table 1
). It is likely that Cyt1Aa lowered (fourfold) the ampicillin MIC for E. coli through partial disruption of the outer membrane, enabling better penetration of the antibiotic into the periplasmic space and resulting in a greater inhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis. In S. aureus, Cyt1Aa only halved the MIC of ampicillin, perhaps because the multi-layered peptidoglycan diminished the penetration of Cyt1Aa,. The combination with Cyt1Aa resulted in a fourfold decreased MIC of erythromycin for S. aureus. We suggest that even a small injury to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane caused by Cyt1Aa in S. aureus contributes to the penetration of erythromycin and increases its activity, i.e. binding to the 50S ribosome and blocking protein synthesis. The small (twofold) decrease in MIC obtained by adding Cyt1Aa to erythromycin in E. coli is surprising because the toxin was anticipated to disrupt the membrane, thus enhancing penetration of the drug.
An MBC analysis was performed for both species, to determine whether the combined effect is bactericidal (no growth is detected at the MIC of the antibacterial agent) or bacteriostatic (no growth is detected at fourfold or higher concentrations). Table 1
demonstrates that the combined treatment of Cyt1Aa with either ampicillin, kanamycin or polymyxin B was bactericidal for E. coli, as was each of these agents alone. S. aureus cells were also treated with the combination of Cyt1Aa and the bactericidal antibiotics ampicillin, kanamycin or polymyxin B. These combinations were found to have a bactericidal effect on S. aureus, although Cyt1Aa alone has only a bacteriostatic effect on this bacterium. The combined treatment of erythromycin and Cyt1Aa was bacteriostatic for S. aureus as well as for E. coli. This bacteriostatic effect for S. aureus may be derived from the bacteriostatic effect of each of the drugs alone. However, this combination was also bacteriostatic for E. coli even though Cyt1Aa alone is bactericidal for E. coli. We assume that because erythromycin molecules hardly penetrate the outer membrane of E. coli, the high erythromycin concentration (50 µg ml–1) screens the surface of the Gram-negative bacterium and impairs the binding of Cyt1Aa molecules to the outer membrane.
Association of Cyt1Aa with bacterial cells
The association of Cyt1Aa with the bacterial cells was demonstrated with antibodies against B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis crystals. The bacterial cells were treated (at a concentration lower than the MIC) with Cyt1Aa and ampicillin (E. coli) or erythromycin (S. aureus), separately and together. All samples were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C followed by centrifugation and sonication of the pellets. The cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and the proteins from the gel were transferred to nitrocellulose for Western blot analysis. Antibodies against the crystals reacted with the E. coli lysate that was treated with Cyt1Aa (Fig. 2
, lane 5), more so when the cells were treated with a combination of Cyt1Aa and antibiotics (lane 4). Lysates of the untreated cells and of the cells that were treated with antibiotics alone did not react with the antibodies (lanes 2 and 3, respectively). Similar results were obtained with the erythromycin-treated S. aureus (data not shown). These results lead to the conclusion that Cyt1Aa associates with cells of both species, and that its association increases when the cells are co-treated with antibiotics. We assume that the antibiotics weaken the bacterial cells, leading to better association of Cyt1Aa with the cell membrane.
|
|
X-ray microanalysis
Membrane damage was also demonstrated by XRMA (Fig. 4
). A combined treatment of Cyt1Aa and ampicillin resulted in significant changes in the ion composition of both E. coli and S. aureus (about 60 % compared to untreated cells). The same results were obtained when the cells were treated with Cyt1Aa (at the MIC) (data not shown). When treated with Cyt1Aa or ampicillin (lower than the MIC), the changes in ion composition were only about 10 % compared to untreated cells. The combined bactericidal treatment of E. coli with Cyt1Aa and ampicillin resulted in the release of sulfur from the bacterial cell, indicating a decrease in protein content. An efflux of phosphorus was also observed, demonstrating that the cells became empty of their content. The influx of sodium, potassium and calcium ions into the bacterial cell occurred in parallel, indicating that the ion pumps were not functioning and there was free influx into the cells (Fig. 4a
). The XRMA spectra for S. aureus treated by the combined bacteriostatic treatment of Cyt1Aa and erythromycin exhibited a different picture from that for E. coli. The sulfur and phosphorus contents did not change. However, the potassium ion concentration decreased, indicating some damage to the membrane pumps (Fig. 4b
). Untreated E. coli and S. aureus cells exhibited normal XRMA spectra with a high peak of phosphate and a very low peak of sodium. The XRMA results are in complete agreement with the above morphological changes.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Edited by: J. Green
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Al-yahyaee, S. A. S. & Ellar, D. J. (1995). Maximal toxicity of cloned CytA
-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis requires proteolytic processing from both the N- and C-termini. Microbiology 141, 3141–3148.
Ben-Dov, E., Nissan, G., Pelleg, N., Manasherob, R., Boussiba, S. & Zaritsky, A. (1999). Refined, circular restriction map of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis plasmid carrying the mosquito larvicidal genes. Plasmid 42, 186–191.[CrossRef][Medline]
Berry, C., O'Neill, S., Ben-Dov, E., Jones, A. F., Murphy, L., Quail, M. A., Holden, M. T., Harris, D., Zaritsky, A. & Parkhill, J. (2002). Complete sequence and organization of pBtoxis, the toxin-coding plasmid of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 5082–5095.
Bourgouin, C., Klier, A. & Rapoport, G. (1986). Characterization of the genes encoding the haemolytic toxin and the mosquitocidal delta-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis. Mol Gen Genet 205, 390–397.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248–254.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bravo, A., Gill, S. S. & Soberon, M. (2007). Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon 49, 423–435.[Medline]
Brown, M. R., Collier, P. J. & Gilbert, P. (1990). Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: modification of the cell envelope and batch and continuous culture studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34, 1623–1628.
Brownbridge, M. & Margalit, J. (1986). New Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated in Israel are highly toxic to mosquito larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 48, 216–222.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chow, E., Singh, G. J. & Gill, S. S. (1989). Binding and aggregation of the 25-kilodalton toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis to cell membranes and alteration by monoclonal antibodies and amino acid modifiers. Appl Environ Microbiol 55, 2779–2788.
Cohen, S., Cahan, R., Ben-Dov, E., Nisnevitch, M., Zaritsky, A. & Firer, M. A. (2007). Specific targeting to murine myeloma cells of Cyt1Aa toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies israelensis. J Biol Chem 282, 28301–28308.
Crickmore, N., Bone, E. J., Williams, J. A. & Ellar, D. J. (1995). Contribution of the individual components of the
-endotoxin crystal to the mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 131, 249–254.
Dai, S. M. & Gill, S. S. (1993). In vitro and in vivo proteolysis of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis CryIVD protein by Culex quinquefasciatus larval midgut proteases. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 23, 273–283.[CrossRef][Medline]
Debro, L., Fitz-James, P. C. & Aronson, A. (1986). Two different parasporal inclusions are produced by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. finitimus. J Bacteriol 165, 258–268.
Donovan, W. P., Tan, Y. & Slaney, A. C. (1997). Cloning of the nprA gene for neutral protease A of Bacillus thuringiensis and effect of in vivo deletion of nprA on insecticidal crystal protein. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 2311–2317.[Abstract]
Douek, J., Einav, M. & Zaritsky, A. (1992). Sensitivity to plating of Escherichia coli cells expressing the cryA gene from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis. Mol Gen Genet 232, 162–165.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gill, S. S., Cowles, E. A. & Pietrantonio, P. V. (1992). The mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins. Annu Rev Entomol 37, 615–636.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goldberg, L. J. & Margalit, J. (1977). Bacterial spore demonstrating rapid larvicidal activity against Anopheles sergentii, Uranotaenia unguiculata, Culex univitattus, Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens. Mosq News 37, 355–361.
Guerchicoff, A., Ugalde, R. A. & Rubinstein, C. P. (1997). Identification and characterization of a previously undescribed cyt gene in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 63, 2716–2721.[Abstract]
Hadas, H., Einav, M., Fishov, I. & Zaritsky, A. (1995). Division-inhibition capacity of penicillin in Escherichia coli is growth-rate dependent. Microbiology 141, 1081–1083.
Hofte, H. & Whiteley, H. R. (1989). Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53, 242–255.
Khasdan, V., Ben-Dov, E., Manasherob, R., Boussiba, S. & Zaritsky, A. (2001). Toxicity and synergism in transgenic Escherichia coli expressing four genes from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Environ Microbiol 3, 798–806.[CrossRef][Medline]
Knowles, B. H. & Ellar, D. J. (1987). Colloid-osmotic lysis is a general feature of the mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis
-endotoxins with different insect specificity. Biochim Biophys Acta 924, 509–518.
Knowles, B. H., Blatt, M. R., Tester, M., Horsnell, J. M., Carroll, J., Menestrina, G. & Ellar, D. J. (1989). A cytolytic delta-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis forms cation-selective channels in planar lipid bilayers. FEBS Lett 244, 259–262.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koni, P. A. & Ellar, D. J. (1994). Biochemical characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis cytolytic delta-endotoxins. Microbiology 140, 1869–1880.
Li, J., Koni, P. A. & Ellar, D. J. (1996). Structure of the mosquitocidal delta-endotoxin CytB from Bacillus thuringiensis sp. kyushuensis and implications for membrane pore formation. J Mol Biol 257, 129–152.[CrossRef][Medline]
Manasherob, R., Zaritsky, A., Metzler, Y., Ben-Dov, E., Itsko, M. & Fishov, I. (2003). Compaction of the Escherichia coli nucleoid caused by Cyt1Aa. Microbiology 149, 3553–3564.
Manasherob, R., Itsko, M., Sela-Baranes, N., Ben-Dov, E., Berry, C., Cohen, S. & Zaritsky, A. (2006). Cyt1Ca from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis: production in Escherichia coli and comparison of its biological activities with those of other Cyt-like proteins. Microbiology 152, 2651–2659.
Manceva, S. D., Pusztai-Carey, M. & Butko, P. (2004). Effect of pH and ionic strength on the cytolytic toxin Cyt1A: a fluorescence spectroscopy study. Biochim Biophys Acta 1699, 123–130.[Medline]
Manceva, S. D., Pusztai-Carey, M., Russo, P. S. & Butko, P. (2005). A detergent-like mechanism of action of the cytolytic toxin Cyt1A from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis. Biochemistry 44, 589–597.[CrossRef][Medline]
Margalith, Y. & Ben-Dov, E. (2000). Biological control by Bacillus thuringiesis subsp. israelensis. In Insect Pest Management: Techniques for Environmental Protection, pp. 243–301. Edited by J. E. Rechcigl & N. A. Rechcigl. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Nisnevitch, M., Cohen, S., Ben-Dov, E., Zaritsky, A., Sofer, Y. & Cahan, R. (2006). Cyt2Ba of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis: activation by putative endogenous protease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 344, 99–105.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oppert, B. (1999). Protease interactions with Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxins. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 42, 1–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
Parker, M. W. & Feil, S. C. (2005). Pore-forming protein toxins: from structure to function. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 88, 91–142.[CrossRef][Medline]
Promdonkoy, B. & Ellar, D. J. (2003). Investigation of the pore-forming mechanism of a cytolytic delta-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochem J 374, 255–259.[CrossRef][Medline]
Revina, L. P., Kostina, L. I., Dronina, M. A., Zalunin, I. A., Chestukhina, G. G., Yudina, T. G., Konukhova, A. V. & Izumrudova, A. V. (2005). Novel antibacterial proteins from entomocidal crystals of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis. Can J Microbiol 51, 141–148.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thomas, W. E. & Ellar, D. J. (1983). Mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis insecticidal delta-endotoxin. FEBS Lett 154, 362–368.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wu, D. & Federici, B. A. (1993). A 20-kilodalton protein preserves cell viability and promotes CytA crystal formation during sporulation in Bacillus thuringiensis. J Bacteriol 175, 5276–5280.
Yudina, T. G., Konukhova, A. V., Revina, L. P., Kostina, L. I., Zalunin, I. A. & Chestukhina, G. G. (2003). Antibacterial activity of Cry- and Cyt-proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis. Can J Microbiol 49, 37–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yudina, T. G., Brioukhanov, A. L., Zalunin, I. A., Revina, L. P., Shestakov, A. I., Voyushina, N. E., Chestukhina, G. G. & Netrusov, A. I. (2007). Antimicrobial activity of different proteins and their fragments from Bacillus thuringiensis parasporal crystals against clostridia and archaea. Anaerobe 13, 6–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received 22 May 2008;
revised 15 July 2008;
accepted 17 July 2008.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |