Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 154 (2008), 1242-1250; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2007/010017-0
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thykaer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thykaer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thykaer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.
Microbiology 154 (2008), 1242-1250; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2007/010017-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology

NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase in Penicillium chrysogenum is involved in regulation of β-lactam production

Jette Thykaer1, Kanchana Rueksomtawin1, Henk Noorman2 and Jens Nielsen1

1 Center for Microbial Biotechnology, Technical University of Denmark, Building 223, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
2 DSM-Anti-Infectives, Industrial Pharmaceutical Products Division, Wateringsweg 1, PO Box 1, NL-2600 MA Delft, Denmark

Correspondence
Jens Nielsen
jn{at}biocentrum.dtu.dk


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The interactions between the ammonium assimilatory pathways and β-lactam production were investigated by disruption of the NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) in two industrial β-lactam-producing strains of Penicillium chrysogenum. The strains used were an adipoyl-7-ADCA- and a penicillin-producing strain. The gdhA gene disruption caused a decrease in maximum specific growth rate of 26 % and 35 % for the adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strain and the penicillin-producing strain, respectively, compared to the corresponding reference strains. Interestingly, no β-lactam production was detected in either of the {Delta}gdhA strains. Supplementation with glutamate restored growth but no β-lactam production was detected for the constructed strains. Cultures with high ammonium concentrations (repressing conditions) and with proline as nitrogen source (de-repressed conditions) showed continued β-lactam production for the reference strains whereas the {Delta}gdhA strains remained non-productive under all conditions. By overexpressing the NAD-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase, the specific growth rate could be restored, but still no β-lactam production was detected. The results indicate that the NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase may be directly or indirectly involved in the regulation of β-lactam production in industrial strains of P. chrysogenum.


Abbreviations: ADCA, aminodeacetoxycephalosporanic acid; APA, aminopenicillanic acid; GDHA, glutamate dehydrogenase, NADPH-dependent; GDHB, glutamate dehydrogenase, NAD+-dependent


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
β-Lactams have been produced industrially for more than 60 years, and the developments in this production process have been outstanding. An important element in strain improvement programmes is a thorough understanding of the physiology of the strains, as this may point to ways of improving the cultivation conditions or of genetically modifying the strain with the aim of improving the production, the latter often referred to as metabolic engineering. Therefore, microbial physiology constitutes an essential part of metabolic engineering (Nielsen & Olsson, 2002Down; Thykaer & Nielsen, 2003Down).

Several research groups have been working specifically on optimization of the β-lactam production of Penicillium chrysogenum, e.g. via gene dosage studies (Veenstra et al., 1991Down; Theilgaard et al., 2001Down; Skatrud & Queener, 1989Down; Mathison et al., 1993Down; Gutierrez et al., 1997Down). It is, however, of equal importance to gain insight into other aspects of the metabolism to establish a general overview in order to apply metabolic engineering for further improvement of the production strains. It is essential that the redox metabolism is considered when characterizing the metabolism of cells. It functions as a tightly controlled connection between the different parts of the central metabolism and provides an important link between the primary and the secondary metabolism. A major player in redox metabolism in P. chrysogenum is ammonium assimilation (Fig. 1Down).


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. The ammonium assimilatory pathways in P. chrysogenum. GDHA, glutamate dehydrogenase, NADPH-dependent; GDHB, glutamate dehydrogenase, NAD+-dependent; GOGAT, glutamate synthase; GS, glutamine synthetase.

 
Ammonium is utilized by its incorporation into glutamate and glutamine in P. chrysogenum. This is achieved mainly by the activity of the NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (GDHA) or through the reaction catalysed by glutamine synthetase (GS). GDHA catalyses the reductive amination of 2-oxoglutarate, resulting in glutamate, and this pathway is thermodynamically and energetically favoured for ammonium assimilation. The catabolic reaction from 2-oxoglutarate is catalysed by a related glutamate dehydrogenase, GDHB. However, the essential difference is that GDHB has a requirement for NAD+. Thus, both types of co-factors are used in the ammonium-assimilatory pathways (Fig. 1Up), and it is therefore possible to shift the co-factor requirements through genetic engineering. This has been demonstrated previously, and the co-factor switch successfully led to increased bioethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Nissen et al., 2000Down).

In this work, a study of the interactions between the redox metabolism, the central carbon and nitrogen metabolism and the secondary metabolism was undertaken. Especially the role of the NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase was investigated. This was achieved by disrupting the gdhA gene encoding NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase in both penicillin- and cephalosporin-producing strains of P. chrysogenum. Targeted gene deletion or disruption is very commonly used in Aspergillus species, especially Aspergillus nidulans, and has been carried out by numerous research groups. Gene disruption and deletion has also been reported for several Penicillium strains (Laich et al., 2003Down; Naranjo et al., 2004Down; Baba et al., 2006Down), but in these studies only wild-type or academic strains were exploited. In the present study gene disruption was carried out in high-yielding β-lactam-producing strains and this is to our knowledge the first report on targeted gene disruption in industrial strains of P. chrysogenum. In addition, strains overexpressing gdhB were constructed to compensate for the loss of GDHA. The constructed strains, together with the reference strains, were characterized in both batch and chemostat cultures, focusing on cellular performance, i.e. maximum specific growth rate, biomass yield and productivity.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Strains.
The penicillin-producing recipient strain was a high-producing strain of Penicillium chrysogenum designated DS12975. The other recipient strain was an adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strain, originating from DS12975, where the expandase gene from Streptomyces clavuligerus had been inserted into the genome (Crawford et al., 1995Down). Both reference strains were kindly donated by DSM Anti-Infectives (Delft, the Netherlands).

Plasmids and DNA fragments.
The plasmids pAN7-1 and pAN8-1 were kindly donated by Dr Peter Punt, TNO, Quality of Life, the Netherlands.

Unless specifically stated all DNA manipulations were carried out as described by Sambrook et al. (1989)Down. The DNA fragments and plasmids constructed for the fungal transformations are listed in Table 1Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Plasmids and DNA fragments used in this study

 
PCR products were purified from a 1 % agarose gel using the GFX PCR purification kit (Amersham Biosciences).

PCR primers and probes
Cloning and disruption of gdhA.
A 433 bp probe amplified by PCR was used to screen an EMBL4 phage library of P. chrysogenum for the gdhA gene. The following primers were used to amplify the probe: 5'-GTCGTCTACTACGTCGAGCACATGATCCAGCACGCCTCCG-3' and 5'-AGCCCTCAGCGATGAACTTG-3'.

A 5.5 kb fragment containing the gdhA gene was identified and subcloned into a pBluescript vector, resulting in the plasmid pgdhAH1 (Table 1Up). The gdhA gene was disrupted by replacing 0.8 kb of the C-terminus of the gene sequence with the 4.1 kb BglII–XbaI hygromycin B resistance cassette (HygR) through construction of the plasmid pdgdhAH13 (Table 1Up, Fig. 2Down).


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Experimental strategy used for disrupting the gdhA gene of P. chrysogenum. The gdhA gene was disrupted by replacing 0.8 kb of the C-terminus of the gene with the hygromycin B resistance cassette (HygR). In the upper right corner, the result of the Southern analysis is shown verifying the correct insertion of HygR: DS12975, penicillin-producing reference strain; PD414, gdhA-disrupted strain of the penicillin-producing strain line; DS36079, adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing reference strain, AD12, gdhA-disrupted strain of the adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strain line.

 
Cloning of gdhB.
The following primers were designed for amplification of the A. nidulans gdhB gene (accession number AY223544): PgdhB-F (5'-CATGCCATGGTGTCTCCCGCATC-3') and PgdhB-R (5'-CCGGAAGATCTTTACAAGTTGAAGAAAGAG-3'). An NcoI cloning site was introduced into the forward primer and a BglII site included in the reverse primer (both are underlined in the primer sequences). A PCR product with the expected size (3.4 kb) was first completely digested with NcoI and was then partially digested with BglII as there is another BglII site in the A. nidulans gdhB gene. In parallel, plasmid pAlcR was constructed from the plasmid pAN7-1 (Bautista et al., 2000Down) by replacing a 3.3 kb EcoRI–BamHI fragment containing the gpdA promoter and hph gene of pAN7-1 with a 2.9 kb EcoRI–BamHI fragment containing the A. nidulans gpdA promoter together with a small part of the A. nidulans alcR gene from pMH-B (Bautista et al., 2000Down) (Fig. 3Down). The gdhB expression vector, pGdhB, was constructed by replacing a 0.6 kb NcoI–BamHI fragment of alcR with the 3.4 kb NcoI–BglII gdhB fragment (Fig. 3Down)


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Construction of the gdhB overexpression plasmid. pAlcR was constructed from pAN7-1 by replacing a 3.3 kb EcoRI–BamHI fragment of pAN7-1 with a 2.9 kb EcoRI–BamHI fragment obtained from pMH-B, thereby introducing an NcoI site. pGdhB was constructed by replacing a 0.6 kb NcoI–BamHI alcR fragment of pAlcR with a 3.4 kb NcoI–BglII fragment of the gdhB gene.

 
Construction of strains.
The fungal transformations were performed according to the procedure described by Cantoral et al. (1987)Down except that Glucanex (15 mg ml–1) was used instead of Novozym 234 for protoplast formation. In the construction of the gdhA-disrupted strains, transformants were selected by their ability to grow through an agar overlay containing 1 mg hygromycin B ml–1 (Punt & van den Hondel, 1992Down).

The P. chrysogenum strains were transformed with an 8.8 kb linear DNA fragment containing the gdhA gene disrupted with the HygR cassette purified from p{Delta}gdhAH13 (Fig. 2Up, Table 1Up). The fragment included 2.7 kb and 1.5 kb of homologous flanking regions upstream and downstream of the disrupted gdhA gene, respectively, to ensure integration by homologous recombination with the genomic DNA. Several transformants were selected and it was checked by PCR whether the HygR cassette had been integrated in the P. chrysogenum genome (data not shown). One transformant carrying the HygR cassette from each of the two different strain lines, designated AD12 and PD414, were chosen for the further experiments.

Strains overexpressing NAD-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (gdhB) were constructed by co-transformation of pAN8-1 and pGdhB in the ratio 1 : 10 (µg) using the phleomycin-resistance marker system (Punt & van den Hondel, 1992Down). As selection pressure 10 µg phleomycin ml–1 was used and resistant colonies were isolated by streaking on plates containing 50 µg phleomycin ml–1.

Cultivation medium.
All batch cultivations were carried out using defined medium containing, per litre: 25 g sucrose, 3.5 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.8 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g MgSO4.7H2O, 0.15 g Na2EDTA, 0.04 g FeSO4.7H2O, 1 ml silicone antifoam agent (Sigma) and 5 ml trace element solution. The trace element solution contained, per litre: 1.0 g CuSO4.5H2O, 4 g MnSO4.H2O, 4 g ZnSO4.7H2O and 1 g CaCl2.H2O. In the cultivations with the adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strains 12.5 g adipic acid (AA) l–1 was used as side chain precursor, dissolved with KOH in the ratio AA : KOH 2 : 1 (g g–1). In the cultivations with the penicillin-producing strains, 6.5 g phenoxyacetic acid l–1 was included in the medium as side-chain precursor to produce penicillin V. During each cultivation, 14 samples were taken throughout the experiment.

For the chemostat cultivations 5 g glucose l–1 was used as carbon source in both the batch and the chemostat phase. The side-chain precursors were added at a concentration of 5 g l–1 and 6.5 g l–1 for adipic acid and phenoxyacetic acid, respectively.

A series of batch cultivations using either 135 mM Formula or 30 mM proline as nitrogen source were also conducted. Apart from the nitrogen source, the medium used was the same as described above. However, the sampling frequency in these experiments was reduced to five samples during each cultivation.

Cultivation conditions.
All cultivations were carried out in 5 litre bioreactors with an initial working volume of 4 litres. The temperature was maintained constant at 25 °C and pH was kept at 6.5 through addition of 2 M NaOH and 1 M HCl. The initial aeration rate and agitation were 0.2 vvm and 200 r.p.m., respectively. These were increased after germination (approx. 20 h) to 0.5 vvm and 300 r.p.m., and finally after observing mycelial development the aeration rate was increased to 1 vvm and agitation was increased to 500 r.p.m.; these parameters were then kept constant throughout the rest of the cultivation. All cultivations were inoculated with spores to an initial concentration of 2x109 spores kg–1. For the chemostat cultivations, the continuous phase was initiated by feed addition when all the glucose in the batch phase was exhausted.

Sampling.
Biomass samples were taken manually from the reactor. For dry weight measurements, the samples were filtered, washed with water and dried at 105 °C to constant weight. The filtrate was kept at –80 °C and analysed for content of sugar and products.

Southern analysis.
Biomass samples from the exponential growth phase of batch cultivations were harvested and total DNA was isolated with reference to standard procedures for filamentous fungi (Sambrook et al., 1989Down).

The DNA fragment used as probe for the Southern blotting was 961 bp in length and was amplified from total DNA by PCR using the following gene-specific primers: 5'-ACCTTCCCTTCGAGCCTGAG-3' and 5'-AGAGGGAGATGACGGAGCCA-3'.

The probe was labelled with [{alpha}-32P]dCTP by random priming using Rediprime II kit (Amersham Biosciences). Hybridization of the blotted DNA was performed in rotating incubators (Hybridization Oven/Shaker, Amersham), according to the ECL Hybridization kit protocol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Measurements of sugars.
Sucrose, glucose and fructose were separated at room temperature by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography using a Carbopac PA-10 column (Dionex). The column was eluted at 1.2 ml min–1 with carbonate-free NaOH. For the first 10 min the NaOH concentration in the eluent was 20 mM. A linear NaOH gradient from 20 to 30 mM was applied from 10 to 15 min after injection, and another linear gradient from 30 to 200 mM was applied from 15 to 30 min after injection. The sugars were quantified by pulsed amperometric detection using an ED 40 detector from Dionex.

Measurements of adipic acid and β-lactams.
Adipate and the fermentation products of cultivations with the adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strains were analysed using an isocratic HPLC method described by Robin et al. (2003b)Down. Pure adipoyl-6-APA and adipoyl-7-ADCA standards were kindly donated by DSM Anti-Infectives (Delft, the Netherlands).

Penicillin V produced in the cultivations with the penicillin-producing strains was analysed according to the HPLC method of Christensen et al. (1994)Down.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Strain construction
The gdhA gene encoding the NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase of P. chrysogenum has previously been sequenced and characterized (Diez et al., 1999Down). Based on this sequence, the {Delta}gdhA strains were constructed by targeted gene disruption using the hygromycin B resistance marker system (Fig. 2Up) (Punt et al., 1987Down; Punt & van den Hondel, 1992Down). The reason for choosing a dominant selectable marker was that no auxotrophic markers were available for the industrial strains exploited in this study. To verify that the gdhA gene had been disrupted by the HygR cassette, Southern blotting was carried out. From the Southern blot (Fig. 2Up), only a fragment of 5.5 kb was found in the reference strains, whereas an 8.8 kb fragment was found in the transformant strains, corresponding to the HindIII fragment containing the native gdhA gene and the HindIII fragment with the disrupted gdhA gene, respectively. Thus, the HygR cassette had been integrated at the correct position in the genomes of both the P. chrysogenum strains.

To compensate for the loss of gdhA, strains overexpressing the NADH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (gdhB) were constructed. Since the penicillin- and cephalosporin-producing {Delta}gdhA strains behaved similarly, strains overexpressing gdhB were only constructed for the adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strain line. Thus, only the AD12 strain was used as recipient strain for gdhB overexpression.

The gdhB gene was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of A. nidulans. The PCR primers were designed to introduce NcoI and BglII restriction sites upstream and downstream of the gdhB coding region, respectively, and subsequently cloned into plasmid pAlcR, resulting in pGdhB (Fig. 3Up). The gdhB overexpression strains were constructed by co-transformation with pAN8-1 and pGdhB, using the dominant phleomycin-resistance marker for selection (Punt & van den Hondel, 1992Down). Two strains were selected and the presence of additional A. nidulans gdhB copies was verified by PCR (data not shown).

Sequencing the gdhA downstream region
As shown in Fig. 2Up, the gdhA gene was disrupted by replacing 0.8 kb of the C-terminus of the gene with the HygR cassette. Apart from the C-terminus of the gene being deleted, 300 bp of the downstream region was also deleted in this construct. The sequence of this part of the genome is not known. Therefore, to verify that no other essential gene or promoter region was deleted in the construction of the gdhA-disrupted strain, this 300 bp fragment was sequenced by MWG, Germany (data not shown). The sequence showed an A-rich segment 30 bp upstream from the XbaI cloning site. This polyadenylation site indicated the termination of the gdhA transcript and since no start or stop codons were found in the last part of the sequence it was assumed that no other gene was disrupted during the construction of the {Delta}gdhA strain. This conclusion was supported by BLAST searches of the sequenced 300 bp fragment, which did not show alignments to any known genes.

Physiological characterization
The recipient strains and the constructed strains were all cultivated in batch cultures. Two different cultivations were performed, one with plain medium and one where glutamate was added to a final concentration of 10 mM. A typical time profile of the biomass concentration, sugar concentration and product formation during batch cultivation is shown in Fig. 4Down. The specific production rate rp was estimated by dividing the volumetric productivity qp, estimated from Fig. 4(c)Down, by the average biomass concentration of the stationary phase (indicated by the rectangle in Fig. 4aDown) The physiological fermentation data from the batch cultures are summarized in Table 2Down.


Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. (a) A typical time profile during a batch cultivation showing the sugar concentration, product formation and biomass formation as a function of time. (b) Estimation of the biomass yield coefficient Ysx. The biomass concentration was plotted as a function of the total C-mol carbon consumed for biomass. The biomass yield coefficient was estimated from the slope of the resulting curve. (c) Penicillin formation curve. The penicillin V titre was plotted against time and the penicillin V production rate was estimated from the slope of the curve.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Overview of the cultivations performed and the resulting physiological data

 
Table 2Up shows that disruption of gdhA had a radical impact on the maximum specific growth rates of the constructed strains. For the adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strain µmax decreased by 27 % compared to the reference strain, whereas a decrease of 32 % was observed for the penicillin-producing strain. Supplementing glutamate to the medium could however restore the specific growth rates of the transformants. Furthermore, overexpression of gdhB also had the expected effect of restoring the specific growth rate, as µmax in both cultivations with the {Delta}gdhA+gdhB strains was increased from 0.11 h–1 in the {Delta}gdhA strain to 0.15 h–1 in the cultivations with the gdhB overexpression strains.

The most remarkable result of the batch cultivations with the gdhA-disrupted strains was that no production of β-lactams was measured in any of the cultivations. Moreover, neither when glutamate was added to the medium nor with overexpression of gdhB was it possible to restore β-lactam production, although the strains were growing with the same µmax as the recipient strains.

To ensure that the lack of production in the constructed strains was not a result of the physiological conditions during the batch cultivations, a series of chemostat cultivations with the different strains at dilution rates of 0.065 h–1 were carried out. For all cultivations, including the ones with the constructed strains, steady states with regard to biomass were achieved (data not shown) and the biomass yields were comparable with yields found in previous studies (van Gulik et al., 2000Down; Robin et al., 2003cDown). The specific productivities of the reference strains were estimated to be 17(±2) µmol β-lactam (g dry wt)–1 h–1, but as with the batch cultivations no production of β-lactam was detected in any of the constructed strains during carbon-limited chemostat cultures.

Influence of nitrogen source on β-lactam production
The results described above indicated that the lack of production in both batch and chemostat cultivations was caused by ammonium repression of the β-lactam genes (see discussion below). To test this hypothesis additional batch cultivations were carried out using different nitrogen sources (Table 3Down). Two main results were found from this study: it was not possible to eliminate β-lactam production in the high-producing industrial strains (recipient strains) by increasing the ammonium concentration fivefold in the medium; and the {Delta}gdhA strains remained non-productive during growth with proline as non-repressing nitrogen source (Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Influence of nitrogen source on the β-lactam production during batch cultivations

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The genetic modification of the redox metabolism in P. chrysogenum by disruption of the NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase resulted, as expected, in fundamental changes in the cellular metabolism. A significant decrease of about 30 % was observed in the maximum specific growth rate of the constructed {Delta}gdhA strains, which was caused by the lower capacity of these strains to assimilate ammonium. These findings are in accordance with similar studies in S. cerevisiae, where decreases of 22 % or 46 % were found during aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively (Moreira dos Santos et al., 2004Down; Nissen et al., 2000Down). As expected, the µmax of the gdhA-disrupted strains could be restored by supplementing glutamate to the medium and by overexpression of gdhB.

The specific productivities in batch cultivations of the reference strains were on average estimated to be 0.6 µmol (g dry wt)–1 h–1 for the adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strain and 2.2 µmol (g dry wt)–1 h–1 for the penicillin-producing strain. These results correlated with specific productivities described previously (Robin et al., 2001Down; Theilgaard et al., 2001Down). The difference in the specific productivity of the two recipient strains was explained by degradation of the side-chain precursor, adipate, during adipoyl-7-ADCA production (Thykaer et al., 2002Down; Robin et al., 2003aDown).

The complete loss of β-lactam production was not anticipated when this set of experiments was initiated. The dramatic effect the gene disruption had on the secondary metabolism led to speculation whether some other essential gene had been deleted, as the sequence of 300 bp downstream of the gdhA gene was unknown. However, based on the results of the BLAST searches and the identification of the polyadenylation site in the deleted part of the downstream sequence, it was concluded that the gdhA gene was the only essential gene element that had been deleted.

Ammonium has been shown to have a direct effect on the expression of the β-lactam biosynthetic genes similar to glucose repression. Ammonium concentrations higher than 100 mM strongly interfered with cephalosporin production in Acremonium chrysogenum and parallel studies in P. chrysogenum showed repression of both pcbAB and pcbC, encoding ACVS and IPNS, respectively, by addition of 40 mM NH4Cl (Shen et al., 1984Down; Feng et al., 1994Down). In the present study, the nitrogen source consisted of 27 mM ammonium, which did not cause repressing conditions in the recipient strains, as illustrated by significant production of β-lactams. For the gdhA-disrupted strains it is argued that the intracellular concentration of glutamate is lower than in the recipient strains due to reduced utilization of ammonium, which results in a higher intracellular ammonium concentration in these strains. This is supported by metabolite profiling of S. cerevisiae carrying a deletion of the gdh1 gene, encoding NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase, and simultaneous overexpression of gdh2, encoding NADH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (Villas-Bôas et al., 2005Down). Hypothetically, this higher concentration of ammonium could cause repression of the β-lactam biosynthetic genes, resulting in loss of β-lactam production. Supplementing the medium with glutamate increases the intracellular pools of both glutamate and glutamine, whereas the ammonium concentration remains unchanged, thereby maintaining ammonium repression conditions. Therefore, supplementing glutamate to cultures of the gdhA-disrupted strains restored the maximum specific growth rates, but not the β-lactam production.

The ammonium repression hypothesis was tested by two different approaches. First, it was tested whether it was possible to eliminate production of β-lactam in the industrial strains simply by increasing the ammonium concentration to 135 mM, which according to the literature should repress the β-lactam production significantly (Shen et al., 1984Down; Feng et al., 1994Down). Unexpectedly, both the high-producing industrial strains remained productive. The other approach focused on utilization of a non-repressive nitrogen source, in this case proline. If ammonium repression was causing the constructed {Delta}gdhA strains to be non-productive, cultivating the strains with proline would relieve the repression and production would occur. Unfortunately, as in the other cultivations with the gdhA-disrupted strains, no β-lactam was produced. Therefore, it was concluded that the lack of production in the gdhA-disrupted strains could not be caused by ammonium repression.

Considering the results and discussion above it may be argued that the GDHA enzyme is involved in protein–protein interactions with regulators of the β-lactam biosynthetic pathway, e.g. NRE. The nre gene is homologous to the major nitrogen regulatory gene areA from A. nidulans (Haas et al., 1995Down). It has been demonstrated that NRE binds to fragments containing at least two GATA core sequences, among these the intergenic region between acvA and pcbC, encoding ACVS and IPNS, respectively (Haas & Marzluf, 1995Down). NRE has therefore been suggested to mediate both nitrogen metabolite regulation and β-lactam regulation in P. chrysogenum (Brakhage et al., 2004Down). Studies in A. nidulans have shown that a GDHA loss-of-function mutant has very high AreA activity (Caddick, 1994Down). In these mutants, the GDHA protein is still present and only the glutamate dehydrogenase activity is lost (Kinghorn & Pateman, 1975Down). Following this line of argument it was expected that the activity of NRE would be elevated in the gdhA-disrupted strains and the production of β-lactam should be increased if NRE was acting as a positive regulator. However, the lack of production shows that this is not the case and it is therefore speculated that NRE needs to be activated to induce β-lactam production and this activation could be achieved through binding with GDHA. Assuming that the GDHA protein is not synthesized in the gdhA-disrupted strains, the NRE is not being activated and the production is not induced.

An alternative explanation of the observed results could be that 2-oxoglutarate acts as a repressor molecule for NRE. Organic acids are known to act as effector molecules of the FadR-binding proteins which are involved in regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis and degradation in Escherichia coli (Pagliarulo et al., 2004Down). As outlined above, the 2-oxoglutarate concentration is highly elevated in a {Delta}gdhA strain, which is a requirement for the thermodynamically unfavoured reaction, catalysed by GDHB, to take over the production of glutamate. The concentration of 2-oxoglutarate would therefore remain high independent of the nitrogen source, since it is required for biosynthesis of glutamate. It is therefore hypothesized that 2-oxoglutarate binds to NRE and prevents this protein from binding to the β-lactam promoter region, resulting in lack of production.

From the results described above it is concluded that besides being the key enzyme in ammonium assimilation, the NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase appears to be involved in regulation of β-lactam production in industrial strains of P. chrysogenum. Furthermore, this study clearly emphasizes the complex interactions between the central and secondary metabolism and the redox metabolism.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The research on P. chrysogenum at the Center for Microbial Biotechnology is financially supported by DSM Anti-Infectives. The authors would like to thank DSM researcher Roel Bovenberg for support and stimulating discussions. We also wish to thank Alexei Aleksenko and Michael Lynge Nielsen for their inputs to the molecular part of this study. Furthermore, Vsevolod Serebrianyi is acknowledged for constructing the pdgdhAH13 plasmid and special thanks are offered to Gerald Hoffman for doing the Southern analysis. Finally, we also thank Sameer Mapari for technical assistance.

Edited by: C. J. Hewitt


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Baba, S., Abe, Y., Ono, C. & Hosobuchi, M. (2006). Targeted disruption of the genes, mlcR and ariB, which encode GAL4-type proteins in Penicillium citrinum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1759, 410–416.[Medline]

Bautista, L. F., Aleksenko, A., Hentzer, M., Santerre-Henriksen, A. & Nielsen, J. (2000). Antisense silencing of the creA gene in Aspergillus nidulans. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 4579–4581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brakhage, A. A., Sprote, P., Al-Abdallah, Q., Gehrke, A., Plattner, H. & Tuncher, A. (2004). Regulation of penicillin biosynthesis in filamentous fungi. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 88, 45–90.[Medline]

Caddick, M. X. (1994). Nitrogen metabolite repression. Prog Ind Microbiol 29, 323–353.[Medline]

Cantoral, J. M., Diez, B., Barredo, J. L., Alvarez, E. & Martin, J. F. (1987). High-frequency transformation of Penicillium chrysogenum. Bio/Technology 5, 494–497.[CrossRef]

Christensen, L. H., Mandrup, G., Nielsen, J. & Villadsen, J. (1994). A robust liquid chromatographic method for measurement of medium components during penicillin fermentations. Anal Chim Acta 296, 51–62.[CrossRef]

Crawford, L., Stepan, A. M., McAda, P. C., Rambosek, J. A., Conder, M. J., Vinci, V. A. & Reeves, C. D. (1995). Production of cephalosporin intermediates by feeding adipic acid to recombinant Penicillium chrysogenum strains expressing ring expansion activity. Biotechology (N Y) 13, 58–62.

Diez, B., Mellado, E., Rodriguez, M., Bernasconi, E. & Barredo, J. L. (1999). The NADP-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase gene from Penicillium chrysogenum and the construction of expression vectors for filamentous fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52, 196–207.[CrossRef][Medline]

Feng, B., Friedlin, E. & Marzluf, G. A. (1994). A reporter gene analysis of penicillin biosynthesis gene expression in Penicillium chrysogenum and its regulation by nitrogen and glucose catabolite repression. Appl Environ Microbiol 60, 4432–4439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gutierrez, S., Velasco, J., Marcos, A. T., Fernandez, F. J., Fierro, F., Barredo, J. L., Diez, B. & Martin, J. F. (1997). Expression of the cefG gene is limiting for cephalosporin biosynthesis in Acremonium chrysogenum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48, 606–614.[CrossRef][Medline]

Haas, H. & Marzluf, G. A. (1995). NRE, the major nitrogen regulatory protein of Penicillium chrysogenum, binds specifically to elements in the intergenic promoter regions of nitrate assimilation and penicillin biosynthetic gene clusters. Curr Genet 28, 177–183.[CrossRef][Medline]

Haas, H., Bauer, B., Redl, B., Stoffler, G. & Marzluf, G. A. (1995). Molecular cloning and analysis of nre, the major nitrogen regulatory gene of Penicillium chrysogenum. Curr Genet 27, 150–158.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kinghorn, J. R. & Pateman, J. A. (1975). The structural gene for NADP L-glutamate dehydrogenase in Aspergillus nidulans. J Gen Microbiol 86, 294–300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Laich, F., Fierro, F. & Martin, J. F. (2003). Isolation of Penicillium nalgiovense strains impaired in penicillin production by disruption of the pcbAB gene and application as starters on cured meat products. Mycol Res 107, 717–726.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mathison, L., Soliday, C., Stephan, T., Aldrich, T. & Rambosek, J. (1993). Cloning, characterization, and use in strain improvement of the Cephalosporium acremonium gene cefG gene encoding acetyl transferase. Curr Genet 23, 33–41.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moreira dos Santos, M. M., Thygesen, G., Kötter, P., Olsson, L. & Nielsen, J. (2004). Aerobic physiology of redox-engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains modified in the ammonium assimilation for increased NADPH availability. FEMS Yeast Res 4, 59–68.[CrossRef]

Naranjo, L., Martin de Valmaseda, E., Casqueiro, J., Ullan, R. V., Lamas-Maceiras, M., Banuelos, O. & Martin, J. F. (2004). Inactivation of the lys7 gene, encoding saccharopine reductase in Penicillium chrysogenum, leads to accumulation of the secondary metabolite precursors piperideine-6-carboxylic acid and pipecolic acid from {alpha}-aminoadipic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 1031–1039.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nielsen, J. & Olsson, L. (2002). An expanded role for microbial physiology in metabolic engineering and functional genomics: moving towards systems biology. FEMS Yeast Res 2, 175–181.[Medline]

Nissen, T. L., Kielland-Brandt, M. C., Nielsen, J. & Villadsen, J. (2000). Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab Eng 2, 69–77.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pagliarulo, C., Salvatore, P., De Vitis, L. R., Colicchio, R., Monaco, C., Tredici, M., Talà, A., Bardaro, M., Lavitola, A. & other authors (2004). Regulation and differential expression of gdhA encoding NADP-specific glutamate dehydrogenase in Neisseria meningitidis clinical isolates. Mol Microbiol 51, 1757–1772.[CrossRef][Medline]

Punt, P. J. & van den Hondel, C. A. (1992). Transformation of filamentous fungi based on hygromycin B and phleomycin resistance markers. Methods Enzymol 216, 447–457.[Medline]

Punt, P. J., Oliver, R. P., Dingemanse, M. A., Pouwels, P. H. & van den Hondel, C. A. (1987). Transformation of Aspergillus based on the hygromycin B resistance marker from Escherichia coli. Gene 56, 117–124.[CrossRef][Medline]

Robin, J., Jakobsen, M., Beyer, M., Noorman, H. & Nielsen, J. (2001). Physiological characterisation of Penicillium chrysogenum strains expressing expandase gene from Steptomyces clavuligerus during batch cultivations. Growth, adipoyl-7-ADCA production and adipic acid uptake. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57, 357–362.[CrossRef][Medline]

Robin, J., Bonneau, S., Schipper, D., Noorman, H. & Nielsen, J. (2003a). Influence of the adipate and dissolved oxygen concentrations on the β-lactam production during continuous cultivations of a Penicillium chrysogenum strain expressing the expandase gene from Streptomyces clavuligerus. Metab Eng 5, 42–48.[CrossRef][Medline]

Robin, J., Lettier, G., McIntyre, M., Noorman, H. & Nielsen, J. (2003b). Continuous cultivations of a Penicillium chrysogenum strain expressing the expandase gene from Streptomyces clavuligerus: growth yields and morphological characterization. Biotechnol Bioeng 83, 361–368.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Shen, Y. Q., Heim, J., Solomon, N. A., Wolfe, S. & Demain, A. L. (1984). Repression of β-lactam production in Cephalosporium acremonium by nitrogen sources. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 37, 503–511.[Medline]

Skatrud, P. L. & Queener, S. W. (1989). An electrophoretic molecular karyotype for an industrial strain of Cephalosporium acremonium. Gene 78, 331–338.[CrossRef][Medline]

Theilgaard, H. B., van den Berg, M., Mulder, C., Bovenberg, R. & Nielsen, J. (2001). Quantitative analysis of Penicillium chrysogenum Wis54-1255 transformants overexpressing the penicillin biosynthetic genes. Biotechnol Bioeng 72, 379–388.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thykaer, J. & Nielsen, J. (2003). Metabolic engineering of β-lactam production. Metab Eng 5, 56–69.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thykaer, J., Christensen, B. & Nielsen, J. (2002). Metabolic network analysis of an adipoyl-7-ADCA-producing strain of Penicillium chrysogenum: elucidation of adipate degradation. Metab Eng 4, 151–158.[CrossRef][Medline]

van Gulik, W. M., de Laat, W. T., Vinke, J. L. & Heijnen, J. J. (2000). Application of metabolic flux analysis for the identification of metabolic bottlenecks in the biosynthesis of penicillin-G. Biotechnol Bioeng 68, 602–618.[CrossRef][Medline]

Veenstra, A. E., van Solingen, P., Bovenberg, R. A. L. & van der Voort, L. H. M. (1991). Strain improvement of Penicillium chrysogenum by recombinant DNA techniques. J Biotechnol 17, 81–90.[CrossRef][Medline]

Villas-Bôas, S. G., Moxley, J. F., Akesson, M., Stephanopoulos, G. & Nielsen, J. (2005). High-throughput metabolic state analysis: the missing link in integrated functional genomics of yeasts. Biochem J 388, 669–677.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received 25 May 2007; revised 24 January 2008; accepted 28 January 2008.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thykaer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thykaer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thykaer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.