Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 154 (2008), 2209-2218; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2007/015032-0
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiely, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Gara, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiely, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Gara, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kiely, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Gara, F.
Microbiology 154 (2008), 2209-2218; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2007/015032-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology

Genetic analysis of genes involved in dipeptide metabolism and cytotoxicity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

Patrick D. Kiely, Julie O'Callaghan, Abdelhamid Abbas and Fergal O'Gara

BIOMERIT Research Centre, Department of Microbiology, University College Cork, Ireland

Correspondence
Fergal O'Gara
f.ogara{at}ucc.ie


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The dipeptide transport operon in bacteria comprises genes for the transport and metabolism of amino acids and dipeptides, as well as haem and haem precursors such as aminolaevulinic acid. Such nutrient and mineral sources are vital for bacteria to survive in and colonize a range of niches. In silico analysis of the dipeptide transport systems in sequenced Pseudomonas species identified the presence of two genes in P. aeruginosa strains that were absent in other sequenced pseudomonads. These genes encode a putative metallopeptidase, PA4498, and a putative transcriptional regulator, PA4499. Proteomic profiling of wild-type PAO1 and a PA4499 mutant strain indicated that PA4499 negatively regulated the putative peptidase, PA4498. Transcriptional fusion analysis verified that expression of PA4498 (mdpA, metallo-dipeptidase aeruginosa) was negatively regulated by the downstream putative transcriptional regulator PA4499 (psdR, Pseudomonas dipeptide regulator). Transcriptional fusion analysis also showed that the dppABCDF operon was under the negative control of psdR. Functional genomic analysis of mdpA indicated that it is required for the metabolism of a range of dipeptides and that it contributes to the cytotoxicity of PAO1 on an epithelial cell line.


Abbreviations: HTH, helix–turn–helix; LES, Liverpool epidemic strain; XRE, xenobiotic response element


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium commonly isolated from soil and water and is renowned for its nutritional and ecological versatility. The ability to transport and metabolize an array of nutrients enables this bacterium to colonize a wide variety of niches. As an opportunistic human pathogen, P. aeruginosa is a common cause of nosocomial infections. It is responsible for persistent infection of immunocompromised individuals and can cause chronic lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (Govan & Deretic, 1996Down). Given that epithelial cells act as the initial barrier to infection, an understanding of the interactions between these cells and the bacterium is critical. P. aeruginosa has also been shown to cause infections in non-mammalian hosts such as insects (Jander et al., 2000Down) and plants (Rahme et al., 1995Down; Silo-Suh et al., 2002Down; Walker et al., 2004Down). The metabolic versatility of this bacterium is reflected in the fact that 10 % of its genome encodes membrane-associated transporters, with a further 8 % involved in the metabolism of carbon-containing compounds (Stover et al., 2000Down). One transport system of particular interest is the dipeptide (dpp) transport operon because of its involvement in the transport of not only dipeptide containing compounds but also aminolaevulinic acid (Carter et al., 2002Down; King & O'Brian, 1997Down), haem (Letoffe et al., 2006Down) and single amino acids (Tamber & Hancock, 2006Down).

The dpp transport operon has been well characterized and shows conservation in structure across both Gram-negative (Abouhamad & Manson, 1994Down) and Gram-positive (Guedon et al., 2001Down; Slack et al., 1995Down) bacterial species. The dpp operon has been shown to be maximally expressed in the stationary phase of growth, with expression driven from the promoter region upstream of the first gene, dppA (Abouhamad & Manson, 1994Down). In Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, dppA has been shown to play a role in chemotaxis (Abouhamad et al., 1991Down). The role of the dpp transport machinery in utilizing haem iron has also been shown in E. coli. Binding of haem by the DppA protein allows transport of this molecule into the cell via the dppBCDF ATP-binding cassette transporter (Letoffe et al., 2006Down).

To date relatively little information is available regarding the regulation of this transport machinery. Regulation of the dpp transport operon in Bacillus subtilis has been shown to be exerted by the pleiotropic negative regulators CodY and AbrB (Slack et al., 1995Down). In Lactococcus lactis, a homologue of CodY was shown to respond to the levels of branched-chain amino acids, thereby sensing aspects of the nutritional supply for the cell. Additionally an lrp (encoding a leucine-responsive regulatory protein) gene from Bradyrhizobium japonicum has been shown to complement an E. coli dpp mutant strain for the uptake of dipeptides (King & O'Brian, 1997Down). In E. coli the gcvB gene, which encodes a small untranslated RNA, has been shown to regulate expression of both the Dpp and oligopeptide (Opp) transport systems. This small untranslated RNA appears to regulate genes associated with oligopeptide transport at the translational level whereas it appears to regulate dppA expression at the mRNA level (Urbanowski et al., 2000Down).

P. aeruginosa PAO1 contains a gene cluster which shows a high level of homology to previously characterized dpp transport operons (http://www.pseudomonas.com). Interestingly, transcriptome analysis has shown that dppA3 in P. aeruginosa PAO1 is induced under low-iron conditions (Ochsner et al., 2002Down). The porin OpdP, which is associated with this putative dipeptide transport machinery in P. aeruginosa PAO1, is required for the transport of the dipeptide glycyl-glutamic acid (Tamber & Hancock, 2006Down). The opdP gene is induced to a high level when bacteria are grown on the amino acid L-arginine, suggesting involvement of OpdP in the uptake of single amino acids as well as dipeptides (Tamber & Hancock, 2006Down).

Previous transcriptome analysis of P. aeruginosa, carried out in the presence of a human airway epithelial cell line, showed that expression of the gene PA4498, encoding a putative metallopeptidase, was upregulated 4.8-fold (Frisk et al., 2004Down). Variations in gene expression have been shown to influence the virulence of the Liverpool epidemic strain (LES) of P. aeruginosa. The highly virulent, epidemic strain LES431 has shown increased resistance to antimicrobials and has caused mortality in both immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients. Transcriptome analysis of this strain has shown that it also overexpresses the mdpA gene, encoding a putative metallopeptidase (Salunkhe et al., 2005Down).

This paper identifies the psdR gene as a transcriptional repressor of the mdpA and dppA3 genes. It also demonstrates that the mdpA gene is essential for the growth of P. aeruginosa on dipeptides as sole carbon source and suggests an involvement of this gene in P. aeruginosa cytotoxicity.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions.
Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1Down. All cultures of P. aeruginosa PAO1 and associated mutants were routinely grown on Casamino Acid (CAA) medium supplemented with 100 µM FeCl3, LB or M9 minimal medium (Sambrook et al., 1989Down) at 37 °C. The mPA4498 (mPAmdpA) mutant strain was obtained from the University of Washington Mutant Library (Jacobs et al., 2003Down). E. coli strains were routinely grown in LB medium at 37 °C. Where appropriate, antibiotics were added to growth media at the following concentrations: for P. aeruginosa, 50 µg kanamycin ml–1, 200 µg chloramphenicol ml––1 and 50 µg gentamicin ml–1; for E. coli, 25 µg gentamicin ml–1, 50 µg ampicillin ml–1 and 12.5 µg tetracycline ml–1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

 
Mammalian cell culture.
Immortalized human epithelial cell line 16HBE140 S-1 was obtained from P. B. Davis (Case Western Reserve University) (Kube et al., 2001Down; Rajan et al., 2000Down). Cells were cultured on BSA-collagen-fibronectin-coated plastic, using minimum essential medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 µg penicillin ml–1, 100 µg streptomycin ml–1 and 400 µg neomycin G-418 ml–1. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified 5 % CO2 atmosphere. All cell culture reagents were supplied by Sigma, unless stated otherwise.

DNA and RNA manipulations.
Restriction digests, ligations, transformations and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed as described by Sambrook et al. (1989)Down. All restriction enzymes were obtained from Roche Pharmaceuticals. Small-scale plasmid DNA isolation was performed using the Qiagen Plasmid Mini-kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Prior to cloning, PCR products were purified either from agarose gels using the Qiagen Gel Extraction kit or directly from solution using the Qiagen PCR Purification kit and cloned into the pCR2.1TOPO plasmid using the TA cloning kit according to the manufacturer's specifications (Invitrogen). Plasmids were mobilized into Pseudomonas strains by triparental mating using the helper plasmid pRK2013 (Figurski & Helinski, 1979Down).

Determination of nucleotide sequence and sequence analysis.
All transcriptional fusions and psdR gene disruption were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing performed at Lark Technologies. The sequence data were assembled using the DNASTAR software package and analysed using the University of Wisconsin genetic computer group (GCG) program FASTA (Pearson & Lipman, 1988Down) and BLAST (Altschul et al., 1990Down) at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the CLUSTAL W program (Chenna et al., 2003Down).

Construction of the psdR mutant.
To construct a PA4499 (psdR)-negative mutant we first amplified two genomic fragments. Fragment 1 (Frg1) covers the region extending from +1435 to –130 relative to the PA4498 (mpdA) ATG start codon, and fragment 2 (Frg2) covers the region extending from +270 relative to the psdR ATG start codon to +507 relative to the PA4500 (dppA3) ATG start codon. These two fragments are located 348 bp apart. The joining of Frg1 and Fgr2 would delete 348 bp of the psdR gene including 58 bp of the untranslated region upstream to the ATG and the first 96 codons of the psdR ORF. We engineered PstI and NotI restriction sites at the 5' and the 3' ends of Frg1 and NotI and XbaI restriction sites at the 5' and the 3' ends of Frg2 respectively. These fragments were separately cloned into the TOPO cloning vector. Frg1 and Fgr2 were then joined at the NotI site. The vector containing Frg1 and Frg2 was linearized at the NotI site and ligated to the gentamicin-resistance cassette digested with the same restriction enzyme to produce the recombinant plasmid P{Delta}psdR1 containing a disrupted psdR gene. The disrupted gene was transferred to into the allelic-exchange vector pK19mobsac using PstI and XbaI restriction sites to create pK19{Delta}psdR. The sacB gene contained on pK19mobsac codes for the enzyme levansucrase, which confers sucrose susceptibility to cells expressing the intact gene. Triparental mating was carried out to transfer this construct from E. coli XL1 to P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild-type strain. The positive clones, which had integrated the plasmid into the chromosome, were selected for on 50 µg gentamicin ml–1, 50 µg ampicillin ml–1. The loss of the sacB gene by a second crossover allows the host to grow on medium supplemented with 5 % sucrose. Thus to select for a double crossover event we plated all PAO1 transconjugants that were gentamicin resistant on LB supplemented with 5 % sucrose. All gentamicin- and sucrose-resistant colonies were considered as candidates to possibly contain the double crossover. Cells were subsequently screened by PCR using primers PK4499CKF and PK4499CKR (Table 2Down). The confirmed disruptants with the double crossover were named PApsdR.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Primers used in this study

 
Complementation of the psdR mutant strain.
For the complementation of the strain carrying the mutation in psdR, primers PKCOMP99F and PKCOMP99R were designed, which would amplify the entire psdR gene and its promoter region. This fragment was cloned into the TOPO cloning vector. This was then digested back out from the TOPO vector using the restriction enzymes HindIII and XbaI. Plasmid pBBR1MCS was also digested using HindIII and XbaI. Both insert and linearized pBBRIMCS backbone were ligated at 16 °C. The ligated construct, pBBRpsdR, was electroporated initially into E. coli and following this into the psdR mutant strain of P. aeruginosa. The PApsdR/pBBRpsdR strain was selected for on 50 µg gentamicin ml–1, 200 µg chloramphenicol ml–1.

Construction of the transcriptional fusions.
To characterize the transcriptional activity of the psdR, mdpA and dppA3 genes, we used the pMP220 vector bearing a promoterless lacZ reporter gene. Two pairs of primers, PKTF4499F/PKTF4499R and PKTF4498F/PKTF4498R (Table 2Up), were used to amplify a 592 bp fragment containing the psdRmdpA intergenic region with the psdR and mdpA predicted promoters and part of the ORF of both genes. To facilitate directional cloning into pMP220 and a correct fusion of psdR and mdpA promoters with the lacZ reporter gene we introduced a PstI site downstream and an EcoRI site upstream of each promoter. Therefore, both transcriptional fusions, pTF99 (psdR) and pTF98 (mpdA), contain the full-length mdpApsdR intergenic region but in different orientation. The two constructs were transferred into P. aeruginosa PAO1 and the PApsdR mutant strain by electroporation to produce pMP220 : : PpsdR and pMP220 : : PmdpA respectively. To characterize the transcriptional activity of dppA the primers PKTF4500F and PKTF4500R were used to amplify a 414 bp region. This consisted of the entire psdR–dppA intergenic region and the first 62 bp of the dppA gene. To facilitate directional cloning into pMP220 and correct fusion of the dppA promoter with the lacZ reporter gene, a downstream PstI and upstream EcoRI site were introduced. This construct was then transferred into P. aeruginosa PAO1 and the PApsdR mutant strain by electroporation to produce PAO1/pMP220 : : PdppA and PApsdR/pMP220 : : PdppA respectively.

To verify the transcriptional fusion analysis the strains PApsdR/pMP220 : : PdppA and PApsdR/pMP220 : : PmdpA were complemented using the vector pBBRpsdR. The construct was transferred into PApsdR/pMP220 : : PdppA and PApsdR/pMP220 : : PmdpA by electroporation to produce PApsdR/pMP220 : : PdppA pBBRpsdR and PApsdR/pMP220 : : PmdpA pBBRpsdR respectively.

Proteomic analysis
Protein isolation.
Cells were inoculated at an OD600 of 0.01 and grown to an OD600 of 0.6 in 200 ml CAA medium. Total protein from the bacterial suspension was isolated by removing whole cells from the culture by centrifugation (7000 r.p.m., 10 min at 4 °C) using a Sorvall SS-34 rotor in a Sorvall RC-5B centrifuge. The pellet was resuspended in 6 ml HEPES buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4), protease inhibitor cocktail, DNase (50 U), RNase (10 mg) and 200 µl MgCl2 (100 mM). Resuspended cells were lysed by sonication (5x20 s). Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation (6000 r.p.m., 10 min at 4 °C). Aliquots of 1–2 ml of extracts were extracted twice with 1 ml phenol heated for 10 min at 70 °C. The proteins (solid phase) were precipitated by adding 2 ml acetone.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
Pellets were resolubilized in solution A [7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4 % (w/v) CHAPS, and 50 mM DTT] and diluted to a concentration of 10 mg protein ml–1. Then 100 µl solution B [7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4 % (w/v) CHAPS, 50 mM DTT, carrier ampholytes, Triton X-100 and bromophenol blue (0.005 g ml–1)] were added to 3 mg protein. Proteins were loaded by in-gel rehydration on 24 cm pH 4–7 immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips (Amersham Biosciences). Isoelectric focusing was conducted for a total of 89 kV h. IPG strips were then reduced, alkylated and loaded for second-dimension SDS-PAGE as described previously (Nouwens et al., 2000Down). Coomassie-blue-stained gels were imaged using a Fluor-S Multimager. To reduce the likelihood of false variations in spot intensity, protein mix from each sample was separated in triplicate gels. The 2D gel electrophoresis was repeated twice in two different experiments. To reduce gel-to-gel variation within the three repeated gels for each strain, one average gel for the proteome of each strain was generated using Photoretix PG200 software (Nonlinear Dynamics).

Peptide mass mapping.
Protein spots were excised from the gel, washed three times with 120 µl ammonium bicarbonate (pH 7.8, 25 mM)/acetonitrile 50 % (v/v) and dried using a SpeedVac (Savant Instruments). Gel pieces were rehydrated with 8 µl ammonium bicarbonate (25 mM, pH 7.8) containing 10 ng porcine modified trypsin µl–1 (Promega) for 10 min at room temperature. Proteins were then digested at 37 °C for 16 h. Peptides were extracted from the gel in 8 µl 50 % acetonitrile/1 % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). A 1 µl aliquot of each extract was spotted onto a target plate, covered with 1 µl 8 mg {alpha}-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid ml–1 in 50 % acetonitrile/1 % TFA and allowed to dry. Peptide masses were generated by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using a Maldi-TOF Voyager DE-Pro. All spectra were obtained in reflectron mode using an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Mass calibration was performed using Calibration Mix 2 (PE Biosystems) as an external standard. The peptide mass profile was analysed using Data Explore (PerSeptive Biosystems) software and tested against the Mascot Peptide Mass Fingerprint database (http://www.matrixscience.com). The parameters for a successful identification included a mass tolerance of 150 p.p.m. per peptide and total sequence coverage greater than 30 %. Identified proteins were reconfirmed by checking their predicted mass and pI values against their location in the gels.

Epithelial cell infection conditions.
For infection studies, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, detached and resuspended in the described cell culture medium and seeded at the appropriate cell number 5 days prior to infection to obtain confluent monolayers on the day of infection. Bacterial strains were cultured overnight aerobically for 16–18 h in cell culture medium without antibiotics (infection medium) at 37 °C. Following PBS washing to remove extracellular components, bacterial densities (in infection medium) were adjusted so as to infect PBS-washed, fully confluent cell monolayers at an m.o.i. of approximately 50 : 1. Serial dilutions were plated onto LB agar to confirm both the m.o.i. used and the bacterial numbers after 9 h of infection. C.f.u. ml–1 values for mutant and wild-type strains showed no significant difference. Quantification of cytotoxicity was carried out for mPAO1 and the mdpA mutant strain as previously described (O'Grady et al., 2006Down).

Growth curve analysis.
Mutants and parent strains were grown overnight in M9 minimal medium (Sambrook et al., 1989Down) supplemented with glucose. Cells were then washed in quarter-strength Ringer's solution and resuspended at a final OD600 of 0.01 in M9 minimal medium supplemented with different dipeptides (Gly-Asp, Gly-Gln, Gly-Gly, Gly-Phe, Gly-Ala, Ala-Val, Val-Val, Phe-Pro, Gly-Pro) at a concentration of 10 mM. OD600 readings were taken over a 4 day period (30 s every 15 min) with cultures grown with shaking at 37 °C. Analysis of growth was carried out using the Bioscreen C (Oy Growth Curves, Helsinki, Finland) 200-well culture growth monitoring instrument.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bioinformatic analysis identifies novel genes associated with the dpp operon
Bioinformatic analysis of the dipeptide transport genes in all sequenced Pseudomonas strains has highlighted different levels of complexity in the operon structure (Fig. 1Down). In particular the cluster of genes associated with dpp transport in P. aeruginosa strains PAO1 and PA14 contains an extra four genes which encode a putative transcriptional regulator (PsdR), a putative metallopeptidase (MdpA) and two predicted dipeptide-binding proteins (DppA1, DppA2). The mdpA and psdR genes are not found in the genomes of Pseudomonas entomophila L48 (Vodovar et al., 2006Down), P. putida KT2440 (Nelson et al., 2002Down), P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Buell et al., 2003Down), P. syringae pv. syringae B728a (Feil et al., 2005Down) and P. syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448A (Joardar et al., 2005Down). Bioinformatic analysis of mdpA, located upstream of the putative transcriptional regulator psdR, has identified the protein as a putative metallopeptidase. BLASTP pairwise comparisons showed that MdpA has substantial amino sequence similarity to and domain conservation with Xaa-Pro aminopeptidases. Domain analysis showed that PsdR is a MerR family-like regulator with a helix–turn–helix (HTH) XRE (xenobiotic response element) domain and a cupin sensor domain. In P. fluorescens Pf-5 bioinformatic analysis identified a region with DNA sequence homology to psdR. However, this DNA sequence was found to contain an internal stop codon.


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Genomic organization of genes associated with dpp transport in sequenced Pseudomonas species and E. coli K-12. The dppA4BCDF gene cluster encodes proteins involved in single and dipeptide amino acid transport (in E. coli: Abouhamad & Manson, 1994Down); opdP has been shown to play a role in the transport of the dipeptide glycyl-L-glutamic acid (Tamber et al., 2006Down). In P. aeruginosa PAO1 and PA-14 the presence of genes encoding two extra putative binding proteins, dppA1, and dppA2, and the genes mdpA and psdR are found. The gene psdR encodes a putative transcriptional regulator, and domain analysis has shown that PsdR belongs to the MerR family of transcriptional regulators containing a HTH XRE domain and cupin sensor residue. The gene mdpA encodes a putative metallo-dipeptidase. In P. fluorescens Pf-5 a region directly upstream of the dpp operon is homologous to the probable transcriptional regulator, psdR. This, however, is predicted to be a non-coding region because it contains an internal stop codon. The dppA1,2 and mdpA genes are not present in this strain. The transport operon identified in P. entomophila L48 is similar to that of P. fluorescens and contains two additional genes encoding dipeptide-binding proteins. Other fully sequenced Pseudomonas species, including P. putida KT2440, P. syringae DC3000 and P. syringae b728a, contain the more conventional, condensed dipeptide transport operon and lack the upstream dppA1,2, mdpA and psdR genes. The dipeptide transport operon in E. coli K-12 lacks a copy of the opdP gene, and contains only a single dppA gene.

 
Proteomic analysis identifies targets of psdR
In order to investigate the effect of the psdR gene product on the genes located immediately downstream and upstream of it, we constructed a psdR mutant (PApsdR) with a deletion covering most of the predicted promoter and half of the ORF which includes the HTH domain. Proteomic analysis was performed to examine the global impact of psdR deletion. Total proteins were extracted from PAO1 and the PApsdR mutant strains grown to an OD600 of 0.6 in CAA medium. Up to 250 protein spots were visible on gels of both mutant and wild-type strains, representing approximately 5 % of the total proteome (Fig. 2Down). In order to reduce gel-to-gel variation within the three repeated gels for each strain, one average gel was generated for each set using Photoretix PG200 software. The use of this approach to compare proteome profiles from wild-type and the psdR mutant stain identified one genuine difference (Fig. 2a, bDown). The protein spot that was present in the psdR mutant and undetectable in the parent strain was characterized using MALDI-TOF MS and identified as the putative metallopeptidase, MdpA. These results suggest that the putative transcriptional regulator, PsdR, negatively regulates expression of the metallopeptidase, MdpA.


Figure 2
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis proteome profiles of the psdR mutant (a) and wild-type PAO1 (b) strains. The 2D analysis was carried out in two independent experiments with triplicate gels for the mutant and the wild-type. The arrows indicate the protein spot corresponding to MdpA present in the mutant and undetectable in the wild-type. Triplicate gels were analysed using Photoretix PG200 software. The protein spot was identified by MALDI-TOF.

 
PsdR negatively regulates transcription of mdpA and dppA3
In silico analysis of the promoter region of the mdpA gene was carried out to predict whether PsdR plays a direct role in regulating its expression. The promoter region identified contained a 21 bp spacer region between the –10 and –35 consensus sites. This elongated spacer region is associated with promoters that could be under the control of MerR-type regulators (Brown et al., 2003Down), to which PsdR shows homology. This observation suggests that the expression of mdpA could be under the control of PsdR. Inspection of the promoter region of dppA3 identified a promoter region homologous to that of mdpA (Table 3Down). This suggests that PsdR may also function in regulating expression of the dpp transport machinery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Alignment of putative promoter regions of mdpA and dppA genes of P. aeruginosa

 
Expression of mdpA in a psdR mutant strain was much higher than in the wild-type based on β-galactosidase transcriptional fusion analysis. Expression was also growth phase dependent, with maximum levels seen at mid-exponential phase (Fig. 3aDown). This result indicates that expression of mdpA is negatively regulated by PsdR. Expression of dppA3 was significantly higher in the mutant backround, and levels of expression increased throughout growth. This result suggested that dppA3 expression is also negatively regulated by psdR. When the psdR mutant was complemented with the plasmid pBBRpsdR, the level of expression of mdpA was similar to wild-type and remained below 400 Miller units over the 24 h period. A similar pattern emerged when expression of dppA was analysed in a psdR complemented strain, with levels of expression similar to those of the wild-type (data not shown). This verifies that a mutation in psdR results in increased expression of both mdpA and psdR.


Figure 3
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Role of PsdR in regulating expression of mdpA and dppA3: kinetics of expression of (a) mdpA and (b) dppA3 transcriptional reporter lacZ fusions in P. aeruginosa PAO1 and the psdR mutant. Cultures were grown in M9 minimal medium supplemented with glucose. Experiments were carried out in triplicate; means±SE are presented. (a) lacZ expression of mdpA is significantly higher in the mutant strain disrupted in psdR compared to wild-type (LSD, P=0.05), and this difference is growth phase dependent. (b) Expression of dppA is also significantly higher in the mutant strain disrupted in psdR (LSD, P=0.05) but the pattern of expression as a function of growth phase is different. Complementation of psdR restores expression to wild-type levels (data not shown).

 
MdpA and PsdR are involved in the metabolism of a range of dipeptides
The characterization of the porin OpdP and its specificity for the transport of the dipeptide glycyl-L-glutamic acid (Tamber et al., 2006Down) in P. aeruginosa PAO1 prompted us to hypothesize that MdpA may be involved in the metabolism of this dipeptide. This was examined by assessing the wild-type and an mdpA mutant strain for growth in the presence of different dipeptide carbon sources including glycyl-L-glutamic acid. Wild-type and mdpA mutant strains showed indistinguishable growth in M9 minimal medium supplemented with glucose as a carbon source (data not shown). Unlike the wild-type the mdpA mutant strain was unable to utilize a range of dipeptides as a sole carbon source (Table 4Down). A psdR mutant strain was also compared to wild-type for growth when these dipeptides were used as sole carbon sources. Disruption of psdR resulted in a shorter lag phase of growth when these dipeptides, including Gly-Glu (Fig. 4bDown), were used. When X-Pro dipeptides, including Phe-Pro and Gly-Pro (Fig. 4cDown), were used as carbon sources, the growth kinetics of wild-type and mutant strains were more similar.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Growth of mPAO1 and an mdpA mutant strain on different dipeptides as the sole carbon source

–, No growth;+, OD600 0.1–0.3; ++, OD600 >0.3.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Growth of PAO1 (plain line) and a psdR mutant strain (squared line) in M9 minimal medium supplemented with different dipeptide carbon sources. (a) Growth in M9 supplemented with glucose is the same for both strains. (b) The psdR mutant has a shorter lag phase compared to wild-type in M9 supplemented with Gly-Glu. Similar growth kinetics were seen for Gly-Phe, Ala-Val and Gly-Ala. (c) Growth of mutant and wild-type strains was more similar when X-Pro dipeptides are used as the sole carbon source (shown for Gly-Pro). Complementation of psdR restored growth to wild-type levels (data not shown). Growth was assayed over 52 h; means±SE are presented (error bars not shown where smaller than symbols).

 
The mdpA gene is induced in the presence of X-Pro dipeptides
In an attempt to determine whether mdpA is induced in the presence of dipeptides, its expression was analysed using a reporter strain with an mdpA–lacZ transcriptional fusion grown in M9 minimal medium supplemented with different dipeptides: Gly-Asp, Gly-Gln, Gly-Gly, Gly-Phe, Gly-Ala, Ala-Val, Val-Val, Phe-Pro, Gly-Pro. Cells were harvested at an OD600 of 0.7, a value at which cultures had previously been shown to have the highest level of expression of mdpA in M9 minimal medium (data not shown).

Expression of mdpA was significantly induced, about fourfold, only in the presence of the X-Pro dipeptides (Phe-Pro, Gly-Pro) (Fig. 5Down). This result indicated that the mdpA gene promoter is directly or indirectly induced by X-Pro dipeptides.


Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Specific dipeptides induce expression of the mdpA β-galactosidase transcriptional fusion in P. aeruginosa PAO1. Cultures were grown in M9 minimal medium supplemented with different dipeptides and grown to an OD600 of 0.7. Experiments were carried out in triplicate; means±SE are presented. Expression of mdpA is higher in the presence of the X-Pro (Phe-Pro, Gly-Pro) dipeptides.

 
Dipeptidase MdpA plays a role in cytotoxicity of P. aeruginosa PAO1
Transcriptomic evidence shows induction of mdpA in the presence of epithelial cells in the highly virulent LES isolates of P. aeruginosa (Frisk et al., 2004Down; Salunkhe et al., 2005Down). This prompted us to test the role of mdpA in virulence using a cytotoxicity assay on human epithelial cells. Cytotoxicity of airway epithelial cells was measured by quantifying the release of lactate dehydrogenase into culture supernatants. At an m.o.i. of 50 : 1, PAO1 was about four times more cytotoxic to airway epithelial cells than the mdpA mutant at 6 h post-infection (Fig. 6Down). Thus mdpA appears to contribute to cytotoxicity in PAO1.


Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Analysis of cytotoxicity of P. aeruginosa strains mPAO1 (black bars) and mPAmdpA (white bars). Cytotoxicity was determined in triplicate experiments by quantifying the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into culture supernatants. Means±SE are presented. Strain mPAmdpA had reduced cytotoxicity compared to the wild-type.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We have identified a transcriptional regulator, PsdR, and characterized its role in the regulation of the dpp transport operon and dipeptide metabolism in P. aeruginosa PAO1. PsdR has a HTH domain at its N-terminal region. The HTH domain is a common DNA-binding motif found in several bacterial and eukaryotic repressors as well as activators. Domain analysis showed that PsdR is a MerR-like regulator. Deletion of most of the predicted promoter and the HTH region of PsdR led to significant increase in transcription of mdpA and dppA3. It is noteworthy that the psdR mutation affects the levels and not the pattern of expression of both genes. The structure of PsdR and its effect on mpdA and dppA3 expression strongly suggest that it is a repressor of the expression of these two genes and may directly interact with their promoters. At this stage it is not possible to exclude an indirect control of mdpA and dppA3 transcription by PsdR. The psdR mutant strain shows a shorter lag phase of growth than the wild-type when different dipeptides are supplied as the sole carbon source. This is consistent with the observation that the mutant would have increased expression of genes responsible for both dipeptide transport and metabolism. Interestingly, the dipeptide carbon sources on which the wild-type and the psdR mutant strain have similar growth rates are the X-Pro dipeptides. These dipeptides have been shown to specifically induce mdpA expression, which could explain the similar pattern of growth kinetics between the psdR mutant and wild-type strains. The induction of mdpA expression in the presence of these specific dipeptides presumably allows for faster metabolism of these carbon sources and therefore faster growth.

The results reported here show that expression of psdR in the wild-type strain does not fully repress mdpA expression and that the transcription of this gene is growth phase dependent. This suggests that mdpA is under control of other regulators which are not affected by PsdR. Previous experimental evidence suggests that the regulation of expression of mdpA is complex and is controlled by many regulatory inputs. Transcriptome analysis suggests that mdpA is regulated by quorum-sensing-dependent regulators LasR and RhlR in P. aeruginosa PAO1. Expression was shown to be ninefold higher when the PAO1 and lasR/rhlR double mutant strains were compared (Schuster et al., 2003Down). A similar phenotype is seen in the post-transcriptional regulator rsmA mutant background (Burrowes et al., 2006Down).

Transcriptome-profiling experiments had previously shown that mdpA is induced both in the presence of an epithelial cell line (Frisk et al., 2004Down) and in a highly virulent LES isolate of P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Salunkhe et al., 2005Down). This result suggested to us that this gene could play a specific role in interactions with epithelial cells. Interestingly, a mutation in mdpA results in reduced cytotoxicity of the bacterium to an epithelial cell line (Fig. 6Up). P. aeruginosa produces several proteases that are implicated in the process of infections caused by this organism (Doring et al., 1985Down). Most clinical strains of P. aeruginosa produce elastase, a zinc metalloprotease that is implicated in the pathogenesis of infections related to these organisms. Indeed, numerous other examples of proteases and aminopeptidases that are linked to virulence have been highlighted (Coffey et al., 2000Down; Corbett et al., 2003Down; Feil et al., 2005Down; Hidalgo-Grass et al., 2006Down; Kooi et al., 2006Down; Song et al., 2004Down; Spratt et al., 1995Down). Dipeptidyl aminopeptidase activity has previously been implicated in the virulence of Porphyromonas gingivalis (Kumagai et al., 2000Down). This aminopeptidase has been shown to function extracellularly. However, sequence analysis of MdpA does not show the presence of a signal peptide involved in triggering protein translocation; it rather suggests a cytoplasmic location for this protein. The exact mechanism of how the dipeptidase MdpA is involved in virulence is unknown.

Analysis of Pseudomonas genomes has shown the presence of the mdpA dipeptidase gene specifically in P. aeruginosa strains and not in other sequenced Pseudomonas species. Questions remain regarding what biological roles both the regulator and peptidase play in Pseudomonas–host interactions. The contribution of MdpA is potentially explained by its role in cytotoxicity, presumably because of the advantages in nutrient metabolism it affords. The physiological role of PsdR, which functions as a repressor of both dipeptide transport and metabolism, is less clear. Perhaps a tighter regulation of genes involved in the uptake and metabolism of small molecules into the cell is required for the successful colonization of environments in which P. aeruginosa is prominent.

It is assumed that the genetic complexity of P. aeruginosa allows for its ecological and metabolic versatility. Analysis of the dpp gene cluster in P. aeruginosa, the characterization of novel genes associated with both nutrient transport and metabolism and the role of mdpA in cytotoxicity would support this view.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We acknowledge Joanne Cummins, Simon Miller, Claire Adams and Pat Higgins for useful advice and discussions. This research was supported in part by grants awarded by the European Commission (MTKD-CT-2006-042062; O36314), the Science Foundation of Ireland (SFI 02/IN.1/B1261; 04/BR/B0597), the Department of Agriculture and Food (DAF RSF 06 321; DAF RSF 06 377), Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology (IRCSET) (05/EDIV/FP107;), the Health Research Board (RP/2004/145; RP/2006/271; RP/2007/290), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 2006-PhD-S-21) and the Higher Education Authority of Ireland (PRTLI3).

Edited by: M. A. Curtis


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Abouhamad, W. N. & Manson, M. D. (1994). The dipeptide permease of Escherichia coli closely resembles other bacterial transport systems and shows growth-phase-dependent expression. Mol Microbiol 14, 1077–1092.[Medline]

Abouhamad, W. N., Manson, M., Gibson, M. M. & Higgins, C. F. (1991). Peptide transport and chemotaxis in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: characterization of the dipeptide permease (Dpp) and the dipeptide-binding protein. Mol Microbiol 5, 1035–1047.[CrossRef][Medline]

Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215, 403–410.[CrossRef][Medline]

Brown, N. L., Stoyanov, J. V., Kidd, S. P. & Hobman, J. L. (2003). The MerR family of transcriptional regulators. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27, 145–163.[CrossRef][Medline]

Buell, C. R., Joardar, V., Lindeberg, M., Selengut, J., Paulsen, I. T., Gwinn, M. L., Dodson, R. J., Deboy, R. T., Durkin, A. S. & other authors (2003). The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 10181–10186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Burrowes, E., Baysse, C., Adams, C. & O'Gara, F. (2006). Influence of the regulatory protein RsmA on cellular functions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, as revealed by transcriptome analysis. Microbiology 152, 405–418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carter, R. A., Yeoman, K. H., Klein, A., Hosie, A. H., Sawers, G., Poole, P. S. & Johnston, A. W. (2002). dpp genes of Rhizobium leguminosarum specify uptake of {delta}-aminolevulinic acid. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15, 69–74.[Medline]

Chenna, R., Sugawara, H., Koike, T., Lopez, R., Gibson, T. J., Higgins, D. G. & Thompson, J. D. (2003). Multiple sequence alignment with the CLUSTAL series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 3497–3500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Coffey, A., van den Burg, B., Veltman, R. & Abee, T. (2000). Characteristics of the biologically active 35-kDa metalloprotease virulence factor from Listeria monocytogenes. J Appl Microbiol 88, 132–141.[CrossRef][Medline]

Corbett, C. R., Burtnick, M. N., Kooi, C., Woods, D. E. & Sokol, P. A. (2003). An extracellular zinc metalloprotease gene of Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiology 149, 2263–2271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Doring, G., Goldstein, W., Roll, A., Schiotz, P. O., Hoiby, N. & Botzenhart, K. (1985). Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzymes in lung infections of patients with cystic fibrosis. Infect Immun 49, 557–562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feil, H., Feil, W. S., Chain, P., Larimer, F., DiBartolo, G., Copeland, A., Lykidis, A., Trong, S., Nolan, M. & other authors (2005). Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a and pv. tomato DC3000. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 11064–11069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Figurski, D. H. & Helinski, D. R. (1979). Replication of an origin-containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76, 1648–1652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frisk, A., Schurr, J. R., Wang, G., Bertucci, D. C., Marrero, L., Hwang, S. H., Hassett, D. J. & Schurr, M. J. (2004). Transcriptome analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa after interaction with human airway epithelial cells. Infect Immun 72, 5433–5438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Govan, J. R. & Deretic, V. (1996). Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiol Rev 60, 539–574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guedon, E., Serror, P., Ehrlich, S. D., Renault, P. & Delorme, C. (2001). Pleiotropic transcriptional repressor CodY senses the intracellular pool of branched-chain amino acids in Lactococcus lactis. Mol Microbiol 40, 1227–1239.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hidalgo-Grass, C., Mishalian, I., Dan-Goor, M., Belotserkovsky, I., Eran, Y., Nizet, V., Peled, A. & Hanski, E. (2006). A streptococcal protease that degrades CXC chemokines and impairs bacterial clearance from infected tissues. EMBO J 25, 4628–4637.[CrossRef][Medline]

Holloway, B. W. & Morgan, A. F. (1986). Genome organization in Pseudomonas. Annu Rev Microbiol 40, 79–105.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jacobs, M. A., Alwood, A., Thaipisuttikul, I., Spencer, D., Haugen, E., Ernst, S., Will, O., Kaul, R., Raymond, C. & other authors (2003). Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 14339–14344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jander, G., Rahme, L. G. & Ausubel, F. M. (2000). Positive correlation between virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants in mice and insects. J Bacteriol 182, 3843–3845.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Joardar, V., Lindeberg, M., Jackson, R. W., Selengut, J., Dodson, R., Brinkac, L. M., Daugherty, S. C., Deboy, R., Durkin, A. S. & other authors (2005). Whole-genome sequence analysis of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448A reveals divergence among pathovars in genes involved in virulence and transposition. J Bacteriol 187, 6488–6498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

King, N. D. & O'Brian, M. R. (1997). Identification of the lrp gene in Bradyrhizobium japonicum and its role in regulation of {delta}-aminolevulinic acid uptake. J Bacteriol 179, 1828–1831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kooi, C., Subsin, B., Chen, R., Pohorelic, B. & Sokol, P. A. (2006). Burkholderia cenocepacia ZmpB is a broad-specificity zinc metalloprotease involved in virulence. Infect Immun 74, 4083–4093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kovach, M. E., Phillips, R. W., Elzer, P. H., Roop, R. M., II & Peterson, K. M. (1994). pBBR1MCS: a broad-host-range cloning vector. Biotechniques 16, 800–802.[Medline]

Kube, D., Sontich, U., Fletcher, D. & Davis, P. B. (2001). Proinflammatory cytokine responses to P. aeruginosa infection in human airway epithelial cell lines. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 280, L493–L502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumagai, Y., Konishi, K., Gomi, T., Yagishita, H., Yajima, A. & Yoshikawa, M. (2000). Enzymatic properties of dipeptidyl aminopeptidase IV produced by the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis and its participation in virulence. Infect Immun 68, 716–724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Letoffe, S., Delepelaire, P. & Wandersman, C. (2006). The housekeeping dipeptide permease is the Escherichia coli heme transporter and functions with two optional peptide binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 12891–12896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nelson, K. E., Weinel, C., Paulsen, I. T., Dodson, R. J., Hilbert, H., Martins dos Santos, V. A., Fouts, D. E., Gill, S. R., Pop, M. & other authors (2002). Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol 4, 799–808.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nouwens, A. S., Cordwell, S. J., Larsen, M. R., Molloy, M. P., Gillings, M., Willcox, M. D. & Walsh, B. J. (2000). Complementing genomics with proteomics: the membrane subproteome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Electrophoresis 21, 3797–3809.[CrossRef][Medline]

O'Grady, E. P., Mulcahy, H., O'Callaghan, J., Adams, C. & O'Gara, F. (2006). Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of airway epithelial cells modulates expression of Kruppel-like factors 2 and 6 via RsmA-mediated regulation of type III exoenzymes S and Y. Infect Immun 74, 5893–5902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ochsner, U. A., Wilderman, P. J., Vasil, A. I. & Vasil, M. L. (2002). GeneChip expression analysis of the iron starvation response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: identification of novel pyoverdine biosynthesis genes. Mol Microbiol 45, 1277–1287.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pearson, W. R. & Lipman, D. J. (1988). Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85, 2444–2448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rahme, L. G., Stevens, E. J., Wolfort, S. F., Shao, J., Tompkins, R. G. & Ausubel, F. M. (1995). Common virulence factors for bacterial pathogenicity in plants and animals. Science 268, 1899–1902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rajan, S., Cacalano, G., Bryan, R., Ratner, A. J., Sontich, C. U., van Heerckeren, A., Davis, P. & Prince, A. (2000). Pseudomonas aeruginosa induction of apoptosis in respiratory epithelial cells: analysis of the effects of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator dysfunction and bacterial virulence factors. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 23, 304–312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salunkhe, P., Smart, C. H., Morgan, J. A., Panagea, S., Walshaw, M. J., Hart, C. A., Geffers, R., Tummler, B. & Winstanley, C. (2005). A cystic fibrosis epidemic strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays enhanced virulence and antimicrobial resistance. J Bacteriol 187, 4908–4920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Schafer, A., Tauch, A., Jager, W., Kalinowski, J., Thierbach, G. & Puhler, A. (1994). Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene 145, 69–73.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schuster, M., Lostroh, C. P., Ogi, T. & Greenberg, E. P. (2003). Identification, timing, and signal specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-controlled genes: a transcriptome analysis. J Bacteriol 185, 2066–2079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Silo-Suh, L., Suh, S. J., Sokol, P. A. & Ohman, D. E. (2002). A simple alfalfa seedling infection model for Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains associated with cystic fibrosis shows AlgT (sigma-22) and RhlR contribute to pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 15699–15704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Slack, F. J., Serror, P., Joyce, E. & Sonenshein, A. L. (1995). A gene required for nutritional repression of the Bacillus subtilis dipeptide permease operon. Mol Microbiol 15, 689–702.[Medline]

Song, T., Toma, C., Nakasone, N. & Iwanaga, M. (2004). Aerolysin is activated by metalloprotease in Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria. J Med Microbiol 53, 477–482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Spaink, H. P., Okker, R. J. H. O., Wijffelman, C. A., Pees, E. & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (1987). Promoters in the nodulation region of the Rhizobium leguminosarum Sym plasmid pRL1J1. Plant Mol Biol 9, 27–39.[Medline]

Spratt, D. A., Greenman, J. & Schaffer, A. G. (1995). Capnocytophaga gingivalis aminopeptidase: a potential virulence factor. Microbiology 141, 3087–3093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stover, C. K., Pham, X. Q., Erwin, A. L., Mizoguchi, S. D., Warrener, P., Hickey, M. J., Brinkman, F. S., Hufnagle, W. O., Kowalik, D. J. & other authors (2000). Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406, 959–964.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tamber, S. & Hancock, R. E. (2006). Involvement of two related porins, OprD and OpdP, in the uptake of arginine by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 260, 23–29.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tamber, S., Ochs, M. M. & Hancock, R. E. (2006). Role of the novel OprD family of porins in nutrient uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 188, 45–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Urbanowski, M. L., Stauffer, L. T. & Stauffer, G. V. (2000). The gcvB gene encodes a small untranslated RNA involved in expression of the dipeptide and oligopeptide transport systems in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 37, 856–868.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vodovar, N., Vallenet, D., Cruveiller, S., Rouy, Z., Barbe, V., Acosta, C., Cattolico, L., Jubin, C., Lajus, A. & other authors (2006). Complete genome sequence of the entomopathogenic and metabolically versatile soil bacterium Pseudomonas entomophila. Nat Biotechnol 24, 673–679.[CrossRef][Medline]

Walker, T. S., Bais, H. P., Deziel, E., Schweizer, H. P., Rahme, L. G., Fall, R. & Vivanco, J. M. (2004). Pseudomonas aeruginosa–plant root interactions. Pathogenicity, biofilm formation, and root exudation. Plant Physiol 134, 320–331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 13 November 2007; revised 2 April 2008; accepted 11 April 2008.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiely, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Gara, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiely, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Gara, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kiely, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Gara, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.