|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
3 Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Correspondence
Shawn R. Starkenburg
starkens{at}onid.orst.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although several phylogenetically distinct genera carry out
oxidation (Nitrospira, Nitrobacter, Nitrococcus and Nitrospina), most of what is known about the organic carbon metabolism of NOB has been derived from studies of the genus Nitrobacter. Several reports using strains of Nitrobacter winogradskyi have shown that simple organic substrates, such as acetate, pyruvate and glycerol, can support organotrophic growth (Bock, 1976
; Delwiche & Feinstein, 1965
; Smith & Hoare, 1968
; Steinmuller & Bock, 1976
, 1977
). Nevertheless, the bias of N. winogradskyi towards a lithoautotrophic lifestyle is supported by the fact that organotrophic growth rates are much slower than lithoautotrophic growth rates, and when CO2 is stripped from cultures containing organic carbon and
(mixotrophy), these organic carbon sources cannot serve as the sole carbon source (Delwiche & Feinstein, 1965
; Ida & Alexander, 1965
).
Nitrobacter hamburgensis, a more recent isolate (circa 1983) of the Nitrobacter genus, has been described as having a greater organotrophic potential than N. winogradskyi, as an early description reported (without presenting data) that mixotrophic and organotrophic growth rates were faster than lithoautotrophic growth rates (Bock et al., 1983
). Many investigations of N. hamburgensis have been conducted with cells grown mixotrophically (Harris et al., 1988
; Kirstein et al., 1986
; Laanbroek et al., 1994
; Spieck et al., 1996
), although it is not well understood how this bacterium utilizes, or adapts to, organic carbon. Some evidence of a physiological adaptation to organic carbon by N. hamburgensis exists, as cell membranes from mixotrophic and organotrophic cultures have been shown to contain different b-type cytochromes (Kirstein et al., 1986
). Nevertheless, detailed studies of how organic carbon is processed in N. hamburgensis and how its metabolism is influenced by
have not been completed. Furthermore, it is not known whether organic carbon can be used as the sole carbon source in the presence of
(lithoheterotrophy), or whether organic carbon positively or negatively influences the rate of
oxidation in this species.
The recent availability of the N. hamburgensis X14 genome sequence prompted a re-examination of mixotrophy and organotrophy in this bacterium, as three genes that could encode lactate dehydrogenases (LDHs) have been identified (Starkenburg et al., 2008
). In contrast to the well-studied NAD-dependent LDHs, these genes encode homologues of flavin-dependent LDHs (iLDHs), which oxidize lactate to pyruvate and could provide energy and/or carbon to the cell (Garvie, 1980
). In this study, the ability of N. hamburgensis to metabolize lactate was examined and its affect on lithoautotrophy was explored.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2-uptake measurements.
N. hamburgensis cells were harvested by centrifugation from late-exponential phase cultures, washed, and resuspended in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5. Rates of lactate- or
-dependent O2 uptake by cell suspensions were measured with a Clark-type O2 electrode (Yellow Springs Instrument) mounted in an all-glass, water-jacketed reaction vessel (1.8 ml volume) held at 30 °C.
Lactate consumption assay.
Lithotrophically, mixotrophically and organotrophically grown cells of N. hamburgensis were harvested by centrifugation from late-exponential phase cultures, washed twice, and resuspended to OD600 0.3–1.0 in sterile phosphate-buffered base medium (pH 7.5). Aliquots (5 ml) of cell suspensions were added to 38 ml culture bottles and sealed with Teflon-faced grey butyl rubber stoppers (Supelco) and fastened with aluminium crimp seals. CO2 in the headspace was measured with a thermal conductivity gas chromatograph (model GC-8A, Shimadzu) equipped with a 90 cm Porapak T column (Waters Associates) with the column temperature set to 150 °C and the detector set to 220 °C. The concentration of D-lactate was measured with a D-lactate assay kit (Megazyme International) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
[14C]lactate incorporation.
Resting cells of lithotrophically, mixotrophically and organotrophically grown N. hamburgensis were harvested by centrifugation from late-exponential phase cultures and resuspended in sealed 38 ml bottles containing 5 ml phosphate-buffered medium with 2 mM (NH4)2SO4, 1 mM D-lactate and 1.4 µCi (518 Mbq) DL-[1-14C]lactate (Sigma-Aldrich). N. hamburgensis was inoculated into these sealed bottles to OD600 0.4–0.6. Each culture bottle contained a 1.5 ml plastic tube containing a piece of Whatman filter paper soaked in 100 µl 18 M KOH to trap evolved CO2. At the end of the experiment (t=4 h), the bottles were opened, and the KOH-soaked filter paper was removed and added to a vial with 3.5 ml Ecolume scintillation fluid (ICN), and 14CO2 was measured on a Beckman 6500 multi-purpose scintillation counter. A 1 ml aliquot of the cell-free supernatant was added to another sealed vial containing a KOH trap and was acidified with 20 µl 12.1 M hydrochloric acid to measure the residual 14CO2 dissolved in the incubation medium. This quantity was added to the radiolabel measured in the first KOH trap to determine the total 14CO2 released from lactate. Cellular incorporation of radioactive 14C from D-lactate was measured in cells that were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice, and resuspended in 1 ml phosphate-buffered base medium. A 200 µl aliquot of the cell suspension was added to a vial containing 3.5 ml scintillation fluid, and cellular 14C incorporation was measured as described above.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The effect of
on lactate consumption was measured in resting cells harvested from both lithoautotrophic and mixotrophic cultures (Table 1
). Cells harvested from lithoautotrophic cultures readily consumed lactate at 1.17 µmol D-lactate (mg protein)–1 h–1. This short-term rate of lactate consumption by lithoautotrophically grown cells was not significantly affected by the addition of
. Mixotrophically grown cells consumed lactate at a faster rate [1.67 µmol D-lactate (mg protein)–1 h–1] than lithoautotrophically grown cells, suggesting that N. hamburgensis had adapted to growth on lactate. In the presence of
, the short-term rate of lactate consumption by mixotrophically grown cells decreased by 15 %.
|
|
14 mmol
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results for the metabolism of organic carbon by N. hamburgensis appear to differ from published literature regarding organotrophy in both N. winogradskyi and N. hamburgensis. First, although
stimulates acetate assimilation by both lithoautotrophically and organotrophically grown cells of N. winogradskyi (Smith & Hoare, 1968
),
did not affect lactate consumption by lithoautotrophically grown cells of N. hamburgensis, and
even slightly reduced the rate of lactate consumption in mixotrophically and organotrophically grown cells. Second, although organic compounds in general positively affect the rate of
oxidation in other Nitrobacter species (Steinmuller & Bock, 1976
; Tandon & Mishra, 1968
), our data suggest that lactate does not increase the rate of
oxidation in N. hamburgensis, but instead reduces the
requirement of the cell, as evidenced by a faster growth rate and an increase in growth yield in mixotrophic versus lithoautotrophic conditions. Third, an early description of the growth phenotype of N. hamburgensis indicated that organotrophic growth rates on pyruvate, acetate or glycerol were faster than lithoautotrophic growth (Bock et al., 1983
). In our laboratory, the generation time of D-lactate-grown cells was threefold slower than that of lithoautotrophic cultures, and growth rates on pyruvate or acetate were also consistently slower than either lithoautotrophic or mixotrophic growth (our unpublished results). The discrepancy in organotrophic growth rates between our studies and other reports may be explained by the fact that a chemically defined minimal medium was used in our experiments, whereas in earlier investigations, N. hamburgensis was grown in an undefined, complex medium containing yeast extract and peptone (Bock et al., 1983
; Harris et al., 1988
; Kirstein & Bock, 1993
; Sundermeyer-Klinger et al., 1984
). We have observed that ammonium amendment of
-containing cultures enhances the growth rate and cell yield of lithoautotrophically grown N. hamburgensis (our unpublished results), implying that reduced forms of organic nitrogen could have stimulated the faster mixotrophic and organotrophic growth rates of N. hamburgensis reported in the earlier studies.
Although a lactate metabolic pathway in N. hamburgensis appears to be constitutively expressed, our results indicate that the physiology of N. hamburgensis changes in response to lactate, in both the presence and absence of
. The rates of D-lactate consumption and D-lactate-dependent O2 uptake were faster in organotrophically compared to lithoautotrophically grown cells, and others have shown that a shift occurs in the cytochrome and FMN content of organotrophically grown N. hamburgensis (Bock et al., 1986
; Kirstein et al., 1986
). These adaptive changes also complement our observation that lactate-dependent O2 uptake rates were threefold higher in organotrophically and mixotrophically grown cells compared with cells harvested from lithoautotrophic cultures.
Despite these physiological adaptations, N. hamburgensis could only use D-lactate as the sole carbon source in the absence, but not the presence, of
, suggesting (but not proving conclusively) that lithoheterotrophic growth is not possible. The apparent inability of N. hamburgensis to grow on
and D-lactate (a C3 molecule) as the sole energy and carbon source, respectively, could be the result of an insufficient supply of the CO2 required for biosynthetic carboxylations. However, this hypothesis is not consistent with findings from an earlier study in which various C4–C6 compounds did not rescue growth of N. winogradskyi in the absence of CO2 (Delwiche & Feinstein, 1965
). Alternatively, the lack of growth and the reduced rate of lactate metabolism in the presence of
during CO2 limitation may be explained by a redox imbalance. Since reductant for biosynthesis is thought to be generated via an energetically unfavourable reverse flow of electrons from
to complex I (Sewell & Aleem, 1969
), continuous consumption of reductant by CO2 fixation (and the concomitant maintenance of an oxidized pool of electron carriers) may be required to sustain reverse electron flow from
. Use of CO2 fixation as a reductant sink is not unprecedented, as other alphaproteobacteria maintain redox balance by fixing CO2 to regenerate oxidized electron carriers during photoheterotrophic growth (Dubbs & Tabita, 2004
; Shively et al., 1998
). Similarly, if oxidized electron carriers cannot be regenerated efficiently by N. hamburgensis in the absence of CO2, they would be unavailable to serve as electron acceptors to oxidize lactate. It is possible that N. hamburgensis is able to overcome this redox imbalance after a more prolonged adaptation to organotrophic growth, since reduced electron carriers generated from lactate oxidation must be driving a forward flow of electrons to oxygen to generate ATP. When other facultative lithoautotrophs encounter organic carbon, in many cases a complete repression of autotrophic CO2 fixation occurs (Shively et al., 1998
; Tabita, 1988
). On the other hand, in both Thiobacillus intermedius and Ralstonia eutropha, RuBisCO and other Calvin cycle enzymes are only partially repressed by the presence of some organic carbon sources and fully repressed by others (Shively et al., 1998
; Tabita, 1988
). At least some repression of autotrophy occurs in Nitrobacter, because RuBisCO activity has been reported to be suppressed 50–99 % in organotrophically grown cells of N. winogradskyi strain agilis (Smith & Hoare, 1968
; Steinmuller & Bock, 1977
) and our results indicate that
-dependent O2 uptake was also suppressed by
40 % after growth solely on lactate. Undoubtedly, further experimentation is required to determine the details of how the redox state of a
-driven autotrophic metabolism in N. hamburgensis is affected by D-lactate.
In summary, our data suggest that Nitrobacter can take full advantage of D-lactate when it is the sole source of energy, yet if
is present, the organism's heterotrophic and mixotrophic potential is hampered by an inability to stop fixing CO2 and efficiently switch to an organic carbon source. Further investigations of the obligate requirement of Nitrobacter for CO2 during growth on
may help elucidate the physiological constraints of utilizing relatively poor inorganic energy sources, and aid in understanding how N. hamburgensis and other facultative lithoautotrophs regulate the metabolism of mixed energy and carbon sources.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Edited by: H. L. Drake
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bock, E., Sundermeyer-Klinger, H. & Stackebrandt, E. (1983). New facultative lithoautotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Arch Microbiol 136, 281–284.[CrossRef]
Bock, E., Koops, H. P. & Harms, H. (1986). Cell biology of nitrifiers. In Nitrification, pp. 17–38. Edited by J. I. Prosser. Oxford: IRL Press.
Bock, E., Koops, H. P., Harms, H. & Ahlers, B. (1991). The Biochemistry of nitrifying organisms. In Variations in Autotrophic Life, pp. 171–200. Edited by J. M. Shively and L. L. Barton. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Delwiche, C. C. & Feinstein, M. S. (1965). Carbon and energy sources for the nitrifying autotroph Nitrobacter. J Bacteriol 90, 102–107.
Dubbs, J. M. & Tabita, F. R. (2004). Regulators of nonsulfur purple phototrophic bacteria and the interactive control of CO2 assimilation, nitrogen fixation, hydrogen metabolism and energy generation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28, 353–376.[CrossRef][Medline]
Garvie, E. I. (1980). Bacterial lactate dehydrogenases. Microbiol Rev 44, 106–139.
Grobler, J., Bauer, F., Subden, R. E. & Van Vuuren, H. J. (1995). The mae1 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe encodes a permease for malate and other C4 dicarboxylic acids. Yeast 11, 1485–1491.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hageman, R. H. & Hucklesby, D. P. (1971). Nitrate reductase from higher plants. Methods Enzymol 23, 491–503.[CrossRef]
Harris, S., Ebert, A., Schutze, E., Diercks, M., Bock, E. & Shively, J. M. (1988). Two different genes and gene products for the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCOase) in Nitrobacter hamburgensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 49, 267–271.[CrossRef]
Horikiri, S., Aizawa, Y., Kai, T., Amachi, S., Shinoyama, H. & Fujii, T. (2004). Electron acquisition system constructed from an NAD-independent D-lactate dehydrogenase and cytochrome c2 in Rhodopseudomonas palustris No. 7. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68, 516–522.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ida, S. & Alexander, M. (1965). Permeability of Nitrobacter agilis to organic compounds. J Bacteriol 90, 151–156.
Kirstein, K. & Bock, E. (1993). Close genetic relationship between Nitrobacter hamburgensis nitrite oxidoreductase and Escherichia coli nitrate reductases. Arch Microbiol 160, 447–453.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kirstein, K. O., Bock, E., Miller, D. J. & Nicholas, D. J. D. (1986). Membrane-bound b-type cytochromes in Nitrobacter. FEMS Microbiol Lett 36, 63–67.[CrossRef]
Laanbroek, H. J., Bodelier, P. & Gerards, S. (1994). Oxygen consumption kinetics of Nitrosomonas europaea and Nitrobacter hamburgensis grown in mixed continuous cultures at different oxygen concentrations. Arch Microbiol 161, 156–162.[CrossRef]
Lord, J. M. (1972). Glycolate oxidoreductase in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta 267, 227–237.[Medline]
Markwell, J. P. & Lascelles, J. (1978). Membrane-bound, pyridine nucleotide-independent L-lactate dehydrogenase of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. J Bacteriol 133, 593–600.
Nelson, D. C., Waterbury, J. B. & Jannasch, H. W. (1982). Nitrogen fixation and nitrate utilization by marine and freshwater Beggiatoa. Arch Microbiol 133, 172–177.[CrossRef]
Sewell, D. L. & Aleem, M. I. (1969). Generation of reducing power in chemosynthesis. V. The mechanism of pyridine nucleotide reduction by nitrite in the chemoautotroph Nitrobacter agilis. Biochim Biophys Acta 172, 467–475.[Medline]
Shively, J. M., van Keulen, G. & Meijer, W. G. (1998). Something from almost nothing: carbon dioxide fixation in chemoautotrophs. Annu Rev Microbiol 52, 191–230.[CrossRef][Medline]
Smith, A. J. & Hoare, D. S. (1968). Acetate assimilation by Nitrobacter agilis in relation to its "obligate autotrophy". J Bacteriol 95, 844–855.
Spieck, E., Muller, S., Engel, A., Mandelkow, E., Patel, H. & Bock, E. (1996). Two-dimensional structure of membrane-bound nitrite oxidoreductase from Nitrobacter hamburgensis. J Struct Biol 117, 117–123.[CrossRef]
Starkenburg, S. R., Larimer, F. W., Stein, L. Y., Klotz, M. G., Chain, P. S., Sayavedra-Soto, L. A., Poret-Peterson, A. T., Gentry, M. E., Arp, D. J. & other authors (2008). Complete genome sequence of Nitrobacter hamburgensis X14 and a comparative genomic analysis of species within the genus Nitrobacter. Appl Environ Microbiol 74, 2852–2863.
Steinmuller, W. & Bock, E. (1976). Growth of Nitrobacter in the presence of organic matter. I. Mixotrophic growth. Arch Microbiol 108, 299–304.[CrossRef][Medline]
Steinmuller, W. & Bock, E. (1977). Enzymatic studies on autotrophically, mixotrophically and heterotrophically grown Nitrobacter agilis with special reference to nitrite oxidase. Arch Microbiol 115, 51–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sundermeyer-Klinger, H., Meyer, W., Warninghoff, B. & Bock, E. (1984). Membrane-bound nitrite-oxidoreductase of Nitrobacter: evidence for a nitrate reductase system. Arch Microbiol 140, 153–158.[CrossRef]
Tabita, F. R. (1988). Molecular and cellular regulation of autotrophic carbon dioxide fixation in microorganisms. Microbiol Rev 52, 155–189.
Tandon, S. P. & Mishra, M. M. (1968). Effect of some organic acids on nitrification by Nitrobacter agilis. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg 122, 401–404.[Medline]
Received 29 February 2008;
revised 10 April 2008;
accepted 14 April 2008.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |