Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Microbiology 154 (2008), 2804-2813; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2008/018804-0
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imperi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Visca, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imperi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Visca, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Imperi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Visca, P.
Microbiology 154 (2008), 2804-2813; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.2008/018804-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology

Membrane-association determinants of the {omega}-amino acid monooxygenase PvdA, a pyoverdine biosynthetic enzyme from Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Francesco Imperi1,2,{dagger}, Lorenza Putignani2,{dagger},{ddagger}, Federica Tiburzi1,2, Cecilia Ambrosi1,§, Rita Cipollone1,||, Paolo Ascenzi1,2 and Paolo Visca1,2

1 Department of Biology, University ‘Roma Tre’, Viale G. Marconi 446, I-00146 Rome, Italy
2 National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, ‘Lazzaro Spallanzani’, Via Portuense 292, I-00149 Rome, Italy

Correspondence
Paolo Visca
visca{at}uniroma3.it


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The L-ornithine N{delta}-oxygenase PvdA catalyses the N{delta}-hydroxylation of L-ornithine in many Pseudomonas spp., and thus provides an essential enzymic function in the biogenesis of the pyoverdine siderophore. Here, we report a detailed analysis of the membrane topology of the PvdA enzyme from the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Membrane topogenic determinants of PvdA were identified by computational analysis, and verified in Escherichia coli by constructing a series of translational fusions between PvdA and the PhoA (alkaline phosphatase) reporter enzyme. The inferred topological model resembled a eukaryotic reverse signal-anchor (type III) protein, with a single N-terminal domain anchored to the inner membrane, and the bulk of the protein spanning the cytosol. According to this model, the predicted transmembrane region should overlap the putative FAD-binding site. Cell fractionation and proteinase K accessibility experiments in P. aeruginosa confirmed the membrane-bound nature of PvdA, but excluded the transmembrane topology of its N-terminal hydrophobic region. Mutational analysis of PvdA, and complementation assays in a P. aeruginosa {Delta}pvdA mutant, demonstrated the dual (structural and functional) role of the PvdA N-terminal domain.


Abbreviations: OHOrn, N{delta}-hydroxyornithine; Orn, L-ornithine; TM, transmembrane

{dagger}These authors contributed equally to this work.

{ddagger}Present address: Children's Hospital and Research Institute ‘Bambino Gesù’, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, I-00165 Rome, Italy.

§Present address: National Research Council, Istituto di Cristallografia, Sezione di Monterotondo, Monterotondo Stazione, I-00016 Rome, Italy.

||Present address: Department of Experimental Medicine and Biochemical Sciences, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Via Montpellier 1, I-00133 Rome, Italy.

A multiple sequence alignment of PvdA is available with the online version of this paper.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Iron is one of the most important nutrients for bacteria because of its essential metabolic role. To fulfil their nutritional iron demand, many bacteria synthesize, excrete and ingest high-affinity iron chelators, termed siderophores, which bind environmental iron (generally Fe3+), and deliver it to the cell through receptor-mediated active transport (Andrews et al., 2003Down). Pyoverdine is the major siderophore produced by the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and it plays an important role in P. aeruginosa pathogenicity and ecology (reviewed by Visca et al., 2007Down).

Structurally, pyoverdine is a chromopeptide consisting of three domains: (i) a fluorescent chromophore, (ii) an acyl side chain, and (iii) a peptide moiety linked via an amide bond to the carboxyl group of the chromophore. Fe3+ is bound by pyoverdine with high affinity to form a very stable octahedral complex (dissociation constant approximately 10–32 M). In type 1 pyoverdine from P. aeruginosa PAO1, the three bidentate ligands involved in Fe3+ coordination are provided by the chatecholic hydroxyl groups of the chromophore and two hydroxamic groups of the formylated N{delta}-hydroxyornithine (OHOrn) residues of the peptide moiety. As a rule, the whole pyoverdine molecule is assembled by non-ribosomal peptide synthases, according to the carrier thiotemplate mechanism (Visca et al., 2007Down).

In P. aeruginosa, L-ornithine (Orn) hydroxylation is catalysed by the Orn N{delta}-oxygenase, which is encoded by the pvdA gene (Visca et al., 1994Down), and belongs to the {omega}-amino acid monooxygenase family (EC 1.14.13.–). Several lines of evidence indicate that PvdA plays an essential role in pyoverdine biogenesis by P. aeruginosa (Visca et al., 1994Down, 2007Down; Putignani et al., 2004Down). Recently, P. aeruginosa PAO1 PvdA has been purified and biochemically characterized as a monomeric enzyme in solution, and it has been shown to require both FAD and NADPH for activity (Meneely & Lamb, 2007Down).

The {omega}-amino acid monooxygenase family is an elusive group of enzymes that contains two putative dinucleotide-binding motifs (GXGXXG/P and GXGXXG/A for FAD and NAD(P)H, respectively) and a substrate recognition (F/LATGY) domain (Stehr et al. 1998Down; Putignani et al., 2004Down). Members of this family catalyse the incorporation of one hydroxyl group into the side-chain amino group of {omega}-amino acids by reducing molecular oxygen through concomitant oxidation of both NAD(P)H and FADH2 (Plattner et al., 1989Down). Interestingly, the only {omega}-amino acid monooxygenase whose subcellular localization has been investigated to date is the PvdA proximate homologue IucD, which catalyses L-lysine hydroxylation during aerobactin biogenesis in Escherichia coli (Herrero et al., 1988Down). Pioneer topology studies on IucD have suggested that this enzyme is membrane bound by means of at least one transmembrane (TM) domain that encompasses the putative FAD-binding motif at the N-terminal region (Herrero et al., 1988Down). Accordingly, Viswanatha and coworkers were unable to obtain a soluble form of IucD, unless a recombinant protein with an altered N terminus was constructed (Thariath et al., 1993Down). However, the group of Diekmann reported that native IucD could be purified to homogeneity in an active form (Plattner et al., 1989Down), giving rise to a dispute on the assumption that the membrane-associated form of IucD could be an artefact resulting from the moderate hydrophobicity of dinucleotide-binding domains (Dick et al., 1998Down; Seth et al., 1998Down; Stehr et al. 1998Down). Therefore, the actual cellular localization of bacterial {omega}-amino acid monooxygenases remains an open issue.

This study was undertaken to explore the membrane topology of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 PvdA enzyme, with the aim of providing novel insights into the membrane-association determinants of bacterial {omega}-amino acid monooxygenases. By using in silico topology predictions, alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) translational fusions, cell fractionation assays and mutational analysis, we demonstrate that PvdA is anchored to the cytoplasmic membrane with the core of the protein exposed to the cytosol, and that the PvdA N-terminal hydrophobic domain is important for membrane association. Overall, our results provide a valuable background for further investigations on the pyoverdine multienzymic biosynthetic pathway in P. aeruginosa, and provide a basis for topological studies on biosynthetic enzymes of other hydroxamate siderophores.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In silico analyses.
Secondary structure and solvent accessibility were inferred by using Jpred algorithms (http://barton.ebi.ac.uk/servers/jpred.html). Java outputs were manually edited. Hydrophobicity profiles were generated by using Hopp–Woods (Hopp & Woods, 1983Down) and Kyte–Doolittle (Kyte & Doolittle, 1982Down) functions over a window size of 19 aa (http://bip.weizmann.ac.il/index.html). Prediction of TM domains was accomplished by combining four software programs: TMpred, DAS and TMHMM (all available on the ExPASy server, www.expasy.org/tools/), and ConPred II (http://bioinfo.si.hirosaki-u.ac.jp/~ConPred2/). All user-adjustable parameters were left at their default values.

Construction of PvdA–PhoA translational fusions.
A series of PvdA–PhoA translational fusions was constructed by PCR amplification, using P. aeruginosa PAO1 genomic DNA as a template. Routine genetic manipulations were carried out according to Sambrook et al. (1989)Down. The sense primer, which annealed to the start codon of the pvdA coding sequence, was paired with antisense primers to generate fusions at appropriate positions. In both sense and antisense primers, the KpnI restriction site was included to allow cloning of each amplicon into the compatible restriction site of pBADphoA (Table 1Down), upstream of the phoA gene without a signal sequence, which encodes a PhoA variant lacking the N-terminal signal peptide essential for PhoA export into the periplasm (Melchers et al., 1999Down). Fusions 12P and 22P were obtained by the oligonucleotide adaptor technique (Invitrogen). Primer and oligonucleotide sequences used in this study are given in Table 2Down. Correct in-frame cloning and amplicon sequences were verified by automated DNA sequencing. The resultant fusion plasmids were individually introduced into the phoA-null mutant E. coli strain LMG194 (F {Delta}lacZX74 galE thi rpsL {Delta}phoA {Delta}ara-714 leu : : Tn10; Guzman et al., 1995Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Plasmids and encoded proteins used in this study

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Oligonucleotides used in this study

 
Expression of fusion proteins, PhoA assay, and preparation of E. coli subcellular fractions.
E. coli LMG194 cells expressing PvdA–PhoA fusion proteins were grown at 37 °C in NZYM medium (Sambrook et al., 1989Down) supplemented with 100 µg ampicillin ml–1. PhoA activity was assayed by measuring the rate of p-nitrophenyl phosphate hydrolysis in permeabilized cells (Michaelis et al., 1983Down), and it was reported in arbitrary units (Melchers et al., 1999Down). Periplasmic, cytoplasmic and membrane fractions from E. coli cells were prepared as described (Neu & Heppel, 1965Down), using ice-cold 1 mM MgCl2 instead of water to reduce the amount of shock-released cytoplasmic proteins (Hantash & Earhart, 2000Down). Immunoblots of PhoA fusion proteins were performed with rabbit anti-PhoA polyclonal antibody (Abcam). Immunodetection was performed with goat anti-rabbit alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated polyclonal antibody (Abcam). Protein concentration was determined using the DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). Densitometric measurements were obtained by using Quantity One software and a Gel Doc 2000 CCD camera (Bio-Rad).

Generation of the P. aeruginosa PAO1{Delta}pvdA mutant.
Site-specific excision of the entire pvdA coding sequence was performed using a sacB-based strategy described by Hoang et al. (1998)Down. Two regions of approximately 800 bp upstream and downstream of the pvdA gene were generated by PCR with specific primer pairs (Table 2Up). Upstream and downstream fragments were digested with appropriate restriction enzymes, and directionally cloned into the pEX18Tc suicide vector (Hoang et al., 1998Down). The gentamicin-resistance (GmR)–GFP cassette from pPS858 (Hoang et al., 1998Down) was ligated into the BamHI site situated between the two cloned fragments, and the resulting pEX{Delta}pvdA construct was conjugally transferred into P. aeruginosa PAO1. Methods for resolution of merodiploids and excision of the GmR–GFP cassette were as described (Hoang et al., 1998Down). The deletion event was verified by PCR and DNA sequencing, and the resulting mutant was named PAO1{Delta}pvdA.

Construction of pvdA deletions and point mutations.
The DNA sequences encoding the whole PvdA protein and three N-terminal-deleted PvdA derivatives [{Delta}9PvdA, {Delta}9PvdA(G15->D) and {Delta}30PvdA] were PCR amplified with specific primers containing BamHI (sense) and HindIII (antisense) restriction sites (Table 2Up), using P. aeruginosa PAO1 genomic DNA as a template. The amplicons were directionally cloned into the same restriction sites of the vector pQE60 (Qiagen), and excised by XhoI/PvuII digestion to obtain pvdA-deletion derivatives under the control of the T5 promoter provided by pQE60. These DNA fragments were ligated to the compatible SalI and SmaI sites of the EscherichiaPseudomonas shuttle vector pUCP19 (Schweizer, 1991Down). Correct frame and sequence were verified by DNA sequencing. The resultant constructs were individually introduced into the PvdA-defective P. aeruginosa mutant PAO1{Delta}pvdA by transformation.

Complementation and membrane-association assays.
P. aeruginosa PAO1, or P. aeruginosa PAO1{Delta}pvdA cells expressing PvdA, {Delta}9PvdA, {Delta}9PvdA(G15->D) or {Delta}30PvdA, were grown to late-exponential phase at 37 °C in DCAA medium (Visca et al., 1993Down). When necessary, the medium was supplemented with 150 µg carbenicillin ml–1. Pyoverdine production was assayed by absorbance at 405 nm of culture supernatants (Tiburzi et al., 2008Down) and by UV fluorescence on cetrimide (Pseudosel; Acumedia) agar plates. P. aeruginosa cells were spheroplasted by the lysozyme/sucrose method (Robles-Price et al., 2004Down) to release periplasmic proteins. Spheroplasts were then disrupted by sonication, and cell debris was removed by low-speed centrifugation (10 min at 3000 g). Cytosolic and membrane fractions were separated by ultracentrifugation at 55 000 g for 2 h at 4 °C. The specificity of subcellular fractions was verified by measuring relative isocitrate dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase activities, as previously described (Tiburzi et al., 2008Down). Separation was considered acceptable when subcellular fractions showed less than 2 % cross-contamination between enzyme markers of the different fractions. Immunoblot analysis was carried out using the mouse anti-PvdA monoclonal antibody 3H6D12 raised against the C-terminal region of PvdA (Putignani et al., 2004Down), a mouse anti-RpoD monoclonal antibody (Neoclone), and a rabbit anti-XcpY polyclonal serum (Michel et al., 1998Down).

The nature of PvdA association with P. aeruginosa PAO1 membranes was assessed by means of different chemical treatments. Membrane samples were treated with 1.0 M NaCl, 0.1 M NaOH, 1.5 M urea, 5.0 M urea, or 2 % N-lauryl-sarcosine (Sarcosyl), for 30 min at 4 °C, and then centrifuged at 55 000 g for 2 h at 4 °C. Proteins retained in the pellet were directly solubilized in SDS-PAGE loading buffer (Sambrook et al., 1989Down), while proteins in the supernatants were precipitated with 10 % trichloroacetic acid, and suspended in SDS-PAGE loading buffer.

Proteinase K accessibility assay.
Proteinase K accessibility experiments were performed as described (Arts et al., 2007Down). Briefly, P. aeruginosa PAO1 cells were grown to late-exponential phase at 37 °C in DCAA medium. Cells were spheroplasted by incubation in ice-cold 40 % sucrose, 1.5 mM EDTA, 33 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8) and 5 µg lysozyme ml–1. After 10 min on ice, and 10 min at 37 °C, spheroplasts were stabilized by the addition of MgCl2 at 10 mM final concentration. Spheroplasts were then incubated for 1 h on ice in the presence and absence of 50 µg proteinase K ml–1. PMSF (2 mM) was added to terminate the reaction, and proteins were precipitated with 10 % trichloroacetic acid, and suspended in SDS-PAGE loading buffer.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PvdA hydrophobicity, TM domain and secondary structure predictions
Hydropathy plots of the PvdA amino acid sequence, computed by both Kyte–Doolittle (Kyte & Doolittle, 1982Down) and Hopp–Woods (Hopp & Woods, 1983Down) algorithms, showed a highly hydrophobic peak encompassing amino acid residues 10–30 (Fig. 1aDown). Analyses with TMpred, TMHMM, DAS and ConPred II algorithms predicted a single putative TM domain overlapping this hydrophobic region (Fig. 1bDown, and data not shown), although this showed a moderate probability score with TMHMM. Analysis of the residues flanking the predicted TM region highlighted a net negative charge (–1) on the left site (D12) and a zero charge (E31 plus R32) on the right site. This feature could represent an extension of the positive inside rule (von Heijne, 1992Down), thus resembling protein behaviour in eukaryotes in which cytoplasmic location is conferred by the more positive flanking sequence rather than by a positive charge per se (Goder & Spiess, 2001Down). Indeed, the Nout/Cin TM orientation for this presumptive TM domain was strongly suggested by TMpred (Fig. 1bDown) and ConPred II (the latter probed against eukaryotic databases). The PvdA secondary structure was predicted by the Jpred PSIBLAST algorithm, following multiple alignment with putative or confirmed hydroxylase/monooxygenase homologues (supplementary Fig. S1, available with the online version of this paper). All homologues belong to pyridine nucleotide-disulphide oxidoreductase (Pfam00070) or flavin-binding monooxygenase-like (Pfam00743) families, which are members of the FAD/NAD(P)H-binding Rossmann fold superfamily. The multiple alignment showed the highest amino acid conservation over an extended N-terminal region of approximately 110 residues (10–120 aa relative to PvdA) and over two shorter amino acid stretches located in the central and C-terminal regions (210–225 and 345–356 aa relative to PvdA, respectively). Solvent accessibility algorithms predicted the longest stretch of contiguous buried residues at the PvdA N terminus, overlapping the FAD signature (Fig. S1), and corroborated the inferred high hydrophobicity of this region. Finally, PvdA secondary structure predictions highlighted two β{alpha}β folds (residues 9–46 and 210–240), followed by three consecutive β-strands (Fig. S1); this structure resembles a variant of the typical mononucleotide-binding fold (Dym & Eisenberg, 2001Down).


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Hydropathy computations and TM domain predictions for P. aeruginosa PAO1 PvdA. (a) Combined hydrophobicity plots generated by the Hopp–Woods (green) and Kyte–Doolitle (blue) methods over a window of 19 aa. The highest hydrophobic peak is indicated by the red segment. (b) TM predictions obtained by TMpred and TMHMM algorithms, and manually superimposed. TMpred scores for out->in (grey dotted line) and in->out (black line) orientation, and TMHMM probabilities for periplasmic (magenta line), cytoplasmic (blue line) and TM (red vertical bars) regions, are shown on the left and right, respectively.

 
Topogenic determinants of PvdA
The presence of possible topogenic determinants in the PvdA amino acid sequence was investigated by means of PhoA fusions (Melchers et al., 1999Down). PvdA coding regions were fused in-frame with a truncated phoA gene encoding a PhoA enzyme lacking the native signal peptide. The eventual presence of topogenic determinant(s) in the fused protein fragment may target PhoA, lacking a signal peptide sequence, across the inner membrane to the periplasm, where PhoA folds and becomes enzymically active (Manoil et al., 1990Down).

Based on computational analyses, we fused the PhoA reporter enzyme, lacking a signal peptide sequence, with eight different N-terminal fragments of PvdA extending from position 1 to positions 12, 22, 31, 40, 210, 220, 240 and 443 (Fig. 2aDown). The resulting fusion proteins were named 12P, 22P, 31P, 40P, 210P, 220P, 240P and 443P, respectively (Fig. 2aDown, Table 1Up). The enzymic activity of each fusion protein was measured in E. coli LMG194, as summarized in Fig. 2(a)Down. The highest PhoA activity value was observed for the 12P fusion, whereas the other fusions showed activities comparable with the PhoA enzyme, lacking a signal peptide sequence (i.e. 22P, 31P and 40P), with the host strain (i.e. 210P, 220P, 240P and 443P) (Fig. 2aDown). The expression level of each PhoA fusion protein was determined by immunoblot analysis of E. coli LMG194 whole-cell lysates with an anti-PhoA antibody. All fusion proteins showed the expected molecular mass, indicating that none was processed by the heterologous E. coli host (Fig. 2bDown). However, expression levels were variable and extremely low for 12P (Fig. 2bDown). When PhoA activities were normalized by the protein expression levels, as measured by densitometric analysis, the relative PhoA activity of the 12P fusion increased by at least 40-fold with respect to all the other fusions (data not shown). To further assess the subcellular localization of fusion proteins, cell fractionation experiments were performed. Immunoblot analysis with the anti-PhoA antibody on E. coli LMG194 subcellular fractions showed that 22P, 31P, 40P, 210P, 220P, 240P and 443P localized in the membrane fraction, while only 12P was released in the periplasmic fraction (Fig. 2cDown). As expected, the PhoA control, lacking a signal peptide sequence, was detected in the cytosolic fraction (Fig. 2cDown). These results indicate that the first 12 residues of PvdA drive the export of PhoA across the inner membrane of E. coli, and that a minimum of 22 residues at the PvdA N terminus is able to retain PhoA on the cytosolic leaflet of the membrane. Overall, topological studies in the heterologous host E. coli suggested that one single N-terminal domain anchors PvdA to the inner membrane, with the bulk of the protein plausibly exposed to the cytosol.


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Enzymic activity and expression profile of PvdA–PhoA fusion proteins. (a) Linear representation (not to scale) of PvdA and PvdA–PhoA fusions. FAD, NADPH and LATGY domains are represented as white, light grey and dark grey boxes, respectively, and their amino acid positions are indicated in full-length PvdA. The PhoA, lacking a signal peptide sequence (grey ellipse), and the E. coli LMG194 host strain were included as negative controls. The histogram shows mean PhoA activity values (±SD) of three independent experiments. (b) Coomassie Blue staining (upper panel) and immunoblot analysis (lower panel) of cell extracts (5 and 10 µg protein, respectively) from E. coli LMG194 cells expressing different PvdA–PhoA fusions with the anti-PhoA antibody. (c) Cell fractionation immunoblot analysis from E. coli LMG194 cells as reported in (b). A 3 µg quantity of protein for whole-cell extract (W), periplasmic (P), cytosolic (C) and membrane-bound (M) fractions was loaded onto gels. Molecular mass standards (kDa) are indicated on the left. The immunoblots are representative of three experiments showing similar results.

 
Membrane association of PvdA
To verify the ability of PvdA to associate with the membranes in vivo, we performed experiments of cell fractionation in the homologous P. aeruginosa host. Bacteria were grown in iron-depleted DCAA medium to induce PvdA expression. Cells were spheroplasted to release the periplasmic protein fraction, and the resulting spheroplasts were lysed by sonication. Soluble (cytosolic) and membrane proteins were separated by ultracentrifugation. Isovolumes of each fraction (or appropriate dilutions) were resolved by SDS-PAGE to determine the distribution of PvdA between the cytosolic and membrane compartments of P. aeruginosa cells. Immunoblot analysis with an anti-PvdA monoclonal antibody showed that almost the whole cellular pool of PvdA co-sedimented with P. aeruginosa membranes, corroborating the membrane localization of PvdA in P. aeruginosa PAO1 cells (Fig. 3aDown). Detection of the vegetative sigma factor RpoD and the inner-membrane protein XcpY almost entirely in the cytosolic and membrane fractions, respectively, confirmed the selectivity of the fractionation procedure (Fig. 3aDown).


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Subcellular localization of PvdA, RpoD, and XcpY in P. aeruginosa PAO1. (a) Partition of PvdA, RpoD and XcpY between the cytosolic and membrane protein fractions from iron-depleted P. aeruginosa PAO1 cells. Twofold serial dilutions were loaded onto the gel starting from equal volumes of each protein fraction (equivalent to 5 µg cytosolic protein), resolved by SDS-PAGE, and electroblotted. Purified full-length PvdA (30 ng) was used as positive control (Ctl). (b) Membrane samples from P. aeruginosa PAO1 were untreated (NT), or treated with 1.0 M NaCl, 0.1 M NaOH, 1.5 M urea, 5.0 M urea or 2 % sarcosyl, as indicated. After sedimentation of the membranes, equal volumes of the supernatant (S) and membrane-retained proteins (R) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and electroblotted. Proteins were probed with antibodies directed against PvdA and XcpY, as indicated. The immunoblots are representative of three experiments showing similar results.

 
To investigate the biochemical nature of the membrane association of PvdA, membranes from P. aeruginosa PAO1 were treated with chemical agents that disrupt different types of protein bonding with membranes (Fig. 3bUp). PvdA was released from membranes by alkali (0.1 M NaOH) and denaturant (1.5 M and 5.0 M urea), both of which solubilize peripheral membrane proteins, while allowing integral membrane proteins to remain anchored to the lipid bilayer (Rosenberg, 2005Down and references therein). High salt (1.0 M NaCl) treatment, which is known to affect protein–protein and protein–phospholipid electrostatic interactions (Rosenberg, 2005Down), caused only partial solubilization of PvdA from membranes. In contrast, the integral inner-membrane protein XcpY was not solubilized by any of these treatments, confirming that membrane integrity was preserved upon alkali, urea and salt treatments. Finally, both PvdA and XcpY were retrieved in the soluble fraction after treatment of membranes with Sarcosyl (2 %), which is a detergent that selectively disrupts the inner membrane without affecting the stability of the outer membrane (Filip et al., 1973Down), and this suggests that PvdA is localized at the inner membrane level. Overall, these results indicate that PvdA behaves as a peripheral protein, and rule out any unspecific co-sedimentation of PvdA with the P. aeruginosa membranes.

While in silico topology and PhoA fusion assays suggested that the PvdA N-terminal hydrophobic region (amino acid residues 10–30) could be responsible for PvdA association with membranes, solubilization assays argued against the existence of a canonical TM domain by which PvdA can actually cross the lipid bilayer. To verify whether PvdA is entirely exposed to the cytosolic leaflet of the inner membrane, a proteinase K accessibility assay was performed on spheroplasts obtained from iron-starved P. aeruginosa cells. As expected, treatment of the spheroplasts with proteinase K resulted in substantial signal reduction for the type II bitopic inner-membrane protein XcpY (Fig. 4Down), which exposes a large region to the periplasmic space (Bleves et al., 1996Down). In contrast, PvdA was protected from the protease in spheroplasts, while it was completely digested upon treatment of the P. aeruginosa whole-cell lysate with proteinase K (Fig. 4Down). The SDS-PAGE mobility of PvdA from proteinase-K-treated spheroplasts was identical to that of the native protein from untreated spheroplasts, while it differed from that of the {Delta}9PvdA deletion derivative, which lacks the first 9 aa at the PvdA N terminus (see below); the {Delta}9PvdA deletion derivative was used as size control in case of N-terminal proteolysis (Fig. 4Down).


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Proteinase K accessibility of PvdA and XcpY in spheroplasts obtained from iron-starved P. aeruginosa cells. P. aeruginosa PAO1 spheroplasts, and whole-cell lysates of PAO1 and PAO1{Delta}pvdA(pUCP19{Delta}9pvdA) strains were treated (+) or not (–) with 50 µg proteinase K ml–1, as indicated. A 10 µg quantity of proteins from each sample was resolved by SDS-PAGE, immunoblotted, and probed with anti-PvdA and anti-XcpY antibodies.

 
A dual role for the PvdA N-terminal region
We have previously generated by chemical mutagenesis the pyoverdine defective PALS124 P. aeruginosa mutant, and shown that it is unable to produce OHOrn (Visca et al., 1992Down). We observed by immunoblotting that this mutant expressed a full-length (apparent mass approx. 49 kDa) PvdA under conditions of iron starvation (data not shown), suggesting that PvdAPALS124 could carry an amino acid replacement that compromises its enzymic activity. Sequencing of the whole pvdA gene revealed that PALS124 carries a single mutation at codon 215 (GGC->GAC) of pvdA, resulting in a single amino acid substitution (G215->D) in the NADPH-binding motif (G214GGQSA219 in wild-type PvdA). This finding corroborates the importance of the G residues in the dinucleotide-binding motif, in line with their role in the formation of the tight turn necessary for protein binding to the pyrophosphate group of FAD and NAD(P)H (Dym & Eisenberg, 2001Down).

Since the N-terminal region of PvdA appears to be endowed with both structural (membrane-interaction) and functional (FAD-binding) roles, three PvdA deletion derivatives [{Delta}9PvdA, {Delta}9PvdA(G15->D) and {Delta}30PvdA] were expressed in the PvdA-defective P. aeruginosa strain PAO1{Delta}pvdA. The {Delta}9PvdA and {Delta}30PvdA proteins were PvdA derivatives lacking the first 9 and 30 aa at the N terminus, respectively, while the {Delta}9PvdA(G15->D) protein originated from {Delta}9PvdA by a single amino acid substitution (G->D at position 15) in the FAD-binding motif (Fig. 5aDown). The full-length PvdA protein was used as positive control (Fig. 5aDown). While all proteins were efficiently expressed in PAO1{Delta}pvdA cells, only PvdA and {Delta}9PvdA were able to complement the {Delta}pvdA mutation by restoring pyoverdine production. Conversely, PvdA derivatives deleted of, or mutated in, the FAD signature did not restore pyoverdine production (Fig. 5bDown). The subcellular localization of these PvdA derivatives was also investigated by means of cell fractionation experiments, and by immunoblot analysis with an anti-PvdA antibody. As shown in Fig. 5(b)Down, both {Delta}9PvdA and {Delta}9PvdA(G15->D) sedimented with cell membranes as their native counterpart. On the other hand, a large amount of {Delta}30PvdA was detected in the soluble cytosolic fraction (Fig. 5bDown), indicating that deletion of the PvdA N-terminal hydrophobic region results in a redistribution of the enzyme from the membrane to the cytosolic compartment. Taken together, these results indicate that, although PvdA retains its activity upon deletion of the nine N-terminal residues, it requires a functional FAD-binding motif for the catalytic activity. In addition, the hydrophobic region encompassing amino acid residues 10–30 is essential for membrane association of PvdA, and this confirms the dual role of the PvdA N-terminal domain.


Figure 5
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Activity and membrane association of PvdA derivatives carrying mutations in the N-terminal region expressed in the PAO1{Delta}pvdA mutant. (a) Schematic representation of PvdA derivatives used. The amino acid sequence of the FAD signature is indicated for the full-length PvdA and for {Delta}9PvdA(G15->D). The black cross represents the single amino acid mutation (G->D) in the FAD-binding motif of {Delta}9PvdA(G15->D) and in the NADPH-binding motif of PvdAPALS124. (b) A 5 µg quantity of whole P. aeruginosa PAO1{Delta}pvdA proteins (W), and equal volumes of cytosolic (C) and membrane (M) protein fractions (equivalent to 5 µg of cytosolic proteins), were probed with the 3H6D12 anti-PvdA antibody. Purified full-length PvdA (10 ng) was used as positive control (Ctl). The immunoblot is representative of three experiments showing similar results. The histogram shows the amount of pyoverdine produced by each strain normalized by the number of cells (A405/A600). Values are means (±SD) of three independent experiments.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In past years, pyoverdine biosynthesis has been extensively studied in light of the role of this siderophore in P. aeruginosa virulence, initiation of infection and pathogenesis (reviewed by Visca et al., 2007Down). It is now well established that pyoverdine synthesis relies on four non-ribosomal peptide synthases that direct the synthesis of the peptide backbone, and on at least three accessory enzymes responsible for synthesis of the non-proteinogenic amino acid precursors. Nevertheless, the subcellular localization of pyoverdine biosynthetic enzymes remains uncertain.

Herein, we provide evidence for the membrane-bound nature of PvdA, which is a key enzyme of the pyoverdine biosynthetic pathway (Visca et al., 1994Down, 2007Down). Similar to its close homologue IucD (Herrero et al., 1988Down), PvdA possesses a major hydrophobic region overlapping the putative FAD-binding motif, and in silico analyses predicted a single TM domain at the N-terminal region (Fig. 1bUp) flanked by a charge bias rather than a cytosolic net positive charge typical of bacterial TM domains (von Heijne, 1992Down). On this basis, the membrane topology of PvdA was experimentally tested by means of a series of PvdA–PhoA translational fusions in the heterologous host E. coli. The results indicate that the 12 N-terminal residues of PvdA are able to target the reporter PhoA protein through the inner membrane into the periplasm, while the following hydrophobic residues seem to be responsible for anchoring the enzyme to the inner membrane (Fig. 2Up). Given the lack of other topogenic determinants, we expect the bulk of the protein to be exposed to the cytoplasm. In view of this, PvdA could have a membrane topology reminiscent of a eukaryotic reverse signal-anchor (type III) membrane protein that translocates its N-terminal end across the membrane in an Nout/Cin orientation (Goder & Spiess, 2001Down). According to this model, PvdA co-sediments with P. aeruginosa membranes in cell fractionation experiments, and its N-terminal hydrophobic region appears to be essential for membrane association (Figs 3aUp and 5bUp). However, we demonstrated that native PvdA can be released from membranes by chemical treatments that do not affect membrane stability (Fig. 3bUp), thus excluding the existence of a canonical TM domain in the PvdA N-terminal region. Accordingly, PvdA was resistant to treatment of P. aeruginosa spheroplasts with proteinase K (Fig. 4Up), and this suggests that PvdA lacks a protease-accessible periplasmic domain. Overall, these observations are compatible with the finding that a recombinant soluble form of PvdA can be obtained by hexahistidine tagging the N terminus, but not the C terminus (Ge & Seah, 2006Down; Meneely & Lamb, 2007Down), and this suggests that the hexahistidine tag could provide the N-terminal domain with a hydrophilic character capable of counteracting its intrinsic hydrophobicity.

Most membrane proteins span the bilayer with long {alpha}-helical stretches. However, the predicted secondary structure of the PvdA N-terminal region consists of a short β-sheet (from H11 to V16) and an {alpha}-helix (from S21 to Q30) separated by two residues generally involved in {alpha}-helical breaking (G19 and P20). P and G residues are widely distributed in TM domains of many integral membrane proteins (Williams & Deber, 1991Down; Landolt-Marticorena et al., 1993Down), and their helical propensity is greatly enhanced in lipid bilayers (Li et al., 1996Down; Deber et al., 1999Down). Nevertheless, the N-terminal hydrophobic region of PvdA overlaps the putative FAD-binding motif. We showed that this motif is essential for PvdA activity, since a single amino acid substitution in the FAD-binding motif of PvdA abrogated the genetic complementation (i.e. restoration of pyoverdine synthesis) in the PvdA-defective P. aeruginosa mutant (Fig. 5bUp). This confirms the crucial role of the FAD signature in PvdA activity and function.

It is difficult to reconcile the inclusion of a functional FAD signature within a structural membrane-anchoring domain. We can only speculate that the PvdA N-terminal hydrophobic domain interacts with the lipid bilayer by forming a U-shaped or re-entrant loop aided by contiguous G19–P20 residues without actually crossing the membrane. Then, part of the FAD-binding domain may interact with the membrane, concomitantly leaving exposed residues to the intracellular milieu. Hence, the observed export of the 12P translational fusion into the periplasm of E. coli cells should plausibly be an artefact due to the lack of constraints otherwise imposed by the downstream structure(s). Notably, a similar cryptic signal peptide unmasked upon fusion to the PhoA reporter enzyme has been detected in the HMWP2 protein of Yersinia spp. (Guilvout et al., 1995Down). In view of this, it is worth noting that the first 9 aa at the N terminus of PvdA are not required for either membrane association or enzymic activity (Fig. 5Up). The dual role of the PvdA N-terminal hydrophobic domain is very intriguing, and deserves further studies to refine residues responsible for membrane anchoring, and to elucidate the actual secondary structure of this domain.

Overall, the membrane localization for PvdA is biologically meaningful. Since PvdA is involved in iron metabolism, and requires oxygen for oxygenase activity, the membrane location would facilitate oxygen recruitment from the outer environment, and thereby contribute to the maintenance of a reducing intracellular milieu. On the other hand, the putative substrate-binding pocket (LATGY) would be localized on the cytoplasmic side, and as result it would be accessible to the substrate (Orn). To the best of our knowledge, in P. aeruginosa, OHOrn is exclusively utilized for pyoverdine biosynthesis. Moreover, because of its high instability at neutral pH (Akers & Neilands, 1973Down), cytoplasmic OHOrn should promptly be formylated and/or sequestered into the nascent pyoverdine backbone by the pyoverdine biosynthesis machinery. In this scenario, our work provides the basis for future studies aimed at investigating the subcellular localization of the whole pyoverdine biosynthesis machinery.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We wish to thank Dr M. Ehrmann (University of Cardiff) for critical contribution to experimental design, and for providing us with the E. coli strain LMG194 and the pBADphoA plasmid, Dr I. J. Schalk (Université Strasbourg 1) for providing us with the anti-XcpY antibody, and E. Nebuloso (National Institute for Infectious Disease ‘L. Spallanzani’) for DNA sequencing. This work was supported by grants to P. V. from the Ministry for Health of Italy (‘Ricerca Corrente 2006’ to the National Institute for Infectious Diseases ‘L. Spallanzani’), the Ministry of University and Research of Italy (PRIN-2006), and the Italian Cystic Fibrosis Research Foundation (grant FFC#10/2007), with the contribution of ‘Gruppo Aziende Ferraresi’, ‘Delegazione FFC di Ferrara’ and ‘Gruppo di Sostegno FFC di Comacchio’.

Edited by: P. Cornelis


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Akers, H. A. & Neilands, J. B. (1973). A hydroxamic acid present in Rhodotorula pilimanae cultures grown at low pH and its metabolic relation to rhodotorulic acid. Biochemistry 12, 1006–1010.[CrossRef][Medline]

Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K. & Rodriguez-Quinones, F. (2003). Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27, 215–237.[CrossRef][Medline]

Arts, J., van Boxtel, R., Filloux, A., Tommassen, J. & Koster, M. (2007). Export of the pseudopilin XcpT of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type II secretion system via the signal recognition particle–Sec pathway. J Bacteriol 189, 2069–2076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bleves, S., Lazdunski, A. & Filloux, A. (1996). Membrane topology of three Xcp proteins involved in exoprotein transport by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 178, 4297–4300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Deber, C. M., Liu, L. P. & Wang, C. (1999). Perspective: peptides as mimics of transmembrane segments in proteins. J Pept Res 54, 200–205.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dick, S., Marrone, L., Thariath, A., Valvano, M. A. & Viswanatha, T. (1998). Cofactor- and substrate-binding domains in flavin-dependent N-hydroxylating enzymes. Trends Biochem Sci 23, 414–415.[Medline]

Dym, O. & Eisenberg, D. (2001). Sequence-structure analysis of FAD-containing proteins. Protein Sci 10, 1712–1728.[CrossRef][Medline]

Filip, C., Fletcher, G., Wulff, J. L. & Earhart, C. F. (1973). Solubilization of the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli by the ionic detergent sodium-lauryl sarcosinate. J Bacteriol 115, 717–722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ge, L. & Seah, S. Y. (2006). Heterologous expression, purification, and characterization of an L-ornithine N5-hydroxylase involved in pyoverdine siderophore biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 188, 7205–7210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goder, V. & Spiess, M. (2001). Topogenesis of membrane proteins: determinants and dynamics. FEBS Lett 504, 87–93.[CrossRef][Medline]

Guilvout, I., Carniel, E. & Pugsley, A. P. (1995). Yersinia spp. HMWP2, a cytosolic protein with a cryptic internal signal sequence which can promote alkaline phosphatase export. J Bacteriol 177, 1780–1787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guzman, L. M., Belin, D., Carson, M. J. & Beckwith, J. (1995). Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol 177, 4121–4130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hantash, F. M. & Earhart, C. F. (2000). Membrane association of the Escherichia coli enterobactin synthase proteins EntB/G, EntE, and EntF. J Bacteriol 182, 1768–1773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Herrero, M., de Lorenzo, V. & Neilands, J. B. (1988). Nucleotide sequence of the iucD gene of the pColV-K30 aerobactin operon and topology of its product studied with phoA and lacZ gene fusions. J Bacteriol 170, 56–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoang, T. T., Karkhoff-Schweizer, R. R., Kutchma, A. J. & Schweizer, H. P. (1998). A broad-host-range Flp-FRT recombination system for site-specific excision of chromosomally located DNA sequences: application for isolation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants. Gene 212, 77–86.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hopp, T. P. & Woods, K. R. (1983). A computer program for predicting protein antigenic determinants. Mol Immunol 20, 483–489.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kyte, J. & Doolittle, R. F. (1982). A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157, 105–132.[CrossRef][Medline]

Landolt-Marticorena, C., Williams, K. A., Deber, C. M. & Reithmeier, R. A. (1993). Non-random distribution of amino acids in the transmembrane segments of human type I single span membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 229, 602–608.[CrossRef][Medline]

Li, S. C., Goto, N. K., Williams, K. A. & Deber, C. M. (1996). {alpha}-Helical, but not β-sheet, propensity of proline is determined by peptide environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 6676–6681.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Manoil, C., Mekalanos, J. J. & Beckwith, J. (1990). Alkaline phosphatase fusions: sensors of subcellular location. J Bacteriol 172, 515–518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Melchers, K., Schuhmacher, A., Buhmann, A., Weitzenegger, T., Belin, D., Grau, S. & Ehrmann, M. (1999). Membrane topology of CadA homologous P-type ATPase of Helicobacter pylori as determined by expression of phoA fusions in Escherichia coli and the positive inside rule. Res Microbiol 150, 507–520.[Medline]

Meneely, K. M. & Lamb, A. L. (2007). Biochemical characterization of a flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent monooxygenase, ornithine hydroxylase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, suggests a novel reaction mechanism. Biochemistry 46, 11930–11937.[CrossRef][Medline]

Michaelis, S., Inouye, H., Oliver, D. & Beckwith, J. (1983). Mutations that alter the signal sequence of alkaline phosphatase in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 154, 366–374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Michel, G., Bleves, S., Ball, G., Lazdunski, A. & Filloux, A. (1998). Mutual stabilization of the XcpZ and XcpY components of the secretory apparatus in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 144, 3379–3386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neu, H. C. & Heppel, L. A. (1965). The release of enzymes from Escherichia coli by osmotic shock and during the formation of spheroplasts. J Biol Chem 240, 3685–3692.[Free Full Text]

Plattner, H. J., Pfefferle, P., Romaguera, A., Waschutza, S. & Diekmann, H. (1989). Isolation and some properties of lysine N6-hydroxylase from Escherichia coli strain EN222. Biol Met 2, 1–5.[CrossRef][Medline]

Putignani, L., Ambrosi, C., Ascenzi, P. & Visca, P. (2004). Expression of L-ornithine Ndelta-oxygenase (PvdA) in fluorescent Pseudomonas species: an immunochemical and in silico study. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313, 245–257.[CrossRef][Medline]

Robles-Price, A., Wong, T. Y., Sletta, H., Valla, S. & Schiller, N. L. (2004). AlgX is a periplasmic protein required for alginate biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 186, 7369–7377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rosenberg, I. M. (2005). Protein Analysis and Purification: Benchtop Techniques, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Birkhauser Boston.

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Schweizer, H. P. (1991). EscherichiaPseudomonas shuttle vectors derived from pUC18/19. Gene 97, 109–121.[CrossRef][Medline]

Seth, O., Smau, L., Welte, W., Ghisla, S., Stehr, M., Diekmann, H. & Macheroux, P. (1998). A reply to Dick et al. Trends Biochem Sci 23, 414–415.[Medline]

Stehr, M., Diekmann, H., Smau, L., Seth, O., Ghisla, S., Singh, M. & Macheroux, P. (1998). A hydrophobic sequence motif common to N-hydroxylating enzymes. Trends Biochem Sci 23, 56–57.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thariath, A., Socha, D., Valvano, M. A. & Viswanatha, T. (1993). Construction and biochemical characterization of recombinant cytoplasmic forms of the IucD protein (lysine:N6-hydroxylase) encoded by the pColV-K30 aerobactin gene cluster. J Bacteriol 175, 589–596.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tiburzi, F., Imperi, F. & Visca, P. (2008). Intracellular levels and activity of PvdS, the major iron starvation sigma factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 67, 213–227.[Medline]

Visca, P., Serino, L. & Orsi, N. (1992). Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants blocked in the synthesis of pyoverdine. J Bacteriol 174, 5727–5731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Visca, P., Ciervo, A., Sanfilippo, V. & Orsi, N. (1993). Iron-regulated salicylate synthesis by Pseudomonas spp. J Gen Microbiol 139, 1995–2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Visca, P., Ciervo, A. & Orsi, N. (1994). Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the pvdA gene encoding the pyoverdin biosynthetic enzyme L-ornithine N5-oxygenase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 176, 1128–1140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Visca, P., Imperi, F. & Lamont, I. L. (2007). Pyoverdine siderophores: from biogenesis to biosignificance. Trends Microbiol 15, 22–30.[CrossRef][Medline]

von Heijne, G. (1992). Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J Mol Biol 225, 487–494.[CrossRef][Medline]

Williams, K. A. & Deber, C. M. (1991). Proline residues in transmembrane helices: structural or dynamic role? Biochemistry 30, 8919–8923.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received 26 March 2008; revised 23 May 2008; accepted 28 May 2008.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imperi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Visca, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imperi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Visca, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Imperi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Visca, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.