Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online ahead of print on 23 April 2009 as doi:10.1099/mic.0.027581-0
Microbiology 2009;155:2211.

Microbiology (2009), DOI 10.1099/mic.0.027581-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Papers in Press[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mic.0.027581-0v1
155/7/2211    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishmael, N.
Right arrow Articles by Tettelin, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishmael, N.
Right arrow Articles by Tettelin, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ishmael, N.
Right arrow Articles by Tettelin, H.
Microbiology 0 (2009), mic.0.027581; DOI  10.1099/mic.0.027581-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology


Extensive Genomic Diversity of Closely Related Wolbachia Strains

Nadeeza Ishmael1, Julie C Dunning Hotopp2,8, Panagiotis Ioannidis3, Sarah Biber4, Joyce Sakamoto5, Stefanos Siozios3, Vishvanath Nene5, John Werren6, Kostas Bourtzis3, Seth R Bordenstein7 and Hervé Tettelin5

1 Centre for Structural and Functional Genomics, Concordia University;
2 University of Maryland, Baltimore;
3 Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Management, University of Ioannina;
4 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biology, Brandeis University;
5 Institute for Genome Sciences, Univeristy of Maryland Baltimore;
6 University of Rochester;
7 Vanderbilt University

ABSTRACT

Using microarray-based comparative genome hybridizations (mCGH), the genomic content of Wolbachia pipientis wMel from Drosophila melanogaster was compared to the closely related Wolbachia from D. innubila (wInn), D. santomea (wSan), and three strains from D. simulans (wAu, wRi, wSim). A large number of auxiliary genes are identified in these five strains with most absent/divergent genes being unique to a given strain. Each strain caused an average of ~60 genes to be removed from the core genome. As such, these organisms do not appear to have streamlined genomes expected of obligate intracellular bacteria. Prophage, hypothetical, and ankyrin repeat genes are over-represented in the absent/divergent genes with 21-88% of absent/divergent genes coming from prophage regions. The only wMel region absent/divergent in all five query strains is that containing WD_0509 to WD_0511 including a DNA mismatch repair protein MutL-2, a degenerate ribonuclease, and a conserved hypothetical protein. A region flanked by the two portions of the WO-B prophage in wMel is found in four of the five Wolbachia strains as well as on a plasmid of a Rickettsial endosymbiont of Ixodes scapularis, suggesting lateral gene transfer between these two obligate intracellular species. Overall, these insect-associated Wolbachia have highly mosaic genomes with lateral gene transfer playing an important role in their diversity and evolution.

8 E-mail: jdhotopp{at}som.umaryland.edu







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.